Bankruptcy Reform: The Means Test

Bankruptcy Reform: The Means Test

Order Code RS22058
Updated May 9, 2005
CRS Report for Congress
Received through the CRS Web
Bankruptcy Reform: The Means Test
Mark Jickling
Specialist in Public Finance
Government and Finance Division
Summary
The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act — P. L. 109-8 (S.
256) — was signed into law on April 20, 2005. A key provision of the new law subjects
certain petitions for debt relief under Chapter 7 to a means test. Bankruptcy petitioners
with relatively high incomes could be prevented from filing under Chapter 7 (where
many unsecured debts are discharged, or wiped out, by the court) and instead given the
choice of converting to Chapter 13 (where some debt must be repaid out of future
income) or having their petitions dismissed and receiving no bankruptcy relief at all.
The means test takes into account the petitioner’s income, debt burden, and various
allowable living expenses, which can vary significantly according to the debtor’s place
of residence and particular circumstances. If income minus allowable living expenses
exceeds certain levels, a Chapter 7 petition is presumed to be abusive. This report sets
out the details of the means test calculation. (For a general overview of the bankruptcy
reform legislation, see CRS Report RL32765, The “Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and
Consumer Protection Act of 2005,” S. 256, in the 109th Congress, by Robin Jeweler.)
This report will be updated if events warrant.
Virtually all consumer bankruptcies are either Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 cases.
Chapter 7 is the most common form of bankruptcy, accounting for 71.5% of non-business
filings in 2004, or over 1.1 million cases. In Chapter 7, the debtor’s assets are liquidated
and distributed among creditors, and many remaining debts are discharged, or cancelled,
leaving the debtor free to make a fresh start. (Some debts are not dischargeable, and
secured debts like mortgages are not affected by bankruptcy.) In practice, most Chapter
7 filings are “zero asset” cases, where unsecured creditors get nothing. (Several types of
assets are exempt from liquidation and cannot be distributed to creditors.)
In Chapter 13 bankruptcies, debtors with regular incomes agree to a plan to pay back
some or all of their debt under court supervision over a period of several years. At the
plan’s conclusion, remaining debts are discharged. An advantage of Chapter 13 for
debtors is that a wider range of debts can be discharged than under Chapter 7. If the
debtor is unable to complete the series of payments required by the Chapter 13 plan, the
case may be dismissed or converted to Chapter 7. Upon dismissal, remaining debts are
Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress

CRS-2
not discharged, unless the court finds that the debtor cannot justly be held accountable for
failure to complete the plan, and creditors have received at least the amount of repayment
they would have received under a Chapter 7 filing. Under the old law, the choice of
chapters was left entirely up to the debtor.
Supporters of reform long argued that the “excessive generosity”1 of the old
bankruptcy system encouraged abuse and allowed some debtors to repudiate debts that
they could have repaid, at least in part. P.L. 109-8 responds to these concerns by
restricting access to Chapter 7 in cases where debtors’ income is determined to be
sufficient to repay some debt, after allowing for reasonable living expenses. The means
test set out in Title I of the reform act will determine eligibility for Chapter 7 relief.
Debtors who “pass” the means test will either have their Chapter 7 petitions dismissed or
converted to Chapter 13 or Chapter 11.2 (Conversion will not occur without the debtor’s
consent, but no other form of bankruptcy relief will be available.)
The Basic Test
Under the means test, a Chapter 7 filing is presumed to be abusive if the debtor’s
monthly income, reduced by numerous allowances and living expenses (discussed below),
and multiplied by 60 (that is, over a five-year period), is greater than $10,000. If income
thus adjusted is less than $6,000, there is no presumption of abuse, and the debtor is free
to choose Chapter 7. If adjusted income is between $6,000 and $10,000, abuse is
presumed only if income exceeds 25% of nonpriority, unsecured debt in the case. An
abusive Chapter 7 filing is subject to dismissal or conversion.
Living Expenses and Allowances
A key determinant in whether a debtor passes the means test is the amount by which
actual monthly income3 is reduced by various allowances and living expenses. The law
sets out several categories of allowable monthly expenses.
Debtors’ monthly expenses are calculated primarily by referring to a set of allowances
established by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) that are used to help determine a
taxpayer’s ability to pay a delinquent tax liability.4 The allowances, which the IRS calls
Collections Financial Standards, set out monthly living expenses in three basic categories:
(1) food, clothing, and other items; (2) housing and utilities; and (3) transportation. The
allowable living expenses are subject to several variables.
1 See testimony of Todd J. Zywicki before the Senate Committee on the Judiciary hearing on S.
256, Feb. 10, 2005.
2 Chapter 11 is used primarily in business reorganizations. It is rarely used by individuals
because of its complex and expensive procedural requirements.
3 “Current monthly income,” as defined in the reform act, includes nontaxable income and
payments from third parties (such as alimony or child support) but excludes Social Security
benefits.
4 In other words, the IRS will take all the taxpayer’s disposable income in excess of these
allowances. See [http://www.irs.gov/individuals/article/0,,id=96543,00.html].

CRS-3
In the food, clothing, and other5 category, the IRS sets out living expenses that vary
according to the size of the household and gross monthly income. For example, a single
person with a gross income of $832/month would be allowed $403 in living expenses,
while a family of four earning $5,834/month would be allowed $1,564 for expenses in this
category. These amounts are national standards — uniform across the contiguous 48 states
— except that higher schedules are provided for Alaska and Hawaii.
The allowance for housing and utilities varies according to size of household and
geographical location. The standards provide separate dollar figures for each county in the
nation, for households of one or two, three, and four or more persons. A single person
living in Wilkinson County, in southwest Mississippi, would be allowed to deduct
$774/month, while a family of four in Manhattan would be allowed $4,799.
The transportation standards provide regional allowances,6 with variations for persons
living in any of 28 specified metropolitan areas. Allowable living expenses include
ownership costs ($475 for one car, an additional $338 for a second car) and operating costs
(or public transportation costs, for those with no car). Operating or public transportation
allowances range from $161 per month for nondriving Pittsburghers to $479 for New York
City residents with two cars.
These allowances are not reduced if a bankruptcy petitioner’s actual expenditures are
less than the standard. In some cases, the IRS recognizes actual expenses that exceed the
standards; under the reform act, a debtor’s monthly expenses may include actual expenses
in categories specified as Other Necessary Expenses by the IRS for the area in which the
debtor resides.
Beyond the IRS allowances, the bankruptcy reform law permits current income to be
reduced by several other types of expenses. Monthly expenses for purposes of the means
test may include
! reasonable and necessary spending to care for an elderly, chronically ill,
or disabled member of the debtor’s immediate family or household;
! reasonably necessary expenditures for health insurance, disability
insurance, and health savings accounts;
! actual expenses for the primary or secondary education of a dependent
child (under age 18), up to $1,500 per child per year;
! home energy costs in excess of the IRS housing and utility standards, with
proper documentation and justification;
5 “Other items” include housekeeping supplies, personal care products and services, and
miscellaneous.
6 The regions are Northeast, Midwest, South, and West.

CRS-4
! average monthly payments on secured debts (most commonly home
mortgages and car loans);7
! average monthly payments on priority claims (e.g., child support, student
loans, alimony, etc.);
! reasonable and necessary expenses to maintain the safety of the debtor’s
family from family violence, as identified under Section 309 of the
Family Violence Prevention and Services Act;8 and
! administrative costs incurred in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy plan.
Finally, a debtor may claim higher monthly expenses if special circumstances exist
that require additional expenditures. To establish special circumstances, the debtor must
itemize such expenses and explain in detail why each of them is reasonable and necessary.
Given the number of factors that may reduce monthly income for purposes of the
bankruptcy means test, it is clear that simple gross income is not a good indicator of
whether a debtor will be allowed to file Chapter 7. Because some of the allowable
expenses can be very large in dollar terms (e.g., support for the elderly or infirm), it is not
difficult to imagine hypothetical cases in which a debtor with a relatively high money
income would be allowed to make a fresh start under Chapter 7, while a lower-income
filer might have to choose between Chapter 13 and dismissal. Other provisions of the
reform legislation address this potential disparity by creating safe harbors for lower-
income individuals and households.
Safe Harbor Provisions Based on State Median Income
Under P.L. 109-8, a motion must be filed in bankruptcy court to dismiss or convert
a Chapter 7 petition. Who may bring such a motion depends on the debtor’s income.
The law provides that if the debtor’s income exceeds the median family income
(adjusted for household size) as calculated by the Bureau of the Census9 for the applicable
state, any party in interest, including a creditor, may bring an abuse motion under section
707(b).
Tables of median family income by state, by family size, and by number of earners
a p p e a r o n t h e A m e r i c a n B a n k r u p t c y I n s t i t u t e ’ s w e b s i t e a t
[http://www.abiworld.net/bankbill/median.html]. The figures reflect 1999 data collected
in the 2000 Census, but the website includes Consumer Price Index (CPI) figures that
7 Since the IRS standard for housing and utilities is meant to account for the costs of home
ownership, allowing monthly income to be reduced by mortgage payments (in addition to the
IRS-specified amounts) appears to create a significant advantage for homeowners over renters.
8 These expenses would normally be for counseling services.
9 If no Census median income figure were available for the current year, the most recent Census
figure would be adjusted for changes in the Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers (CPI-
U).

CRS-5
allow adjustment for inflation. (As of February 2005, the CPI stood 15% above the mid-
1999 level — the median income figures should be adjusted upwards by about that
amount.)
If the income of the debtor (or debtor and spouse, in a joint filing) is less than or
equal to the median family income (taking household size into account10) for the
applicable state, only the judge or a bankruptcy trustee or administrator may file a motion
to dismiss or convert a Chapter 7 petition.
If the combined income of the debtor and the debtor’s spouse is equal to or less than
the state median family income (again adjusted for household size), no motion to dismiss
or convert may be filed.
In addition, P.L. 109-8 creates an exemption from means testing for disabled veterans
whose debts were incurred while they were on active duty or performing a homeland
defense activity.
Rebutting the Presumption of Abuse
A Chapter 7 petition by a debtor who passes the means test is presumed to be
abusive. The law provides that this presumption may only be rebutted by demonstrating
special circumstances, such as a serious medical condition or a call to active duty in the
Armed Forces, that justify additional expenses or adjustments to current monthly income.
Conclusion
How many bankruptcy petitions now filed under Chapter 7 will be dismissed or
converted to Chapter 13 under P.L. 109-8 (which takes effect in October 2005)? Estimates
range from about 3% to 20% of Chapter 7 filings, of which there were over 1.1 million in
2004. Studies based on limited data samples indicate that the median annual income of
bankruptcy petitioners is between $25,000 and $30,000.11 This is considerably below the
median income for all U.S. households in 2003, which the Census Bureau reports as
$42,527. Thus, a substantial majority of bankruptcy filers will be exempted from the
means test under the safe harbor provisions linked to median income.
Even among the minority of filers whose income is above the state median (adjusted
for household size), a large number will be able to claim enough monthly expenses that
they “fail” the means test and are permitted to file under Chapter 7. While the lack of data
on petitioners’ incomes and expenses does not permit a precise calculation, it seems safe
10 The adjustment works as follows: in the case of a single-person household, the threshold is the
state median family income for a family with one earner. For households with two, three, or four
individuals, the threshold is the highest median family income for a family with the same number
of, or fewer, individuals. For households with over four individuals, the family income threshold
rises by $525 per month for each additional individual.
11 See. e.g., David U. Himmelstein, Elizabeth Warren, Deborah Thorne, and Steffie Woolhandler,
Illness And Injury As Contributors To Bankruptcy, Feb. 2005, Exhibit 1. Available online at
[http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/full/hlthaff.w5.63/DC1]. Data on bankruptcy filers’
incomes and other financial circumstances are not compiled by the courts.

CRS-6
to say that the new law will not bring about a dramatic decline in the proportion of
bankruptcy cases filed under Chapter 7.12 This outcome would be consistent with the aims
of bankruptcy reformers, who have long argued that the means test was not aimed at the
mass of Americans seeking relief from financial trouble, but at the few who abuse the
bankruptcy system to repudiate debts they can afford to repay.
12 It is worth noting that the ratio of Chapter 7 to Chapter 13 cases is not consistent nationwide,
but varies widely from state to state. In Texas, for example, 47.9% of personal bankruptcies filed
in 2004 were Chapter 13 cases; in Wyoming, only 6.9%. (Nationally, Chapter 13’s accounted
for 28.4% of all personal bankruptcies in 2004.)