The Child Tax Credit and the President's Tax Cut Plan

The Child Tax Credit and the President's Tax Cut Plan

Order Code RS20847
Updated March 30, 2001
CRS Report for Congress
Received through the CRS Web
The Child Tax Credit and the
President’s Tax Cut Plan
Gregg A. Esenwein
Specialist in Public Finance
Government and Finance Division
Summary
The child tax credit was enacted as part of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997. The
current credit is $500 per qualifying child. President Bush has proposed increasing the
child tax credit to $1,000 per qualifying child. The President has also proposed making
permanent the temporary rule in current law that allows the child tax credit to offset a
taxpayer’s alternative minimum tax.
Economic theory does not provide a definitive answer to the question of how the
costs of child rearing should be accounted for under an income tax. The empirical
evidence suggests, however, that over the past 15 years the average federal tax rate on
families in the low- and middle-income ranges has fallen and has remained relatively
constant for upper-income families.
Current Law
The child tax credit was enacted as part of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997.
Congress passed the bill because it believed that the tax structure did not adequately reflect
a family's reduced ability to pay taxes as family size increased. The decline in the real
value of the personal exemption over time was cited as evidence of the tax system's failure
to reflect a family's ability to pay. Congress believed that the child tax credit would reduce
families’ tax liabilities, would better recognize the financial responsibilities of child rearing,
and promote family values.
Initially, for tax year 1998, families with qualifying children were allowed a credit
against their federal income tax of $400 for each qualifying child. For tax years after 1998,
the credit increased to $500 per qualifying child.
To qualify for the credit the child must be an individual for whom the taxpayer can
claim a dependency exemption. That means the child must be the son, daughter, grandson,
granddaughter, stepson, stepdaughter or an eligible foster child of the taxpayer. The child
Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress

CRS-2
must be under the age of 17 at the close of the calender year in which the taxable year of
the taxpayer begins.
For families with one or two qualifying children, the child tax credit is not refundable.
However, it is calculated before the taxpayer calculates his earned income tax credit
(EITC). For families with three or more qualifying children, the child tax credit is
refundable. However, in any given year, the credit cannot exceed: (a) the sum of the
taxpayer’s regular income tax liability (excluding the EITC) and the taxpayer’s share of
Social Security taxes, reduced by (b) his EITC.
The child tax credit is phased out for taxpayers whose adjusted gross incomes (AGIs)
exceed certain thresholds. For married taxpayers filing joint returns, the phaseout begins
at AGI levels in excess of $110,000, for married couples filing separately the phaseout
begins at AGI levels in excess of $55,000, and for single individuals filing as either heads
of households or as singles the phaseout begins at AGI levels in excess of $75,000. The
child tax credit is phased out by $50 for each $1,000 (or fraction thereof) by which the
taxpayer’s AGI exceeds the threshold amounts. Neither the child tax credit amount nor
the phaseout thresholds are indexed for inflation.
President Bush’s Proposal
President Bush has proposed expanding the child tax credit from its current law level
of $500 per child to $1,000 per child. The increase in the child tax credit would be phased
in with the credit rising to $600 in 2002, $700 in 2003, $800 in 2004, $900 in 2005, and
$1,000 in 2006 and thereafter.
In addition, the President would increase to $200,000 the point at which the child tax
credit is phased out. The new $200,000 threshold would be the same for joint, head of
household, and single returns. This new threshold would also be phased in between 2002
and 2006. After 2006, the $200,000 threshold would not be indexed for inflation. Finally,
the President would make permanent the current law provision that allows the child tax
credit to offset an individual’s alternative minimum tax (AMT) liability.
Preliminary estimates by the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) indicate that these
proposed changes in the child tax credit would reduce federal income tax revenues by
$162 billion over the fiscal year period 2002 to 2010.

One of the most important elements of the President’s proposal is the fact that he
would permanently allow the child tax credit to offset a taxpayer’s alternative minimum
tax liability. The interaction of the child tax credit and the individual alternative minimum
tax is an area of growing concern.1
Usually, personal tax credits are limited in that they cannot be used to reduce regular
income tax liability below an individual’s alternative minimum tax liability. For example,
1 For more information on the AMT see CRS Report RL30149, The Alternative Minimum Tax for
Individuals, by Gregg A. Esenwein. Also see CRS Report RL30485, The Individual Alternative
Minimum Tax: Interaction with Marriage Penalty Tax Relief and Other Tax Cuts, by Jane G.
Gravelle.

CRS-3
consider the case where a taxpayer has a regular income tax liability before credits of
$600, is eligible for a $500 child tax credit, and has an alternative minimum tax liability of
$350. Under regular federal income tax rules, the taxpayer would only be allowed to use
$250 of the child tax credit to reduce his regular income tax to $350 ( the same but no
lower than the alternative minimum tax).
Congress became aware that the interaction of the child tax credit and the alternative
minimum tax could reduce the value of the child tax credit. Thus, in the Omnibus
Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1998, Congress allowed
personal tax credits (including the child tax credit) to offset an individual's regular income
tax in full for tax year 1998 even though the personal tax credits might be larger than the
amount by which the taxpayer's regular income tax exceeded his alternative minimum tax.
Subsequently, the Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Improvement Act of 1999
extended, through December 31, 2001, the provision allowing individuals to offset their
regular income tax by the full amount of their personal tax credits regardless of their
alternative minimum tax liability.
However, starting in tax year 2002 when these provisions expire, the interaction of
the alternative minimum tax with the personal tax credits could result in some families not
receiving the full benefits of the child tax credit. If the child tax credit was doubled
without taking account of the interaction with the AMT, many households would not be
able to take full advantage of the increase in the credit. Hence, the President’s proposal
to permanently allow the child tax credit to offset AMT liability is a critical component of
the overall change.

Legislative Activity in the 107th Congress
In late March 2001, the House passed H.R. 6, a bill that, among other things, would
make changes to the child tax credit. Under this bill the child tax credit would be
increased to $1,000 with the increase phased in between 2001 and 2006. It would also
make the child tax credit refundable for families with one or two children. Finally, it would
make permanent the temporary rule in current law that allows the child tax credit to offset
a taxpayer’s AMT. The first two of these provisions are estimated to cost $175 billion
over the fiscal year period 2001 to 2011.
Assessment
Economic theory does not provide an answer to the question of how the costs of
child rearing should be accounted for under an income tax. Proponents of an increased
child tax credit argue that the current credit is not large enough to offset the costs of
raising a child. Critics argue, however, that it was never intended that the federal income
tax provide offsets for the full financial responsibility of raising children. Indeed, some
even argue that the decision to have children represents a choice of how to consume one’s
income and therefore the costs of raising children should not be a consideration when
assessing income taxes.

CRS-4
Historically, the federal income tax has differentiated among families of different size
through the combined use of personal exemptions, dependent care credits, standard
deductions, and the earned income tax credit. These provisions were modified over time
so that families of differing size would not be subject to federal income tax if their incomes
fell below the poverty level.2
The child tax credit represents a departure from past policy practices because it is
not designed primarily as a means of differentiating between low-income families of
different size, but rather is designed to provide general tax reductions to middle income
families. The empirical evidence, however, suggests that for families at the low end of the
income spectrum the federal tax burden has declined over the past 15 years. For families
in the middle and higher income ranges, the federal tax burden has either declined or
remained constant over the same time period.3
2 For more information on the tax treatment of different family types see CRS Report 98-653E, The
Marriage Penalty and Other Family Tax Issues, by Jane G. Gravelle.
3 U.S. Department of Treasury. Office of Tax Analysis. Average and Marginal Federal Income,
Social Security and Medicare, and Combined Tax Rates for Four-Person Families at the Same
Relative Positions in the Income Distribution, 1955-1999. Jan. 15, 1998.