Mozambique and Other Recent Flood Disasters: Comparing the U.S. and International Responses

Mozambique and Other Recent Flood Disasters: Comparing the U.S. and International Responses

Order Code RS20518
Updated April 17, 2000
CRS Report for Congress
Received through the CRS Web
Mozambique and Other Recent Flood Disasters:
Comparing the U.S. and International Responses
Lois McHugh
Foreign Affairs Analyst
Foreign Affairs, Defense and Trade
Summary
Some have criticized the U.S. response to the recent floods in southern Africa.
Their concern has been that the U.S. response has been too little and too late in
comparison with disasters in other parts of the world. U.S. spokesmen argue that their
response has been appropriate and timely with contributions to Mozambique of over $32
million and additional contributions to the region of over $40 million. The U.S.
government has responded to eight flood disasters thus far in FY2000 in addition to the
current flooding in southern Africa. This report and the table on p. 6 compare the U.S.
and international responses to each. The report will be updated.
Current Disaster in Mozambique and Southern Africa
South Africa, Mozambique, Swaziland, Botswana, Madagascar, and Zimbabwe
experienced their worst flooding in decades during January and February 2000. In
addition, Cyclone Connie brought rains in the first week of February, Cyclone Leon-Eline
crossed the region between February 17 and 23, and Tropical Depression Gloria a few
days later added significant rainfall. Continuing release of excess water to protect dams
in the region also contributed to the flooding in Mozambique. About 2 million people
have been affected by flooding in southern Africa and the regional death toll is estimated
to be 1,000. Mozambique declared a disaster on February 7, Botswana on February 16,
South Africa on February 17, and Zimbabwe on February 29. Mozambique is the most
severely affected country. As the rains continued, the situation grew worse, with growing
numbers of people displaced or missing, food and water supplies dwindling, and threats
from water-borne diseases increasing. The rainfall and flooding are moderating at this time
and the rainy season is ending in the region.1
1 Information in this paper is drawn from USAID Office of Foreign Disaster (OFDA)
situation reports [www.info.usaid.gov/hum_response] and from the U.N. disaster
response web site, [www.reliefweb.int].
Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress

CRS-2
Mozambique. Higher than average rainfall, torrential rains in early February, and
additional rain caused by cyclones in late February and March led to extensive flooding.
Excess water released to protect dams in the region added to the flooding. Mozambique
declared a disaster on February 7, and the U.S. responded the same day. The
Mozambique government estimated the number affected at 1.2 million. This includes
330,000 in shelters and 400,000 additional internally displaced. The death toll is currently
estimated to be 652. As of April 14, the United States had provided $32.06 million to
Mozambique. Assistance to the region now totals $40.17, including $7 million in Food
for Peace commodities and $21 million in Department of Defense assistance. International
contributions as reported to the U. N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian
Assistance (UNOCHA) were $119.5 million as of March 17. On March 22, UNOCHA
issued an appeal for $102 million for relief and rehabilitation activities through August
2000. (The text of the appeal is available on the Relief web site cited.) A reconstruction
conference for Mozambique will be held in Rome on May 3 and 4.
Rivers in the north have receded below flood stage, however those in the south are
still receding slowly. Cyclone Hudah has caused no appreciable additional damage and the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) reports that weather patterns
indicate Mozambique is now in the dry season. Food aid is now flowing smoothly,
according to the World Food Program, and aid will be continued until June when it will
be changed to food for work programs. U.S. emergency personnel and the special military
equipment left the region on March 28 although aid is still being provided with U.S. funds.

Botswana. Botswana declared a flood emergency on February 16. The government
reported that 94,000 people in the southern and eastern part of the country are affected.
The United States declared the disaster and contributed over $53,000 as of April 14.
Total international contributions reported to UNOCHA as of March 30 are $293,720.
South Africa. South Africa declared a flood emergency on February 17. An
estimated 100 persons died. Little other information is available from USAID or
UNOCHA. The United State has reported contributions of $25,000.
Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe’s government appealed for international aid on March 4. As
of March 21, UNOCHA estimated that 100 have died and 96,000 are directly affected.
About 20,000 have been displaced from their homes. The U.S. has provided $170,000 in
cash and food aid as of April 14. The amount reported to UNOCHA as of March 28 is
$2,081,364.
Other Recent Flood Disasters
The United States has responded to eight other flood disasters in FY2000. The
following brief description is based on USAID and U.N. information.
Honduras. Heavy rains accompanying tropical storms caused flooding and damage
in Honduras. At the time of the U.S. disaster declaration on October 5, 1999, UNOCHA
reported serious damage to the infrastructure which had been temporarily rebuilt after
Hurricane Mitch in October 1998. On October 13, UNOCHA reported 28 dead, 15,000
evacuated from their homes and many houses, bridges, and highways destroyed. Flooding
continued well into November due to continued tropical storm activity. U.S. funding

CRS-3
reported to USAID Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA) to date totals
$381,591.00. No estimate of international contributions is available.
Mexico. Mexico also suffered from flooding and landslides in October,1999. The
Mexican government did not request international assistance and chose to rely on local
military, police and Red Cross volunteers to provide relief. By October 13, the
government had assessed local needs and welcomed international help in those areas. By
October 28, the estimated death toll was 379 with over 530,000 displaced from their
homes, but the International Federation of the Red Cross (IFRC) noted that it was difficult
to get consolidated figures for the number of victims or the magnitude of the damage.
According to USAID OFDA records, the United States declared the disaster on October
13, and has provided $100,000. UNOCHA has reported contributions of $1.6 million, not
including the U.S. assistance.
Ghana. While flooding in Ghana is an annual problem, two months of flooding
described as the worst in 30 years led the government to appeal for international assistance
on October 25, 1999. At that time, the government estimated 50 deaths and over 290,000
displaced in northern Ghana with flood waters flowing southward. By December 1, the
UNOCHA assessment indicated 54,748 were displaced from their homes. The United
States declared the disaster on October 26 and USAID OFDA records that the United
States has contributed $25,000. UNOCHA reports contributions of $1.3 million in
international aid.
Mauritania. Flooding also affected Mauritania in October, 1999. Press reports
indicate that 30,000 Mauritanians were left homeless. The United States provided $25,000
after declaring the disaster on November 18. There is no UNOCHA disaster report
available, but press reports indicate that ECHO, the European Union humanitarian disaster
agency, provided $374,444.
Democratic Republic of the Congo. Flooding of the Congo river forced 20,000
people from their homes in Kinshasa by early December 1999. The government of the
Democratic Republic of the Congo appealed for international aid on November 30. Some
65,000 people were eventually evacuated in Kinshasa and 13,000 more in Bas Congo. On
December 1, the United States declared the disaster and contributed $25,000 to the
humanitarian response, according to USAID OFDA. About $1.3 million in contributions
has been reported to UNOCHA.
Cambodia. Monsoon rains which were supposed to end in July continued
throughout the Fall due to a series of tropical storms. Originally, the government relied
on Cambodian military forces and the Cambodian Red Cross. A November 6 press report
indicated that 45,000 had been driven from their homes by flooding and up to 100,000
were in danger of disease from contaminated drinking water. The United States
contributed $25,000. UNOCHA reports international contributions of $60,000, in
addition to the U.S. contribution.
Vietnam. Flooding began in November and worsened considerably in December.
The United States declared the disaster on November 4 and again on December 8. As of
mid December, the number of deaths from both disasters was 742 with over 1.5 million
people in need of assistance. The government of Vietnam estimated damages to the

CRS-4
country at $488 million. The U.S. contribution of about $900,000 is included in the
international contribution of $7.577 million reported by UNOCHA.
Venezuela. A month of heavy rainfall led to flash flooding and mud slides in
northern coastal Venezuela during December, 1999. The government of Venezuela
declared a state of emergency on December 16 and the United States responded on the
same day. The U.S. contribution so far is estimated at $8,269,897. UNOCHA reports
that $27.98 million has been contributed, including the U.S. aid.
U.S. Disaster Response Mechanism
The President has wide authority to provide emergency assistance for foreign
disasters and the U.S. government uses several channels to provide disaster assistance.
When the U.S. ambassador to a country declares a disaster (usually in response to a
request from the host government) he can authorize the transfer of $25,000 in grants,
usually available within 24 hours. The USAID Administrator is the President’s Special
Coordinator for International Disaster Assistance. The Office of Foreign Disaster
Assistance (OFDA) within USAID can respond immediately with relief materials and
personnel (including some already located in various countries around the world)2. OFDA
has emergency response teams of experts (DARTS) which can be put together quickly to
respond to each particular disaster. They provide expertise in disaster response as well as
an assessment of what assistance is needed from donors, including the United States.
OFDA has wide authority to borrow funds, equipment and personnel from other parts of
USAID and other federal agencies. OFDA also provides assistance as grants to
governmental and nongovernmental agencies in the disaster area. USAID administers Title
II of the Food for Peace program which provides food aid to victims of disasters. The
Department of Defense also has a humanitarian assistance program that is sometimes
involved in disaster response. In addition, the President has the authority to draw down
defense equipment and direct military personnel to respond to disasters3. The President
may also use the Denton program4 to provide space available transportation on military
aircraft and ships to private donors who wish to transport humanitarian goods and
equipment in response to a disaster.
Assistance for the long term recovery of a nation after a disaster can also be provided
in a variety of ways. Foreign aid programs may be reprogrammed or the President may
ask Congress for a Supplemental Appropriation. In the aftermath of the Hurricane Mitch
disaster affecting six countries in Central America, the Administration used both
reprogramming and a supplemental appropriation as well as debt forgiveness. For
information on that disaster, see CRS report 98-1030 F, Central America: Reconstruction
after Hurricane Mitch, and CRS Report RL30083, Supplemental Appropriations for
FY1999: Central America Disaster Aid, Middle East Peace, and Other Initiatives.
2 Authorized in sec. 491-493 of P.L. 87-195, the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961.
3 Sec. 506 of P.L. 87-195 authorizes the President to draw down articles and services from any
U.S. agency. Title 10, sec. 2551 authorizes the use of DOD funds to transport humanitarian relief
items and provide other humanitarian assistance to the extent authorized annually by Congress.
4 Title 10, section 402 authorizes the shipment of privately donated humanitarian goods on U.S.
military aircraft on a space available basis.

CRS-5
International Disaster Response
The United States provides disaster assistance as one of many donors. In the U.N.
system, UNICEF, UN Development Program, World Health Organization, and the World
Food Program all respond to natural disasters. Information sharing and technical
assistance is provided by the Office of the Coordinator of Humanitarian Activities under
the U.N. Secretary General. Many countries besides the United States provide bilateral
disaster assistance. ECHO, the humanitarian response agency of the European Union
provides assistance in addition to the contributions made by European Union members.
Private voluntary agencies, including the Red Cross affiliates, provide assistance using
government funds as well as their own.
U.S. Disaster Assistance in FY2000
The United States has declared 43 disasters since FY2000 began on October 1, 1999.
The declaration of a disaster means that the ambassador may request $25,000 for
immediate release to a local relief organization and that the United States will respond to
requests for further humanitarian assistance. Sixteen of the disasters declared were man
made disasters caused by warfare or political activities resulting in flows of refugees.
Thirteen of the disasters were floods, including the southern Africa floods. The
declaration is generally made when the host government declares a disaster and asks for
assistance. Aid is provided for varying lengths of time.

It is difficult to compare disasters and the U.S. response to them. First, there are
different humanitarian needs in an earthquake, a war, a flood, or an environmental
accident. Second, while some governments have little capability to handle domestic
disasters, many have competent staff with long experience in disaster response who need
only modest help. Third, in providing aid, the United States takes into account the
humanitarian aid provided by other governments and international organizations as well.
Some countries have special relations (such as France with its former colonies) or common
borders which result in high levels of governmental or private response to disasters.
Fourth, disasters last for varying lengths of time. Earthquakes are over quickly but
droughts may last much longer. Aid in an earthquake situation must be quick and specific
to find and help people trapped by the quake. A drought develops over months and aid
may be most needed toward the end of the disaster. When the disaster occurs is also
important. A drought or flood in a time when fields are fallow is less damaging to a
country than the same problem at harvest or planting time.
The following table compares the thirteen floods for which the U.S. has provided
assistance so far in FY2000, including the current one in southern Africa. The number
of killed, displaced, and affected are only estimates. In disasters, people flee to safe havens
and are considered missing or dead until they show up. In other cases, people who are
listed as missing may never be found and never added to the death toll. The terms
displaced and affected are often used interchangebly by governments and humanitarian
workers, making it difficult to tell whether people have fled their homes and are in danger,
or are safe but can’t get to markets or jobs until the water level goes down or can’t afford
to buy goods at the inflated prices caused by the flood. The column listing U.S. spending
gives the amounts collected and totaled by USAID OFDA to date from all the agencies
and programs involved. It generally takes many months and sometimes years for the

CRS-6
actual totals to be determined and reported. Finally, the column which includes all
international aid reported to UNOCHA for a particular disaster is incomplete. First, there
is no requirement that a country or organization report aid provided in a disaster, so
UNOCHA can include only the information which it receives. Second, UNOCHA
statistics do not include aid in kind (blankets, for example) or services (helicopters and
crews, for example) if a country doesn’t provide UNOCHA with a monetary value.
Finally, countries place their own value on their assistance, and may also include assistance
which they plan to provide or hope to provide, but have not yet provided.s.
U.S. and International Humanitarian Aid to Flood Victims, FY2000
Country/Date of
Killed/affected
U.S. Aid
All aid reported to
U.S. disaster
(estimate)
UNOCHA
declaration
Honduras 10/5/99
35 dead/ 18,000
$381,600
no information
displaced
Mexico 10/13/99
416dead/
$100,000
$1, 583,503
530,000 displaced
Ghana 10/26/99
50 dead/ 55,000
$25,000
$1,317,525 (includes U.S.
displaced/
contribution)
291,500 affected
Mauritania
30,000 displaced
$25,000
no information
11/18/99
Dem. Rep. Congo
78,000 est.
$25,000
$1,270,850 (includes U.S.
12/1/99
contribution)
Cambodia 11/99
100,000+
$25,000
$60,000.
displaced
Vietnam
742 dead/ 1
$900,000
$7,577,000 (including
11/4/99,12/8/99
million+ affected
U.S. contributions)
Venezuela
30,000-50,000
$8,269,897
$27,987,520 (including
12/16/99
dead
U.S. contributions)
200,000-600,000
affected
Mozambique
652 dead (est) 2
$32,059,555
$134,428,084 (including
2/7/00
million affected.
some U.S. contribution)
Botswana 2/16/00
94,000 affected
$54,000
$293,720
South Africa
100 dead, 1.5
$25,000
no information
2/16/00
million affected
Zimbabwe
100 dead, 96,000
$169,780
$2,081,364 (including
affected
some U.S. contribution)

EveryCRSReport.com
The Congressional Research Service (CRS) is a federal legislative branch agency, housed inside the
Library of Congress, charged with providing the United States Congress non-partisan advice on
issues that may come before Congress.
EveryCRSReport.com republishes CRS reports that are available to al Congressional staff. The
reports are not classified, and Members of Congress routinely make individual reports available to
the public.
Prior to our republication, we redacted names, phone numbers and email addresses of analysts
who produced the reports. We also added this page to the report. We have not intentional y made
any other changes to any report published on EveryCRSReport.com.
CRS reports, as a work of the United States government, are not subject to copyright protection in
the United States. Any CRS report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without
permission from CRS. However, as a CRS report may include copyrighted images or material from a
third party, you may need to obtain permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or
otherwise use copyrighted material.
Information in a CRS report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public
understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to members of Congress in
connection with CRS' institutional role.
EveryCRSReport.com is not a government website and is not affiliated with CRS. We do not claim
copyright on any CRS report we have republished.