{ "id": "RL33990", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "RL33990", "active": false, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 403901, "date": "2012-02-13", "retrieved": "2016-04-07T00:15:39.314531", "title": "Federal Funding for Wildfire Control and Management", "summary": "The Forest Service (FS) and the Department of the Interior (DOI) are responsible for protecting most federal lands from wildfires. Wildfire appropriations nearly doubled in FY2001, following a severe fire season in the summer of 2000, and have remained at relatively high levels. Acres burned annually have also increased over the past 50 years, with the six highest annual totals occurring since 2000. Many in Congress are concerned that wildfire costs are spiraling upward without a reduction in damages. With emergency supplemental funding, FY2008 wildfire funding reached a record high of $4.46 billion. \nThere are three basic categories of federal programs for wildfire: federal lands protection, non-federal lands protection, and other fire-related expenditures. The vast majority (about 95%) of federal wildfire funds are spent to protect federal lands\u2014for fire preparedness (equipment, baseline personnel, and training); fire suppression operations (including emergency funding); post-fire rehabilitation (to help sites recover after the wildfire); and fuel reduction (to reduce wildfire damages by reducing fuel levels). Since FY2001, FS fire appropriations have included funds for state fire assistance, volunteer fire assistance, and forest health management, as well as for community assistance, fire research, and fire facilities. \nFour issues have dominated wildfire funding debates. One is the high cost of fire management and its effects on other agency programs. Several studies have recommended actions to try to control wildfire costs, and the agencies have taken various steps, but it is unclear whether these actions will be sufficient. Wildfire suppression expenditures have exceeded agency appropriations annually for more than a decade. Borrowing to pay high wildfire suppression costs has affected other agency programs. The Federal Land Assistance, Management, and Enhancement (FLAME) Act of 2009 was enacted in P.L. 111-88 to insulate other agency programs from high wildfire suppression costs by creating a separate funding structure for emergency supplemental wildfire suppression efforts.\nAnother issue is funding for fuel reduction. Funding and acres treated rose (roughly doubling) between FY2000 and FY2003, and have stabilized since. Currently about 3 million acres, less than 1% of federal lands, are treated annually. However, 75 million acres of federal land are at high risk, and another 156 million acres are at moderate risk, of ecological damage from catastrophic wildfire. Since many ecosystems need to be treated on a 10-35 year cycle (depending on the ecosystem), current treatment rates are insufficient to address the problem. A third issue is the federal role in protecting non-federal lands, communities, and private structures. In 1994, federal firefighting resources were apparently used to protect private residences at a cost to federal lands and resources in one severe fire. A federal policy review recommended increased state and local efforts to match their responsibilities, but federal programs to protect non-federal lands have also expanded, reducing incentives for local participation in fire protection.\nFinally, post-fire rehabilitation is raising concerns. Agency regulations and legislation in the 109th Congress focused on expediting such activities, but opponents expressed concerns that this would restrict environmental review of and public involvement in salvage logging decisions, leading to greater environmental damage. Legislation was introduced but not enacted in the 110th Congress to provide alternative means of addressing post-fire restoration in particular areas. The large wildfires to date in 2011 have reignited concerns about post-fire rehabilitation. Except for appropriations, legislative action regarding this issue since the 110th Congress has been minimal.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL33990", "sha1": "402b40eee92d1bc5ed2c6ebf0a3624116f699820", "filename": "files/20120213_RL33990_402b40eee92d1bc5ed2c6ebf0a3624116f699820.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL33990", "sha1": "3fd7e69bad19522ce32a2107c38acb19351d4498", "filename": "files/20120213_RL33990_3fd7e69bad19522ce32a2107c38acb19351d4498.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc96772/", "id": "RL33990_2011Jul05", "date": "2011-07-05", "retrieved": "2012-08-07T13:52:45", "title": "Federal Funding for Wildfire Control and Management", "summary": "This report looks at four issues dominating wildfire funding debates: the high cost of fire management, funding for fuel reduction, the federal role in protecting nonfederal lands, and post-fire rehabilitation. The Forest Service (FS) and the Department of the Interior (DOI) are responsible for protecting most federal lands from wildfires, however, many in Congress are concerned that wildfire costs are spiraling upward without a reduction in damages.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20110705_RL33990_bf206b7e836516094c8380d150e3f7665d9265a9.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20110705_RL33990_bf206b7e836516094c8380d150e3f7665d9265a9.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Natural resources", "name": "Natural resources" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Emergency management", "name": "Emergency management" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Forest fires", "name": "Forest fires" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Budgets", "name": "Budgets" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc807099/", "id": "RL33990_2010Apr22", "date": "2010-04-22", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Federal Funding for Wildfire Control and Management", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20100422_RL33990_16c43bf259127bfc3af7d8d5de574c8ddb679542.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20100422_RL33990_16c43bf259127bfc3af7d8d5de574c8ddb679542.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc817697/", "id": "RL33990_2008Oct17", "date": "2008-10-17", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Wildfire Funding", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20081017_RL33990_525dc7fde1640424c1e0efe3d9b7f6ab748751b3.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20081017_RL33990_525dc7fde1640424c1e0efe3d9b7f6ab748751b3.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc98093/", "id": "RL33990_2008Apr28", "date": "2008-04-28", "retrieved": "2012-08-21T08:46:06", "title": "Wildfire Funding", "summary": "This report briefly describes the three categories of federal programs for wildfire protection: [1] protection of the federal lands managed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (FS), and by the U.S. Department of the Interior, whose wildfire programs are coordinated by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM); [2] assistance for state and local governments and communities in protecting nonfederal lands; [3] support for fire research, fire facilities, and improvements in forest health. The last section of this report discusses the impact of high and rising wildfire costs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20080428_RL33990_3b319289edf38c1d64d4230fb35fa2d1db7ee231.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20080428_RL33990_3b319289edf38c1d64d4230fb35fa2d1db7ee231.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Forest fires", "name": "Forest fires" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Forest management", "name": "Forest management" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Forestry law and legislation", "name": "Forestry law and legislation" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc807586/", "id": "RL33990_2008Feb05", "date": "2008-02-05", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Wildfire Funding", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20080205_RL33990_1b83e4d8e6fd110b66ff040aa21e8fea8435fefe.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20080205_RL33990_1b83e4d8e6fd110b66ff040aa21e8fea8435fefe.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc810113/", "id": "RL33990_2007Jun04", "date": "2007-06-04", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Wildfire Funding", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20070604_RL33990_a59db0b732e6a5a90a4e4712c4ff66333872d8e4.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20070604_RL33990_a59db0b732e6a5a90a4e4712c4ff66333872d8e4.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc821547/", "id": "RL33990_2007May07", "date": "2007-05-07", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Wildfire Funding", "summary": "This report briefly describes the three categories of federal programs for wildfire protection. One is to protect the federal lands managed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (FS), and by the U.S. Department of the Interior, whose wildfire programs are coordinated by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). A second category assists state and local governments and communities in protecting nonfederal lands; these programs are used to reduce wildland fuels, to otherwise prepare for fire control, to contain and control wildfires, and to respond after severe\r\nwildfires have burned. A third category of federal programs supports fire research, fire facilities, and improvements in forest health. The last section of this report discusses the impact of high and rising wildfire costs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20070507_RL33990_d892f29f6e19487847529204d4aa41e75f9a92ce.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20070507_RL33990_d892f29f6e19487847529204d4aa41e75f9a92ce.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Forest fires", "name": "Forest fires" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Forest management", "name": "Forest management" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Forestry law and legislation", "name": "Forestry law and legislation" } ] } ], "topics": [ "Appropriations", "Energy Policy", "Environmental Policy" ] }