{ "id": "RL33514", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "RL", "number": "RL33514", "active": true, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov, EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "RL", "title": "Social Security: What Would Happen If the Trust Funds Ran Out?", "date": "2020-07-29", "retrieved": "2020-09-07T12:22:10.982987", "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "active": true, "id": "RL33514_30_2020-07-29", "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL33514", "formats": [ { "sha1": "8dcf378ecc4867b09e4a4f4779d050526aaa35e0", "filename": "files/2020-07-29_RL33514_8dcf378ecc4867b09e4a4f4779d050526aaa35e0.pdf", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL33514/30", "format": "PDF" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2020-07-29_RL33514_8dcf378ecc4867b09e4a4f4779d050526aaa35e0.html" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 599963, "date": "2019-06-12", "retrieved": "2019-12-20T18:18:36.691251", "title": "Social Security: What Would Happen If the Trust Funds Ran Out?", "summary": "Social Security\u2019s receipts and expenditures are accounted for through two federal trust funds: the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund and the Federal Disability Insurance (DI) Trust Fund. Under their intermediate assumptions and under current law, the Social Security trustees project that the DI trust fund will become depleted in 2052 and the OASI trust fund will become depleted in 2034. Although the two funds are legally separate, they are often considered in combination. The trustees project that the combined Social Security trust funds will become depleted in 2035. At that point, the combined trust funds would become insolvent, because incoming tax revenue would be sufficient to pay only about 80% of scheduled benefits.\nIf a trust fund became depleted and current receipts were insufficient to cover current expenditures, there would be a conflict between two federal laws. Under the Social Security Act, beneficiaries would still be legally entitled to their full scheduled benefits. However, the Antideficiency Act prohibits government spending in excess of available funds, so the Social Security Administration (SSA) would not have legal authority to pay full Social Security benefits on time.\nIt is unclear what specific actions SSA would take if a trust fund were insolvent. After depletion, the trust funds would continue to receive tax revenues, from which a majority of scheduled benefits could be paid. One option would be to pay full benefits on a delayed schedule; another would be to make timely but reduced payments. Social Security beneficiaries would remain legally entitled to full, timely benefits and could take legal action to claim the balance of their benefits.\nMaintaining financial balance after trust fund insolvency would require substantial reductions in Social Security benefits, substantial increases in tax revenues, or some combination of the two. The trustees project that following depletion of the combined funds in 2035, Congress could restore balance by reducing scheduled benefits by about 20%; the required reduction would grow gradually to 25% by 2093. An alternative could be for Congress to raise the Social Security payroll tax rate from 12.4% to 15.60% following depletion in 2035, then gradually increase it to 16.50% by 2093. \nTrust-fund insolvency could be avoided if expenditures were reduced or receipts increased sufficiently. The sooner Congress acts to adjust Social Security policy, the less abrupt the changes would need to be, because they could be spread over a longer period and would therefore affect a larger number of workers and beneficiaries. Even if changes were not implemented immediately, enacting them sooner would give workers and beneficiaries more time to plan and adjust their work and savings behavior.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL33514", "sha1": "a608d901bb1d220976b2d45a24fff49ec80c5e23", "filename": "files/20190612_RL33514_a608d901bb1d220976b2d45a24fff49ec80c5e23.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33514_files&id=/4.png": "files/20190612_RL33514_images_617162d11fa8ec6a504758b16e404ac8b0d5fa62.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33514_files&id=/1.png": "files/20190612_RL33514_images_c6ca18890b492f0fb50762c19f3615e5a12f3d5d.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33514_files&id=/2.png": "files/20190612_RL33514_images_073ec2c0a54d96c100189ad3cbe75c6da0490e64.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33514_files&id=/5.png": "files/20190612_RL33514_images_84bd1f1cf53832f88fa4c46850f5d4f5220f80a9.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33514_files&id=/3.png": "files/20190612_RL33514_images_9267095e95cd90045bc9f8820c319f264412abdb.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33514_files&id=/0.png": "files/20190612_RL33514_images_71d5452b19bf6b24444b40ebdd477a5f897829e2.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL33514", "sha1": "2b2af643e13a629ce63c3fa0a0261bafdf366875", "filename": "files/20190612_RL33514_2b2af643e13a629ce63c3fa0a0261bafdf366875.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4796, "name": "Social Security" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 581831, "date": "2018-06-11", "retrieved": "2018-06-12T14:00:17.723276", "title": "Social Security: What Would Happen If the Trust Funds Ran Out?", "summary": "Social Security\u2019s receipts and expenditures are accounted for through two federal trust funds: the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund and the Federal Disability Insurance (DI) Trust Fund. Under their intermediate assumptions and under current law, the Social Security trustees project that the DI trust fund will become depleted in 2032 and the OASI trust fund will become depleted in 2034. Although the two funds are legally separate, they are often considered in combination. The trustees project that the combined Social Security trust funds will become depleted in 2034. At that point, the combined trust funds would become insolvent, because incoming tax revenue would be sufficient to pay only about 79% of scheduled benefits.\nIf a trust fund became depleted and current receipts were insufficient to cover current expenditures, there would be a conflict between two federal laws. Under the Social Security Act, beneficiaries would still be legally entitled to their full scheduled benefits. However, the Antideficiency Act prohibits government spending in excess of available funds, so the Social Security Administration (SSA) would not have legal authority to pay full Social Security benefits on time.\nIt is unclear what specific actions SSA would take if a trust fund were insolvent. After depletion, the trust funds would continue to receive tax revenues, from which a majority of scheduled benefits could be paid. One option would be to pay full benefits on a delayed schedule; another would be to make timely but reduced payments. Social Security beneficiaries would remain legally entitled to full, timely benefits and could take legal action to claim the balance of their benefits.\nMaintaining financial balance after trust fund insolvency would require substantial reductions in Social Security benefits, substantial increases in tax revenues, or some combination of the two. The trustees project that following depletion of the combined funds in 2034, Congress could restore balance by reducing scheduled benefits by about 21%; the required reduction would grow gradually to 26% by 2092. Alternatively, Congress could raise the Social Security payroll tax rate from 12.4% to 15.7% following depletion in 2034, then gradually increase it to 16.7% by 2092. \nTrust-fund insolvency could be avoided if expenditures were reduced or receipts increased sufficiently. The sooner Congress acts to adjust Social Security policy, the less abrupt the changes would need to be, because they could be spread over a longer period and would therefore affect a larger number of workers and beneficiaries. Even if changes were not implemented immediately, enacting them sooner would give workers and beneficiaries more time to plan and adjust their work and savings behavior.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL33514", "sha1": "1f668d37377b9fd87c7e0f0fc4821ba83aa0ffb8", "filename": "files/20180611_RL33514_1f668d37377b9fd87c7e0f0fc4821ba83aa0ffb8.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33514_files&id=/1.png": "files/20180611_RL33514_images_b24679cee69ecc50dcce52e73f2543ce0ed75a09.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33514_files&id=/5.png": "files/20180611_RL33514_images_92732b12b05b11c6e2f3630d45be6f6b3aec9130.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33514_files&id=/0.png": "files/20180611_RL33514_images_ace3111e1ef085e58e6dbc842bd9d865a6fbc900.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33514_files&id=/2.png": "files/20180611_RL33514_images_ffb50b9d521483136d405f802919120ea0640174.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33514_files&id=/3.png": "files/20180611_RL33514_images_b8bbca422e1679d77df9ca3a75a85f9dbe58b164.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33514_files&id=/4.png": "files/20180611_RL33514_images_570bb1ddb22cac4d1f698dcb0e01d16e2498dafb.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL33514", "sha1": "cb54a855cc4cae14408c3c9446444072af20e1dd", "filename": "files/20180611_RL33514_cb54a855cc4cae14408c3c9446444072af20e1dd.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4796, "name": "Social Security" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 574122, "date": "2017-09-12", "retrieved": "2018-05-10T12:35:08.453713", "title": "Social Security: What Would Happen If the Trust Funds Ran Out?", "summary": "Social Security\u2019s income and outlays are accounted for through two federal trust funds: the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund and the Federal Disability Insurance (DI) Trust Fund. Under their intermediate assumptions and under current law, the Social Security trustees project that the DI Trust Fund will become depleted in 2028 and the OASI Trust Fund will become depleted in 2035. Although the two funds are legally separate, they are often considered in combination. The trustees project that the combined Social Security trust funds will become depleted in 2034. At that point, revenue would be sufficient to pay only about 77% of scheduled benefits.\nIf a trust fund became depleted, there would be a conflict between two federal laws. Under the Social Security Act, beneficiaries would still be legally entitled to their full scheduled benefits. However, the Antideficiency Act prohibits government spending in excess of available funds, so the Social Security Administration (SSA) would not have legal authority to pay full Social Security benefits on time. \nIt is unclear what specific actions SSA would take if a trust fund were depleted. After insolvency, Social Security would continue to receive tax income, from which a majority of scheduled benefits could be paid. One option would be to pay full benefits on a delayed schedule; another would be to make timely but reduced payments. Social Security beneficiaries would remain legally entitled to full, timely benefits and could take legal action to claim the balance of their benefits.\nMaintaining financial balance after trust fund insolvency would require substantial reductions in Social Security benefits, substantial increases in income, or some combination of the two. The trustees project that following insolvency of the combined funds in 2034, Congress could restore balance by reducing scheduled benefits by about 23%; the required reduction would grow gradually to 27% by 2091. Alternatively, Congress could raise the Social Security payroll tax rate from 12.4% to 16.0% following insolvency in 2034, then gradually increase it to 16.9% by 2091. \nTrust-fund insolvency could be avoided if outlays were reduced or income increased sufficiently. The sooner Congress acts to adjust Social Security policy, the less abrupt the changes would need to be, because they could be spread over a longer period and would therefore affect a larger number of workers and beneficiaries. Even if changes were not implemented immediately, enacting them sooner would give workers and beneficiaries time to plan and adjust their work and savings behavior.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL33514", "sha1": "3bf800aa6c4e79ab48a81e54b86cd4ccccb18bc1", "filename": "files/20170912_RL33514_3bf800aa6c4e79ab48a81e54b86cd4ccccb18bc1.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33514_files&id=/4.png": "files/20170912_RL33514_images_d99f807fec96d1a0113afd6b47d6f49835c93565.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33514_files&id=/1.png": "files/20170912_RL33514_images_3f38a7159aa8f82dc8bb35c2411d153b852f6681.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33514_files&id=/2.png": "files/20170912_RL33514_images_e654d9dad9ce4d12c30c7080e8ea8273c35e8b3c.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33514_files&id=/5.png": "files/20170912_RL33514_images_c28b2e2034d0869a18555c25419cacb95b8d827f.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33514_files&id=/3.png": "files/20170912_RL33514_images_203d38b9588ab886f7314733ceef8e2a08a50802.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33514_files&id=/0.png": "files/20170912_RL33514_images_173bea9c3230e1c8c7369fe05c7c89ecb1b576b5.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL33514", "sha1": "2dffd5fe5eb1f6957234379fd8d27e1672f4cf00", "filename": "files/20170912_RL33514_2dffd5fe5eb1f6957234379fd8d27e1672f4cf00.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4796, "name": "Social Security" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 457211, "date": "2016-11-23", "retrieved": "2016-11-28T21:03:45.623698", "title": "Social Security: What Would Happen If the Trust Funds Ran Out?", "summary": "The Social Security trustees project that, under their intermediate assumptions and under current law, the Disability Insurance (DI) trust fund will become depleted in 2023 and the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) trust fund will become depleted in 2035. Although the two funds are legally separate, they are often considered in combination. The trustees project that the combined Social Security trust funds will become depleted in 2034. At that point, revenue would be sufficient to pay only about 79% of scheduled benefits.\nIf a trust fund became depleted, there would be a conflict between two federal laws. Under the Social Security Act, beneficiaries would still be legally entitled to their full scheduled benefits. However, the Antideficiency Act prohibits government spending in excess of available funds, so the Social Security Administration (SSA) would not have legal authority to pay full Social Security benefits on time. \nIt is unclear what specific actions SSA would take if a trust fund were depleted. After insolvency, Social Security would continue to receive tax income, from which a majority of scheduled benefits could be paid. One option would be to pay full benefits on a delayed schedule; another would be to make timely but reduced payments. Social Security beneficiaries would remain legally entitled to full, timely benefits and could take legal action to claim the balance of their benefits.\nMaintaining financial balance after trust fund insolvency would require substantial reductions in Social Security benefits, substantial increases in income, or some combination of the two. The trustees project that following insolvency of the combined funds in 2034, Congress could restore balance by reducing scheduled benefits by about 21%; the required reduction would grow gradually to 26% by 2090. Alternatively, Congress could raise the Social Security payroll tax rate from 12.4% to 15.7% following insolvency in 2034, then gradually increase it to 16.8% by 2090. \nTrust-fund insolvency could be avoided if outlays were reduced or income increased sufficiently. The sooner Congress acts to adjust Social Security policy, the less abrupt the changes would need to be, because they could be spread over a longer period and would therefore affect a larger number of workers and beneficiaries. Even if changes were not implemented immediately, enacting them sooner would give workers and beneficiaries time to plan and adjust their work and savings behavior.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL33514", "sha1": "ebff58970acd78ba35ddd3a2745fc2604f480793", "filename": "files/20161123_RL33514_ebff58970acd78ba35ddd3a2745fc2604f480793.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL33514", "sha1": "f849d03bae1e311dd3cc7a9d02836170af1a3e24", "filename": "files/20161123_RL33514_f849d03bae1e311dd3cc7a9d02836170af1a3e24.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4796, "name": "Social Security" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 444332, "date": "2014-08-28", "retrieved": "2016-04-06T20:09:00.183766", "title": "Social Security: What Would Happen If the Trust Funds Ran Out?", "summary": "Congressional Research Service\n7-5700\nwww.crs.gov\nRL33514\nSummary\nThe Social Security Trustees project that, under their intermediate assumptions and under current law, the Disability Insurance (DI) trust fund will become exhausted in 2016 and the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) trust fund will become exhausted in 2034. Although the two funds are legally separate, they are often considered in combination. The trustees project that the combined Social Security trust funds will become exhausted in 2033. At that point, revenue would be sufficient to pay only about 77% of scheduled benefits.\nIf a trust fund became exhausted, there would be a conflict between two federal laws. Under the Social Security Act, beneficiaries would still be legally entitled to their full scheduled benefits. But the Antideficiency Act prohibits government spending in excess of available funds, so the Social Security Administration (SSA) would not have legal authority to pay full Social Security benefits on time. \nIt is unclear what specific actions SSA would take if a trust fund were exhausted. After insolvency, Social Security would continue to receive tax income, from which a majority of scheduled benefits could be paid. One option would be to pay full benefit checks on a delayed schedule; another would be to make timely but reduced payments. Social Security beneficiaries would remain legally entitled to full, timely benefits and could take legal action to claim the balance of their benefits.\nTo delay insolvency of the DI trust fund, Congress could effectively transfer funds from the OASI to the DI trust fund, for example by increasing the share of Social Security payroll tax revenues that are credited to the DI trust fund. Such action would hasten the insolvency of the OASI trust fund, however.\nMaintaining financial balance after trust fund insolvency would require substantial reductions in Social Security benefits, substantial increases in income, or some combination of the two. The trustees project that following insolvency of the combined funds in 2033, Congress could restore balance by reducing scheduled benefits by about 23%; the required reduction would grow gradually to 27% by 2088. Alternatively, Congress could raise the Social Security payroll tax rate from 12.40% to 16.2% following insolvency in 2033, then gradually increase it to 17.3% by 2088. To maintain balance in later years, larger benefit reductions or tax increases would be required. \nTrust-fund insolvency could be avoided if outlays were reduced or income increased sufficiently. The sooner Congress acts to adjust Social Security policy, the less abrupt the changes would need to be, because they could be spread over a longer period and would therefore affect a larger number of workers and beneficiaries. Even if changes were not implemented immediately, enacting them sooner would give workers and beneficiaries time to plan and adjust their work and savings behavior.\nContents\nIntroduction\t1\nThe Social Security Trust Funds\t1\nHow the Trust Funds Work\t1\nTrust Fund Receipts\t1\nTrust Fund Expenditures\t2\nAnnual Surpluses and Deficits\t2\nTrust Fund Solvency\t2\nHistorical Trust Fund Operations\t3\nCash-Flow Surpluses and Deficits\t3\nNear-Insolvency in the Early 1980s\t3\nSocial Security Financial Projections\t4\nTrust Fund Ratio\t4\nLegal Background on Trust Fund Insolvency\t5\nThe Antideficiency Act\t5\nLegal Entitlement to Social Security Benefits\t6\nWhat Happens to Benefits in the Case of Insolvency?\t6\nWhat If Congress Waits to Act?\t7\nBenefit Cut Scenario\t8\nSize of Benefit Cuts\t8\nPayroll Tax Increase Scenario\t11\nSize of Payroll Tax Rate Increases\t11\nImpact of Payroll Tax Increases\t12\nConclusion\t12\n\nFigures\nFigure 1. Social Security Trust Fund Ratios\t5\nFigure 2. Payable Benefits as a Share of Scheduled Benefits at Current Law Payroll Tax Rates, 2014-2088\t8\nFigure 3. Replacement Rates Under Benefit Cut Scenario, 2014-2088\t10\nFigure 4. Initial Real Annual Payable Benefits Under Benefit Cut Scenario, 2014-2088\t11\nFigure 5. Combined Payroll Tax Rate Needed To Fund Scheduled Benefits, 2014-2088\t12\n\nTables\nTable 1. Current Social Security Benefit Payment Schedule\t7\n\nContacts\nAuthor Contact Information\t13\nAcknowledgments\t13\n\nIntroduction\nEach year when the Social Security trustees release their annual report, attention is focused on the projection of the year that the Social Security trust funds will become insolvent. In their 2014 report, the Trustees projected that, under their intermediate assumptions and under current law, the Disability Insurance (DI) trust fund will become exhausted in 2016 and the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) trust fund will do so in 2034. Although the two funds are legally separate, they are often described in combination. The trustees project that the combined Social Security trust funds will become exhausted in 2033.\nSome Americans may believe that if the trust funds were exhausted, Social Security would be unable to pay any benefits. In fact, in 2033, the first year of projected insolvency of the combined Social Security trust funds, the program is projected to have enough tax revenue to pay about 77% of scheduled benefits; that percentage would decline to 72% by the end of the 75-year projection period.\nAlthough benefits would be paid in some form, it is unclear how the necessary reductions would be implemented, because the Social Security Act does not specify what would happen to benefits if a trust fund became exhausted. One option would be to pay full benefit checks on a delayed schedule; another would be to make timely but reduced payments. \nThis report explains what the Social Security trust funds are and how they work. It describes the historical operations of the trust funds and the Social Security trustees\u2019 projections of future operations. It explains what could happen if Congress allowed the trust funds to run out. It also analyzes two scenarios that assume Congress waits until the moment of insolvency to act, showing the magnitude of benefit cuts or tax increases needed and how such changes would affect beneficiaries.\nThe Social Security Trust Funds\nHow the Trust Funds Work\nSocial Security provides retirement, disability, and survivor benefits to qualifying workers and their families. These benefits are funded from two trust funds: the OASI trust fund and the DI trust fund. The two funds operate separately but are closely linked. Several times in the past\u2014most recently in 1994\u2014Congress has reallocated the Social Security payroll tax rate to equalize the financial conditions of the two trust funds. In part because of those experiences, analysts often treat the two funds collectively.\nTrust Fund Receipts\nThe trust funds\u2019 primary source of income is the Social Security payroll tax, but they also receive income from income taxes on benefits and interest on the funds\u2019 balance. The payroll tax consists of a 12.4% tax on wages and self-employment earnings up to the taxable maximum, which is $117,000 in 2014 and increases annually with average wages in the economy. Of the 12.4% total, 10.6% is credited to the OASI trust fund and 1.8% to the DI trust fund. Some Social Security benefits paid to people with incomes above a certain threshold are subject to income tax. Most of the resulting revenue is credited to the Social Security trust funds, and some goes to the Medicare Health Insurance trust fund. In 2013, payroll taxes accounted for 84.9% of Social Security income, interest accounted for 12.0%, and income taxes on benefits accounted for 2.5%. \nTrust Fund Expenditures\nIn 2013, 98.7% of the trust funds\u2019 expenditures paid for benefits. Administrative expenses accounted for 0.7% of expenditures. The remaining 0.5% was transferred to the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) as part of a financial interchange with the RRB. This annual exchange of funds places the Social Security trust funds in the same financial position in which they would have been if railroad service had been covered by Social Security.\nAnnual Surpluses and Deficits\nIn years when Social Security\u2019s total receipts, including interest, exceed expenditures, then the trust funds have a surplus. By law, that surplus is invested in special issue Treasury bonds. In other words, Social Security\u2019s cash surpluses are borrowed by the general fund of the U.S. Treasury. The Treasury, in turn, incurs an obligation to repay the bonds with interest. \nWhen the trust funds spend more than they receive in taxes and interest, they have a deficit, which requires Social Security to redeem bonds accumulated in previous years. Treasury pays benefits with cash from general revenues and writes down an equivalent amount of the trust fund\u2019s bond holdings. \nAn alternative measure of the trust funds\u2019 finances is given by the cash-flow balance. That measure does not consider interest income, so the trust funds run a cash-flow surplus when tax income exceeds expenditures, and they run a cash-flow deficit when they spend more than they receive in taxes.\nTrust Fund Solvency\nIf the trust funds are not able to pay all of current expenses out of current tax income and accumulated trust fund assets, they are insolvent. Insolvency means that Social Security\u2019s trust funds are unable to pay full benefits on time. It does not mean that Social Security will be completely broke and unable to pay any benefits.\nHistorical Trust Fund Operations\nThe OASI trust fund was established in 1937; the DI trust fund was established in 1957. Neither of the Social Security trust funds has ever become insolvent. In 2013, the OASI trust fund had a surplus of $64.3 billion, and the DI trust fund had a deficit of $32.2 billion, for a combined surplus of $32.1 billion, including interest. Interest income for the combined funds was $102.8 billion, so on a cash-flow basis, there was a combined 2013 deficit of $70.7 billion. At the end of 2013, the combined trust funds had total assets of $2.8 trillion.\nCash-Flow Surpluses and Deficits\nThe trust funds have run annual surpluses in most years. Except for the first decades of the program and a few years beginning in the late 1960s, these annual surpluses were typically small relative to the size of the trust funds\u2019 expenditures. Beginning in 1975, the combined trust funds ran annual deficits. The trust funds made up the difference between income and outgo during these years by redeeming some of the bonds accumulated in earlier years. In other words, in those years, the Social Security trust funds received net transfers from the Treasury\u2019s general fund.\nNear-Insolvency in the Early 1980s\nThe Social Security trust funds have never been exhausted. However, in the early 1980s, a solvency crisis loomed for the OASI trust fund. The 1982 Social Security Trustees Report projected that in the absence of legislative changes the OASI trust fund would become insolvent by July 1983. To relieve the pressure on the OASI trust fund temporarily, Congress permitted the fund to borrow from the DI and Medicare Hospital Insurance (HI) trust funds. Money was transferred to the OASI fund in 1982 and repaid by 1986. Interfund borrowing authority expired at the end of 1989. \nThis temporary measure allowed policy makers time to develop a more sustainable solution to Social Security\u2019s solvency problem. The Social Security Amendments of 1983 (P.L. 98-21) increased Social Security income and reduced spending. As a result, the combined trust funds ran significant surpluses, which on average exceeded a quarter of outlays from 1987 to 2009.\nThe aging of the baby-boom population and the recent recession and subsequent weak economy have resulted in higher outlays and lower tax revenues for Social Security. Since 2010, the combined trust funds have run cash-flow deficits, which are projected to continue indefinitely under current law. However, because interest income has exceeded the cash-flow deficit, trust funds have continued to run surpluses, which averaged 7% of outlays from 2010 through 2013. \nCash-flow deficits do not affect Social Security directly. However, if the non-Social Security portion of the federal budget is in deficit, redemption of trust fund bonds puts additional pressure on the overall federal budget.\nSocial Security Financial Projections \nThis CRS report focuses on the trustees\u2019 \u201cintermediate\u201d Social Security projections, which reflect their \u201cbest estimates\u201d of future demographic and economic trends. Under that set of assumptions, the DI trust fund is exhausted in 2016 and the OASI trust fund is exhausted in 2034. Considered on a combined basis, the trust funds would become insolvent in 2033. However, the trustees\u2019 projections\u2014like all long-term projections\u2014are uncertain. They estimate that there is a 10% chance that the combined trust funds would become insolvent in 2029 or earlier and a 10% chance that insolvency would occur in 2038 or later. Using somewhat different assumptions and projection methods, the Congressional Budget Office projects that the combined trust funds will become insolvent in 2030.\nEven after insolvency, the trust funds will continue to receive income from payroll taxes and income taxes on benefits that will allow some benefits to be paid. The trustees project that, under their intermediate assumptions, tax income will be sufficient to cover about 77% of scheduled benefits following trust fund insolvency in 2033, declining to 72% in 2088.\nTrust Fund Ratio\nTo put the trust fund balance in context, analysts commonly consider the trust fund ratio: the balance in the trust funds at the beginning of a year divided by projected outlays for that year. The trust fund ratio thus represents the proportion of a year\u2019s cost that could be paid solely with the reserves at the beginning of the year. The ratio for the combined trust funds peaked at 358% at the end of 2008. They declined to 332% at the end of 2013 and are continuing to fall. By definition, the ratio will reach zero when the trust funds become exhausted.\nFigure 1. Social Security Trust Fund Ratios\n\nSource: Social Security Trustees, 2014 Annual Report of the Board of Trustees of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance and Disability Insurance Trust Funds, July 28, 2014, Table IV.B3, at http://www.ssa.gov/oact/tr/2014/lr4b3.html.\nNote: The trust fund ratio equals the fund balance at the beginning of a year expressed as a percentage of the cost during the year.\nLegal Background on Trust Fund Insolvency\nThe Antideficiency Act\nThe Social Security Act specifies that benefit payments shall be made only from the trust funds (i.e., accumulated trust fund assets). Another law, the Antideficiency Act, prohibits government spending in excess of available funds. Consequently, if the Social Security trust funds become insolvent\u2014that is, if current tax income and accumulated assets are not sufficient to pay the benefits to which people are entitled\u2014the law effectively prohibits full Social Security benefits from being paid on time.\nLegal Entitlement to Social Security Benefits\nThe Social Security Act states that every individual who meets program eligibility requirements is entitled to benefits. In other words, Social Security is an entitlement program, which means that the government is legally obligated to pay Social Security benefits to all those who are eligible for them as set forth in the statute. If the government fails to pay the benefits stipulated by law, beneficiaries could take legal action. Insolvency would not relieve the government of its obligation to provide benefits.\nWhat Happens to Benefits in the Case of Insolvency?\nThe Antideficiency Act prohibits government agencies from paying for benefits, goods, or services beyond the limit authorized in law for such payments. The authorized limit in law for Social Security benefits is the balance of the trust fund. The Social Security Act does not stipulate what would happen to benefit payments if the trust funds ran out. As a result, either full benefit checks may be paid on a delayed schedule or reduced benefits would be paid on time. In either case, total payable benefits would be lower than scheduled benefits.\nTo see how a delay could affect beneficiaries, consider the current Social Security benefit payment schedule, shown in Table 1. (This schedule may be changed at the discretion of the Social Security Commissioner.) New beneficiaries\u2019 payment dates are generally based on their day of birth\u2014for example, if a retired worker was born on the first of the month (e.g., June 1); his or her benefit check is paid on the second Wednesday in the month. If trust fund insolvency caused delays in the benefit payment schedule, benefit checks could be paid in the usual order\u2014first to those who receive benefits on the third of the month, then to those on the second Wednesday of the month, and so on, until the remainder of the trust funds\u2019 balance reached zero. At that point, no benefits could be paid until more tax receipts were credited to the trust funds. Then benefit payments could be picked up where they left off when the trust funds ran out. This cycle could continue indefinitely. The timing of these checks would be unpredictable.\nTable 1. Current Social Security Benefit Payment Schedule\nBenefits Paid On\nBirth Date of Worker on Whose Record Benefits are Paid\n\nThird of every month\nAny birth date for:\n(1) Social Security beneficiaries who also receive SSI benefits or who reside in a foreign country, and \n(2) Most beneficiaries who began to receive benefits prior to June 1997.\n\nSecond Wednesday\n1st to 10th day of the month\n\nThird Wednesday\n11th to 20th day of the month\n\nFourth Wednesday\n21st to 31st day of the month\n\nSource: Social Security Administration, Cyclical Payment of Social Security Benefits, at http://ssa.gov/OACT/ProgData/cyclicalpay.html.\nNote: For beneficiaries scheduled to receive payments on the third of the month, benefits may be paid earlier if the third is on a weekend or holiday.\nWhat If Congress Waits to Act?\nThere are many options to restore Social Security solvency, which could be combined or targeted in a variety of ways. For example, Congress could decrease Social Security benefits. Benefit cuts could be applied proportionately to all beneficiaries or structured to protect certain people, such as disabled or low-income beneficiaries. Congress could also increase Social Security\u2019s income by raising payroll or other taxes or by transferring funds from the Treasury\u2019s general fund. Payroll tax increases could be applied proportionately to all workers or targeted to certain workers, such as those who earn more than the taxable maximum.\nTo extend the solvency of the DI trust fund, Congress could consider a variety of legislative changes to increase program revenues and reduce program costs. For example, the DI trust fund could be authorized to borrow from the OASI fund, or part of the Social Security payroll tax currently allocated to the OASI fund could be reallocated to the DI trust fund. Such action would hasten the insolvency of the OASI trust fund, however. For additional information, see CRS Report R43318, Social Security Disability Insurance (DI) Trust Fund: Background and Solvency Issues, by William R. Morton.\nThe next section presents two policy options that could be implemented after the trust funds\u2019 combined balance fell to zero to ensure a balanced system in later years:\nthe benefit cut scenario, under which benefits would be cut across the board and\nthe tax increase scenario, under which the payroll tax rate would increase.\nBoth scenarios assume that current law would remain in place until the combined trust funds became insolvent. If changes were made sooner, they could be smaller, since the burden of lower benefits or higher taxes would be shared by more beneficiaries or workers over a longer period. Either scenario would essentially convert Social Security to a pure pay-as-you-go system, in which income and outgo are equal on an annual basis and there are no trust fund assets. These scenarios are only two of a wide range of possibilities.\nBenefit Cut Scenario\nSize of Benefit Cuts\nIf the trust funds were allowed to run out, Congress could eliminate annual cash-flow deficits by cutting benefits so that spending equals tax income on an annual basis. According to the trustees, achieving annual balance would require benefit cuts of 23% in 2033, the first year of insolvency, rising to 28% by 2088. To maintain balance after 2088, the Social Security trustees project that larger benefit reductions would be needed, because people would continue to live longer and therefore collect benefits for longer periods. Figure 2 shows the percentage of scheduled benefits that are payable each year with scheduled revenues.\nFigure 2. Payable Benefits as a Share of Scheduled Benefits \nat Current Law Payroll Tax Rates, 2014-2088\n\nSource: CRS, based on 2014 Social Security Trustees Report and Social Security Administration memorandum by Chris Chaplain and Daniel Nickerson, \u201cPresent-Law OASDI Payable Percentages: Present-Law Revenue as a Percent of the Cost of Providing Scheduled Benefits through Year 2087,\u201d July 2, 2013 (hereinafter cited as SSA Payable Benefits Memo).\nOne way to understand how such a reduction would affect beneficiaries is to examine the effect on projected replacement rates and real benefit amounts for hypothetical workers.\nReplacement Rates\nOne way of measuring the adequacy of Social Security benefits is the replacement rate, the ratio of a person\u2019s benefit to pre-retirement earnings. Replacement rates can be calculated in different ways. This report uses the methodology used by SSA\u2019s actuaries, which is to calculate a worker\u2019s initial Social Security benefit as a percentage of the worker\u2019s average indexed monthly earnings. Social Security was established to replace income lost to a family as a result of the retirement, death, or disability of a worker. To ensure that average benefit levels grow along with average wages\u2014thus keeping replacement rates generally steady\u2014initial Social Security benefits are indexed to wage growth. Historically, wages have generally risen faster than prices, allowing the standard of living to rise from one generation to the next. \nFigure 3 shows projected replacement rates under the benefit cut scenario for hypothetical low, medium, and high earners who claim retirement benefits at the age of 65 from 2014 through 2088. The Social Security benefit formula is progressive, so the replacement rate is higher for people with lower earnings than for people with higher earnings. In 2014, the estimated rates are 55% for low earners, 40% for medium earners, and 34% for high earners.\nBetween 2014 and 2025, replacement rates for people aged 65 are projected to decrease by about 10% because of the scheduled increase in the full retirement age (FRA). Thereafter, the FRA would remain 67, and scheduled replacement rates would remain steady. But when the trust funds become exhausted, payable benefits and replacement rates would fall immediately by 23%.\nBecause lower earners have higher replacement rates, the 23% reduction would result in a larger percentage point reduction in replacement rates for low earners than for high earners. The replacement rate for low earners would fall from 49% in 2032 to 37% in 2033, a decline of 12 percentage points. In contrast, the replacement rate for high earners would fall from 30% in 2032 to 23% in 2033, a 7 percentage point drop.\nFigure 3. Replacement Rates Under Benefit Cut Scenario, 2014-2088\n\nSource: CRS, based on Social Security Administration, Office of the Chief Actuary, Replacement Rates For Hypothetical Retired Workers, Actuarial Note 2014.9, July 2014, and SSA Payable Benefits Memo.\nNotes: Replacement rates are for hypothetical earners who claim retirement benefits at the age of 65.\nReal Benefit Levels\nAnother measure of benefit adequacy is initial annual benefit amounts. Since benefits are based on workers\u2019 lifetime earnings, higher earners tend to receive higher benefit amounts than lower earners. In 2014, a hypothetical low earner is estimated to receive an annual Social Security benefit of $11,077, a medium earner a benefit of $18,251, and a high earner a benefit of $24,198 in 2014.\nFigure 4 shows future initial real benefit amounts in 2014 dollars (i.e., after adjusting for inflation), which illustrates how the purchasing power of benefits will change over time. Because average real earnings generally grow over time, scheduled real benefits also grow. The trustees project that scheduled initial real benefit amounts for hypothetical individuals claiming retirement benefits at the age of 65 will increase by 19% between 2014 and 2033.\nUnder the benefit cut scenario, real payable benefit levels are projected to drop by 23% after the trust funds become insolvent in 2033, then to once again rise gradually. Under the trustees\u2019 projections, benefits in 2034 would be 8% lower than they are today, but by 2042 they would again exceed today\u2019s levels and would continue to increase thereafter.\nFigure 4. Initial Real Annual Payable Benefits Under Benefit Cut Scenario, 2014-2088\n\nSource: CRS, based on 2014 Social Security Trustees Report, table V.C7, at http://www.ssa.gov/oact/tr/2014/lr5c7.html, and SSA Payable Benefits Memo.\nNote: Benefits are for hypothetical earners who claim retirement benefits at the age of 65. After insolvency, scheduled benefits would continue to increase because average real earnings are projected to continue to grow. Payable benefits would therefore also grow over time following the drop upon insolvency, though they would be permanently lower than scheduled benefits. For clarity, scheduled benefits are shown only for high earners. \nPayroll Tax Increase Scenario\nUpon trust fund exhaustion, the system could also be balanced by raising the payroll tax rate so that the tax income would be sufficient to pay scheduled benefits each year.\nSize of Payroll Tax Rate Increases\nThe trustees project that paying scheduled benefits after exhaustion in 2033 would require an increase in the combined employee and employer payroll tax rate from the current 12.4% to 16.2% after insolvency in 2033. To sustain balance, the payroll tax rate would have to reach 17.3% by 2088, the last year of the 75-year projection period, and it would likely need to increase further in later years. Figure 5 shows the payroll tax rates needed to pay scheduled benefits from 2014 to 2088.\nFigure 5. Combined Payroll Tax Rate Needed To Fund Scheduled Benefits, 2014-2088\n\nSource: CRS based on the 2014 Social Security Trustees Report.\nNote: Under the trustees\u2019 projections, the current 12.4% payroll tax is sufficient to pay scheduled benefits prior to 2033.\nImpact of Payroll Tax Increases\nRaising the payroll tax rate would increase most workers\u2019 taxes by the same proportion. However, because covered wages are taxable only up to a specified maximum ($117,000 in 2014), the effective increase in the payroll tax would be smaller in percentage terms for people who earn more than the taxable maximum than for other workers. Unlike the federal income tax, the Social Security payroll tax is levied at a flat rate starting at the first dollar of wages.\nConclusion\nUnder current law, the Social Security trust funds will almost certainly become insolvent. The sooner changes are made to the program, the smaller and less abrupt the changes would need to be to maintain solvency. Prompt action would also allow Congress to gradually phase in changes, rather than abruptly cutting benefits or raising taxes, thus allowing workers to plan in advance for their retirements.\n\nAuthor Contact Information\n\nDawn Nuschler\nSpecialist in Income Security\ndnuschler@crs.loc.gov, 7-6283William R. Morton\nAnalyst in Income Security\nwmorton@crs.loc.gov, 7-9453\nAcknowledgments\nEarlier versions of this report were written by former CRS analysts Kathleen Romig, Christine Scott, and Noah Meyerson. All questions should be directed to the current authors.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL33514", "sha1": "58ef95f3e5995fe41321f98eb0168ac030084acd", "filename": "files/20140828_RL33514_58ef95f3e5995fe41321f98eb0168ac030084acd.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL33514", "sha1": "e94c34338cce13e48f96734d699b0f2a68db8f8e", "filename": "files/20140828_RL33514_e94c34338cce13e48f96734d699b0f2a68db8f8e.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 328, "name": "Social Security" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc228029/", "id": "RL33514_2013Oct21", "date": "2013-10-21", "retrieved": "2013-11-05T18:07:05", "title": "Social Security: What Would Happen If the Trust Funds Ran Out?", "summary": "This report explains what the Social Security trust funds are and how they work. It describes the historical operations of the trust funds and the Social Security trustees' projections of future operations. It explains what could happen if Congress allowed the trust funds to run out. It also analyzes two scenarios that assume Congress waits until the moment of insolvency to act, showing the magnitude of benefit cuts or tax increases needed and how such changes would affect beneficiaries.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20131021_RL33514_56bf9007f88393ec6da7e9af5013eeab7799adcb.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20131021_RL33514_56bf9007f88393ec6da7e9af5013eeab7799adcb.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Social security", "name": "Social security" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Social security beneficiaries", "name": "Social security beneficiaries" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Social security finance", "name": "Social security finance" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Government trust funds", "name": "Government trust funds" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc816918/", "id": "RL33514_2012Jun15", "date": "2012-06-15", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Social Security: What Would Happen If the Trust Funds Ran Out?", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20120615_RL33514_4709a0e7bb80fbf3e01d62908fdbd8f5bb91344e.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20120615_RL33514_4709a0e7bb80fbf3e01d62908fdbd8f5bb91344e.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc809963/", "id": "RL33514_2011Aug02", "date": "2011-08-02", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Social Security: What Would Happen If the Trust Funds Ran Out?", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20110802_RL33514_847d1c150d1c25c79342623fc1dc8010caff0991.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20110802_RL33514_847d1c150d1c25c79342623fc1dc8010caff0991.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc94044/", "id": "RL33514_2009Aug20", "date": "2009-08-20", "retrieved": "2012-07-24T12:39:36", "title": "Social Security: What Would Happen If the Trust Funds Ran Out?", "summary": "This report looks at ways to overhaul the Social Security system due to a projected lack of system funds, which are estimated to become exhausted in 2041.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20090820_RL33514_4feaeebeebf2a535b853b7615ed2715da14f39ed.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20090820_RL33514_4feaeebeebf2a535b853b7615ed2715da14f39ed.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Social security", "name": "Social security" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Finance", "name": "Finance" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Social security finance", "name": "Social security finance" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc811873/", "id": "RL33514_2008Apr25", "date": "2008-04-25", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Social Security: What Would Happen If the Trust Funds Ran Out?", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20080425_RL33514_f8bb7d763d1ee86c5db7ae2d45a9cfc37364a35e.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20080425_RL33514_f8bb7d763d1ee86c5db7ae2d45a9cfc37364a35e.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc817078/", "id": "RL33514_2007Jun14", "date": "2007-06-14", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Social Security: What Would Happen If the Trust Funds Ran Out?", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20070614_RL33514_14ae7239160afe330aaaa44d76f8c8bea885c5bc.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20070614_RL33514_14ae7239160afe330aaaa44d76f8c8bea885c5bc.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs9457/", "id": "RL33514 2006-07-03", "date": "2006-07-03", "retrieved": "2006-12-05T12:35:28", "title": "Social Security: What Would Happen if the Trust Funds Ran Out?", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20060703_RL33514_651c44d5a6da44afa87493d370fa1ab27e43d9fa.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20060703_RL33514_651c44d5a6da44afa87493d370fa1ab27e43d9fa.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Social security", "name": "Social security" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Government trust funds", "name": "Government trust funds" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Supplemental security income program", "name": "Supplemental security income program" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Budgets", "name": "Budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Welfare", "name": "Welfare" } ] } ], "topics": [ "Domestic Social Policy" ] }