{
  "id": "RL33205",
  "type": "CRS Report",
  "typeId": "REPORTS",
  "number": "RL33205",
  "active": false,
  "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 341291,
      "date": "2007-01-17",
      "retrieved": "2016-04-07T18:32:06.653029",
      "title": "Intellectual Property and the Free Trade Agreements: Innovation Policy Issues",
      "summary": "The United States has entered into a number of Free Trade Agreements, or FTAs, with Australia, Chile, Singapore, and other trading partners. Negotiations are currently ongoing with respect to the establishment of additional FTAs. In keeping with a congressional directive established in the Bipartisan Trade Promotion Act of 2002, P.L. 107-210, one objective of forming the FTAs is to establish \u201ca standard of [intellectual property] protection similar to that found in United States law.\u201d As a result, most of the FTAs stipulate minimum levels of protection with respect to copyrights, data protection, patents, trademarks, and other forms of intellectual property. These standards relate to such provisions as the term of protection, scope of rights, and mechanisms by which these intellectual property rights are acquired and enforced.\nThe different FTAs vary in their comprehensiveness and level of detail. Each of these agreements has nonetheless been drafted in a manner that complies with current U.S. law. As a result, the effect of each FTA is to obligate signatories to such agreements to amend their intellectual property laws to match or resemble those of the United States.\nThe FTAs have been described as an effective mechanism for advancing U.S. interests in securing intellectual property protection. Increased levels of intellectual property protection with respect to computer software, music, motion pictures, and pharmaceuticals may promote a more favorable balance of trade for U.S. industry, decrease domestic prices for innovative goods and services, and serve other policy goals. The FTA framework has at times proven to be a more advantageous forum for achieving the intellectual property goals of the United States than multilateral settings.\nNonetheless, concerns have arisen over the intellectual property provisions of the FTAs. Some observers believe that certain FTA provisions may lock the United States into current intellectual property policies, inhibiting opportunities for future reform. Other commentators are concerned that under existing multilateral agreements, in particular those of the World Trade Organization, the intellectual property obligations found within one FTA may extend beyond that particular treaty partner. Finally, some observers perceive the FTAs to be an inappropriate and unfair vehicle for international intellectual property reforms due to the strong bargaining position of the United States. The scope of these potential consequences counsels continued congressional attention towards the FTAs that the United States has already formed, as well as those FTAs that are planned for the future.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL33205",
          "sha1": "fc811ea03f9f803cfb8190013fb6f77f98b89906",
          "filename": "files/20070117_RL33205_fc811ea03f9f803cfb8190013fb6f77f98b89906.html",
          "images": null
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL33205",
          "sha1": "b67616ddacc4eec5c0cc2b668a7d034ea80b9dec",
          "filename": "files/20070117_RL33205_b67616ddacc4eec5c0cc2b668a7d034ea80b9dec.pdf",
          "images": null
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs8252/",
      "id": "RL33205 2005-12-21",
      "date": "2005-12-21",
      "retrieved": "2006-02-24T13:00:31",
      "title": "Intellectual Property and the Free Trade Agreements: Innovation Policy Issues",
      "summary": "This report discusses Free Trade Agreements (FTA) with Australia, Chile, Singapore, and other trading partners in respect to copyrights, data protection, patents, trademarks, and other forms of intellectual property.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20051221_RL33205_c2c3cf71450a104f5116f3af32cb6e6a5d1287db.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20051221_RL33205_c2c3cf71450a104f5116f3af32cb6e6a5d1287db.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Trade",
          "name": "Trade"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Trade agreements - U.S.",
          "name": "Trade agreements - U.S."
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Intellectual property",
          "name": "Intellectual property"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "International affairs",
          "name": "International affairs"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Affairs"
  ]
}