{ "id": "RL33187", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "RL33187", "active": false, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 310783, "date": "2005-12-15", "retrieved": "2016-04-07T19:25:11.030029", "title": "Civil Rights Opinions of U.S. Supreme Court Nominee Samuel Alito: A Legal Overview", "summary": "During his 15 years as a federal appellate judge on the Third Circuit, Judge Alito has written for\nthe\nmajority, concurred, or dissented in several cases alleging discrimination based on race, ethnicity,\ngender, religion, and other prohibited grounds. His legal position in these cases has varied,\ndepending on the facts and law being applied, and defy rigid or facile classification. Nonetheless,\nsome continuity in judicial approach, both substantive and procedural, may arguably be discerned\nfrom a review of several of his significant opinions.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL33187", "sha1": "4d644978a2524b23768bc17ea52647b7713bede5", "filename": "files/20051215_RL33187_4d644978a2524b23768bc17ea52647b7713bede5.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL33187", "sha1": "7a0a5093fab0272947535c383c2011e221350264", "filename": "files/20051215_RL33187_7a0a5093fab0272947535c383c2011e221350264.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs8081/", "id": "RL33187 2005-12-12", "date": "2005-12-12", "retrieved": "2006-02-14T17:36:04", "title": "Civil Rights Opinions of U.S. Supreme Court Nominee Samuel Alito: A Legal Overview", "summary": "During his 15 years as a federal appellate judge on the Third Circuit, Judge Alito has written for the majority, concurred, or dissented in several cases alleging discrimination based on race, ethnicity, gender, religion, and other prohibited grounds. His legal positions in these cases have varied, depending on the facts and law being applied, and defy rigid or facile classification. Nonetheless, some continuity in judicial approach, both substantive and procedural, may arguably be discerned from a review of several of his significant opinions.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20051212_RL33187_dea2799ef3cc96a2ea0eb952a82d1a67cb739405.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20051212_RL33187_dea2799ef3cc96a2ea0eb952a82d1a67cb739405.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Civil rights", "name": "Civil rights" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Judge Samuel Alito", "name": "Judge Samuel Alito" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Judicial opinions", "name": "Judicial opinions" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Law", "name": "Law" } ] } ], "topics": [ "American Law" ] }