{ "id": "RL32362", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "RL32362", "active": false, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 100427, "date": "2004-04-21", "retrieved": "2016-04-07T20:17:00.608448", "title": "Key Benefits Under Medicaid and the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) for Children With Mental Health and Substance Abuse Problems", "summary": "About 18% of all U.S. adolescents received mental health treatment in 2000. Almost $7 billion\nwas\nspent for such services for teens in 1998. While many youth have used alcohol or other illicit drugs,\nless than 2% received treatment for substance use in 2000. In 1997, costs for such care for children\nunder 18 totaled $604 million.\n \n In this report, the availability of selected mental health and substance abuse services under\nMedicaid and SCHIP for low and moderate income children is explored. Under SCHIP, states may\nprovide coverage by expanding Medicaid or creating a separate SCHIP program or both. Data from\ntwo CRS-sponsored surveys, documenting general limits placed on such services as of June, 2000,\nare presented. For Medicaid, including Medicaid expansions under SCHIP, survey results were\nreported for all 50 states and the District of Columbia. For separate SCHIP programs, survey results\nwere reported for all 41 programs operating in 33 states.\n \n Nearly all Medicaid and SCHIP programs covered inpatient and outpatient mental health\nservices for children, and most also covered inpatient detoxification and outpatient substance abuse\ntreatment. Such benefits were more frequently unlimited under Medicaid than under SCHIP. While\nthe majority of Medicaid programs covered residential treatment centers, most SCHIP programs did\nnot. In many cases, expressing benefit limits as a simple quantity (e.g., days of care, admissions per\nyear, visits/hours per year) did not address the full scope of restrictions on coverage. Other means\nof limiting benefits were also reported (e.g., use of prior authorization, thresholds specific to\ncondition/diagnosis, and treatment plan requirements). Under SCHIP, but not Medicaid, a single\nquantity limit was often applied to two or more related benefits combined rather than separately for\neach benefit category.\n \n Coverage policies and benefit limits for children under Medicaid are seldom absolute in part\nbecause of special provisions in the law requiring that children receive all medically necessary\nservices authorized in federal statute. This guarantee does not exist in SCHIP. Instead, SCHIP\nchildren have access to similar types of benefit packages available in the private sector.\n \n Facing declining revenues and increased expenses, some states are implementing a number of\nMedicaid cost containment strategies focused on reductions in provider payments, and reductions\nin and/or elimination of optional services and populations, mostly affecting adults. Under SCHIP,\nsome states are also capping enrollment and increasing beneficiary cost-sharing. While these\nproposed strategies appear to leave mental health and substance abuse benefits for children largely\nintact, they could effectively limit access to care.\n \n Finally, this report also describes mental health parity and its application to Medicaid and\nSCHIP under current federal law, and related, pending legislation in the 108th Congress.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32362", "sha1": "6089d9e2bffd40029b2b5b4813fe068a9db60445", "filename": "files/20040421_RL32362_6089d9e2bffd40029b2b5b4813fe068a9db60445.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32362", "sha1": "98c565e3bc093fc48342675a8de48ee93167bab2", "filename": "files/20040421_RL32362_98c565e3bc093fc48342675a8de48ee93167bab2.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [] } ], "topics": [ "Health Policy" ] }