{
  "id": "RL30711",
  "type": "CRS Report",
  "typeId": "REPORT",
  "number": "RL30711",
  "active": false,
  "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1119/",
      "id": "RL30711_2000Oct10",
      "date": "2000-10-10",
      "retrieved": "2005-06-10T23:29:36",
      "title": "The House Apportionment Formula in Theory and Practice",
      "summary": "This report has four major purposes: to summarize the constitutional and statutory requirements governing apportionment; to explain how the current apportionment formula works in theory and in practice; to summarize recent challenges to it on grounds of unfairness; and to explain the reasoning underlying the choice of the equal\r\nproportions method over its chief alternative, major fractions.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20001010_RL30711_fe1f522ef54c1109862d086cbb597285b321d6ce.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20001010_RL30711_fe1f522ef54c1109862d086cbb597285b321d6ce.html",
          "source": "pymupdf"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Congress",
          "name": "Congress"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Congressional districts",
          "name": "Congressional districts"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "topics": [
    "American Law",
    "Constitutional Questions",
    "Economic Policy"
  ]
}