Baltimore Bridge Collapse: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Baltimore Bridge Collapse: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Baltimore Bridge Collapse: Frequently Asked
Questions (FAQ)
Updated May 7, 2024
Congressional Research Service
https://crsreports.congress.gov
R48028

link to page 3 link to page 3 link to page 3 link to page 4 link to page 4 link to page 5 link to page 6 link to page 7 link to page 8 link to page 9 link to page 9 link to page 10 link to page 11 link to page 11 link to page 7 link to page 8 link to page 10 link to page 12
Baltimore Bridge Collapse: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Contents
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1
Who Owns and Controls the Ship? ................................................................................................. 1
How Do Ships Navigate Through Harbors? .................................................................................... 1
How Common Is It for Ships to Lose Power? ................................................................................. 2
Could Tug Escorts Have Prevented the Collapse of the Bridge? .................................................... 2
How Is Port Traffic Affected? ......................................................................................................... 3
When Will the Port Reopen? ........................................................................................................... 4
How Is Road Traffic Affected? ........................................................................................................ 5
Has Anything Like This Happened Before? .................................................................................... 6
Who Is in Charge of the Safety Investigation? ................................................................................ 7
What Is the Federal Government’s Role in Rebuilding the Bridge? ............................................... 7
Will Baltimore Want a Higher Bridge Like Those at Other Ports? ................................................. 8
What Is the Coast Guard’s Role in Bridge Permitting? ................................................................... 9
Could the Owner of the Dali Be Liable for Damages? ................................................................... 9

Figures
Figure 1. Baltimore Harbor Federal and Temporary Alternate Channels ........................................ 5
Figure 2. Map of Baltimore Transportation Facilities ..................................................................... 6

Tables
Table 1. Air Drafts of Bridges at Select Container Ports ................................................................. 8

Contacts
Author Information ........................................................................................................................ 10

Baltimore Bridge Collapse: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Introduction
At about 1:30 a.m. on March 26, 2024, the MV Dali, a container ship departing the Port of
Baltimore, struck a support tower of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, MD, causing the
bridge to collapse into the Patapsco River. The bridge is a segment of Interstate 695—Baltimore’s
beltway—and spans the Patapsco shipping channel into the harbor.1
A pothole repair crew of eight was on the bridge at the time of the collision. Two have survived;
one with injuries. Authorities were able to stop traffic over the bridge right before the vessel
strike. There were 23 mariners aboard the ship, and none sustained injury. A Unified Command
and Joint Information Center have been established by the U.S. Coast Guard and Maryland state
officials to coordinate their response and disseminate information on the incident.2
Who Owns and Controls the Ship?
The Dali is being chartered (leased) by Maersk, a Danish shipping firm that provides container
shipping services worldwide in addition to other types of shipping. The ship is managed by the
Synergy Marine Group3 and owned by Grace Ocean Private Ltd., both based in Singapore.4 The
ship’s crew are from India. It is flagged and homeported in Singapore and was classed (meaning
certified as meeting construction and maintenance standards) by a Japanese firm, Nippon Kaiji
Kyokai (ClassNK).5 The multitude of nationalities involved in operating and administering the
ship is typical of the industry.
The ship was built in 2015 by Hyundai Heavy Industries in South Korea with a MAN-
manufactured engine. It is almost 950 feet in length and about 160 feet in breadth with a capacity
to carry 10,000 TEUs of containers (a TEU is a 20-foot container). It could be considered an
average-sized container ship today but would be considered a large ship compared with the fleet
in the late 1970s when the bridge was built. The ship had sailed from Asia through the Panama
Canal and had called at Norfolk and New York before its Baltimore port call. When it struck the
bridge, the ship was departing Baltimore for Sri Lanka.
How Do Ships Navigate Through Harbors?
A preliminary report stated that the ship lost power as it was approaching the bridge, meaning the
ship may have lost propulsion. Two Baltimore harbor pilots were aboard the ship; harbor pilots
navigate ships in and out of harbors because they have expertise with local navigation conditions.
Even when harbor pilots are at the helm, the captain of the ship and the shipping line (Maersk)
remain responsible for the safety of the vessel. Tugs typically assist in moving ships into and out
of their berths (docking and undocking) and rarely escort ships through harbors as an emergency

1 For a map showing the location of port terminals in relation to the bridge, see Moran Towing Co., Port Baltimore
map, https://www.morantug.com/Customer-Content/www/ports-and-operations/PortMap/Baltimore.pdf.
2 Key Bridge Response 2024, https://www.keybridgeresponse2024.com/.
3 Synergy Marine Group, “About Us,” https://www.synergymarinegroup.com/about/about-us/.
4 Lloyd’s Register of Ships, 2022-2023 edition. The ship’s International Maritime Organization (IMO) identification
number is 9697428.
5 ClassNK, “Introduction,” https://www.classnk.com/hp/en/about/aboutNK/index.html.
Congressional Research Service

1

Baltimore Bridge Collapse: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

safety measure. This ship released the tugs before reaching the bridge, as is reportedly normal in
the harbor.6
How Common Is It for Ships to Lose Power?
Loss of propulsion is a known and recorded occurrence in shipping. An annual review of marine
incidents for vessels with a connection to the European Union (EU; EU-registered or EU-owned
vessels or incidents occurring in EU waters) found that loss of propulsion surpassed vessel-to-
vessel collisions as the leading cause of marine casualties from 2014 to 2022.7
Could Tug Escorts Have Prevented the Collapse of
the Bridge?
Some observers have raised the question of whether tugs escorting the ship under the bridge
could have prevented the ship from hitting one of the towers.8 After the ship reportedly lost
power, the pilot called for tug assistance moments before striking the bridge, but by then it was
too late for the tugs to reach the ship again.9 Tugs have the ability to push ships in a desired
direction and even stop ships over some distance, but they must have sufficient engine power and
have other design features specifically for this purpose.10
Some harbors require tug escorts but they appear to be exclusively for tankers of liquid bulk
cargoes, such as oil, chemicals, or liquid natural gas (LNG). The requirements are not intended to
specifically prevent bridge strikes but rather to prevent any event that might result in a spill, such
as a tanker grounding. Tug escorts are a federal requirement in Prince William Sound, Alaska, and
in Puget Sound, Washington.11 The State of California requires tug escorts of tankers in its
harbors per state regulation.12 However, requiring tug escorts can introduce additional risk
exposure simply due to the mere presence of more vessels on the water.13 For instance, in January
2023, one of five tugs assisting an empty tanker into the Port of Corpus Christi accidently got

6 John Konrad, “Ship Lost Control Before Hitting Baltimore Bridge,” gCaptain, March 26, 2024, https://gcaptain.com/
ship-lost-control-before-hitting-baltimore-bridge/.
7 European Maritime Safety Agency, “Annual Overview of Marine Casualties and Incidents 2023,” June 15, 2023, p.
40, https://www.emsa.europa.eu/publications/reports/item/5052-annual-overview-of-marine-casualties-and-
incidents.html.
8 Bruce Buls, “Key Bridge Mistake,” WorkBoat, April 1, 2024, https://www.workboat.com/key-bridge-mistake; Tony
Munoz, “A Remedy for Ship Accidents: Tug Escorts,” The Maritime Executive, March 30, 2024, https://maritime-
executive.com/editorials/a-remedy-for-ship-accidents-tug-escorts.
9 National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) preliminary timeline of the incident: NTSB, “Contact of Cargo Vessel
Dali with Francis Scott Key Bridge and Subsequent Bridge Collapse,” March 27, 2024, https://www.ntsb.gov/
investigations/Pages/DCA24MM031.aspx.
10 Iain Braidwood and Robert G. Allan, “A Risk Profile for Escorted Tankers and Their Resistance to Collision
Damage,” in Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Damaged Ship IV, May 16-17, 2018,
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/58ffe2e66b8f5b40c0cec664/t/5c8172af971a1811b3000599/1551987382686/
Braidwood+Allan+RINA+Damaged+Ships.pdf.
11 33 C.F.R. Part 168.
12 California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 1, Subdivision 4, §§851.20-851.32.
13 Pamela Glass, “Tug Escort Rules in Ports May Be Reviewed After the Key Bridge Collapse,” WorkBoat, April 3,
2024, https://workboat.com/coastal-inland-waterways/tug-escort-rules-in-ports-may-be-reviewed-after-the-key-bridge-
collapse.
Congressional Research Service

2

Baltimore Bridge Collapse: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

caught in the tanker’s propeller.14 The National Transportation Safety Board’s (NTSB’s)
forthcoming report on the MV Dali strike may provide insights into the safety benefits and
drawbacks of tug escorts.
In 2000, the U.S. Supreme Court distinguished federal regulations concerning the safe operation
of tankers in harbors from nonfederal requirements that can be imposed if they do not conflict
with federal requirements and are based on “the peculiarities of local waters.”15 State proposals
concerning ship safety could also interfere with international treaties that have established global
standards. While local requirements for tug escorts are allowed, ports may be reluctant to require
them because of their cost and the heightened competition for containerized cargo.
How Is Port Traffic Affected?
The Port of Baltimore was the 17th busiest port by total tonnage in the United States in 2021, the
most recent year for which data are available.16 It was the 10th busiest by dry bulk tonnage and the
15th busiest container port in TEUs. According to the Maryland Port Administration, the port
ranks “first among the nation’s ports for autos and light truck volume, roll on/roll off farm and
construction machinery, and imported gypsum.”17 It is also “responsible for nearly $3.3 billion in
personal wages and salaries, $2.6 billion in business revenue[,] and nearly $400 million in state
and local tax revenue annually.”18
Containers currently at the port awaiting export could be moved to other ports by truck or rail;
one of the Port of Baltimore’s two container terminals is served by on-dock rail access. Dry
bulk—such as coal,19 the largest commodity by volume handled by the port—and roll on/roll off
machinery may be more difficult to move through other ports, as specialized facilities are needed
for loading and unloading. The closest large ports to Baltimore are Wilmington, DE; Philadelphia,
PA; and Camden, NJ, all of which may be accessed via the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal
provided the vessels have a shallow enough draft. Another nearby port, not draft restricted, is the
port of Norfolk near the entrance to the Chesapeake Bay.
Following the collapse, large commercial vessels were unable to enter or exit the Port of
Baltimore; 11 vessels were trapped in port as a result. The U.S. Coast Guard shipyard at Hawkins
Point20 on Curtis Bay is also upriver from the bridge, and six vessels of the U.S. Department of
Transportation’s Ready Reserve Force (available to provide surge sealift capacity to the

14 NTSB, “Collision Between Tugboat Mark E Kuebler and Tanker Nisalah, MIR-24-04, February 21, 2024,
https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/MIR2404.pdf.
15 United States v. Locke, 529 U.S. 89 (2000).
16 Bureau of Transportation Statistics, “Port Performance Freight Statistics,” January 2024, https://www.bts.gov/sites/
bts.dot.gov/files/2024-01/2024_Port_Performance_Report_0.pdf.
17 Maryland Port Administration, “Maryland’s Port of Baltimore Announces Cargo Volume Growth Through Third
Quarter,” December 7, 2023, https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/MDMPA/bulletins/37ed137#:~:text=
The%20port%20is%20first%20among,and%20local%20tax%20revenue%20annually.
18 Ibid.
19 U.S. Energy Information Administration, “What Are the Energy Impacts from the Port of Baltimore Closure?”
March 28, 2024, https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=61663.
20 U.S. Coast Guard, “Coast Guard Yard,” https://www.dcms.uscg.mil/Our-Organization/Assistant-Commandant-for-
Engineering-Logistics-CG-4-/Logistic-Centers/Surface-Forces-Logistics-Center/Coast-Guard-Yard/.
Congressional Research Service

3

link to page 7 Baltimore Bridge Collapse: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Department of Defense, if needed) were berthed in Baltimore as of January 2024 and presumably
were unable to exit the port.21
When Will the Port Reopen?
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) is managing bridge debris removal for the
congressionally authorized 50-foot-deep navigation channel, initially using existing USACE
Baltimore Harbor and Channels project funds.22 USACE is employing both federal and contracted
assets and expertise (e.g., U.S. Navy Supervisor of Salvage and Diving team and heavy-lift
cranes). USACE released a tentative timeline on April 4, 2024, which would see temporary
channels established until the reopening of the permanent 50-foot-deep and 700-foot-wide federal
navigation channel by the end of May.23
The first temporary alternate channel opened on April 1, 2024, to the northeast of the (blocked)
main channel, with a controlling depth of 11 feet and vertical clearance of 95 feet.24 A second
temporary channel was opened on April 2 to the southwest, with a controlling depth of 14 feet
and a vertical clearance of 124 feet.25 A third temporary channel opened on April 19 with a
controlling depth of 20 feet.26 A fourth temporary channel opened on April 25 with a controlling
depth of 35 feet, running along one edge of the federal channel.27 (See Figure 1.)

21 U.S. Department of Transportation Maritime Administration, “National Defense Reserve Fleet Inventory for the
Month Ending January 31, 2024,” February 2, 2024, https://www.maritime.dot.gov/sites/marad.dot.gov/files/2024-02/
2024_01%20Public%20NDRF%20Inventory.pdf.
22 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), “Baltimore Harbor & Channels, MD & VA,” March 1, 2023,
https://usace.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/p16021coll11/id/541.
23 USACE, “U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Develops Tentative Timeline to Reopen Fort McHenry Channel Following
Key Bridge Collapse,” April 4, 2024; https://www.nab.usace.army.mil/Media/News-Releases/Article/3731790/us-
army-corps-of-engineers-develops-tentative-timeline-to-reopen-fort-mchenry-c/.
24 Key Bridge Response 2024, “Update 5 Multimedia Release: First Vessel Passes Through Temporary Alternate
Channel Around Key Bridge Wreckage,” press release, April 1, 2024, https://www.keybridgeresponse2024.com/post/
update-5-multimedia-release-first-vessel-passes-through-temporary-alternate-channel-around-key-brid. The vertical
clearance between the water level (considering tides, generally measured at mean high water) and the underside of a
bridge deck is also referred to as a bridge’s “air draft.”
25 Key Bridge Response 2024, “Update 6 Multimedia Release: Unified Command Opens Second Temporary Alternate
Channel Around Key Bridge Wreckage for Commercially Essential Vessels,” press release, April 2, 2024,
https://www.keybridgeresponse2024.com/post/update-6-multimedia-release-unified-command-opens-second-
temporary-alternate-channel-around-key-bri.
26 Key Bridge Response 2024, “UPDATE 14 Multimedia Release: Unified Command Opens Third Temporary
Alternate Channel,” press release, April 19, 2024, https://www.keybridgeresponse2024.com/post/update-14-
multimedia-release-unified-command-opens-third-temporary-alternate-channel.
27 Key Bridge Response 2024, “UPDATE 15: Unified Command Opens Limited Access Deep Draft Channel,” press
release, April 25, 2024, https://www.keybridgeresponse2024.com/post/update-15-unified-command-opens-limited-
access-deep-draft-channel.
Congressional Research Service

4

link to page 8
Baltimore Bridge Collapse: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Figure 1. Baltimore Harbor Federal and Temporary Alternate Channels

Source: Prepared by CRS; Key Bridge Response 2024, “UPDATE 15: Unified Command Opens Limited Access
Deep Draft Channel,” press release, April 25, 2024, https://www.keybridgeresponse2024.com/post/update-15-
unified-command-opens-limited-access-deep-draft-channel; original photograph by WJLA/AP via CNN,
https://www.cnn.com/us/live-news/baltimore-bridge-collapse-03-26-24-intl-hnk/
h_2857cadcd511caaec6a16decf811bcc2.
Note: Channel boundaries are not to scale.
The deeper temporary channels have allowed some commercial traffic to resume. The bulk
freighter Jonathan delivered a load of raw sugar to the Domino Sugar refinery in Baltimore using
the 20-foot channel on April 25, and 4 of the 11 trapped commercial vessels were able to leave
the port using the 35-foot channel the next day.28 The 35-foot channel remained open for four
days before closing to accommodate salvage efforts to relocate the Dali.
How Is Road Traffic Affected?
The Key Bridge first opened to traffic in 1977, spanning the Patapsco River connecting Interstate
695 on the southeastern side of Baltimore (see Figure 2). It had annual average daily traffic of
over 30,000 vehicles in 2023, including over 3,000 trucks per day. It was less heavily used than
the Fort McHenry and Baltimore Harbor Tunnels running under the Patapsco River farther north.
Highway traffic has been rerouted through the Baltimore Harbor or Fort McHenry Tunnels or on
Interstate 695 to the north of Baltimore City. Some larger vehicles, including all double-trailers,

28 Lorraine Mirabella, “Key Bridge Collapse: First Large Ships Leave Port of Baltimore Using Deeper Temporary
Channel,” The Baltimore Sun, April 25, 2024.
Congressional Research Service

5

Baltimore Bridge Collapse: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

and most shipments of hazardous materials are not permitted in the tunnels, and trucks are not
allowed through the Baltimore Harbor Tunnel.
Figure 2. Map of Baltimore Transportation Facilities

Source: Created by CRS using data from the U.S. Census Bureau and ESRI.
Notes: The Fort McHenry and Baltimore Harbor Tunnels are marked in brown, and the location of the Key
Bridge is marked in red. The Key Bridge location forms part of the southeastern edge of Interstate 695.
Has Anything Like This Happened Before?
Other bridges have collapsed, including as a result of vessel strikes, leading to disruptions in
maritime and highway transportation.
In May 1980, the bulk freighter MV Summit Venture struck a support column of the Sunshine
Skyway Bridge near Tampa, FL, causing a large portion of the bridge span to collapse and
resulting in 35 fatalities. Federal investigators concluded that the probable causes of the collision
were the unexpectedly sudden and severe weather, the absence of a severe weather warning, and
the failure of the pilot to change course when weather obscured the channel markers.29 The
Tampa incident led to the publication of new bridge design guidance for withstanding vessel
impacts, but it is not yet known whether the Key Bridge—built before this guidance existed—
could have withstood the Dali’s impact even if it conformed to current design best practices.
In May 2002, the towboat Robert Y. Love and the two barges it was pushing veered off course and
struck a support column of a bridge carrying Interstate 40 over the Arkansas river in Oklahoma,
also causing a section of the bridge to collapse and resulting in 14 fatalities. Federal investigators
concluded that the probable cause of the incident was the captain’s loss of consciousness,
possibly as the result of an unforeseeable, abnormal heart rhythm.30 The inability of motorists to
detect the collapsed bridge in time to stop their vehicles contributed to the loss of life.

29 NTSB, “Marine Accident Report: Ramming of the Sunshine Skyway Bridge by the Liberian Bulk Carrier Summit
Venture Tampa Bay, Florida, May 9, 1980,” https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/
MAR8103.pdf.
30 NTSB, “U.S. Towboat Robert Y. Love Allision with Interstate 40 Highway Bridge Near Webbers Falls, Oklahoma
May 26, 2002,” https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/HAR0405.pdf.
Congressional Research Service

6

Baltimore Bridge Collapse: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Who Is in Charge of the Safety Investigation?
The U.S. Coast Guard shares responsibilities with the NTSB to investigate major safety incidents.
Under the NTSB’s governing statutes31 and regulations,32 the agency shall investigate any “major
marine casualty,” defined as one that results in the loss of six or more lives, the loss of a vessel
larger than 100 gross tons, property damage initially estimated as at least $0.5 million, or a
release of hazardous materials deemed to be a serious threat.33 The U.S. Coast Guard is directed
to conduct a preliminary investigation to determine whether a major marine casualty event has
occurred and notify the NTSB accordingly. The NTSB has stated that it will take 12 to 24 months
to fully investigate this incident and has released an initial timeline of the incident.34
What Is the Federal Government’s Role in
Rebuilding the Bridge?
Rebuilding the Key Bridge would require permits from federal agencies, and these authorizations
would normally require review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). However,
replacement of a damaged or destroyed bridge may be granted a “categorical exclusion” (CE)
exempting it from further NEPA reviews if certain conditions are met. To qualify for a CE, work
must begin within two years of an emergency declaration and occur “within the existing right-of-
way and in a manner that substantially conforms to the preexisting design, function, and location
as the original (which may include upgrades to meet existing codes and standards as well as
upgrades warranted to address conditions that have changed since the original construction).”35
After the Interstate 35W bridge in Minneapolis collapsed in 2007, a new bridge was completed in
11 months, which was 3 months ahead of schedule. The Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) credits a project scope that qualified for a CE with accelerating project delivery. In
Florida, a new Sunshine Skyway Bridge took five years to complete, but traffic was able to
resume at reduced capacity on a parallel span that did not collapse.
Federal funding may be available to replace the bridge, which state officials have estimated may
take approximately four years at a cost of between $1.7 and $1.9 billion.36 FHWA’s Emergency
Relief (ER) Program receives approximately $100 million per year from the Highway Trust Fund.
Congress has periodically provided additional funds to respond to specific incidents. Any
damages or insurance payouts recouped by a bridge owner would be used to offset any ER funds
awarded. Before submitting a standard ER application, state transportation officials can submit a
streamlined application for “Quick Release” funds to cover emergency operations; the State of
Maryland has applied for and received $60 million in such funds for the Key Bridge collapse.
Under the ER Program, federal funds can cover 90% of project costs for interstate highways and
80% for other federal-aid highways. Although the Key Bridge is a segment of Interstate 695, the
portion that includes the bridge is a state highway, so the maximum federal share could be 80%.

31 49 U.S.C. §1131.
32 49 C.F.R. Part 850.
33 49 C.F.R. §850.5(e).
34 NTSB, “NTSB Media Briefing 2 - Francis Scott Key Bridge Struck by Cargo Ship Dali,” https://www.youtube.com/
watch?v=FczgLhdqw0M.
35 23 C.F.R. §771.118(c)(11)(ii)(A).
36 Brian Witte, “Maryland Officials Release Timeline, Cost Estimate, for Rebuilding Bridge,” Associated Press, May 2,
2024, https://apnews.com/article/baltimore-bridge-collapse-body-found-cdd8441c5dff48028d1e141b943ca31e.
Congressional Research Service

7

link to page 10 Baltimore Bridge Collapse: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

However, if the total expenses Maryland incurs to deal with disaster-damaged roads in FY2024
exceed the state’s total federal-aid highway formula funds ($828,287,771 for FY2024), the
maximum federal share could increase to 90%. In the past, Congress has made exceptions
allowing ER funds to cover 100% of costs for specific projects, as it did for the Interstate 35W
bridge project (see P.L. 110-56). A bill introduced in the Senate, S. 4114, would make all costs
related to the repair and reconstruction of the Key Bridge and its approaches eligible for a 100%
federal share.
Will Baltimore Want a Higher Bridge Like Those at
Other Ports?
In addition to dredging deeper channels to allow for larger ships, some ports have had to build
new bridges with higher clearances to allow ships to pass under. The ports of Long Beach and
New York are examples of harbors where either a bridge was entirely replaced or the deck of the
existing bridge was raised to accommodate taller vessels. Savannah, GA, plans to raise the deck
of the Talmadge Memorial Bridge another 20 feet in 2025. As shown in Table 1, the Francis Scott
Key Bridge in Baltimore had a relatively high clearance relative to bridges in other seaports.
Also, the Chesapeake Bay Bridge, which most ships calling at Baltimore would also need to pass
under (those ships sailing up the Chesapeake Bay), has an air draft that is three feet less than that
of the Key Bridge.
Though a higher bridge may not be sought in this case, the issue points to the higher costs that
larger ships impose on the public. While larger ships increase economies of scale at sea, they
impose higher port costs largely borne by the public and not the shipping lines. This includes the
cost of deeper channels, taller bridges, and higher capacity ship-to-shore cranes and other cargo
handling equipment, as well as greater concentration of cargo flow, which accentuates port-area
congestion.
Table 1. Air Drafts of Bridges at Select Container Ports
Port
Bridge
Air Draft in Feet
Baltimore, MD
Francis Scott Key
185

Chesapeake Bay
182
Charleston, SC
Arthur Ravenel Jr.
185
Jacksonville, FL
Napoleon B. Broward
169
Long Beach, CA
Gerald Desmond
155
Los Angeles, CA
Vincent Thomas
185
Mobile, AL
Cochrane-Africatown
140
New Orleans, LA
Crescent City
150
New York/New Jersey
Bayonne and Verrazzano-Narrows
215
Philadelphia, PA
Benjamin Franklin
135

Delaware Memorial
188
San Francisco/Oakland, CA
Golden Gate
220

San Francisco-Oakland Bay
220
Savannah. GA
Talmadge Memorial
185
Congressional Research Service

8

Baltimore Bridge Collapse: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Port
Bridge
Air Draft in Feet
Seattle, WA
West Seattle
140
South Jersey (Camden-Gloucester), NJ
Walt Whitman
150

Delaware Memorial
188
Tampa, FL
Sunshine Skyway
155
Wilmington, DE
Delaware Memorial
188
Source: Bureau of Transportation Statistics, “Air Drafts by Limiting Bridge for Select Container Ports,”
https://data.bts.gov/dataset/Air-Drafts-by-Limiting-Bridge-for-Select-Container/25e5-bvnb/data_preview; San
Francisco area bridge information.
What Is the Coast Guard’s Role in Bridge
Permitting?
Bridges to be built over navigable waterways must submit their design plans to the Coast Guard
so that the agency can ensure the bridge does not impose a safety hazard for navigators.37 The
Coast Guard and the FHWA have signed a memorandum of agreement that is intended to expedite
and coordinate their roles in bridge permitting.38 In addition to reviewing new bridge design
plans, the Coast Guard’s Office of Bridge Programs funds alterations to the support structure of
bridges found to interfere with navigation and regulates the operation of drawbridges to
accommodate the needs of bridge users and navigators.39
Could the Owner of the Dali Be Liable for
Damages?
On April 1, 2024, the Dali’s owner filed a petition in federal district court under the Limitation of
Liability Act of 1851, 46 U.S.C. §§30521–30530, asking the court either to exonerate the owner
from liability for the collision or to restrict the owner’s potential financial liability to
approximately $43 million. This figure, known as an “interim stipulation of value,” is related to
the value of the vessel itself and the amount earned from the vessel’s voyage. Shipowners filed
similar petitions following the Sunshine Skyway and Interstate 40 bridge collapses but voluntarily
settled with various claimants for amounts that exceeded their interim stipulations of value. For
more information about how courts evaluate such petitions, see CRS Legal Sidebar LSB11155,
The Baltimore Bridge Collapse and the Limitation of Liability Act of 1851, by Bryan L. Adkins,
Alexander H. Pepper, and Clay Wild.

37 33 U.S.C. §401, §491, and §525; 33 C.F.R. Subchapter J.
38 “Memorandum of Agreement Between the United States Coast Guard and the Federal Highway Administration to
Coordinate and Improve Bridge Planning and Permitting,” https://www.dco.uscg.mil/Portals/9/
USCG_FHWA_MOA_Jan2014.pdf.
39 U.S. Coast Guard, “Office of Bridge Programs,” https://www.dco.uscg.mil/Office-of-Bridge-Programs/.
Congressional Research Service

9

Baltimore Bridge Collapse: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Author Information

John Frittelli
Ali E. Lohman
Specialist in Transportation Policy
Analyst in Transportation Policy

Ben Goldman

Analyst in Transportation Policy

Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan
shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and
under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other
than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in
connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not
subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in
its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or
material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to
copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

Congressional Research Service
R48028 · VERSION 3 · UPDATED
10