Quantum Computing: Concepts, Current State, and Considerations for Congress

Quantum Computing: Concepts, Current State, and Considerations for Congress

Quantum Computing: Concepts, Current State, September 7, 2023
and Considerations for Congress
Ling Zhu
Congress passed and the President signed into law the National Quantum Initiative Act (NQI
Analyst in
Act; P.L. 115-368; codified at 15 U.S.C. §§8801 et seq.) in December 2018 to accelerate
Telecommunications
quantum research and development (R&D) for the economic and national security of the United
Policy
States and ensure the continued U.S. leadership in quantum information science and its

technology applications. Since the enactment of the NQI Act, researchers have made progress in
quantum R&D. The authorization of funding for several federal R&D activities under the NQI

Act is set to expire at the end of FY2023.
In the NQI Act, Congress defined the term quantum information science as “the use of the laws of quantum physics for the
storage, transmission, manipulation, computing, or measurement of information.” Quantum computing, one of technology
applications of quantum information science, uses a quantum bit, or qubit, as its basic data unit, to harness quantum
properties such as superposition and entanglement. By generating and manipulating qubits, a quantum computer is capable of
performing certain calculations significantly faster than conventional, non-quantum computers, known as classical
computers, leading to new ways to solve some complex problems that were previously unsolvable. Researchers have
demonstrated the potential for quantum computing applications in areas such as cryptography, machine learning, and
scientific and engineering research, particularly using modeling, optimization, and simulation.
The NQI Act is the primary federal law that supports R&D activities in quantum computing. It has been amended by the
National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for FY2022 (P.L. 117-81) and the CHIPS and Science Act (Division B of P.L.
117-167). The current act contains four titles, directing (1) the President to implement an NQI Program with a 10-year plan to
accelerate quantum R&D, invest in and coordinate fundamental federal R&D activities, and partner with industry and
universities to advance goals and priorities in the NQI Program; (2) the National Institute of Standards and Technology
(NIST) to carry out specified R&D activities and convene a stakeholder consortium to identify the future measurement,
standards, cybersecurity, and needs for a robust quantum industry; (3) the National Science Foundation (NSF) to carry out a
basic research and education program and award grants to establish Multidisciplinary Centers for Quantum Research and
Education; and (4) the Department of Energy (DOE) to administer a number of programs, including a basic research
program, National Quantum Information Science Research Centers, a program to accelerate innovation in quantum network
infrastructure, and the Quantum User Expansion for Science and Technology program. The authorization of funding for the
following activities under the NQI Act is set to expire in September 2023: NSF’s five university-based Quantum Leap
Challenge Institutes, DOE’s five national lab-led research centers, and NIST’s R&D activities, including the industry-led
Quantum Economic Development Consortium.
Since the enactment of the NQI Act in 2018, researchers have made notable advances in quantum computing in three areas:
demonstrating that a quantum processor could execute a complex computational task much faster than a classical
supercomputer in an experiment; demonstrating the mitigation of calculation errors caused by the loss of information held by
qubits—a major outstanding challenge to quantum computing—in an experiment; and scaling up quantum computing
processors, thus enhancing their power and potential reliability.
Some experts argue that sustained federal R&D investment is necessary to accelerate progress toward practical quantum
computing and to maintain the leading role of U.S. researchers and institutions globally. There is less consensus, however, on
the specific role the federal government should play in quantum R&D and how resources and support should be specifically
targeted and prioritized.
Congress faces policymaking in three areas. First, Congress may decide whether and how to reauthorize or expand federal
R&D activities and support under the NQI Act. Second, Congress may choose whether to set policy priorities to ensure U.S.
leadership in quantum computing, including (1) accelerating the development of practical quantum computers with near-
term, useful applications; (2) supporting the development of an accessible, sustainable, and secure supply chain and domestic
manufacturing capabilities; and (3) facilitating the development of a quantum-literate workforce. Congress may also consider
whether to set policy priorities to protect national security interests in quantum computing by addressing risks; in particular,
the anticipated compromise of current cryptographic systems that protect sensitive data and communications among
government agencies, financial institutions, health service providers, and others.
Congressional Research Service

link to page 4 link to page 6 link to page 6 link to page 6 link to page 8 link to page 9 link to page 11 link to page 12 link to page 13 link to page 14 link to page 14 link to page 14 link to page 15 link to page 16 link to page 17 link to page 12 link to page 24 link to page 25 link to page 20 link to page 23 link to page 25

Quantum Computing: Concepts, Current State, and Considerations for Congress

Contents
Concepts of Quantum Computing ................................................................................................... 1
The Current State of Quantum Computing ..................................................................................... 3
Demonstrating Quantum Advantage ......................................................................................... 3
Increasing Quantum Computing Reliability ............................................................................. 3
Achieving Quantum Advantage for Practical Problems ............................................................ 5
Federal Law Concerning Quantum Computing ............................................................................... 6
Federal R&D Investments in Quantum Information Science and Technology ......................... 8
Policy Considerations for Congress ................................................................................................ 9
Reauthorizing Federal R&D Activities Under the NQI Act .................................................... 10
Ensuring Continued U.S. Leadership in Quantum Computing ................................................ 11
Accelerating the Development of Practical Quantum Computers with Near-Term
Applications .................................................................................................................... 11
Supporting the Development of a Quantum Supply Chain ............................................... 12
Facilitating Workforce Development for Quantum Computing ....................................... 13
Protecting National Security Interests in Quantum Computing .............................................. 14

Tables
Table 1. R&D Activities Authorized in the NQI Act, as Amended ................................................. 9

Table B-1. NSF Quantum Leap Challenge Institutes (QLCI) ....................................................... 21
Table B-2. DOE National Quantum Information Science Research Centers ................................ 22

Appendixes
Key Terms of Quantum Computing Explained ........................................................ 17
NQI Act-Funded R&D Centers ................................................................................ 20

Contacts
Author Information ........................................................................................................................ 22

Congressional Research Service

link to page 20 Quantum Computing: Concepts, Current State, and Considerations for Congress

ongress passed and the President signed into law the National Quantum Initiative Act (NQI
Act; P.L. 115-368; codified at 15 U.S.C. §§8801 et seq.) in December 2018 to accelerate
C quantum research and development (R&D) for the economic and national security of the
United States and ensure the continued U.S. leadership in quantum information science and its
technology applications. Since the enactment of the NQI Act, researchers have made progress in
quantum R&D, while the authorization of funding for several federal R&D activities under the
NQI Act is set to expire at the end of FY2023. As Congress contemplates whether to reauthorize
the NQI Act and continue appropriations, there are a number of questions it may consider: What
is the current state of quantum technologies? How far are current R&D activities from delivering
useful quantum systems and applications? What resources are needed to accelerate R&D in the
field and how should those resources be prioritized? How can federal agencies further coordinate
and facilitate authorized R&D efforts in collaboration with industry, academia, and global
partners?
This report uses one particular quantum information technology—quantum computing—to
explain concepts such as quantum superposition, entanglement, and qubit, and the current state of
the field, including recent technical milestones. The report also provides an overview of relevant
federal laws—the NQI Act as well as quantum provisions in annual National Defense
Authorization Acts (NDAAs) and the CHIPS and Science Act. Finally, the report discusses
current policy issues that Congress may opt to consider: (1) reauthorizing federal R&D activities
under the NQI Act; (2) ensuring continued U.S. leadership in quantum computing through
accelerating near-term applications, developing a robust supply chain, and facilitating workforce
development; and (3) assessing and protecting national security interests with advances in
quantum computing.
Concepts of Quantum Computing
Congress has defined some key terms related to quantum computing in federal law. In the NQI
Act, the term quantum information science means “the use of the laws of quantum physics for the
storage, transmission, manipulation, computing, or measurement of information.”1 In the
Quantum Computing Cybersecurity Preparedness Act (P.L. 117-260), the term quantum computer
means a computer that “uses the collective properties of quantum states, such as superposition,
interference, and entanglement, to perform calculations.”2 In addition to these statutory
definitions, reports issued under the National Quantum Initiative Program established in the NQI
Act use the term quantum information science and technology (QIST) to refer to the
understanding and applications of quantum information science to design new types of
computers, networks, and sensors that “enable new speed, precision, or functionality.”3
Specifically, quantum computing—part of the umbrella concept of QIST—is an emerging
computing paradigm that harnesses the principles of quantum mechanics to represent, store,
process, and transmit data.4 In quantum computing the basic data unit is a quantum bit, or qubit,

1 15 U.S.C. §8801(6).
2 Section 3(9) of P.L. 117-260.
3 National Quantum Initiative, About the National Quantum Initiative: QIS—Quantum Information Science, at
https://www.quantum.gov/about/#QIS. See also National Quantum Initiative Advisory Committee, Renewing the
National Quantum Initiative: Recommendations for Sustaining American Leadership in Quantum Information Science,
June 2023, p. 3, at https://www.quantum.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/NQIAC-Report-Renewing-the-National-
Quantum-Initiative.pdf.
4 See Appendix A for the explanation for the terms of quantum networking and quantum sensing.
Congressional Research Service

1

link to page 20 Quantum Computing: Concepts, Current State, and Considerations for Congress

the equivalent of a bit in conventional, non-quantum computers (also called classical computers).5
A quantum computer’s data processing power is largely contingent upon the effective and
efficient generation and manipulation of qubits.6 Scientists have physically created and controlled
qubits using superconducting materials and devices,7 or tiny objects such as atoms, electrons,
trapped ions, or photons.8
Unlike a classical bit that can represent only one piece of information, either 0 or 1, a qubit can
represent more mathematically-rich information by being in a superposition, which can be
expressed as a combination of a certain probability of being in 0 and a certain probability of being
in 1.9 Qubits can be entangled with one another, so that a quantum computer can manipulate a
group of qubits in a single operation, unlike in classical computing where the same operation
needs to be performed on each bit individually.10 Computer algorithms specially designed to take
advantage of these unique qubit properties of superposition and entanglement will allow quantum
computers to perform multiple tasks simultaneously and certain calculations significantly faster
than classical computers, leading to new ways to solve some complex problems that are
intractable for classical computers at any scale (even high-performance supercomputers).11
In short, as the number of qubits increases linearly, the information that the qubits are capable of
carrying grows exponentially. In classical computing, doubling the number of bits only doubles
its computational power to handle data. See Appendix A for the explanation for the terms of
quantum, quantum mechanics, quantum superposition, and quantum entanglement.
Resolving computationally complex problems typically requires dealing with a large number of
variables that interact in complicated ways, with multiple possible and uncertain outcomes.12
Solving these problems requires a vast amount of computing resources and is time-consuming.
Examples include modeling the behavior of individual atoms in a molecule; simulating all
possible interactions when two objects collide with each other; optimizing a set of routes for a
fleet of vehicles to deliver packages to customers in different locations; factoring a large
composite integer into a product of prime numbers in cryptographic algorithms; and identifying
fraud patterns in financial transactions. Researchers have demonstrated the potential for quantum
computing to solve complex problems in areas such as cryptography, machine learning, and
scientific and engineering research, particularly using modeling, optimization, and simulation
(e.g., for the study of quantum physics, chemistry, and material science, and for new drug

5 A bit, short for “binary digit,” represents a binary code of either 0 or 1. Letters, numbers, symbols, images, and audio
signals are encoded in combinations of bits to represent and store information in classical computers. See Injosoft AB,
ASCII Characters, at https://www.ascii-code.com/characters.
6 Amazon AWS, What Is Quantum Computing, Quantum Technologies, 2023, at https://aws.amazon.com/what-is/
quantum-computing/. See also Martin Giles, “Explainer: What Is a Quantum Computer?,” MIT Technology Review,
January 29, 2019, at https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/01/29/66141/what-is-quantum-computing.
7 Olivier Ezratty, “Perspective on Superconducting Qubit Quantum Computing,” The European Physical Journal A,
vol. 59, no. 94 (May 2023), p. 1, at https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01006-7.
8 Microsoft, Explore Quantum: Types of Qubits, Azure Quantum, at https://quantum.microsoft.com/en-us/explore/
concepts/types-of-qubits.
9 See Microsoft, Explore Quantum: Superposition, Azure Quantum, at https://quantum.microsoft.com/en-us/explore/
concepts/superposition.
10 Microsoft, Explore Quantum: Entanglement, Azure Quantum, at https://quantum.microsoft.com/en-us/explore/
concepts/entanglement.
11 Microsoft, Explore Quantum: The Qubit, Azure Quantum, at https://quantum.microsoft.com/en-us/explore/concepts/
what-is-a-qubit. See also California Institute of Technology (Caltech), What Is Quantum Computing?, Caltech Science
Exchange Series: Quantum Science and Technology, at https://scienceexchange.caltech.edu/topics/quantum-science-
explained/quantum-computing-computers.
12 IBM, What Is Quantum Computing?, at https://www.ibm.com/topics/quantum-computing.
Congressional Research Service

2

link to page 6 Quantum Computing: Concepts, Current State, and Considerations for Congress

development).13 However, there are practical implementation challenges such as maintaining a
qubit’s superposition and correcting calculation errors (discussed in the following sub-section,
“Increasing Quantum Computing Reliability”), leading to uncertainty about whether and when
quantum computing could be broadly deployed and applied.
The Current State of Quantum Computing
Since the enactment of the NQI Act in 2018, researchers have made notable advances in quantum
computing in three specific areas.
Demonstrating Quantum Advantage
In October 2019, a research team led by scientists from Google’s quantum group reported that a
quantum processor with 54 qubits took about 200 seconds to complete a specially designed
computation; an equivalent computation would take a state-of-the-art classical supercomputer
approximately 10,000 years. The researchers claimed that their experiment demonstrated a
milestone for quantum computing—the first computational task executed much faster on a
quantum processor than on a classical processor. This achievement also demonstrated so-called
“quantum advantage” or “quantum speedup” over classical computing.
In April 2023, another research team led by the same Google group reported that a second
generation of its quantum processor, with 70 qubits, performed a more complex task than the one
reported in 2019. According to the researchers’ estimate, the same task would take about 47 years
for the Frontier supercomputer at Oak Ridge National Laboratory—the fastest classical
computing system in the world at the time.14 The researchers claimed that such a computational
task was beyond the capabilities of many existing classical supercomputers.15
Despite these successes, some experts argue that researchers have thus far only demonstrated
quantum advantage over classical computers in solving mathematical proofs and that quantum
advantage may not have practical value beyond academic research.16
Increasing Quantum Computing Reliability
To make quantum computing broadly applicable in solving practical problems, researchers have
recognized the need for technical advances to increase the reliability of quantum computers.17
Many researchers agree that a major outstanding challenge to quantum computing is “noise,”

13 Michael Brooks, “Quantum Computers: What Are They Good For?,” Nature, vol. 617 (May 2023), pp. S1-S3, at
https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-01692-9.
14 Alexis Morvan et al., “Phase Transition in Random Circuit Sampling,” arXiv, 2304.11119 (April 2023), p. 5, at
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.11119. Frontier remained the fastest classical computing system in the world as of
June 2023. See Top500, “TOP500,” 61st edition, June 2023, at https://www.top500.org/lists/top500/2023/06/.
15 Alexis Morvan et al., “Phase Transition in Random Circuit Sampling,” arXiv, 2304.11119 (April 2023), p. 1, at
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.11119.
16 Michael Brooks, “Quantum Computers: What Are They Good For?,” Nature, vol. 617 (May 2023), pp. S1-S3, at
https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-01692-9. See also Matt Swayne, “Google Claims Latest Quantum Experiment
Would Take Decades on Classical Computer,” The Quantum Insider, July 4, 2023, at https://thequantuminsider.com/
2023/07/04/google-claims-latest-quantum-experiment-would-take-decades-on-classical-computer/.
17 Frank Arute et al., “Quantum Supremacy Using a Programmable Superconducting Processor,” Nature, vol. 574
(October 2019), pp. 505–510, at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5.
Congressional Research Service

3

Quantum Computing: Concepts, Current State, and Considerations for Congress

which can affect the accuracy of calculations made by a quantum computer.18 Noise refers to any
disturbance to a qubit’s environment, such as heat, light, thermal vibrations, electromagnetic
radiation, Earth’s magnetic field, cosmic rays, or neighboring qubits, among others.19 Qubits are
highly susceptible to noise, which can cause the loss of information it holds.20 Error rates are
generally higher in quantum computers than in classical computers.21
Noise introduces errors in quantum calculations that are difficult to correct22 and limits the
number of qubits a quantum computer can have.23 Solutions to this challenge include developing
fault-tolerant quantum processors or running fully error-corrected quantum algorithms. Both
approaches require at least tens of thousands of qubits,24 well beyond the capacity of current
quantum processors.25
Some promising recent research results point to the possible development of techniques that may
help reduce error and increase reliability. In June 2023, a team led by IBM quantum researchers
presented the results of an experiment to “controllably manipulate” quantum noise, demonstrating
success in an experimental setting.26 Google’s quantum research group reported in February 2023
that its researchers were able to demonstrate that increasing the number of qubits can lower the
error rate of calculations in a quantum computer.27 The researchers admitted that the improvement
on the error rate in their experiment was still small, and error rates needs to drop much more to
realize the potential of solving problems beyond the reach of classical computers.28 Some experts
argue that progress so far has mitigated, but not fully corrected, calculation errors, and only full
quantum error correction can truly enable reliable quantum computing.29

18 Youngseok Kim et al., “Evidence for the Utility of Quantum Computing Before Fault Tolerance,” Nature, vol. 618
(June 2023), pp. 500–505, at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06096-3.
19 Juan Moreno, Grant Salton, and Tim Chen, Noise in Quantum Computing, AWS Quantum Technologies Blog,
September 8, 2022, at https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/quantum-computing/noise-in-quantum-computing/. See also
Adam Zewe, A Technique for Making Quantum Computing More Resilient to Noise, Which Boosts Performance,
Science X, March 22, 2022, at https://phys.org/news/2022-03-technique-quantum-resilient-noise-boosts.html.
20 Adrian Cho, “No Room for Error,” Science, July 9, 2020, at https://www.science.org/content/article/biggest-flipping-
challenge-quantum-computing.
21 Adam Zewe, A Technique for Making Quantum Computing More Resilient to Noise, Which Boosts Performance,
Science X, March 22, 2022, at https://phys.org/news/2022-03-technique-quantum-resilient-noise-boosts.html.
22 David Castelvecchi, “IBM Quantum Computer Passes Calculation Milestone,” Nature, vol. 618 (June 2023), pp.
656-657, at https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-01965-3.
23 Michael Brooks, “Beyond Quantum Supremacy: The Hunt for Useful Quantum Computers,” Nature, vol. 574
(October 2019), pp. 19-21, at https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02936-3.
24 David Castelvecchi, “IBM Quantum Computer Passes Calculation Milestone,” Nature, vol. 618 (June 2023), pp.
656-657, at https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-01965-3.
25 Youngseok Kim et al., “Evidence for the Utility of Quantum Computing Before Fault Tolerance,” Nature, vol. 618
(June 2023), pp. 500–505, at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06096-3.
26 Ibid.
27 Google Quantum AI, “Suppressing Quantum Errors by Scaling a Surface Code Logical Qubit,” Nature, vol. 614
(February 2023), pp. 676-681, at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05434-1.
28 Davide Castelvecchi, “Google’s Quantum Computer Hits Key Milestone by Reducing Errors,” Nature, February 22,
2023, at https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00536-w.
29 David Castelvecchi, “IBM Quantum Computer Passes Calculation Milestone,” Nature, vol. 618 (June 2023), pp.
656-657, at https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-01965-3.
Congressional Research Service

4

Quantum Computing: Concepts, Current State, and Considerations for Congress

Achieving Quantum Advantage for Practical Problems
Some experts have suggested focusing on the development of quantum computers that provide
practical quantum advantage, beyond simulating and testing quantum hardware.30 Practical
quantum advantage means using quantum computers to reliably tackle useful, real-world
problems that leading classical supercomputers cannot address. It will require a large-scale
quantum computer with thousands, hundreds of thousands, or even millions of qubits, depending
on factors such as the type of problem, the algorithm, and the architecture of the quantum
hardware.31 Quantum processors at this scale do not yet exist.
To achieve practical quantum advantage, leading industry players have set their R&D roadmaps
to scale up quantum processors with qubits. In November 2022, IBM announced a 433-qubit
processor based on superconducting technology.32 The company claimed that it was on track to
deliver a 1,000-qubit processor by the end of 2023.33 In May 2023, IBM launched a $100 million
partnership with the University of Tokyo and the University of Chicago, aiming to develop a
quantum supercomputer by 2033 powered by 100,000 qubits,34 which it predicts will allow the
supercomputer to perform some useful tasks with practical quantum advantage.35
Researchers at Google believe that scaling up qubits also helps to improve quantum error
correction—the required feature of general-purpose quantum computers.36 Google is reportedly
working toward a 1,000-qubit processor and expects to achieve this milestone as early as 2025.37
It hopes to demonstrate a useful, error-corrected quantum computer with one million qubits
within a decade.38

30 Andrew J. Daley et al., “Practical Quantum Advantage in Quantum Simulation,” Nature, vol. 607 (July 2022), pp.
667-676, at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04940-6. See also John Preskill, “Quantum Computing in the NISQ
Era and Beyond,” Quantum, vol. 2 (July 2018), pp. 79-99, at https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79.
31 John Preskill, “Quantum Computing in the NISQ Era and Beyond,” Quantum, vol. 2 (July 2018), pp. 79-99, at
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79; Michael E. Beverland et al., “Assessing Requirements to Scale to Practical
Quantum Advantage,” arXiv, 2211.07629 (November 2022), at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.07629; Craig
Gidney and Martin Ekerå, “How to Factor 2048 Bit RSA Integers in 8 Hours Using 20 Million Noisy Qubits,”
Quantum, vol. 5 (April 2021), pp. 433-464, at https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2021-04-15-433; and Google, “Our Focused
and Responsible Approach to Quantum Computing,” at https://ai.google/static/documents/approach-quantum-
computing.pdf.
32 IBM, “IBM Unveils 400 Qubit-Plus Quantum Processor and Next-Generation IBM Quantum System Two,”
November 9, 2022, at https://newsroom.ibm.com/2022-11-09-IBM-Unveils-400-Qubit-Plus-Quantum-Processor-and-
Next-Generation-IBM-Quantum-System-Two.
33 IBM, “The IBM Quantum Development Roadmap,” 2022, at https://www.ibm.com/quantum/roadmap.
34 IBM, “IBM Launches $100 Million Partnership with Global Universities to Develop Novel Technologies Towards a
100,000-Qubit Quantum-Centric Supercomputer,” May 21, 2023, at https://newsroom.ibm.com/2023-05-21-IBM-
Launches-100-Million-Partnership-with-Global-Universities-to-Develop-Novel-Technologies-Towards-a-100,000-
Qubit-Quantum-Centric-Supercomputer.
35 Jay Gambetta and Matthias Steffen, “Charting the Course to 100,000 Qubits,” IBM Research Blog, May 21, 2023, at
https://research.ibm.com/blog/100k-qubit-supercomputer.
36 Google Quantum AI, “Suppressing Quantum Errors by Scaling a Surface Code Logical Qubit,” Nature, vol. 614
(February 2023), pp. 676-681, at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05434-1. See also Sankar Das Sarma, “Quantum
Computing Has a Hype Problem,” MIT Technology Review, March 28, 2022, at https://www.technologyreview.com/
2022/03/28/1048355/quantum-computing-has-a-hype-problem/.
37 Google, “Our Focused and Responsible Approach to Quantum Computing,” at https://ai.google/static/documents/
approach-quantum-computing.pdf.
38 Google Quantum AI, “Our Quantum Computing Journey,” at https://quantumai.google/learn/map.
Congressional Research Service

5

Quantum Computing: Concepts, Current State, and Considerations for Congress

Federal Law Concerning Quantum Computing
Since the NQI Act was enacted in December 2018,39 it has been amended by the National
Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for FY2022 (P.L. 117-81) and the CHIPS and Science Act
(Division B of P.L. 117-167).40 In addition to these amendments, the CHIPS and Science Act, the
American COMPETES Act (Title XV of P.L. 116-260), and the NDAAs for FY2019 (P.L. 115-
232), FY2020 (P.L. 116-92), FY2021 (P.L. 116-283), FY2022 (P.L. 117-81), and FY2023 (P.L.
117-263) contain other provisions pertinent to R&D activities in quantum computing. This
section summarizes highlights of those provisions.
Highlights of Federal Laws Concerning Quantum Computing
NQI Act, as amended
The act contains four titles, directing
•
the President to implement an NQI Program to develop a 10-year plan to accelerate development of
quantum information science and technology applications, invest in fundamental federal R&D activities and
quantum workforce, coordinate federal R&D activities, partner with industry and universities, and leverage
existing federal investments to advance goals and priorities set in the NQI Program;41
•
the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to carry out specified R&D activities and convene
a consortium of stakeholders to identify the future measurement, standards, cybersecurity, and needs for a
robust quantum information science and technology industry;42
•
the National Science Foundation (NSF) to carry out a basic research and education program on quantum
information science and engineering and award grants to establish Multidisciplinary Centers for Quantum
Research and Education;43 and
•
the Department of Energy (DOE) to administer a number of programs, including a basic research program on
quantum information science, National Quantum Information Science Research Centers, an R&D program to
accelerate innovation in quantum network infrastructure, and the Quantum User Expansion for Science and
Technology (QUEST) program.44
CHIPS and Science Act
In addition to amendments to the NQI Act, the act contains the fol owing provisions:
•
DOE shall establish an Advanced Computing Program, in which DOE shall maintain foundational research
programs, including on quantum computing.45 In addition, DOE shall support the Computational Science
Graduate Fellowship program to facilitate col aboration between graduate students and researchers at the
National Laboratories and the development of a diverse and inclusive computational research workforce in a
range of relevant areas, including quantum computing.46
•
NSF shall continue the Federal Cyber Scholarship-for-Service Program that provides scholarships to students
who pursue degrees or certifications in relevant fields, including quantum computing.47 In addition, NSF shall
annually update a list of key technology focus areas to guide activities conducted by the newly established

39 For more background information of the NQI Act, see CRS Report R45409, Quantum Information Science:
Applications, Global Research and Development, and Policy Considerations, by Patricia Moloney Figliola.
40 Division B of P.L. 117-167 has been commonly referred to as the CHIPS and Science Act, while it may also be cited
as the “Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act” (Section 10001 of P.L. 117-167).
41 15 U.S.C. §8811.
42 15 U.S.C. §8831.
43 15 U.S.C. §§8841, 8842.
44 15 U.S.C. §§8851-8854.
45 42 U.S.C. §18642(e)(1)(A).
46 42 U.S.C. §18642(j)(1).
47 15 U.S.C. §7442(b)(1).
Congressional Research Service

6

Quantum Computing: Concepts, Current State, and Considerations for Congress

NSF Directorate for Technology, Innovation, and Partnerships (TIP); the initial list identified by Congress
included “quantum information science and technology.”48
American COMPETES Act
The Department of Commerce and Federal Trade Commission shall (1) complete a study on the state of the
quantum computing industry and its impact on the U.S. economy; (2) conduct a survey of the marketplace and
supply chain of quantum computing; and (3) submit to Congress a report that contains results of the study and
survey and policy recommendations regarding quantum computing.49
Title XLI “Federal Permitting Improvement” of the FAST Act, as amended
Federal agencies shall improve the federal permitting process for a covered project that requires federal
authorization or environmental review involving construction of infrastructure for relevant activities, including
R&D in quantum information science and technology.50
Section 2 of the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945, as amended
The Export-Import Bank of the United States shall establish a Program on China and Transformational Exports to
support the extension of loans, guarantees, and insurance with competitive rates, terms, and other conditions
compared with those established by China or a covered country to advance U.S. leadership or support U.S.
innovation, employment, and technological standards through direct exports in transformational areas, including
quantum computing.51
James M. Inhofe NDAA for FY2023
•
The Department of Defense (DOD) shall submit to Congress a plan for investments to support the
development of novel processing approaches for defense applications; the term novel processing approaches
means emerging computational techniques, including “utility scale quantum computing,” and associated
algorithm and hardware development needed to implement such techniques.52
•
NSF shall made awards to support research, including “the implications of quantum computing on applications
of distributed ledger technologies, including long-term protection of sensitive information (such as medical or
digital property).”53
•
The Director of National Intelligence shall develop a plan, including an assessment to support engineering,
research, and development at covered higher education institutions in computer science, including quantum
computing.54
•
Congress authorized an appropriation of $20 mil ion for the DOD Applied Research program on the
“trapped ion quantum computer.”55
NDAA for FY2022
In addition to amendments to the NQI Act, the act contains the fol owing provisions:
•
DOD shall establish a set of activities and an assistance program to accelerate the development and
deployment of dual-use quantum technologies.56
•
Congress authorized an appropriation of $100 mil ion for the DOD Research, Development, Test, and
Evaluation program for “quantum computing acceleration.”57
William M. (Mac) Thornberry NDAA for FY2021

48 47 U.S.C. §19107(a), (c)(3).
49 Section 1501(d) of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (P.L. 116-260).
50 42 U.S.C. §4370m(6)(A), as amended by P.L. 117-173.
51 12 U.S.C. §635(l)(1)(B)(v), as amended by Section 402(a) of the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020
(P.L. 116-94).
52 Section 233(a) and (d) of the James M. Inhofe NDAA for FY2023 (P.L. 117-263).
53 Section 5913(c)(1)(D) of the James M. Inhofe NDAA for FY2023 (P.L. 117-263).
54 Section 6812(a)(1), (2)(A) of the James M. Inhofe NDAA for FY2023 (P.L. 117-263).
55 Line 014 in Section 4201 of the James M. Inhofe NDAA for FY2023 (P.L. 117-263).
56 Section 229 of the NDAA for FY2022 (P.L. 117-81). The term dual-use means products, services, standards,
processes, or acquisition practices, respectively, that are capable of meeting requirements for military and nonmilitary
applications (10 U.S.C. §4801(2)).
57 Line 015 in Section 4201 of the NDAA for FY2022 (P.L. 117-81).
Congressional Research Service

7

link to page 12 Quantum Computing: Concepts, Current State, and Considerations for Congress

•
Each military department shall annually identify a list of technical problems and research challenges that are
likely to be addressable by quantum computers available for use within the next one to three years; and
establish programs and enter contracts to provide functional quantum computing capabilities available in
private sectors to government, industry, and academic researchers.58
•
DOD shall assess threats and risks posed by quantum computing technologies to critical national security
systems and develop recommendations for securing these systems against quantum computing code-breaking
capabilities.59
•
The National Nuclear Security Administration shal commission the National Academy of Sciences to review
the future of computing to meet national security needs; the review shall include quantum computing
architectures and hybrid combinations of classical and quantum computing architectures.60
NDAA for FY2020
•
Each military department shall establish or designate a defense laboratory to engage with public and private
sector organizations to enhance and accelerate the R&D and deployment of quantum information sciences,
technologies, and systems.61
•
DOD shall establish a process to ensure that DOD policies relating to emerging technology, including
quantum computing, are formulated and updated as such technology is developed by DOD.62
John S. McCain NDAA for FY2019
DOD shall establish the Defense Quantum Information Science and Technology Research and Development
Program.63
Federal R&D Investments in Quantum Information Science and
Technology
Actual budget expenditures for federal QIST R&D activities at federal agencies totaled nearly $2
billion between FY2019-FY2021, or an average of $667 million per fiscal year.64 These
expenditures supported R&D activities conducted by NIST, NSF, DOE, DOD, the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS), and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).65
These agencies reported an enacted budget authority of $918 million for FY2022 for QIST R&D
activities, and a requested budget authority of $844 million for FY2023.66 A large portion of the
budget expenditures and budget authorities are for activities authorized in the NQI Act, as shown
in Table 1.

58 Section 214 of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry NDAA for FY2021 (P.L. 116-283).
59 Section 1722(a) of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry NDAA for FY2021 (P.L. 116-283).
60 Section 3172(a), (b)(2)(B) and (C) of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry NDAA for FY2021 (P.L. 116-283).
61 Section 220(4) of the NDAA for FY2020 (P.L. 116-92).
62 Section 232(a), (d)(2) of the NDAA for FY2020 (P.L. 116-92).
63 Section 234 of the John S. McCain NDAA for FY2019 (P.L. 115-232).
64 National Science and Technology Council, Committee on Science, Subcommittee on Quantum Information Science,
National Quantum Initiative Supplement to the President’s FY2023 Budget, January 2023, p. 3, at
https://www.quantum.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/NQI-Annual-Report-FY2023.pdf.
65 Ibid., p. 6.
66 Ibid., p. 3. The National Quantum Initiative Supplement to the President’s FY2023 Budget also listed quantum
activities at the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity and National Security Agency, but did not appear to
include them in the budget authority figures presented above.
Congressional Research Service

8

link to page 12 link to page 12 link to page 12 link to page 24 link to page 23 link to page 25 link to page 23 Quantum Computing: Concepts, Current State, and Considerations for Congress

Table 1. R&D Activities Authorized in the NQI Act, as Amended
Total Authorized
Statutory
Agency
Funded Activities
Amount
Reference
For FY2019-FY2023
NIST
(1) To conduct authorized R&D activities under the NQI
Up to $400 mil ion
15 U.S.C.
Program, including to support and expand basic and applied
from appropriations §8831
R&D; train scientists; carry out research for the development
for NIST
and standardization of quantum cryptography, networking,
communications, and sensing and their applications; provide
technical assistance to other agencies for the development of
quantum networking standards; and establish col aborations
with public and private sector entities.
(2) To convene a stakeholder consortium to identify needs for
a robust QIST industry.a
NSF
To award grants to establish up to five Multidisciplinary
Up to $250 mil ion
15 U.S.C.
Centers for Quantum Research and Education to conduct
from appropriations §8842
basic research and education activities, including advancing
for NSF
quantum information science and engineering, supporting
curriculum and workforce development, and fostering
innovation by bringing industry perspectives.b
DOE
To establish and operate up to five National Quantum
Up to $625 mil ion
15 U.S.C.
Information Science Research Centers to conduct basic
from appropriations §8852
research to accelerate scientific breakthroughs in QIST and
for DOE
support DOE’s quantum information science basic research
program.c
For FY2023-FY2027
DOE
To carry out an R&D program to accelerate innovation in
$500 mil ion from
15 U.S.C.
quantum network infrastructure—any facility, expertise, or
authorized
§8853
capability that enables the development and deployment of
appropriations for
scalable and diverse quantum network technologies.
DOE’s Office of
Science
DOE
To establish and carry out the Quantum User Expansion for
$165.8 mil ion from
15 U.S.C.
Science and Technology Program (QUEST program) to
authorized
§8854
facilitate access to quantum computing hardware and clouds in
appropriations for
the United States for research purposes.
DOE’s Office of
Science
Source: The NQI Act, as amended (P.L. 115-368; codified at 15 U.S.C. §§8801 et seq.).
Notes:
a. In September 2018, NIST signed a cooperative R&D agreement with SRI International to lead the “Quantum
Economic Development Consortium” (QED-C), with a goal of expanding U.S. leadership in global quantum
R&D and the emerging industry in quantum computing, networking, and sensing. For the list of QED-C
members, see https://quantumconsortium.org/members/.
b. See Table B-1 in Appendix B for the list of five NQI Act-funded NSF quantum research and education
centers, called Quantum Leap Challenge Institutes (QLCI).
c. See Table B-2 in Appendix B for the list of five NQI Act-funded DOE national quantum information
science research centers.
Policy Considerations for Congress
Congress may be interested in considering policy issues surrounding the reauthorization of
funding for several R&D activities under the NQI Act, which is set to expire at the end of
Congressional Research Service

9

link to page 12 link to page 24 link to page 25 Quantum Computing: Concepts, Current State, and Considerations for Congress

FY2023. The funded programs and activities include NSF’s five university-based Quantum Leap
Challenge Institutes, DOE’s five national lab-led research centers, and NIST’s R&D activities
such as the industry-led Quantum Economic Development Consortium (QED-C) (see Table 1,
Table B-1, and Table B-2).
Many experts contend that sustained federal investment in QIST R&D generally is necessary to
accelerate progress toward practical quantum computing and to maintain a leading role of U.S.
researchers in quantum computing R&D globally.67 There is less consensus, however, on the
specific role the federal government should play, if any, in QIST R&D and how resources and
support should be specifically targeted and prioritized to accelerate R&D in the field. Areas for
possible congressional action include the following:
Reauthorizing Federal R&D Activities Under the NQI Act
When contemplating reauthorization, Congress may wish to consider the following options:
1. Whether to reauthorize and continue funding the existing NSF and DOE research
and education centers and NIST activities, perhaps for a duration aligned with the
sunset date of December 21, 2029, when the authority to carry out the National
Quantum Initiative in the NQI Act expires.68
2. Whether to increase the number of centers that NSF and DOE are authorized to
support. The current maximum number is five for each agency.69
3. Whether the current model of supporting national-level, large-scale centers is
sustainable and effective to deliver practical quantum computers; whether to
broaden federal support to include other research and education institutions,
startups, small and medium-sized R&D enterprises, and individual principal
investigators; and whether to widen the focus of support from basic to applied
science and engineering research focused on making and testing scalable
quantum systems and developing quantum software.70
4. Whether to expand the NQI Act-authorized activities conducted by NIST, NSF,
and DOE to include other agencies, such as NASA, DHS, the National Institutes
of Health (NIH), and the National Telecommunications and Information
Administration (NTIA).
5. Whether to prioritize particular aspects of quantum computing, networking,
sensing, and their applications. While quantum computing is the most anticipated
and most challenging quantum technology, quantum networking—which may be
implementable for some near-term applications—has important implications for
the development of advanced information infrastructure, where the United States
faces substantial competition from other countries such as China.71

67 See Testimony of Charles Tahan, Assistant Director of Quantum Information Science and Director of the National
Quantum Coordination Office, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, in U.S. Congress, House
Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, Advancing American Leadership in Quantum Technology, hearings,
118th Cong., 1st sess., June 7, 2023.
68 See 15 U.S.C. §8815(a).
69 See 15 U.S.C. §§8842(a), 8852(a)(1).
70 See National Quantum Initiative Advisory Committee, Renewing the National Quantum Initiative: Recommendations
for Sustaining American Leadership in Quantum Information Science, June 2023, p. 10, at https://www.quantum.gov/
wp-content/uploads/2023/06/NQIAC-Report-Renewing-the-National-Quantum-Initiative.pdf.
71 See Testimony of Celia Merzbacher, Executive Director of QED-C, SRI International, in U.S. Congress, House
(continued...)
Congressional Research Service

10

link to page 6 Quantum Computing: Concepts, Current State, and Considerations for Congress

6. Whether to encourage and provide oversight of quantum R&D collaboration and
coordination among federal agencies, national laboratories, academia, industry,
and entities in allied countries. For example, a bipartisan bill introduced in the
118th Congress, S. 2450, would amend the NQI Act to “ensure the coordination,
and avoid unnecessary duplication,” of DOE and NSF activities authorized under
the NQI Act. It would also direct QED-C to conduct a study of the impediments
to collaboration between NSF research and education centers, DOE research
centers, industry, and academia.72
7. Whether to direct any agency that conducts authorized and funded R&D
activities to report its progress to Congress at some regular interval.73 Among the
current authorized activities established in the NQI Act, there is one statutory
reporting requirement: NIST shall submit a report to congressional oversight
committees summarizing QED-C findings.74
Ensuring Continued U.S. Leadership in Quantum Computing
As discussed in the section “The Current State of Quantum Computing,” researchers in the
United States, many supported by federal programs, have made substantial progress in quantum
computing R&D since the enactment of the NQI Act. This has helped establish U.S. leadership in
this still nascent but promising field. To ensure and strengthen U.S. leadership, Congress may
wish to consider three policy priorities when addressing quantum computing.
Accelerating the Development of Practical Quantum Computers with Near-
Term Applications
The current global competition in quantum computing is essentially a race to achieve practical
quantum advantage and solve practical problems. This requires breakthroughs in quantum error
correction and scaled-up quantum processors with a larger number of qubits.
A bipartisan bill in the 118th Congress, the Quantum Sandbox for Near-Term Applications Act of
2023 (S. 1439/H.R. 2739), would amend the NQI Act by directing the Department of Commerce
(DOC), in coordination with NIST, to establish a public-private partnership “focused on quantum
computing application development acceleration for quantum, quantum communication, quantum
sensing, and quantum-hybrid computing near-term use cases.”75 To carry out this mandate, the
bill says DOC should, acting through NIST, engage with QED-C, national laboratories, federally
funded R&D centers, and other members of the U.S. quantum computing ecosystem.76
Another bill, the Leveraging Quantum Computing Act (H.R. 3987), would engage federal
agencies “to identify potential use cases with respect to which quantum computing could advance

Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, Advancing American Leadership in Quantum Technology, hearings,
118th Cong., 1st sess., June 7, 2023.
72 Sections 1(a) and 3(b) of S. 2450, 118th Congress. Other bills that would provide for interagency R&D coordination
in quantum computing include H.R. 2980 and H.R. 2988 in the 118th Congress.
73 Some Members of Congress have also called for an independent study to assess the progress made by the NQI
Program, “with respect to quantum sensing, communications, computing, and workforce development for near-term
development and quantum applications.” See Section 3(a)(2) of S. 2450, 118th Congress.
74 15 U.S.C. §8831(b)(3).
75 The term near-term use case means an application that can be developed and deployed in less than 24 months.
Section 405 of S. 1439/H.R. 2739, 118th Congress.
76 Section 405 of S. 1439/H.R. 2739, 118th Congress.
Congressional Research Service

11

Quantum Computing: Concepts, Current State, and Considerations for Congress

the missions of such agencies, including through on-premises, cloud-based, hybrid, or networked
approaches.”77
Additionally, Congress may wish to consider targeting federal support toward specific priorities.
To accelerate near-term applications of quantum computing, an option could be to direct federal
agencies to support the development and testing of quantum algorithms and fault-tolerant
quantum processors, and the development of computer networks to allow researchers and
developers to access quantum computing resources through cloud computing services.
Supporting the Development of a Quantum Supply Chain
To build quantum computers at scale, industry has identified the strategic priority of developing
an accessible, sustainable, and secure supply chain and independent manufacturing capabilities
that can foster a healthy and stable quantum computing ecosystem. According to an industry
survey commissioned by QED-C in June 2022, “key raw materials” and “key
manufacturing/assembly equipment” were thought to be the top two “most likely causes of a
[quantum computing] supply chain interruption in the next three years.”78
Quantum computing technologies are not mature enough to provide certain and sufficient market
demand to have an established and extant supply chain.79 Different approaches to the physical
implementation of quantum computing may lead to a variety of, as yet unknown, mineral,
material, and equipment requirements,80 some of which may be under the control of non-allied
countries.81
To address these issues, S. 2450 would direct DOC, through NIST and in consultation with DOE,
to (1) determine the manufacturing capabilities to produce reliable quantum components and
systems at scale and the gaps in access to such capabilities; and (2) establish a Manufacturing
USA institute that provides an end-to-end manufacturing ecosystem addressing quantum
computing, sensing, and networking and supports the development of a resilient quantum supply
chain.82
Other options for Congress could include the following:
• Directing a federal agency or body, such as the National Quantum Coordination
Office, to study and report on the global quantum computing supply chain and
identify risks and security concerns.
• Establishing proactive policies to avoid similar supply chain and manufacturing
issues faced by the classical computer chip industry. These may include directing

77 Section 2(a) of H.R. 3987, 118th Congress.
78 Bob Sorensen and Tom Sorensen, Special Analysis: Challenges and Opportunities for Securing a Robust U.S.
Quantum Computing Supply Chain, Hyperion Research, LLC, HR4.0024.04.15.2022, June 2022, p. 7, at
https://quantumconsortium.org/mp-files/qed-c-special-analysis-us-quantum-computing-supply-chain-issues.pdf/.
79 National Quantum Initiative Advisory Committee, Renewing the National Quantum Initiative: Recommendations for
Sustaining American Leadership in Quantum Information Science, June 2023, p. 7, at https://www.quantum.gov/wp-
content/uploads/2023/06/NQIAC-Report-Renewing-the-National-Quantum-Initiative.pdf.
80 Bob Sorensen and Tom Sorensen, Special Analysis: Challenges and Opportunities for Securing a Robust U.S.
Quantum Computing Supply Chain, Hyperion Research, LLC, HR4.0024.04.15.2022, June 2022, p. 1, at
https://quantumconsortium.org/mp-files/qed-c-special-analysis-us-quantum-computing-supply-chain-issues.pdf/.
81 National Quantum Initiative Advisory Committee, Renewing the National Quantum Initiative: Recommendations for
Sustaining American Leadership in Quantum Information Science, June 2023, p. 15, at https://www.quantum.gov/wp-
content/uploads/2023/06/NQIAC-Report-Renewing-the-National-Quantum-Initiative.pdf.
82 Section 2(b) of S. 2450, 118th Congress. For more information on Manufacturing USA institutes, see CRS Report
R46703, Manufacturing USA: Advanced Manufacturing Institutes and Network, by John F. Sargent Jr.
Congressional Research Service

12

Quantum Computing: Concepts, Current State, and Considerations for Congress

and funding federal agencies to support material science and computer
engineering research dedicated to developing additional domestic quantum
computing capacity, and to programs that support the establishment and
maintenance of domestic quantum manufacturing capabilities.
• Imposing export controls for critical quantum computing materials and
components.
Facilitating Workforce Development for Quantum Computing
Many experts maintain that training, recruiting, and retaining talent are important for sustaining
U.S. leadership in quantum computing hardware and software R&D.83 The National Science and
Technology Council Subcommittee on Quantum Information Science has recommended four
strategic actions: (1) understanding the workforce needs in the QIST ecosystem; (2) introducing
broader audiences to QIST through public outreach; (3) enhancing QIST-specific education and
training opportunities; and (4) making careers in QIST and related fields more accessible and
equitable.84 In the abovementioned QED-C industry survey, respondents identified a potential
skilled workforce shortage in the United States in optical, mechanical, and electronics engineers,
and software developers.85
In the CHIPS and Science Act, Congress has authorized $8 million per year for FY2023-FY2026
for NSF to carry out QIST workforce development activities, including (1) commissioning the
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to conduct a study to evaluate and
make recommendations for the workforce; and (2) making awards to carry out the Next
Generation Quantum Leaders Pilot Program to educate and train K-12 students and teachers in
the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics.86
Congress may wish to consider policies to encourage domestic high school and college students
to participate in related STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) education
courses and programs that are foundational to QIST.87 Quantum computing relies upon
knowledge and research in a number of disciplines (e.g., quantum physics, mathematics,
chemistry, electrical engineering, software engineering, bioengineering, computer science and
engineering, and information science, among others). Courses and curricula in relevant fields may
help develop a quantum-literate workforce in general and prepare students with necessary
knowledge and skillsets to work in quantum computing in private and public sectors.

83 Mitch Ambrose, “Expansion of National Quantum Initiative Pitched to Science Committee,” American Institute of
Physics, June 22, 2023, at https://ww2.aip.org/fyi/expansion-of-national-quantum-initiative-pitched-to-science-
committee.
84 National Science and Technology Council, Committee on Science, Subcommittee on Quantum Information Science,
Quantum Information Science and Technology Workforce Development National Strategic Plan, February 2022, p. v,
at https://www.quantum.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/QIST-Natl-Workforce-Plan.pdf.
85 Bob Sorensen and Tom Sorensen, Special Analysis: Challenges and Opportunities for Securing a Robust U.S.
Quantum Computing Supply Chain, Hyperion Research, LLC, HR4.0024.04.15.2022, June 2022, p. 9, at
https://quantumconsortium.org/mp-files/qed-c-special-analysis-us-quantum-computing-supply-chain-issues.pdf/.
86 42 U.S.C. §19261(d), (f).
87 For an introduction to STEM education in general, see CRS Report R45223, Science, Technology, Engineering, and
Mathematics (STEM) Education: An Overview, by Boris Granovskiy.
Congressional Research Service

13

Quantum Computing: Concepts, Current State, and Considerations for Congress

Protecting National Security Interests in Quantum Computing
Some quantum computing technologies may pose risks to national security if they were to be
obtained by adversaries of the United States and other malign actors.88 For example, using
quantum algorithms,89 a practical quantum computer could potentially compromise the
cryptography currently used to protect sensitive data communications among government
agencies, financial institutions, health service providers, and others.90 In general terms, modern
cryptography is based on the idea that the intractability of certain mathematical problems
provides a reliable approach to enforcing policies for accessing digital data—only someone who
holds the authenticated “key” can immediately access the encrypted data; anyone else must first
solve a problem, such as factoring the products of large prime numbers.91 This problem is
designed to be impossible to complete within a reasonable time even using (existing, classical)
supercomputers, and the difficulty of the problem guarantees the security for a cryptosystem.
Some experts claim that a future fault-tolerant quantum computer with millions of qubits could
solve such a problem in hours.92
Experts on the National Quantum Initiative Advisory Committee have urged the federal
government and industry to work together to simultaneously accelerate progress in QIST, and
develop and deploy new encryption algorithms and standards resistant to quantum attacks (also
known as “post-quantum cryptography,” or PQC).93 Some industry leaders have committed to
keeping the government and public informed of their R&D progress toward a practical quantum
computer capable of undermining existing encryption.94
Since 2016, NIST has worked on its PQC standardization process, which selects cryptographic
algorithms that can be implemented on classical computers to protect information that may
become vulnerable with the advent of quantum computers.95 NIST expects that these algorithms
could replace current cryptosystems “to prepare for the eventuality that large-scale quantum

88 National Quantum Initiative Advisory Committee, Renewing the National Quantum Initiative: Recommendations for
Sustaining American Leadership in Quantum Information Science, June 2023, p. 13, at https://www.quantum.gov/wp-
content/uploads/2023/06/NQIAC-Report-Renewing-the-National-Quantum-Initiative.pdf.
89 Peter W. Shor, “Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Prime Factorization and Discrete Logarithms on a Quantum
Computer,” Proceedings of the 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, Santa Fe, NM,
November 1994, pp. 124-134, at https://doi.org/10.1137/S0097539795293172.
Shor’s quantum algorithm demonstrated how to factorize large integers in polynomial time, “which is an exponential
speed-up over the best classical algorithms.” See David Joseph et al., “Transitioning Organizations to Post-Quantum
Cryptography,” Nature, vol. 605 (May 2022), pp. 237-243, at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04623-2.
90 David Joseph et al., “Transitioning Organizations to Post-Quantum Cryptography,” Nature, vol. 605 (May 2022), pp.
237-243, at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04623-2.
91 Ibid.
92 Google, “Our Focused and Responsible Approach to Quantum Computing,” p. 7, at https://ai.google/static/
documents/approach-quantum-computing.pdf.
93 National Quantum Initiative Advisory Committee, Renewing the National Quantum Initiative: Recommendations for
Sustaining American Leadership in Quantum Information Science, June 2023, p. 13, at https://www.quantum.gov/wp-
content/uploads/2023/06/NQIAC-Report-Renewing-the-National-Quantum-Initiative.pdf.
94 Google, “Our Focused and Responsible Approach to Quantum Computing,” p. 8, at https://ai.google/static/
documents/approach-quantum-computing.pdf.
95 NIST, PQC Standardization Process: Announcing Four Candidates to be Standardized, Plus Fourth Round
Candidates, July 5, 2022, at https://csrc.nist.gov/News/2022/pqc-candidates-to-be-standardized-and-round-4.
Congressional Research Service

14

Quantum Computing: Concepts, Current State, and Considerations for Congress

computers become a reality.”96 The agency anticipates finalizing the standard by 2024.97 In May
2022, the Biden Administration issued the National Security Memorandum (NSM) on Promoting
United States Leadership in Quantum Computing While Mitigating Risks to Vulnerable
Cryptographic Systems (NSM-10), which stated that “the United States must prioritize the timely
and equitable transition of cryptographic systems to quantum-resistant cryptography, with the
goal of mitigating as much of the quantum risk as is feasible by 2035.”98
In December 2022, Congress passed and the President signed into law the Quantum Computing
Cybersecurity Preparedness Act (P.L. 117-260). Congress found a potential for adversaries of the
United States “to steal sensitive encrypted data today using classical computers, and wait until
sufficiently powerful quantum systems are available to decrypt it.”99 It directed the Office of
Management and Budget to issue guidance on the migration of federal information technology
systems to PQC and submit to Congress a report on PQC and a report on the progress of agencies
in adopting PQC standards.100 The law codifies NIST’s ongoing work on PQC standards, but does
not apply to any national security systems.101
Breaking classical cryptography systems is one highly anticipated use of quantum computing.
Congress may wish to consider options to safeguard national security interests, in addition to the
abovementioned initiatives and legislative efforts regarding PQC. These options may include
whether to
• prioritize federal support for the development of large-scale, practical quantum
computers that are capable of implementing quantum algorithms to break
existing encryption;
• further support R&D in quantum cryptographic algorithms and standards that can
be implemented on quantum computers and to establish new, secure quantum
data communications;
• require the disclosure by quantum computer developers when they make
substantial progress in breaking existing cryptography systems;
• direct resources to develop a quantum-ready national security workforce;
• strengthen export controls for quantum computing hardware, software, and
network equipment, and intellectual property protections for relevant
technologies and processes;
• oversee technology transfers and commercialization involving dual-use quantum
applications, including cryptography, drug discovery, virus study, and new
material development; and

96 NIST, Call for Proposals: Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC), January 3, 2017, updated August 14, 2023, at
https://csrc.nist.gov/Projects/post-quantum-cryptography/post-quantum-cryptography-standardization/Call-for-
Proposals.
97 NIST, Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC): Workshops and Timeline, August 14, 2023, at https://csrc.nist.gov/
Projects/post-quantum-cryptography/workshops-and-timeline.
98 White House, “National Security Memorandum on Promoting United States Leadership in Quantum Computing
While Mitigating Risks to Vulnerable Cryptographic Systems,” National Security Memorandum/NSM-10, May 4,
2022, at https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/05/04/national-security-memorandum-
on-promoting-united-states-leadership-in-quantum-computing-while-mitigating-risks-to-vulnerable-cryptographic-
systems/.
99 Section 2(a)(4) of P.L. 117-260.
100 6 U.S.C. §1526(a)(1), (e)(1), (2).
101 6 U.S.C. §1526(e)(1)(c) and Section 5 of P.L. 117-260.
Congressional Research Service

15

Quantum Computing: Concepts, Current State, and Considerations for Congress

• enforce the review of foreign investments in U.S. entities and U.S. investments in
non-partner countries in security-related quantum computing technologies and
products.
Congressional Research Service

16

Quantum Computing: Concepts, Current State, and Considerations for Congress

Key Terms of Quantum Computing
Explained
Quantum Networking
Quantum computing, quantum networking, and quantum sensing are closely related to one
another. Quantum computing is discussed in the main text of this report. Quantum networking
(also called quantum communications) refers to building fast and secure data communication
networks that use quantum phenomena such as superposition and entanglement (discussed below)
to encode, send, receive, and store information among interconnected quantum devices.102 Some
experts assert that the ultimate goal of quantum networking is building and scaling a quantum-
enhanced and protected, full-scale global internet, or quantum internet, not replacing but
complementing the existing internet (i.e., a network of networks of classical computing
devices).103 A quantum internet could be used to connect quantum computers to enable distributed
computing services, similar to the ideas of cloud computing and parallel computing for classical
computers.104 Network-enabled quantum computing could unleash even more computing power
than individual quantum computers.105
Quantum Sensing
Quantum sensing refers to the development of quantum-based instruments capable of measuring
physical quantities, such as time, temperature, distance, gravity, and electric and magnetic fields,
with more sensitivity and precision than conventional sensors such as seismometers, microscopes,
or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) devices.106 Quantum sensing may have a variety of
potential applications, including medical imaging; imaging of molecular structures such as
proteins; radio signal receiving and amplification in wireless communications; navigation;

102 Caltech, Quantum Science and Technology: Terms to Know, Caltech Science Exchange Series, at
https://scienceexchange.caltech.edu/topics/quantum-science-explained#terms-to-know.
103 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, From Long-Distance Entanglement to Building a Nationwide
Quantum Internet: Report of the DOE Quantum Internet Blueprint Workshop, February 2020, p. 10, at
https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2020/07/f76/QuantumWkshpRpt20FINAL_Nav_0.pdf. See also Andrew
Nellis, “The Quantum Internet, Explained,” University of Chicago News, Explainer Series, December 8, 2022, at
https://news.uchicago.edu/explainer/quantum-internet-explained.
104 DOE, Office of Science, From Long-Distance Entanglement to Building a Nationwide Quantum Internet: Report of
the DOE Quantum Internet Blueprint Workshop, February 2020, p. 11, at https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2020/
07/f76/QuantumWkshpRpt20FINAL_Nav_0.pdf.
Cloud-based quantum computing, called blind quantum computing, could take advantage of secure quantum
networking to enable the delegation of sensitive computational tasks to remote, powerful quantum computers in the
cloud (see ibid.). In parallel quantum computing, a network of quantum computers could simultaneously work on
different, smaller tasks broken down from a large, complex problem, further improving the performance of quantum
computing (see Andrew Nellis, “The Quantum Internet, Explained,” University of Chicago News, Explainer Series,
December 8, 2022, at https://news.uchicago.edu/explainer/quantum-internet-explained).
105 Gaurav Batra et al., “Shaping the Long Race in Quantum Communication and Quantum Sensing,” McKinsey &
Company, Advanced Electronics Practice Series, December 2021, pp. 3, 5, at https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/
mckinsey/industries/advanced%20electronics/our%20insights/
shaping%20the%20long%20race%20in%20quantum%20communication%20and%20quantum%20sensing/shaping-the-
long-race-in-quantum-communication-and-quantum-sensing.pdf.
106 Caltech, Quantum Science and Technology: Terms to Know, Caltech Science Exchange Series, at
https://scienceexchange.caltech.edu/topics/quantum-science-explained#terms-to-know. See also C. L. Degen, F.
Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, “Quantum Sensing,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 89, no. 3 (July-September 2017), p.
035002-1, at https://journals.aps.org/rmp/pdf/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.035002.
Congressional Research Service

17

Quantum Computing: Concepts, Current State, and Considerations for Congress

environmental monitoring; physical infrastructure monitoring; energy consumption monitoring;
geographical surveying; and fundamental research.107
Quantum computing, networking, and sensing technologies can exist independently, but synergies
may arise as these technologies mature.108 For example, quantum networking may enhance
quantum computing and facilitate quantum sensing, and quantum sensing may enable new
quantum computing applications, particularly in artificial intelligence.
Quantum
The term refers to either the smallest possible discrete unit of energy that can occur in nature, or a
tiny object (e.g., an electron, proton, or neutron in an atom, or a photon of light) that carries such
a single unit of energy. At the atomic and subatomic scale, physical properties such as energy are
not continuous but rather exist in specific discrete amounts. These properties are called
“quantized.”109
Quantum Mechanics
The term refers to the mathematical laws and principles of quantum physics, which describes the
behavior, properties, and interactions of quantum. These quantum objects behave often in ways
that are unfamiliar and may be counterintuitive and surprising. Many phenomena occurring at the
quantum scale cannot be explained by classical physics, which describes nature’s behavior at
much larger scales that people experience in everyday life.110 Yet those quantum phenomena are
essential for QIST.
Quantum Superposition
In quantum mechanics, superposition refers to the fact that an object at the quantum scale (e.g., an
electron) can exist in an undetermined state.111 This state can be expressed by a combination of
possibilities of multiple definite states in which the object may exist.112 For example, an electron
could be in a superposition state with probabilities of two spinning directions—40% of the chance
it is spinning downward and 60% of the chance it is spinning upward. It does not mean that the

107 Gaurav Batra et al., “Shaping the Long Race in Quantum Communication and Quantum Sensing,” McKinsey &
Company, Advanced Electronics Practice Series, December 2021, p. 4, at https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/
mckinsey/industries/advanced%20electronics/our%20insights/
shaping%20the%20long%20race%20in%20quantum%20communication%20and%20quantum%20sensing/shaping-the-
long-race-in-quantum-communication-and-quantum-sensing.pdf.
108 Ibid., pp. 8-9.
109 Quantum Physics Lady, What Is the Difference Between Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Physics?, Encyclopedia
of Quantum Physics, June 28, 2019, at https://quantumphysicslady.org/what-is-the-difference-between-quantum-
mechanics-and-quantum-physics/.
110 Caltech, Quantum Science and Technology: Terms to Know, Caltech Science Exchange Series, at
https://scienceexchange.caltech.edu/topics/quantum-science-explained#terms-to-know.
A classical object consists of millions or billions of atoms. Its behavior is described by classical physics in ways that
may be intuitive. For example, its states (e.g., location, orientation, velocity, etc.) are definite, even if it is not observed
and measured.
111 Quantum Physics Lady, Superposition, Quantum, Encyclopedia of Quantum Physics: Glossary, June 13, 2019, at
https://quantumphysicslady.org/glossary/quantum-superposition/. In an atom, an electron orbits the nucleus like planets
orbiting a star.
112 Caltech, What Is Superposition and Why Is It Important?, Caltech Science Exchange Series: Quantum Science and
Technology: Superposition, at https://scienceexchange.caltech.edu/topics/quantum-science-explained/quantum-
superposition.
Congressional Research Service

18

Quantum Computing: Concepts, Current State, and Considerations for Congress

electron is in both directions simultaneously; rather, it is in a quantum state that can be only
expressed mathematically.
Once a quantum object is measured and interacts with its environment (e.g., other objects, light,
vibration, or heat), the superposition state will “collapse” into a particular state.113 This collapse is
called quantum decoherence. Preventing decoherence, so that quantum computers can continue to
employ superposition to make reliable calculations, is a major challenge in realizing quantum
computing.114
Superposition is one of the fundamental attributes of quantum computers that differentiate them
from classical computers. It is an inherently quantum property, not included in classical physics,
because classical objects are large enough that they always exist in a single definite state.
Quantum computing harnesses this unique property to enable an object at the quantum level to
carry more information than a single given state can represent. For example, while two classical
bits can represent only a pair of data at a time from the four possible combinations of 0|0, 0|1, 1|0,
and 1|1, two qubits can represent possibilities of these four combinations at the same time.115
Following this trajectory, as the number of qubits increases linearly, the information that the
qubits are capable of carrying grows exponentially. In classical computing, however, doubling the
number of bits only doubles its computational power to handle data.116
Quantum Entanglement
In quantum mechanics, entanglement describes a phenomenon in which two or more quantum
objects, when entangled, behave in a correlated way and remain so even if they are physically
separated by a large distance.117 Because of this correlation, measuring the state of one object in
the group instantaneously determines the state of other objects in the group.118
For example, two electrons might be in superposition states and entangled—one with 40% of the
spin-down probability and 60% of the spin-up probability, and the other with 70% spin-down and
30% spin-up. If the first electron is observed and found spinning upward, the superposition state
of the second electron will instantaneously collapse. Without a direct observation on the second
electron, its state is determined spinning downward. Like superposition, entanglement has no
explanation in classical physics, but it is essential to enabling quantum computing and
networking.119

113 Microsoft, Explore Quantum: Superposition, Azure Quantum, at https://quantum.microsoft.com/en-us/explore/
concepts/superposition. Watch an animated visualization of quantum superposition at Physics Reimagined, Quantum
Superposition of States and Decoherence, Quantum Research: State Superposition, YouTube video, 2023, at
https://toutestquantique.fr/en/superposition/.
114 Martin Giles, “Explainer: What Is a Quantum Computer?,” MIT Technology Review, January 29, 2019, at
https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/01/29/66141/what-is-quantum-computing.
115 Microsoft, Explore Quantum: The Qubit, Azure Quantum, at https://quantum.microsoft.com/en-us/explore/concepts/
what-is-a-qubit.
116 Martin Giles, “Explainer: What Is a Quantum Computer?,” MIT Technology Review, January 29, 2019, at
https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/01/29/66141/what-is-quantum-computing.
117 Caltech, What Is Entanglement and Why Is It Important?, Caltech Science Exchange Series: Entanglement, at
https://scienceexchange.caltech.edu/topics/quantum-science-explained/entanglement.
118 NASA, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Particles in Love: Quantum Mechanics Explored in New Study, February 12,
2016, at https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/particles-in-love-quantum-mechanics-explored-in-new-study.
119 Microsoft, Explore Quantum: Entanglement, Azure Quantum, at https://quantum.microsoft.com/en-us/explore/
concepts/entanglement.
Congressional Research Service

19

link to page 24
Quantum Computing: Concepts, Current State, and Considerations for Congress

NQI Act-Funded R&D Centers120
In February 2019, NSF issued a Program Solicitation for Quantum Leap Challenge Institutes
(QLCI), which are “large-scale interdisciplinary research projects that aim to advance the
frontiers of quantum information science and engineering.” Research at these institutes would
focus on topics such as quantum computing, networking, and sensing. According to NSF, the
program is “consistent with the scope of NSF multidisciplinary centers for quantum research and
education” as authorized and funded in the NQI Act.121 NSF thereafter awarded grants to create
and support five QLCI, as shown in Table B-1.

120 In addition to ten NQI Act-funded quantum R&D centers, DOD has designated four defense QIST R&D centers
under the authorization of the NDAA for FY2020: the National Security Agency’s Laboratory for Physical Sciences
(LPS) Qubit Collaboratory (LQC), Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL), Naval Research Laboratory (NRL), and
Army Research Laboratory (ARL). See National Quantum Initiative, Getting the Science Right: QIS Centers, at
https://www.quantum.gov/science/.
121 NSF, Quantum Leap Challenge Institutes (QLCI) Program Solicitation, NSF 19-559, February 2019, at
https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2019/nsf19559/nsf19559.htm.
Congressional Research Service

20

Table B-1. NSF Quantum Leap Challenge Institutes (QLCI)
Total
Intended
Primary
Award
Place of
Congressional
Start
End Date
Name
Amount
Performance
District
Overall Goal
Date
(Estimated)
QLCI for Present and
$24.9 mil ion University of
CA 12
“To help bring about the quantum
9/1/2020
8/31/2025
Future Quantum
California-
computer,” particularly “the realization
Computing
Berkeley
of large-scale quantum computation.”
QLCI for Hybrid
$25 mil ion University of
IL 13
To carry out fundamental research and
9/1/2020
8/31/2025
Quantum Architectures
Il inois at
engineering to develop “a multi-node,
and Networks
Urbana-
ful -stack system, ranging from quantum
Champaign
processor design and control to a high-
level software application interface.”
QLCI for Enhanced
$25 mil ion University of
CO 02
To build scalable and programmable
9/1/2020
8/31/2025
Sensing and Distribution
Colorado at
quantum sensing systems with genuine
Using Correlated
Boulder
quantum advantages
Quantum States
QLCI for Robust
$25 mil ion University of
MD 04
To build “a well-control ed, well-
9/1/2021
8/31/2026
Quantum Simulation
Maryland
characterized quantum system that can
Col ege Park
reliably simulate the behavior of matter
at small scales.”
QLCI for Quantum
$25 mil ion University of
IL 01
To create “biocompatible quantum
9/1/2021
8/31/2026
Sensing in Biophysics and
Chicago
sensors” to extract new information and
Bio-engineering
gain control over biological processes.”
Source: NSF, Quantum Leap Challenge Institutes (QLCI), at https://new.nsf.gov/funding/opportunities/quantum-leap-challenge-institutes-qlci.

CRS-21

link to page 25 Quantum Computing: Concepts, Current State, and Considerations for Congress

In January 2020, DOE’s Office of Science issued a Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA)
for the creation of National Quantum Information Science Research Centers (NQISRCs), which
would “accelerate the transformational advances in basic science and quantum-based technology
needed to assure continued U.S. leadership” in QIST.122 Since then, DOE has funded five
NQISRCs, each led by a DOE national laboratory, as shown in Table B-2.123 The goal of the
NQISRCs is “to create and to steward the ecosystem needed to foster and facilitate advancement”
of QIST.124 Scientists and engineers at the centers work on designing and building (1) powerful
quantum computer, (2) unhackable communication networks, (3) ultrasensitive instruments and
sensors, and (4) groundbreaking new materials.125
Table B-2. DOE National Quantum Information Science Research Centers
Name
Lead Institution
Primary Goal
Next Generation
Argonne National
To create an ecosystem to deliver quantum
Quantum Science and
Laboratory
interconnects, establish national foundries, and
Engineering (Q-NEXT)
demonstrate communication links, networks of sensors,
and simulation testbeds.
Co-design Center for
Brookhaven National
To deliver quantum computer systems that achieve
Quantum Advantage
Laboratory
quantum advantage for scientific computations in high-
(C2QA)
energy, nuclear, chemical, and condensed matter physics.
Superconducting
Fermi National
To enable construction and deployment of superior
Quantum Materials and
Accelerator Laboratory
quantum computing and sensing systems.
Systems Center (SQMS)
Quantum Systems
Lawrence Berkeley
To design quantum algorithms, devices, and engineering
Accelerator (QSA)
National Laboratory
solutions to deliver certified quantum advantage in
scientific applications.
The Quantum Science
Oak Ridge National
To overcome key roadblocks in quantum state resilience,
Center (QSC)
Laboratory
control ability, and scalability of quantum technologies.
Source: DOE, Office of Science, National QIS Research Centers, at https://science.osti.gov/Initiatives/QIS/QIS-
Centers.

Author Information

Ling Zhu

Analyst in Telecommunications Policy

122 DOE, Office of Science, National Quantum Information Science Research Centers: Funding Opportunity
Announcement (FOA), DE-FOA-0002253, March 17, 2020, at https://science.osti.gov/-/media/grants/pdf/foas/2020/
SC_FOA_0002253.pdf.
123 Hannah Adams et al., How the Five National Quantum Information Science Research Centers Harness the Quantum
Revolution, Argonne National Laboratory, August 26, 2022, at https://www.anl.gov/article/how-the-five-national-
quantum-information-science-research-centers-harness-the-quantum-revolution.
124 DOE, Office of Science, National QIS Research Centers, at https://science.osti.gov/Initiatives/QIS/QIS-Centers.
125 DOE, Office of Science, National QIS Research Centers At-A-Glance, at https://science.osti.gov/-/media/QIS/pdf/
QuantumBrochure2021.pdf.
Congressional Research Service

22

Quantum Computing: Concepts, Current State, and Considerations for Congress

Acknowledgments
Jason A. Gallo, Section Research Manager in Science and Technology Policy; Daniel Morgan, Specialist in
Science and Technology Policy; and Patricia Moloney Figliola, Specialist in Internet and
Telecommunications Policy, provided valuable review and input to this report.

Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan
shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and
under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other
than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in
connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not
subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in
its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or
material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to
copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

Congressional Research Service
R47685 · VERSION 1 · NEW
23