2022 Invocation of the Defense Production Act for Large-Capacity Batteries: In Brief

2022 Invocation of the Defense Production Act for Large-Capacity Batteries: In Brief

2022 Invocation of the Defense Production Act May 27, 2022
for Large-Capacity Batteries: In Brief
Heidi M. Peters
On March 31, 2022, President Joseph R. Biden issued Presidential Determination No.
Analyst in U.S. Defense
2022-11, invoking authorities under Section 303 of the Defense Production Act (DPA)
Acquisition Policy
and directing the Department of Defense (DOD) to strengthen the U.S. domestic

industrial base for large-capacity batteries used in “the automotive, e-mobility, and
Erica A. Lee
stationary storage sectors.” As justification, the President cited the need to ensure “a
Analyst in Emergency
robust, resilient, sustainable, and environmentally responsible domestic industrial base”
Management and Disaster
as a critical component of clean energy manufacturing supply chains and a clean energy
Recovery
economy.

Nina M. Hart
The Defense Production Act (DPA) of 1950 (P.L. 81-774, 50 U.S.C. §4501 et seq.), as
Legislative Attorney
amended, confers upon the President a broad set of authorities to influence domestic

industry in the interest of national defense. The authorities can be used across the federal
Brandon S. Tracy
government to shape the domestic industrial base so that, when called upon, it is capable
Analyst in Energy Policy
of providing essential materials and goods needed for the national defense. Though

initially passed in response to the Korean War, the DPA is historically based on the War
Powers Acts of World War II. Gradually, Congress has expanded the

term national defense, as defined in the DPA. Based on this definition, the scope of DPA authorities now extends
beyond shaping U.S. military preparedness and capabilities, as the authorities may also be used to enhance and
support domestic preparedness, response, and recovery from natural hazards, terrorist attacks, and other national
emergencies.
The March 31 Presidential Determination authorizes the Secretary of Defense to exercise specific authorities in
order to support mining and processing of strategic and critical materials for the production of large-capacity
batteries for the “automotive, e-mobility, and stationary storage sectors.” In particular, the Determination directs
the Secretary of Defense to support (1) feasibility studies for “mature mining, beneficiation, and value-added
processing projects” for such critical materials; (2) byproduct and co-product production at existing mining and
other industrial facilities; and (3) improvements to increase productivity, workforce safety, and sustainability in
critical minerals mining, beneficiation, and processing. The exercise of these authorities is subject to funding
available in the Defense Production Act Fund (DPA Fund), for which DOD serves as fund manager. The
Presidential Determination does not authorize activities beyond those in Section 303 of the DPA, including
authorities to issue prioritized federal contracts and allocate materials essential to the national defense under Title
I.
President Biden’s invocation of the DPA may be viewed within the context of strategic and critical material
supply chain concerns, and related actions taken by the executive branch and Congress. For example, both the
DOD and the Department of Energy (DOE) have recently made recommendations related to the exercise of DPA
authorities to promote domestic mining of critical and strategic minerals. In a 2022 report, the DOE set out
strategies the federal government could follow, including use of the DPA, to develop domestic supply chains
related to the production of magnets produced with certain critical minerals. The report also recommended that
Congress consider directly appropriate funding to DOE to implement DPA Title III actions to support a clean
energy transition. DOD similarly recommended use of DPA Title III actions to support this transition.
Congress may consider performing oversight or otherwise monitoring how DOD implements this Determination
and evaluating potentially relevant issues, including use of allocations available in the DPA Fund and potential
consequences for public lands and tribal communities adjacent to the mining activities.

Congressional Research Service

link to page 4 link to page 4 link to page 5 link to page 5 link to page 6 link to page 7 link to page 7 link to page 7 link to page 8 link to page 9 link to page 11 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 14 link to page 15 2022 Invocation of the Defense Production Act for Large-Capacity Batteries: In Brief

Contents
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1
Brief Overview of the Defense Production Act (DPA) ................................................................... 1
Selected Authorities Under Title III of the DPA ....................................................................... 2
Presidential Determinations ................................................................................................ 2
Section 303 of the DPA ....................................................................................................... 3
Recent Delegation of DPA Authorities ...................................................................................... 4
President Biden’s 2022 Determination ............................................................................................ 4
DPA Actions Authorized ........................................................................................................... 4
Limitations on DOD Action ...................................................................................................... 5
Strategic and Critical Materials ....................................................................................................... 6
Executive Branch Recommendations and Actions: Critical Minerals and Materials ................ 8
Related Congressional Actions: Critical Minerals .................................................................. 10
Selected Legislation Enacted in the 117th Congress.......................................................... 10
Congressional Considerations ........................................................................................................ 11

Contacts
Author Information ........................................................................................................................ 12

Congressional Research Service

2022 Invocation of the Defense Production Act for Large-Capacity Batteries: In Brief

Introduction
On March 31, 2022, President Joseph R. Biden issued Presidential Determination No. 2022-11,
invoking authorities in Section 303 of the Defense Production Act (DPA) of 1950 (P.L. 81-774,
50 U.S.C. §4501 et seq.) and directing the Department of Defense (DOD) to strengthen the U.S.
domestic industrial base for large-capacity batteries (i.e., those used in electric vehicles and for
grid-connected electricity storage).1 As justification, the President cited the need to ensure “a
robust, resilient, sustainable, and environmentally responsible domestic industrial base to meet
the requirements of the clean energy economy.” The President noted that “the United States
depends on unreliable foreign sources for many of the strategic and critical materials necessary
for the clean energy transition.... Demand for such materials is projected to increase exponentially
as the world transitions to a clean energy economy” and to reduce reliance on foreign sources of
critical materials, including lithium, nickel, cobalt, graphite, and manganese.2
This In Brief provides an overview of the DPA and presidential delegations of its authorities;
discusses actions authorized by the March 2022 Presidential Determination (hereinafter the
Presidential Determination); examines potential limitations associated with these authorizations;
and provides an overview of recent executive and congressional actions relevant to the invocation
of the DPA for critical minerals necessary for large-capacity battery production. It also explores
considerations for Congress regarding the implementation, limitation, or expansion of the
Presidential Determination.
Brief Overview of the Defense Production Act (DPA)
The DPA confers broad presidential authorities to mobilize domestic industry in service of a
statutorily defined conception of national defense.3 These authorities can be used across the
federal government to shape the domestic industrial base so that, when called upon, private
industry and other entities are capable of providing the essential materials and goods needed for
national defense.4
Gradually, Congress has expanded the definition of national defense for purposes of the DPA.5
The scope of DPA authorities now extends beyond shaping U.S. military preparedness and
capabilities, and has been used to enhance and support domestic preparedness, response, and
recovery from natural hazards, terrorist attacks, and other national emergencies.6

1 Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 303 of the Defense Production Act (DPA) of 1950, as Amended, 87
Federal Register 19775, April 6, 2022 (hereinafter “Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 303”).
2 Ibid.; The White House, “Fact Sheet: President Biden’s Plan to Respond to Putin’s Price Hike at the Pump,” March
31, 2022, at https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/03/31/fact-sheet-president-bidens-
plan-to-respond-to-putins-price-hike-at-the-pump/; the White House, “Background Press Call by Senior Administration
Officials on President Biden’s Plan to Respond to Putin’s Price Hike at the Pump,” March 31, 2022, at
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/press-briefings/2022/03/31/background-press-call-by-senior-
administration-officials-on-president-bidens-plan-to-respond-to-putins-price-hike-at-the-pump/.
3 Section 702(14) of the DPA; 50 U.S.C. §4552(14).
4 For a detailed discussion on the history and authorities of the DPA, see CRS Report R43767, The Defense Production
Act of 1950: History, Authorities, and Considerations for Congress, by Heidi M. Peters.
5 See ibid., pp. 4-5 for a discussion of the evolving scope of “national defense” as defined in the DPA.
6 “The term ‘national defense’ means programs for military and energy production or construction, military or critical
infrastructure assistance to any foreign nation, homeland security, stockpiling, space, and any directly related activity.
Such term includes emergency preparedness activities conducted pursuant to title VI of The Robert T. Stafford Disaster
Congressional Research Service

1

2022 Invocation of the Defense Production Act for Large-Capacity Batteries: In Brief

Current DPA authorities include, but are not limited to:
 Title I: Priorities and Allocations, which allows the President to require persons
(including businesses and corporations) to prioritize and accept contracts for
materials and services as necessary to promote the national defense;
 Title III: Expansion of Productive Capacity and Supply, which allows the
President to incentivize the domestic industrial base to expand the production and
supply of critical materials and goods. Incentives include loans, loan guarantees,
direct purchases and purchase commitments, and the authority for the federal
government to procure and install equipment in private industrial facilities.
(further detail on these authorities is provided below); and
 Title VII: General Provisions, which includes several distinct authorities,
including the authority to establish voluntary agreements with private industry;
the authority to block proposed or pending foreign corporate mergers,
acquisitions, or takeovers that threaten national security;7 and the authority to
employ persons of outstanding experience and ability and to establish a volunteer
pool of industry executives who could be called to government service in the
interest of the national defense.8
Selected Authorities Under Title III of the DPA
Title III authorities help to ensure that the nation has an adequate supply of, or the ability to
produce, essential materials and goods necessary for the national defense. Using Title III
authorities, the President may provide financial incentives to develop, maintain, modernize,
restore, and expand the production capacity of domestic sources for critical components, critical
technology items, materials, and industrial resources essential for the execution of the national
security strategy.9 The President also may use Title III authorities to ensure that critical
components, critical technology items, essential materials, and industrial resources are available
from reliable sources when needed to meet defense requirements during peacetime, graduated
mobilization, and national emergency.10
Presidential Determinations
The DPA affords significant discretion to the President to exercise Title III and other DPA
authorities. However, in the absence of a related national emergency declared by Congress or the
President, the DPA, including Title III, generally requires that the President determine certain

Relief and Emergency Assistance Act [42 U.S.C. §5195 et seq.] and critical infrastructure protection and restoration.”
Section 702(14) of the DPA; 50 U.S.C. §4552(14).
7 The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), which operates pursuant to Section 721 of the
DPA, reviews foreign investment transactions to determine if (1) they threaten to impair the national security; (2) the
foreign investor is controlled by a foreign government; or (3) the transaction could affect homeland security or would
result in control of any critical infrastructure that could impair the national security. The President has the authority to
block proposed or pending foreign investment transactions that threaten to impair the national security. This authority
is generally considered separate and distinct from other DPA provisions. See 50 U.S.C. §4565; 31 C.F.R. chap. VIII.
See CRS In Focus IF10952, CFIUS Reform Under FIRRMA, by James K. Jackson and Cathleen D. Cimino-Isaacs.
8 For a comprehensive overview of the DPA see CRS Report R43767, The Defense Production Act of 1950: History,
Authorities, and Considerations for Congress, by Heidi M. Peters.
9 Section 107(a) of the DPA; 50 U.S.C. §4517. Many of these terms are defined further in 50 U.S.C. §4552.
10 Section 107(b)(1) of the DPA; 50 U.S.C. §4517.
Congressional Research Service

2

2022 Invocation of the Defense Production Act for Large-Capacity Batteries: In Brief

conditions are met prior to invoking many DPA authorities.11 For example, except in periods of
such an emergency, to issue loan guarantees, the President must determine that loans and loan
guarantees are the most “cost-effective, expedient, and practical alternative” to meet the intended
need, and that no other reasonable means exists to do so.12
DPA presidential determinations do not expire unless the President expressly indicates so in the
determination, or the determination is otherwise amended or revoked. The DPA does not require
the President to report these determinations to the public. However, the President must provide
notice to the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs and the House
Committee on Financial Services before using certain authorities under Section 303(a) of the
DPA.13
Section 303 of the DPA
Section 303 provides several authorities through which the President may incentivize the
domestic industrial base to expand the production and supply of critical materials and goods,
including:
 Direct purchases and purchase commitments of industrial resources or critical
technology items for use or resale;
 Encouragement of “exploration, development, and mining of critical and
strategic materials, and other material”;
 Development of productive capacity; and
 Increased use of certain emerging technologies.14
To enter into contracts as a means of using these authorities, the President must determine in
writing that:
 The material is “essential to the national defense”;
 U.S. industry “cannot reasonably be expected to provide the capability for the
needed” material in a timely manner without use of Section 303; and
 Actions “are the most cost effective, expedient, and practical alternative method”
for meeting national defense needs.15
The President may waive these requirements and other limitations under Section 303(a)(7) during
national emergencies, or if he or she finds that “action is necessary to avert an industrial resource
or critical technology item shortfall that would severely impair national defense capability.”16

11 See, for example, Sections 301(a)(2), 302(b)(2), and 303(a)(5) of the DPA; 50 U.S.C. §§4531(a)(2), 4532(b)(2),
4533(a)(5).
12 See, for example, Sections 301(a)(2)(C); 50 U.S.C. §4531(a)(2)(C), which requires presidential determinations that
“the loan guarantee is the most cost effective, expedient, and practical alternative for meeting the needs of the Federal
Government” before the President may invoke the DPA to issue loan guarantees, and Section 302(b)(2)(B); 50 U.S.C.
§4532(b)(2)(B), which requires the President to determine that “without the loan, United States industry cannot
reasonably be expected to provide the needed capacity, technological processes, or materials in a timely manner,”
before the President may provide direct loans through the DPA. When authorized, these determinations may be issued
by the designated delegate.
13 Section 303(a)(6)(A) of the DPA; 50 U.S.C. §4533(a)(6)(A).
14 Section 303(a)(1)(A)-(D) of the DPA; 50 U.S.C. §4533(a)(1)(A)-(D).
15 Section 303(a)(5) of the DPA; 50 U.S.C. §4533(a)(5).
16 Section 303(a)(7) of the DPA; 50 U.S.C. §4533(a)(7).
Congressional Research Service

3

2022 Invocation of the Defense Production Act for Large-Capacity Batteries: In Brief

Recent Delegation of DPA Authorities
Over time, Presidents have chosen to delegate some DPA authorities to department and agency
heads. Most recently, President Barack Obama did so through Executive Order (E.O.) 13603 in
2012.17 E.O. 13603 identified the “head of each agency engaged in procurement for national
defense” and delegated to each the majority of authorities provided to the President under Titles I
and III of the DPA.18 Notably, E.O. 13603 also delegated Section 303 authority “to encourage the
exploration, development, and mining of strategic and critical materials and other materials” to
the Secretaries of Defense and the Interior.19
Prior to 2020, DOD generally exercised DPA authorities, particularly prioritization authorities
under Title I of the DPA, more frequently than other executive branch agencies.20 In addition to
the Department’s frequent use of Title I prioritization authorities, DOD has maintained a
longstanding DPA Title III program office “dedicated to ensuring the timely availability of
essential domestic industrial resources to support national defense and homeland security
requirements.”21 The office generally focuses on facilitating DPA Title III investment actions for
military purposes. Other executive agencies can and have made use of DPA authorities,
particularly in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.22 Observers have noted that the Department
of Energy (DOE) and the Department of the Interior, also cited in the 2022 Determination, have
less frequent direct experience with carrying out activities under DPA authorities generally and
Title III authorities specifically.23
President Biden’s 2022 Determination
DPA Actions Authorized
The Presidential Determination authorizes DOD to use some Section 303 authorities to support
“sustainable and responsible domestic mining, beneficiation, and value-added processing of

17 Executive Order 13603, “National Defense Resource Preparedness,” 77 Federal Register 16651, March 22, 2012.
18 Sections 301-304, 305(b), 307-308, and 310-312 of E.O. 13603.
19 In statute, see Section 303(a)(1)(B) of the DPA; 50 U.S.C. §4533(a)(1)(B). The President delegated this authority to
the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Interior in consultation with the Secretary of Defense as the National
Defense Stockpile Manager, in Section 306 of E.O. 13603.
20 For example, in the 2020 Report to Congress of the Defense Production Act Committee, DOD indicated that it places
approximately 300,000 priority rated contracts and orders (i.e., “rated orders”) per year. See Federal Emergency
Management Agency, “The Defense Production Act Committee Report to Congress,” calendar year 2020 report to
Congress, September 20, 2021, p. 10, at https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/documents/fema_DPAC-report-
Defense-production-act-committee_2020.pdf.
21 Department of Defense, “Assessments & Investments: Defense Production Act (DPA) Title III,” at
https://www.businessdefense.gov/ai/dpat3/index.html.
22 For more information, see U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), Defense Production Act: Opportunities
Exist to Increase Transparency and Identify Future Actions to Mitigate Medical Supply Chain Issues, GAO-21-108,
November 19, 2020, at https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-21-108; GAO, COVID-19: Agencies Are Taking Steps to
Improve Future Use of Defense Production Act Authorities, GAO-22-105380, at https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-22-
105380.
23 Department of Defense, “Title III of the Defense Production Act,” p. 2, at https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/
2014/03/f14/2_seaford_roundtable.pdf; Department of Energy, America’s Strategy to Secure the Supply Chain for a
Robust Clean Energy Transition, Department of Energy Response to Executive Order 14017, “America’s Supply
Chains,” February 24, 2022, at https://www.energy.gov/policy/articles/americas-strategy-secure-supply-chain-robust-
clean-energy-transition.
Congressional Research Service

4

2022 Invocation of the Defense Production Act for Large-Capacity Batteries: In Brief

strategic and critical materials for the production of large-capacity batteries for the automotive, e-
mobility, and stationary storage sectors” because these materials “are essential to the national
defense.”24
The Secretary of Defense must implement this broad directive by supporting, among other
activities:
 feasibility studies for “mature mining, beneficiation, and value-added processing
projects” for such critical materials;
 byproduct and co-product production at existing mining and other industrial
facilities; and
 improvements to increase productivity, workforce safety, and sustainability in
critical minerals mining, beneficiation, and processing.25
DOD must also consult the Secretaries of the Interior, Agriculture, and Energy in carrying out
these activities and is required to issue annual reports to the President and Congress on whether
the domestic industrial base for critical materials for battery production warrants continued used
of Section 303 authorities.
Although the Presidential Determination permits DOD to enter into contracts to implement
Section 303 authorities, the President also appears to have waived certain requirements of the
DPA for purposes of implementing the 2022 Determination.26 For example, the waivers may
allow DOD to execute contracts without following certain requirements for these contracts (e.g., a
prohibition on the government from reselling purchased commodities below certain prices).27 The
practical implication of these waivers, made under Section 303(a)(7) of the DPA, with regard to
DOD’s authority to enter into contracts remains unknown, as there are no public contracts yet
available to show whether or how the waiver has affected contracts in practice.
Limitations on DOD Action
The Presidential Determination does not appear to authorize all economic activities covered by
Section 303. For instance, the President would have to make additional determinations and
findings to authorize the Secretary of Defense to make subsidy payments on any relevant
domestically produced materials.28
Further, the Presidential Determination does not allow the Secretary of Defense to use Title III
authorities beyond those in Section 303. To implement other Title III authorities, the President
and Congress must take additional actions. For example, to issue loan guarantees or direct loans,
the relevant budget authority must be specifically included in an appropriations act.29

24 Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 303.
25 Ibid.
26 Ibid.
27 Ibid. Section 303(a)(7)(B) of the DPA authorizes the President to waive requirements, including the requirement in
Section 303(a)(3) that “[n]o commodity purchased under this subsection shall be sold at less than—(A) the established
ceiling price for such commodity, except that minerals, metals, and materials shall not be sold at less than the
established ceiling price, or the current domestic market price, whichever is lower; or (B) if no ceiling price has been
established, the higher of—(i) the current domestic market price for such commodity; or (ii) the minimum sale price
established for agricultural commodities owned or controlled by the Commodity Credit Corporation, as provided in
section 407” of the Agricultural Act of 1949 (7 U.S.C. §1427).
28 Section 303(c)(1) of the DPA; 50 U.S.C. §4533(c)(1).
29 Section 301(a)(3)(A) of the DPA; 50 U.S.C. §4531(a)(3)(A).
Congressional Research Service

5

2022 Invocation of the Defense Production Act for Large-Capacity Batteries: In Brief

Additionally, the President would need to make additional determinations that would affirm the
ability of the borrower to repay the loan and the absence of other available credit on reasonable
terms for the intended purpose.30
Practical limitations may also constrain implementation. In particular, the exercise of Section 303
authorities is subject to funding available in the Defense Production Act Fund (DPA Fund).31 The
DPA Fund primarily supports standing DOD Title III activities. As account manager under E.O.
13603, DOD exercises considerable discretion over how fund appropriations are used—a source
of prior dispute with Congress.32
Strategic and Critical Materials
President Biden’s invocation of the DPA may be viewed within the context of strategic and
critical material supply-chain concerns, and recent related actions taken by the executive branch
and Congress. In addition, some Members of Congress had urged the President to invoke DPA
authorities to address domestic energy supply shortages by promoting domestic production and
processing of critical minerals.33 Other Members of Congress urged the President to invoke the
DPA to secure other energy resources through other means that were not reflected in the
Presidential Determination—for example, by using the DPA to promote oil refinery
enhancements,34 or increase domestic manufacturing capacity for electric heat pumps.35 Still other
Members of Congress have asked the President not to invoke the DPA to address domestic
mineral supply, citing implications for the environment and tribal communities.36

30 Sections 301(a)(2)(B)-(G) of the DPA; 50 U.S.C. §4531(a)(2)(B)-(G).
31 Section 304(c) of the DPA; 50 U.S.C. §4534(c).
32 In the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (P.L. 117-7), Congress appropriated $10 billion to a new account for the
Department of Health and Human Services to implement pandemic-related Title III actions, in part to bypass DOD
control over the fund, as explained by Chairwoman of the House Committee on Financial Services Maxine Waters:
The Committee also expects that the funds provided by this section will primarily be used by the Secretary of Health and Human
Services (HHS). The DPA allows the President to delegate his authority under the DPA to various agencies, and he has
delegated DPA authority under Title III of the Act to HHS. While the DPA has been administered by the Department of Defense,
the funds made available by this section are not for support of the Defense Industrial Base, but are for medical supplies and
equipment related to the COVID–19 Pandemic ... the Committee intends that the President establish a new account to allow
these funds to be used....
See Chairwoman of the House Committee on Financial Services Maxine Waters, “American Rescue Plan Act of 2021,”
Explanatory Statement on H.R. 1319, Congressional Record, daily edition, vol. 167, part 45 (March 10, 2021), p.
H1281, at https://www.congress.gov/117/crec/2021/03/10/CREC-2021-03-10-pt1-PgH1196.pdf. For further discussion
and explanation of the creation of this new HHS account for DPA Title III actions, see CRS Report R46834, American
Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (P.L. 117-2): Public Health, Medical Supply Chain, Health Services, and Related Provisions,
coordinated by Johnathan H. Duff and Kavya Sekar, pp. 19-21.
33 Senator Lisa Murkowski, “Senators Murkowski, Manchin, Risch and Cassidy Urge Administration to Meet
Domestic Mineral Demand, Address Supply Chain Crisis,” press release, March 11, 2022, at
https://www.murkowski.senate.gov/press/release/senators-murkowski-manchin-risch-and-cassidy-urge-administration-
to-meet-domestic-mineral-demand-address-supply-chain-crisis).
34 Representative Jared Golden et al., Letter to the President regarding the use of the DPA to increase oil and gas
production, March 10, 2022, at https://golden.house.gov/sites/golden.house.gov/files/.
Letter%20to%20POTUS%20Invoke%20the%20DPA%20for%20Domestic%20Energy%20Production%20.pdf).
35 Senator Markey et al., Letter to President Biden regarding use of the DPA to increase manufacturing capacity for
technologies that reduce fossil fuel demand, March 23, 2022, at https://www.markey.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/
(03.23)%202022.03.23%20Executive%20Actions%20on%20EE%20%20Clean%20Tech%20Letter.pdf.
36 House Natural Resources Committee, “Chair Grijalva, Rep. Lowenthal Urge Biden Administration Not to Use the
Defense Production Act to Increase Mining,” press release, March 29, 2022, at https://naturalresources.house.gov/
media/press-releases/chair-grijalva-rep-lowenthal-urge-biden-administration-not-to-use-the-defense-production-act-to-
Congressional Research Service

6

2022 Invocation of the Defense Production Act for Large-Capacity Batteries: In Brief

Strategic and Critical Materials—Definitions
The terms “strategic and critical materials,” “critical and strategic materials,” “critical minerals and materials,” and
“critical minerals” can be, and often are, used interchangeably.
Defense Production Act
The Presidential Determination under the DPA authority includes a determination that “strategic and critical
materials for the production of large-capacity batteries for the automotive, e-mobility, and stationary storage
sectors are essential to the national defense.”37 Neither the Presidential Determination nor the DPA includes a
definition of “strategic and critical materials.” However, the DPA authorizes the President to “make provision ..
for the encouragement of exploration, development, and mining of critical and strategic materials, and other
materials,” among other actions.38 Additionally, E.O. 13603, which delegated authorities and addressed national
defense policies and programs under the DPA, includes a definition of “strategic and critical materials”:
(m) “Strategic and critical materials” means materials (including energy) that (1) would be needed to supply
the military, industrial, and essential civilian needs of the United States during a national emergency, and (2)
are not found or produced in the United States in sufficient quantities to meet such need and are vulnerable
to the termination or reduction of the availability of the material.39
Critical Materials Defined by the Energy Act of 2020
The Presidential Determination references five minerals associated with large capacity, rechargeable batteries
(lithium, nickel, cobalt, graphite, and manganese); these minerals, among others, have been designated “critical
minerals” by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS).40
Section 7002 of the Energy Act of 2020 (Division Z, P.L. 116-260) includes a definition of “critical material”—
distinct from that associated with the DPA via E.O. 13603—that makes explicit the connection between critical
materials and critical minerals:
The term “critical material” means—
(A) any non-fuel mineral, element, substance, or material that the Secretary of Energy determines—
(i) has a high risk of a supply chain disruption; and
(i ) serves an essential function in 1 or more energy technologies, including technologies that produce,
transmit, store, and conserve energy; or
(B) a critical mineral.41
Section 7002 of the Energy Act of 2020 also codifies the methodology to determine the list of critical minerals.
Part of the methodology includes directing the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the USGS,
to consult with the Secretaries of Defense, Commerce, Agriculture, and Energy and the United States Trade
Representative during the process of finalizing the list of critical minerals.42 Provisions allow the Secretary of the
Interior to “designate and include on the list any mineral, element, substance, or material determined by another
Federal agency to be strategic and critical to the defense or national security of the United States.”43
According to the USGS, the methodology used to develop the list of critical minerals includes measures of
country-level production, U.S. net import reliance,44 and a qualitative assessment of importance. Another

increase-mining. See also discussion in U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, Full
Committee Hearing on Domestic Critical Mineral Supply Chains, hearing, 117th Cong., 2nd sess., March 31, 2022.
37 Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 303.
38 50 U.S.C. §4533(a)(1)(B).
39 Executive Order 13603, “National Defense Resource Preparedness,” 77 Federal Register 16651, March 22, 2012.
40 U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), “2022 Final List of Critical Minerals,” 87 Federal Register 10381, February 24,
2022.
41 30 U.S.C. §1606(a)(2).
42 P.L. 116-260.
43 30 U.S.C. §1606(c)(4)(B).
44 According to the USGS, “Net import reliance (NIR) is calculated as the amount of imported material (including
changes in stockpiles) minus exports and changes in government and industry stocks and is expressed as a percentage
of domestic consumption” (Steven M. Fortier, Nedal T. Nassar, and Graham W. Lederer, et al., Draft Critical Mineral
List—Summary of Methodology and Background Information—U.S. Geological Survey Technical Input Document in
Congressional Research Service

7

2022 Invocation of the Defense Production Act for Large-Capacity Batteries: In Brief

consideration used to determine the list of critical minerals regards risks associated with mineral supply chains, or
supply risk. Supply risk is defined in the methodology as “the confluence of the fol owing three factors: the
likelihood of a foreign supply disruption, the dependency of the U.S. manufacturing sector on foreign supplies, and
the vulnerability of the U.S. manufacturing sector to a supply disruption.”45
Executive Branch Recommendations and Actions: Critical Minerals
and Materials
In February 2021—prior to the March 31, 2022, Presidential Determination invoking the DPA—
President Biden ordered a supply chain review from multiple executive branch departments.46
The resulting review, completed in June 2021, includes a DOE chapter on “Review of Large
Capacity Batteries” and a DOD chapter on “Review of Critical Minerals and Materials.”47 Some
recommendations include use of the DPA. For example, in its review of large-capacity battery
supply chains, DOE recommends:
Increase[d] support for resource mapping at the USGS and the DOE to enable informed
policy and investment decisions around production and refinement of lithium and other
critical materials and minerals. The Federal Government should explore using purchase
price and quantity guarantees for a stockpile serving as a backstop, providing loans or
guarantees through DOE’s Loan Program Office (LPO), leveraging the DPA including
Title III and VII authorities to support extraction, and standing up new public financing
streams.... Invest[ing] in domestic [mineral processing] ... similarly through a potential mix
of purchasing guarantees, the DOE LPO, the DPA, and new financing programs in concert
with [research and development] R&D investment to advance existing techniques.48
DOD also made recommendations related to the use of executive branch authorities, including
those invoked in the President’s Determination issued on March 31, 2022. For example, DOD
recommended that “DPA, Title III and similar authorities should be used to support domestic
production in sustainable production and processing operations,” and that the government “should
use [DPA Title VII] authorities to convene a government-industry working group to identify
opportunities to expand sustainable domestic production, and explore opportunities to create
consortiums or public-private partnerships for sustainable domestic processing of key strategic
and critical materials.”49
Both DOE and DOD made additional recommendations related to critical materials and minerals,
among other recommendations; executive authority to act on these recommendations lies outside
that granted by the DPA. For example, some DOE recommendations include:

Response to Secretarial Order No. 3359, U.S. Geological Survey, Open-File Report 2018-1021, p. 9). For additional
information on NIR, see this source.
45 Nedal T. Nassar and Steven M. Fortier, Methodology and Technical Input for the 2021 Review and Revision of the
U.S. Critical Minerals List, USGS Open-File Report 2021–1045, Reston, VA, 2021, p. 3.
46 Executive Order 14017, “America’s Supply Chains,” 86 Federal Register 11849, March 1, 2021.
47 White House, Building Resilient Supply Chains, Revitalizing American Manufacturing, and Fostering Broad-Based
Growth, June 2021, pp. 85-204, at https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/100-day-supply-chain-
review-report.pdf.
48 Ibid., p. 139.
49 Ibid., pp. 199-200.
Congressional Research Service

8

2022 Invocation of the Defense Production Act for Large-Capacity Batteries: In Brief

The Administration should pursue a whole of government approach to stimulating
domestic demand and production of [electric vehicles] EVs and stationary storage through
Federal purchases, consumer incentives, and standard setting.50
The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP), housed at the DOE, should call for
Federal agencies to procure stationary battery storage for Federal facilities in addition to
procuring other types of stationary storage.51
[The United States should] work with allies and partners to expand global production and
ensure secure global supplies.52
Some related DOD recommendations include:
The U.S. Government should incentivize domestic and foreign production, processing, and
recycling of strategic and critical materials, ensuring that they adhere to strong
environmental standards, meaningful community consultation including government-to-
government consultation with Tribal Nations, and strong labor standards.53
Through the Department of State and the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, the
United States should engage with like-minded foreign producers of strategic and critical
materials to promote a value-based approach as they consider approaches to
sustainability—rather than one focused on cost-imposition—and encourage alignment of
U.S. and foreign product sustainability standards.54
Subsequently, the DOE released a separate report outlining a strategy intended to secure supply
chains needed for a robust clean energy transition.55 This report sets out related strategies the
federal government could follow, including use of the DPA to develop domestic supply chains
related to the production of magnets produced with certain critical minerals.56 The report also
contains recommendations that could require additional authority from Congress.57 They include
that “Congress should consider appropriating adequate funding specifically for the purpose of
enabling DOE to utilize Title III of the Defense Production Act to support the production of
critical energy technologies ... and take other actions as needed to support and maintain a secure
Energy Sector Industrial Base for civilian use.”58
In addition to issuing recommendations, DOD has awarded grants to companies to assist in
furthering development of the domestic critical mineral supply chain, with focus on a specific
group of critical materials: the 17 rare earth elements for which the United States does not
currently have any industrial scale extraction capacity.59 Some examples of DOD’s recent

50 Ibid., p. 135. Stationary storage refers to the use of batteries connected to the electricity grid to temporarily store
energy for later use.
51 Ibid., p. 138.
52 Ibid., p. 140.
53 Ibid., p. 195.
54 Ibid., p. 201.
55 U.S. Department of Energy, America’s Strategy to Secure the Supply Chain for a Robust Clean Energy Transition,
U.S. Department of Energy Response to Executive Order 14017, “America’s Supply Chains,” February 24, 2022,
https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2022-02/America%E2%80%99s%20Strategy%20to%20Secure%20the%20
Supply%20Chain%20for%20a%20Robust%20Clean%20Energy%20Transition%20FINAL.docx_0.pdf.
56 Ibid., p. 45.
57 Ibid., p. 45.
58 Ibid., p. 48.
59 For more information on rare earth elements, see CRS Report R46618, An Overview of Rare Earth Elements and
Related Issues for Congress, by Brandon S. Tracy.
Congressional Research Service

9

2022 Invocation of the Defense Production Act for Large-Capacity Batteries: In Brief

activities include granting $28.8 million to the Urban Mining Company to assist with the
development of a domestic source of rare earth magnets;60 $35 million to MP Materials to assist
with the construction of a rare earth element extraction facility;61 and $30.4 million to Lynas Rare
Earths Ltd. for a rare earth element separation facility.62
Related Congressional Actions: Critical Minerals
In recent years, Congress has included provisions to address critical minerals or materials in
various laws, including defense authorization and appropriations acts. This section identifies
selected legislation enacted in the 117th Congress as of May 17, 2022.63
Selected Legislation Enacted in the 117th Congress
As of mid-May 2022, the 117th Congress has enacted two measures that provide support for
critical minerals or critical materials mining and processing.
The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (P.L. 117-58) includes multiple sections with
provisions addressing critical minerals.64 For example, Section 40205 directs the Secretary of
Energy to fund “a facility to demonstrate the commercial feasibility of a full-scale integrated rare
earth element extraction and separation facility and refinery.” Section 40206 directs the Bureau of
Land Management and the Forest Service to complete the federal permitting and review
processes related to critical mineral mines on federal lands with maximum efficiency. Sections
40207, 40208, and 40210 direct the Secretary of Energy to award over $6 billion in grants related
to the supply, processing, and recycling of battery critical materials and minerals. Section 40401
amends the DOE Title XVII loan guarantee program to consider projects that increase the supply
of domestically produced critical minerals.65
The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 (P.L. 117-81) includes provisions
directing the Secretary of Defense to create “a demonstration program on recovering rare earth
elements and critical minerals from acid mine drainage and other coal byproducts.”66

60 Department of Defense, “DOD Announces $77.3 Million in Defense Production Act Title III COVID-19 Actions,”
press release, July 24, 2021, at https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/2287490/dod-announces-773-
million-in-defense-production-act-title-iii-covid-19-actions/.
61 DOD, “DoD Awards $35 Million to MP Materials to Build U.S. Heavy Rare Earth Separation Capacity,” press
release, February 22, 2022, at https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/2941793/dod-awards-35-
million-to-mp-materials-to-build-us-heavy-rare-earth-separation-c/.
62 DOD, “DOD Announces Rare Earth Element Award to Strengthen Domestic Industrial Base,” press release,
February 1, 2021, at https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/2488672/dod-announces-rare-earth-
element-award-to-strengthen-domestic-industrial-base/.
63 Earlier Congresses also have considered and enacted measures with provisions pertaining to critical minerals or
materials. For instance, the 116th Congress enacted three laws mentioning critical minerals or critical materials, as used
in the context discussed in this report: the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (P.L. 116-92), the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (P.L. 116-260 ), and the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021(P.L. 116-283).
64 For more information on these sections, see CRS Report R47034, Energy and Minerals Provisions in the
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (P.L. 117-58), coordinated by Brent D. Yacobucci.
65 42 U.S.C. §§16511 et seq. For more information about the program, see CRS Insight IN11432, Department of
Energy Loan Programs: Title XVII Innovative Technology Loan Guarantees, by Phillip Brown et al.
66 P.L. 117-81 Title III Operation and Maintenance, Subtitle B—Energy and Environment, Section 320. Demonstration
Program on Domestic Production of Rare Earth Elements from Coal Byproducts.
Congressional Research Service

10

2022 Invocation of the Defense Production Act for Large-Capacity Batteries: In Brief

Congressional Considerations
The President exercises discretion when exercising DPA authorities. However, Congress may
consider supporting, limiting, or monitoring the President’s invocation of the DPA for critical
minerals mining and processing in relation to large-capacity batteries. Issues and options for
Congress may include the following:
 DOD may utilize existing DPA Fund appropriations for any DPA-related projects.
Congress could evaluate the sufficiency of available funding for implementation
of Section 303 authorities in the Presidential Determination, and, as warranted,
appropriate additional funding for federal entities responsible for carrying out
related efforts. Congress also may consider whether to appropriate funds specific
to critical materials mining activities to carry out Section 303 authorities under
the Presidential Determination, as well as what terms and parameters are of use
to attach to such funding.67
 In a 2022 report, DOE recommended that Congress consider directly appropriate
funding to DOE to implement DPA Title III actions to support a clean energy
transition.68 Additionally, some Members of Congress have called upon the
President to utilize the DPA to increase manufacturing capacity for technologies
that reduce fossil fuel demand, such as “electric heat pumps, efficient electric
appliances, renewable energy generation and storage, and other clean
technologies.”69 Congress may consider providing additional appropriations or
responsibilities to agencies beyond DOD for DPA actions to secure domestic
energy supplies—particularly those undertaken for both civilian and military
purposes. As noted above, DOD typically undertakes projects in service to
military purposes. Alternatively, Congress may opt to retain existing agency roles
relevant to the exercise of DPA Title III authorities and utilization of DPA Fund
appropriations.
 As of publication of this report, the President has not invoked DPA authorities
beyond Section 303. Congress may consider whether to encourage the President
to invoke other DPA authorities, such as Title I authorities to issue priority
contracts for critical and scarce supplies or Title VII authorities to enter into
voluntary agreements with private industry to help provide for the national
defense. Congress may also encourage the President to utilize DPA authorities
through passing legislation or resolutions. Alternatively, Congress could

67 For example, Congress could support or reject a request for additional emergency supplemental funding (White
House, “FACT SHEET: White House Calls on Congress to Provide Additional Support for Ukraine,” press release,
April 28, 2022, at https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/04/28/fact-sheet-white-house-
calls-on-congress-to-provide-additional-support-for-ukraine/).
68 U.S. Department of Energy, America’s Strategy to Secure the Supply Chain for a Robust Clean Energy Transition,
U.S. Department of Energy Response to Executive Order 14017, “America’s Supply Chains,” February 24, 2022, pp.
xiv, at https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2022-02/America%E2%80%99s%20Strategy%20to%20Secure%20
the%20Supply%20Chain%20for%20a%20Robust%20Clean%20Energy%20Transition%20FINAL.docx_0.pdf;
Department of Energy, “DOE Releases First-Ever Comprehensive Strategy to Secure America’s Clean Energy Supply
Chain,” February 24, 2022, https://www.energy.gov/articles/doe-releases-first-ever-comprehensive-strategy-secure-
americas-clean-energy-supply-chain.
69 Senator Markey et al., Letter to President Biden regarding use of the DPA to increase manufacturing capacity for
technologies that reduce fossil fuel demand, March 23, 2022.
Congressional Research Service

11

2022 Invocation of the Defense Production Act for Large-Capacity Batteries: In Brief

discourage the exercise of authorities in the Presidential Memorandum or pass
legislation that prohibits the use of DPA authorities for such purposes.
 The DPA requires the President to notify Congress of industrial base shortfalls
that warrant the invocation of Section 303(a) authorities.70 Congress may
consider whether changes to this level of reporting and oversight authorities are
needed.
 Members of Congress disagree about the use of the DPA to increase domestic
mining. As noted, some have called upon the President to exercise DPA
authorities to respond to domestic energy shortages. Others have opposed the
invocation of the DPA to address domestic mineral supply, as called for in the
Presidential Determination, due to “the harmful impacts of mining” on public
lands, water and tribal communities.71 Congress may choose to monitor the
consequences of DPA-related mining activities on adjacent tribal communities.
Additionally, Congress could consider the desirability of requiring additional
oversight or reporting on the impacts of DPA related mining on tribal
communities, public lands, and water resources. Congress may additionally
decide to revise the President’s authorities to implement the DPA with attention
to potential risks to natural resources and tribal communities.

Author Information

Heidi M. Peters
Nina M. Hart
Analyst in U.S. Defense Acquisition Policy
Legislative Attorney

Erica A. Lee
Brandon S. Tracy
Analyst in Emergency Management and Disaster
Analyst in Energy Policy
Recovery

70 Section 303 (a)(6) of the DPA; 50 U.S.C. §4533(a)(6).
71 House Natural Resources Committee, “Chair Grijalva, Rep. Lowenthal Urge Biden Administration Not to Use the
Defense Production Act to Increase Mining,” press release, March 29, 2022, at https://naturalresources.house.gov/
media/press-releases/chair-grijalva-rep-lowenthal-urge-biden-administration-not-to-use-the-defense-production-act-to-
increase-mining. See also discussion in U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, Full
Committee Hearing On Domestic Critical Mineral Supply Chains, hearing, 117th Cong., 2nd sess., March 31, 2022.
Congressional Research Service

12

2022 Invocation of the Defense Production Act for Large-Capacity Batteries: In Brief

Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan
shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and
under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other
than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in
connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not
subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in
its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or
material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to
copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

Congressional Research Service
R47124 · VERSION 1 · NEW
13