Institute of Museum and Library Services Grants to States Funding Formula: In Brief

Institute of Museum and Library Services Grants to States Funding Formula: In Brief

Institute of Museum and Library Services
Grants to States Funding Formula: In Brief
November 17, 2020
Congressional Research Service
https://crsreports.congress.gov
R46611

link to page 3 link to page 4 link to page 4 link to page 6 link to page 6 link to page 6 link to page 7 link to page 5 link to page 4 link to page 7
Institute of Museum and Library Services Grants to States Funding Formula

Contents
IMLS Grants to States Program Overview .......................................................................... 1
Appropriations................................................................................................................ 2
IMLS Grants to States Funding Formula Overview .............................................................. 2
Appropriations at or Below the FY2019 Level ............................................................... 4
Appropriations above the FY2019 Level ....................................................................... 4
Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Adjustment ..................................................................... 4
Formula Il ustration: FY2020 State Allocations ................................................................... 5

Figures
Figure 1. IMLS Grants to States Program Al ocation Flowchart.............................................. 3

Tables
Table 1. Funding Levels for the IMLS Grants to States Program, FY2018-FY2020 ................... 2

Contacts
Author Information ......................................................................................................... 5

Institute of Museum and Library Services Grants to States Funding Formula

his report begins with a short overview of the Grants to States program administered by
the Institute of Museum and Library Sciences (IMLS). It then examines the formula used
T to alocate funds under this program to states and territories. The report concludes with an
il ustration of the al ocation formula using FY2020 as an example.
IMLS Grants to States Program Overview
The IMLS is an independent federal agency that serves as the primary administrator of grants
supporting the nation’s libraries and museums. The IMLS administers grants to museums and
libraries in the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico (hereinafter referred to as
states); as wel as four U.S. territories (American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands, Guam, and the U.S. Virgin Islands) and three freely associated states (Palau,
Marshal Islands, and Federated States of Micronesia), which hereinafter are collectively referred
to as territories.
The IMLS Grants to States program is both the largest source of federal funding for library
services in the United States and the largest of the programs administered by the IMLS. The
Grants to States program was first authorized under the Museum and Library Services Act of
1996 (MLSA). It was subsequently authorized as Title II of the MLSA of 2003 (P.L. 108-81),
which was most recently amended by the Museum and Library Services Act of 2018 (P.L. 115-
410). IMLS Grants to States are al ocated to state library administrative agencies (SLAAs), which
are official state agencies charged by law in each state with the extension and development of
library services.1 SLAAs are located in each of the states and territories. SLAAs may be located
in state Departments of Education or in various other government agencies.2 An SLAA may use
IMLS Grants to States funds to support library initiatives and services across its state or territory,
or it may distribute the funds to public, academic, research, school, or special libraries or
consortia of libraries through competitive subawards or cooperative agreements.3
SLAAs differ in the functions and roles they serve within states. In addition to administering the
IMLS Grants to States program and coordinating and distributing other federal funds that may be
granted to a state under the Library Services and Technology Act (LSTA),4 some of the most
common functions and activities of SLAAs include providing reference and information services
to the state government; administering the state library; supporting statewide sharing of resources;
administering summer reading and continuing education programs; serving as the state archives;
and operating libraries for people with visual impairments, blindness, or print disabilities (e.g.,
dyslexia).5

1 20 U.S.C. §9122(4).
2 According to the most recent SLAA survey, the state Department of Education was the single most common
government agency to contain an SLAA (n=13). For further information on SLAAs, see Institute of Museum and
Library Services, State Library Adm inistrative Agencies Survey: Fiscal Year 2018 , Washington, DC, April 2020.
3 For-profit and federal libraries are not eligible for IMLS Grants to States funds.
4 T he LST A is found in Subchapter II of the Museum and Library Services Act, 20 U.S.C. §9121.
5 Institute of Museum and Library Services, State Library Administrative Agencies Survey: Fiscal Year 2018 ,
Washington, DC, April 2020.
Congressional Research Service
1

link to page 4 link to page 5 Institute of Museum and Library Services Grants to States Funding Formula

Appropriations
For FY2020, the total amount appropriated to the states and territories under the IMLS Grants to
States program was $166,803,000 (see Table 1). An additional $30,000,000 was made available
to the states under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act (P.L. 116-
136), enacted in March 2020.6 The state al ocation formula described in this report was also used
to al ocate these supplementary funds to SLAAs.
Table 1. Funding Levels for the IMLS Grants to States Program, FY2018-FY2020
Total Amount Distributed to
Fiscal Year
States and Territories
2018
$160,803,000
2019
$160,803,000
2020
$166,803,000
CARES Act Supplementary
$30,000,000
Appropriations (2020)
Source: IMLS budget tables, available at https://www.imls.gov/grants/grant-programs/grants-states/grants-states-
manual#al otmenttables.
IMLS Grants to States Funding Formula Overview
Under the IMLS Grants to States program, funds are distributed by formula to the states and
territories. An overview of the formula is shown in Figure 1.
The formula includes two sets of minimum grant provisions that are used to determine guaranteed
minimum grant amounts. The minimum grant amounts are written in statute and do not depend on
a state’s or territory’s size or population. The formula also includes provisions delineating that
after the minimum grants have been al ocated, remaining funds—which have been the majority of
funds under recent years’ funding levels—are to be al ocated in accordance with states’ and
territories’ proportionate shares of total population.
The following procedures are used to establish minimum grant levels:
 The first minimum grant is $680,000 for each state and $60,000 for each
territory.7 If the appropriations are not sufficient to give each state its first
minimum grant, then al states and territories receive a ratably reduced amount of
the first minimum grant.
 Under the second minimum grant, which is applicable only if appropriations
exceed the amount provided for FY2019 ($160,803,000), the funds above the
FY2019 amount are used to raise minimum grant amounts up to a maximum of
$1,000,000 for each state and up to $100,000 for each territory.8

6 For more information about supplementary appropriations for IMLS under the CARES Act, see CRS Insight
IN11409, CARES Act Arts and Cultural Provisions.
7 T he $680,000 first minimum grant amount for each state and the $60,000 first minimum grant amount for each
territory are specified in statute, 20 U.S.C. §9131.
8 T he increase to a maximum of $1,000,000 through the second minimum grant amount for each state and the increase
to a maximum of $100,000 through the second minimum grant amount for each territory are specified in statute, 20
Congressional Research Service
2

Institute of Museum and Library Services Grants to States Funding Formula

The nuanced minimum grant calculation is a distinctive part of the IMLS Grants to States
al ocation formula. Under the minimum grant provisions, each state and territory receives the
applicable minimum grant amount, which functions as a base guarantee to which remaining funds
are added. A total of $35,780,000 is necessary to satisfy the first minimum grant provision for
each state and territory.9
As noted above, the second minimum grant only becomes applicable if appropriations exceed the
amount provided for FY2019 ($160,803,000). An additional $16,920,000 in funds above the
FY2019 appropriation are necessary to fully satisfy the second minimum grant provision for each
state and territory.10 If at least that amount is appropriated, the second minimum grant functions
as a base guarantee to which remaining funds are added.
The remaining funds are then al ocated to states and territories according to their proportionate
share of the total population. The next section of this report explains each of these formula steps
in greater detail.
Figure 1. IMLS Grants to States Program Allocation Flowchart

Source: Created by CRS based on statute and conversations with IMLS.

U.S.C. §9131.
9 T his number is derived from 52 states receiving $680,000 each and 7 territories receiving $60,000 each.
10 T his number is derived from increasing each of the 52 states’ and 7 territories’ totals from their first minimum grant
amounts to the full minimum grant of $1,000,000 for each state and the full minimum grant of $100,000 for each
territory.
Congressional Research Service
3

Institute of Museum and Library Services Grants to States Funding Formula

Appropriations at or Below the FY2019 Level
In the case when total current-year funding available for states and territories is below the
FY2019 level of $160,803,000, then only the first minimum grant provision applies. Each state
and territory is guaranteed at least the first minimum grant amount of $680,000 or $60,000,
respectively.11
The remaining funds, calculated by subtracting the $35,780,000 mil ion needed to al ocate the
first minimum grant amounts to states and territories from the total available funds, are then
al ocated to states and territories according to the proportional relationships between each state’s
and territory’s population and the total population of al states and territories.
Appropriations above the FY2019 Level
If total current-year appropriations for the program exceed FY2019 appropriations
($160,803,000), then both the first and second minimum grant provisions apply. In this case, each
state and territory is initial y al ocated its first minimum grant amount of $680,000 and $60,000,
respectively.
The difference between current-year appropriations and FY2019 appropriations is referred to as
new money. The total amount of new money necessary to raise each state’s minimum grant
amount from $680,000 to the second minimum grant level of $1,000,000 and each territory’s
minimum grant amount from $60,000 to $100,000 is $16,920,000. If the amount of new money is
less than that, then the new money is divided evenly between the 52 states to give each state a new
minimum grant amount above $680,000 (the first minimum grant) and up to $1,000,000. In this
case, minimum grants to each territory remain at the first minimum grant amount of $60,000.
If the new money is sufficient to provide each state with a minimum grant of $1,000,000 but not
sufficient to raise each territory’s minimum grant amount to the second minimum grant level of
$100,000, the new money remaining after satisfying the second minimum grant condition for the
states is divided evenly among the territories and added to each territory’s first minimum grant of
$60,000.
After minimum grants are determined, remaining funds are distributed. The remaining funds are
calculated by subtracting the total amount necessary ($35,780,000) to give each state at least
$680,000 and each territory at least $60,000 and the new money (the difference between the
current-year appropriation and the FY2019 appropriation of $160,803,000) used for raising state
minimum grants up to the second minimum grant levels from the total appropriation. The
remaining funds are then al ocated to al states and territories according to the proportional
relationships between each state’s and territory’s population and the total population of al states
and territories.
Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Adjustment
According to Section 223(c)(1)(A)(i) of the Museum and Library Servic es Act of 1996, as
amended, a state’s al ocation under the Grants to States program is reduced if the level of
expenditures by that state’s SLAA for the previous fiscal year is less than the average of the total
of such expenditures for the three prior fiscal years. This is known as the Maintenance of Effort

11 If the total available funding is below $35,780,000, then each state’s and territory’s first minimum grant amount is
ratably reduced.

Congressional Research Service
4

Institute of Museum and Library Services Grants to States Funding Formula

(MOE) provision. IMLS is then required to reduce the al otment of any state or territory that did
not meet its MOE requirement and did not apply for, or receive, a waiver of the requirement.
Funds deducted from states not meeting the MOE requirement are then distributed across the
remaining states in accordance with formula provisions. IMLS does not disclose which states
have failed to meet their MOE requirement.
Formula Illustration: FY2020 State Allocations12
Below is an il ustration of the grant al ocation formula using the FY2020 IMLS Grants to States
appropriation.
The FY2020 appropriation for the IMLS Grants to States program was $166,803,000. This was
sufficient to give each state its first minimum grant of $680,000 and each territory its first
minimum grant of $60,000. Because there were sufficient funds to give each state and territory its
first minimum grant, the total appropriation for FY2020 was compared to the FY2019
appropriation to determine if there was any new money available to increase minimum grant
amounts based on the second minimum grant provision.
The total FY2020 appropriation was $6,000,000 higher than the FY2019 appropriation, meaning
that $6,000,000 in new money was available for increasing state minimum grants. This was not
sufficient to raise each state’s minimum grant amount to $1,000,000; in accordance with the
formula described above, the $6,000,000 was divided evenly among the states, for an additional
amount of $115,384 for each state. This amount was added to each state’s first minimum grant of
$680,000 to arrive at a new state minimum grant of $795,384 for FY2020. Because no new
money remained, the minimum grant for the territories stayed at $60,000.
After calculating minimum grants for the states and territories, the remaining funds available for
grants to states and territories was determined by subtracting the amount of funds needed to meet
the first minimum grant ($35,780,000) and the new money used to meet the second minimum
grant requirement ($6,000,000) from the total appropriation ($166,803,000). This resulted in
$125,023,000 in remaining funds, which were al ocated to the states and territories based on the
most recent available population data from the U.S. Census, consistent with how IMLS calculated
actual pre-MOE adjusted FY2020 grants to states and territories.

Author Information

Boris Granovskiy
Kyrie E. Dragoo
Analyst in Education Policy
Analyst in Education Policy

12 Actual FY2020 state allocations, as well as state allocations for prior fiscal years and state allocations under the
CARES Act supplementary appropriation, are published by IMLS at https://www.imls.gov/grants/grant -programs/
grants-states/grants-states-manual#allotmenttables.
Congressional Research Service
5

Institute of Museum and Library Services Grants to States Funding Formula

Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan
shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and
under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should n ot be relied upon for purposes other
than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in
connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not
subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in
its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or
material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to
copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

Congressional Research Service
R46611 · VERSION 1 · NEW
6