{ "id": "R46242", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "R46242", "active": true, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 618311, "date": "2020-02-27", "retrieved": "2020-03-06T17:07:07.926077", "title": "Major Agricultural Trade Issues in 2020", "summary": "Sales of U.S. agricultural products to foreign markets absorb about one-fifth of U.S. agricultural production, thus contributing significantly to the health of the farm economy. Farm product exports, which totaled $136 billion in FY2019 (see chart), make up about 8% of total U.S. exports and contribute positively to the U.S. balance of trade. The economic benefits of agricultural exports also extend across rural communities, while overseas farm sales help to buoy a wide array of industries linked to agriculture, including transportation, processing, and farm input suppliers.\nU.S. Agricultural Trade, Fiscal Years, 2014-19\nBillion U.S. Dollars\n/\nSource: USDA, Economic Research Service (ERS), January 2020.\nA major area of interest for the 116th Congress during its first session was the loss of export demand for agricultural products in the wake of tariff increases imposed by the Trump Administration on U.S. imports of steel and aluminum from certain countries and other imported products from China. Some of the affected countries levied retaliatory tariffs on U.S. agricultural products, contributing to a 53% decline in value of U.S. agricultural exports to China in 2018 and a broader decline in exports across countries imposing retaliatory tariffs in 2019. To help mitigate the economic impact from export losses, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) authorized two short-term assistance (\u201ctrade aid\u201d) programs to producers of affected agricultural commodities, valued at up to $12 billion in 2019 and $16 billion in 2019. \nOther major agricultural trade developments in 2019 included efforts to ratify the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), trade negotiations with China, Japan, and the European Union, and continued review of U.S. participation in the World Trade Organization (WTO). The USMCA was ratified by Mexico and the U.S. Congress, and awaits ratification by Canada before it can enter into force. The United States and Japan signed an agreement increasing market access for many U.S. agricultural exports to Japan. This agreement, which does not require congressional approval, excludes provisions pertaining to non-tariff measures that could become future trade barriers for U.S. agricultural exporters. A second-stage negotiation toward a more comprehensive pact could commence in 2020. \nIn January 2020, President Trump signed a \u201cPhase One\u201d executive agreement (that also does not require congressional approval) with the Chinese government on trade and investment issues, including agriculture. Under the agreement, China is not required to repeal any tariffs, but it has reduced certain retaliatory tariffs and is granting tariff exclusions for various agricultural products in order to reach a target level of U.S. imports\u2014$32 billion (relative to a 2017 base of $24 billion) over a two-year period. The coronavirus outbreak since January 2020 may affect China\u2019s ability to meet these commitments.\nIn addition to further negotiations with Japan and China, the Administration has stated its intent to pursue trade agreements with the European Union, India, Kenya, the United Kingdom, and possibly other countries. The Trump Administration has also indicated that reforming the WTO is a priority for 2020. The WTO Ministerial Conference in June 2020 presents an opportunity to address pressing concerns over agricultural reform efforts. \nAmong other agricultural trade issues that may arise in the 116th Congress are proposed changes to U.S. trade remedy laws to address imports of seasonal produce affecting growers in the Southeast, the establishment of a common international framework for approval, trade, and marketing of the products of agricultural biotechnology, and foreign restrictions on U.S. exports of meat that are inconsistent with international trade protocols. Additionally, U.S. beef and pork face trade barriers in several markets because of U.S. producers\u2019 use of growth promotants and the feed additive ractopamine.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/R46242", "sha1": "65d91673dc29e079c05ef59ec4b916df39e71088", "filename": "files/20200227_R46242_65d91673dc29e079c05ef59ec4b916df39e71088.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R46242_files&id=/4.png": "files/20200227_R46242_images_757cf701f67d0d9af49310121dcf94a2dfeacdbb.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R46242_files&id=/0.png": "files/20200227_R46242_images_41c56394dac5c474bdb37e8de9a37e1781ab565a.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R46242_files&id=/1.png": "files/20200227_R46242_images_b817c235d9ee1b2317d42010520aa35e4f033134.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R46242_files&id=/5.png": "files/20200227_R46242_images_9a10cfbde3f748ac485779d63cf2284319ef1351.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R46242_files&id=/3.png": "files/20200227_R46242_images_91d14180902c2d450f2d9a003c5bd40c782dffda.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R46242_files&id=/2.png": "files/20200227_R46242_images_b47f03c83d23397da40cec1aaf9b5cb2df304535.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R46242", "sha1": "75a1814cb3e5349bdd0c32ca2e3d963e4a045e82", "filename": "files/20200227_R46242_75a1814cb3e5349bdd0c32ca2e3d963e4a045e82.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4829, "name": "Agricultural Trade & Food Aid" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4893, "name": "Agricultural Trade" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4938, "name": "Major Economies & U.S. Trade Relations" } ] } ], "topics": [ "Agricultural Policy", "Economic Policy", "Foreign Affairs", "Industry and Trade" ] }