{
  "id": "R45844",
  "type": "CRS Report",
  "typeId": "REPORTS",
  "number": "R45844",
  "active": true,
  "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 603453,
      "date": "2019-07-30",
      "retrieved": "2019-08-12T22:12:57.697233",
      "title": "FY2019 Disaster Supplemental Appropriations: Overview",
      "summary": "This report provides a legislative history of the Additional Supplemental Appropriations for Disaster Relief Act, 2019 (P.L. 116-20), and provides an overview of some of the issues that often arise with consideration of supplemental disaster assistance appropriations.\nIn total, 59 major disasters were declared in calendar year 2018, and 27 major disasters were declared in 2019 up to the date the compromise on the disaster supplemental was announced. In addition to these specifically declared incidents, other situations arose that caused disruption to lives, economic resources, and infrastructure. \nTogether, these incidents and ongoing recovery efforts from previous disasters drove a demand for additional federal budgetary resources beyond those provided through regular annual appropriations. This kind of demand is usually reflected in a request by the Administration for supplemental appropriations after the need for funding is recognized. Despite the absence of such a request by the Trump Administration, congressional leadership in both the House and the Senate chose to consider disaster-related supplemental appropriations at the end of the 115th Congress.\nAn initial $7.8 billion proposal that passed the House in the 115th Congress as part of a consolidated appropriations bill did not advance in the Senate. In the 116th Congress, H.R. 268 passed the House. This measure included $14.19 billion in disaster relief appropriations, as well as continuing appropriations intended to resolve an ongoing lapse in annual appropriations that had caused a partial government shutdown. The Senate was unable to get cloture on proposed amendments to the measure, and consideration of the bill stalled. After the lapse in appropriations was resolved, Senate Appropriations Chairman Richard Shelby introduced a $13.45 billion supplemental appropriations measure structured as a substitute to H.R. 268. Again, the Senate could not achieve cloture on the proposal.\nOn April 9, House Appropriations Chairwoman Nita Lowey introduced H.R. 2157, a supplemental appropriations bill, which covered the same disasters addressed in H.R. 268, as well as additional disasters that had occurred since the earlier measure had been passed by the House. CBO estimated the new bill, as introduced, would provide $17.31 billion in discretionary spending, which grew to $19.26 billion through floor action. The bill passed the House May 10, 2019, by a vote of 257-150.\nA $19.19 billion bipartisan, bicameral agreement on FY2019 disaster funding was negotiated, and offered in the Senate as S.Amdt. 250 to H.R. 2157 on May 23, 2019. The bill, as amended, was passed by the Senate, 85-8. Three attempts to approve the amended bill by unanimous consent were blocked in the House of Representatives while the body was in pro forma session during the Memorial Day recess. The House subsequently considered the amended bill under suspension of the rules on June 3, 2019, and voted 354-58 to approve the measure. The bill was signed into law as P.L. 116-20 on June 6, 2019.\nThis report includes a more detailed legislative history and a tabular comparison that shows how the funding in these different approaches evolved. Congressional clients seeking further insight into specific programs and provisions in P.L. 116-20 may consult the analysts and background reports listed in CRS Report R45714, FY2019 Disaster Supplemental Appropriations: CRS Experts. The report also includes a discussion of issues that commonly arise during debate on supplemental appropriations, including\nthe relative timeliness of supplemental appropriations; \nadjustments to spending limits that are often applied to them; \noffsets for disaster relief and recovery appropriations;\nthe appropriate scope of supplemental appropriations;\ntimelines for obligation of funding; and\noversight of supplemental spending.\nThis report will not be updated.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": true,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/R45844",
          "sha1": "09f3700ac0133fd8cae6c1018e69de6d3acbb0f9",
          "filename": "files/20190730_R45844_09f3700ac0133fd8cae6c1018e69de6d3acbb0f9.html",
          "images": {}
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R45844",
          "sha1": "bf64286a1a01398031c3eb548d3f32476e2bea80",
          "filename": "files/20190730_R45844_bf64286a1a01398031c3eb548d3f32476e2bea80.pdf",
          "images": {}
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "IBCList",
          "id": 4845,
          "name": "Federal Emergency Management"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Appropriations",
    "Health Policy"
  ]
}