{ "id": "R45345", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "R", "number": "R45345", "active": true, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov, EveryCRSReport.com", "versions": [ { "summary": null, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=R45345", "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "type": "CRS Report", "formats": [ { "sha1": "18f0502351016ce002dbb47d6b2417fbf34a7b60", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R45345/11", "filename": "files/2024-03-29_R45345_18f0502351016ce002dbb47d6b2417fbf34a7b60.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2024-03-29_R45345_18f0502351016ce002dbb47d6b2417fbf34a7b60.html" } ], "title": "Intelligence Community Whistleblower Provisions: A Legislative History", "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "retrieved": "2024-04-15T04:03:23.562242", "date": "2024-03-29", "typeId": "R", "id": "R45345_11_2024-03-29", "active": true }, { "summary": null, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=R45345", "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "type": "CRS Report", "formats": [ { "sha1": "9d07b74cf183328c25e45761888e551d992fe093", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R45345/10", "filename": "files/2022-06-15_R45345_9d07b74cf183328c25e45761888e551d992fe093.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2022-06-15_R45345_9d07b74cf183328c25e45761888e551d992fe093.html" } ], "title": "Intelligence Community Whistleblower Provisions: A Legislative History", "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "retrieved": "2024-04-15T04:03:23.561179", "date": "2022-06-15", "typeId": "R", "id": "R45345_10_2022-06-15", "active": true }, { "summary": null, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=R45345", "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "type": "CRS Report", "formats": [ { "sha1": "4c0d035fa1043f8ac2cff2c19d3261e8042949c2", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R45345/8", "filename": "files/2021-06-22_R45345_4c0d035fa1043f8ac2cff2c19d3261e8042949c2.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2021-06-22_R45345_4c0d035fa1043f8ac2cff2c19d3261e8042949c2.html" } ], "title": "Intelligence Community Whistleblower Provisions: A Legislative History", "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "retrieved": "2024-04-15T04:03:23.559665", "date": "2021-06-22", "typeId": "R", "id": "R45345_8_2021-06-22", "active": true }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 605572, "date": "2019-09-23", "retrieved": "2019-10-10T22:27:22.275831", "title": "Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protections", "summary": "Whistleblowing can be defined as \u201cthe act of reporting waste, fraud, abuse and corruption in a lawful manner to those who can correct the wrongdoing.\u201d Intelligence community (IC) whistleblowers are those employees or contractors working in any of the 17 elements of the IC who reasonably believe there has been a violation of law, rule, or regulation; gross mismanagement; waste of resources; abuse of authority; or a substantial danger to public health and safety. The IC has publicly recognized the importance of whistleblowing, and supports protections for whistleblowers who conform to guidelines to protect classified information. The Director of National Intelligence (DNI) whistleblowing policy and guidance is publicly available and specifically addresses the process for making protected disclosures and whistleblower protections for IC contractors, members of the Armed Forces, and federal IC employees. There are differing opinions, however, on whether the IC\u2019s internal processes have the transparency necessary to ensure adequate protections against reprisal, and whether protections for IC contractors are sufficient. \nIC whistleblower protections have evolved in response to perceptions of gaps that many observers believed left whistleblowers vulnerable to reprisal. The first whistleblower legislation specific to the IC, enacted in 1998, was limited to specifying a process for IC whistleblowers to make a complaint but offered no specific protections. Subsequent legislation, enacted in 2010, included only general provisions for protecting IC whistleblowers with no additional guidance on standards for implementation. Presidential Policy Directive (PPD)-19, signed in 2012, provided the first specific protections against reprisal actions for making a complaint. The Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 codified these provisions, which were further supported with IC implementation policy. In early 2018, Congress passed legislation to address perceived gaps in protections for IC contractors. Separate legislation under Title 10 of the U.S. Code, along with DOD implementing guidance, provides protections for members of the Armed Forces, including those assigned to elements of the IC.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/R45345", "sha1": "311b96b44d6361b5ee1e6738e82495681f7eb53e", "filename": "files/20190923_R45345_311b96b44d6361b5ee1e6738e82495681f7eb53e.html", "images": {} }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R45345", "sha1": "eb2f4b3ca615a230c2af22715c77024486cba2f6", "filename": "files/20190923_R45345_eb2f4b3ca615a230c2af22715c77024486cba2f6.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4809, "name": "National & Military Intelligence" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 590039, "date": "2019-01-18", "retrieved": "2019-04-17T14:31:50.070033", "title": "Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protections: In Brief", "summary": "Whistleblowing is \u201cthe act of reporting waste, fraud, abuse and corruption in a lawful manner to those who can correct the wrongdoing.\u201d Intelligence community (IC) whistleblowers are those employees or contractors working in any of the 17 elements of the IC who reasonably believe there has been a violation of law, rule, or regulation; gross mismanagement; waste of resources; abuse of authority; or a substantial danger to public health and safety. The IC has publicly recognized the importance of whistleblowing, and supports protections for whistleblowers who conform to guidelines to protect classified information. The Director of National Intelligence (DNI) whistleblowing policy and guidance is publicly available and specifically addresses the process for making protected disclosures and whistleblower protections for IC contractors, members of the Armed Forces, and federal employees. There are differing opinions, however, on whether the IC\u2019s internal processes have the transparency necessary to ensure adequate protections against reprisal, and whether protections for IC contractors are sufficient. \nIC whistleblower protections have evolved in response to perceptions of gaps that many believed left whistleblowers vulnerable to reprisal. The first whistleblower legislation specific to the IC was limited to specifying a process for IC whistleblowers to make a complaint but offered no specific protections. Subsequent legislation included only general provisions for protecting IC whistleblowers with no additional guidance on standards for implementation. Presidential Policy Directive (PPD)-19, signed in 2012, provided the first specific protections against reprisal actions for making a complaint. The Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 codified these provisions, which were further supported with IC implementation policy. Separate legislation under Title 10 of the U.S. Code, along with DOD implementing guidance, provides protections for members of the Armed Forces, including those assigned to elements of the IC. In early 2018, Congress passed legislation to address perceived gaps in protections for IC contractors.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/R45345", "sha1": "955be21d78bc21e1b8114e20e72b35e050691198", "filename": "files/20190118_R45345_955be21d78bc21e1b8114e20e72b35e050691198.html", "images": {} }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R45345", "sha1": "aedb7947f019da3ae800e2d555adae789c56b8a8", "filename": "files/20190118_R45345_aedb7947f019da3ae800e2d555adae789c56b8a8.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4809, "name": "National & Military Intelligence" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 586418, "date": "2018-10-18", "retrieved": "2018-10-19T13:12:45.282589", "title": "Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protections: In Brief", "summary": "Whistleblowing is \u201cthe act of reporting waste, fraud, abuse and corruption in a lawful manner to those who can correct the wrongdoing.\u201d Intelligence Community (IC) whistleblowers are those employees or contractors working in any of the 17 elements of the IC who reasonably believe there has been a violation of law, rule, or regulation, gross mismanagement, waste of resources, abuse of authority, or a substantial danger to public health and safety. The essential distinction between whistleblowers generally and those in the IC (or those who otherwise have security clearances) is the concern for protecting classified information that may be involved in an IC-related incident or complaint. The IC has recognized that whistleblowing can save taxpayers\u2019 dollars, ensure an ethical and safe working environment, and enable timely responses for corrective action. \nWhistleblowing protections for employees and contractors in the IC are extended only to those who make a lawful disclosure. They do not cover disclosures that do not conform to statutes and directives prescribing reporting procedures intended to protect classified information, such as leaking to the media or a foreign government. IC whistleblowing does not include a difference of opinion over policy, strategy, analysis, or priorities for intelligence funding or collection unless there is a reasonable concern over legality or constitutionality. Whistleblowing protections also do not protect against legitimate adverse personnel or security clearance eligibility decisions if the agency can demonstrate that it would have taken the same action in the absence of a protected disclosure. \nCongress and the executive branch have defined in statute and directives procedures for IC whistleblowers to make protected disclosures that also provide for the security of classified information. The Director of National Intelligence (DNI) whistleblowing policy and guidance is publicly available and specifically addresses whistleblower process and protections for IC contractors, members of the Armed Forces, and federal employees. There are differing opinions, however, on whether the IC\u2019s internal processes have the transparency necessary to ensure adequate protections against reprisal, and whether protections for IC contractors are sufficient. \nIC whistleblower protections have evolved in response to perceptions of gaps that many believed left whistleblowers vulnerable to reprisal. The first whistleblower legislation specific to the IC was the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act (ICWPA) of 1998. It was limited to specifying a process for an IC whistleblower to make a complaint but offered no specific protections. The Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 included provisions for protecting IC whistleblowers, though these were general and subject to different standards of implementation. Presidential Policy Directive (PPD)-19, signed in 2012, provided the first specific protections in response to perceptions that IC whistleblowers remained vulnerable to reprisal actions for making a complaint. The Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 codified PPD-19 provisions, and Intelligence Community Directive (ICD)-120 provided PPD-19 implementation policy. For members of the Armed Forces assigned to elements of the IC, Title 10 U.S. Code Section 1034 provides whistleblower protections. Department of Defense (DOD) implementing guidance for Section 1034 can be found in DOD Directive 7050.06, Military Whistleblower Protection.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R45345", "sha1": "44e6c446995a691867a173b117db08ab10d3e106", "filename": "files/20181018_R45345_44e6c446995a691867a173b117db08ab10d3e106.html", "images": {} }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R45345", "sha1": "72bcd4170cd9069e2c8d8dfc2b63f2be6004d027", "filename": "files/20181018_R45345_72bcd4170cd9069e2c8d8dfc2b63f2be6004d027.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [] } ], "topics": [ "Intelligence and National Security", "National Defense" ] }