{ "id": "R45087", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "R", "number": "R45087", "active": true, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov, EveryCRSReport.com", "versions": [ { "summary": null, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=R45087", "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "type": "CRS Report", "formats": [ { "sha1": "4b00e25f378b4ab871d58ba7e61c53cff878d801", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R45087/14", "filename": "files/2021-02-01_R45087_4b00e25f378b4ab871d58ba7e61c53cff878d801.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2021-02-01_R45087_4b00e25f378b4ab871d58ba7e61c53cff878d801.html" } ], "title": "Resolutions to Censure the President: Procedure and History", "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "retrieved": "2021-03-05T04:03:52.452280", "date": "2021-02-01", "typeId": "R", "id": "R45087_14_2021-02-01", "active": true }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 608358, "date": "2019-11-20", "retrieved": "2019-12-13T15:18:37.244629", "title": "Resolutions to Censure the President: Procedure and History", "summary": "Censure is a reprimand adopted by one or both chambers of Congress against a Member of Congress, President, federal judge, or other government official. While Member censure is a disciplinary measure that is sanctioned by the Constitution (Article 1, Section 5), non-Member censure is not. Rather, it is a formal expression or \u201csense of\u201d one or both houses of Congress. \nCensure resolutions targeting non-Members have utilized a range of statements to highlight conduct deemed by the resolutions\u2019 sponsors to be inappropriate or unauthorized. Before the Nixon Administration, such resolutions included variations of the words or phrases unconstitutional, usurpation, reproof, and abuse of power. Beginning in 1972, the most clearly \u201ccensorious\u201d resolutions have contained the word censure in the text. \nResolutions attempting to censure the President are usually simple resolutions. These resolutions are not privileged for consideration in the House or Senate. They are, instead, considered under the regular parliamentary mechanisms used to process \u201csense of\u201d legislation. \nSince 1800, Members of the House and Senate have introduced resolutions of censure against at least 12 sitting Presidents. Two additional Presidents received criticism via alternative means (a House committee report and an amendment to a resolution). \nThe clearest instance of a successful presidential censure is Andrew Jackson. The Senate approved a resolution of censure in 1834. On three other occasions, critical resolutions were adopted, but their final language, as amended, obscured the original intention to censure the President. \nIn the remaining cases, resolutions remained in committee, without further consideration, or were not adopted in a floor vote. Nevertheless, presidential censure attempts have become more frequent since the Watergate era. \nThis report summarizes the procedures that may be used to consider resolutions of censure and the history of attempts to censure the President (1st-115th Congresses). It also provides citations to additional reading material on the subject.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/R45087", "sha1": "ab2797488b59992985ef7f480391fc5ebe4d8734", "filename": "files/20191120_R45087_ab2797488b59992985ef7f480391fc5ebe4d8734.html", "images": {} }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R45087", "sha1": "45a627c5d9801ef573358361f932bf1c76d56151", "filename": "files/20191120_R45087_45a627c5d9801ef573358361f932bf1c76d56151.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 603417, "date": "2019-08-01", "retrieved": "2019-08-12T22:12:10.031359", "title": "Resolutions to Censure the President: Procedure and History", "summary": "Censure is a reprimand adopted by one or both chambers of Congress against a Member of Congress, President, federal judge, or other government official. While Member censure is a disciplinary measure that is sanctioned by the Constitution (Article 1, Section 5), non-Member censure is not. Rather, it is a formal expression or \u201csense of\u201d one or both houses of Congress. \nCensure resolutions targeting non-Members have utilized a range of statements to highlight conduct deemed by the resolutions\u2019 sponsors to be inappropriate or unauthorized. Before the Nixon Administration, such resolutions included variations of the words or phrases unconstitutional, usurpation, reproof, and abuse of power. Beginning in 1972, the most clearly \u201ccensorious\u201d resolutions have contained the word censure in the text. \nResolutions attempting to censure the President are usually simple resolutions. These resolutions are not privileged for consideration in the House or Senate. They are, instead, considered under the regular parliamentary mechanisms used to process \u201csense of\u201d legislation. \nSince 1800, Members of the House and Senate have introduced resolutions of censure against at least 12 sitting Presidents. Two additional Presidents received criticism via alternative means (a House committee report and an amendment to a resolution). \nThe clearest instance of a successful presidential censure is Andrew Jackson. The Senate approved a resolution of censure in 1834. On three other occasions, critical resolutions were adopted, but their final language, as amended, obscured the original intention to censure the President. \nIn the remaining cases, resolutions remained in committee, without further consideration, or were not adopted in a floor vote. Nevertheless, presidential censure attempts have become more frequent since the Watergate era. \nThis report summarizes the procedures that may be used to consider resolutions of censure and the history of attempts to censure the President (1st-115th Congresses). It also provides citations to additional reading material on the subject.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/R45087", "sha1": "90cdd73e95b53959a0085d8a048476f16a6ebe9b", "filename": "files/20190801_R45087_90cdd73e95b53959a0085d8a048476f16a6ebe9b.html", "images": {} }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R45087", "sha1": "17759c9d937bf50278ec1f3b49a66aba89dd1af2", "filename": "files/20190801_R45087_17759c9d937bf50278ec1f3b49a66aba89dd1af2.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 578179, "date": "2018-02-01", "retrieved": "2018-02-06T23:47:33.136653", "title": "Resolutions to Censure the President: Procedure and History", "summary": "Censure is a reprimand adopted by one or both chambers of Congress against a Member of Congress, President, federal judge, or other government official. While Member censure is a disciplinary measure that is sanctioned by the Constitution (Article 1, Section 5), non-Member censure is not. Rather, it is a formal expression or \u201csense of\u201d one or both houses of Congress. As such, censure resolutions targeting non-Members use a variety of statements to highlight conduct deemed by the resolutions\u2019 sponsors to be inappropriate or unauthorized.\nResolutions that attempt to censure the President for abuse of power, ethics violations, or other behavior, are usually simple resolutions. These resolutions are not privileged for consideration in the House or Senate. They are, instead, considered under the regular parliamentary mechanisms used to process \u201csense of\u201d legislation. \nSince 1800, Members of the House and Senate have introduced resolutions of censure against at least 12 sitting Presidents. Two additional Presidents received criticism via alternative means (a House committee report and an amendment to a resolution). \nThe clearest instance of a successful presidential censure is Andrew Jackson. A resolution of censure was approved in 1834. On three other occasions, critical resolutions were adopted, but their final language, as amended, obscured the original intention to censure the President. \nIn the remaining cases, resolutions remained in committee, without further consideration, or were not adopted in a floor vote. Nevertheless, presidential censure attempts have become more frequent since the Richard Nixon era. \nThis report summarizes the procedures that may be used to consider resolutions of censure and the history of attempts to censure the President (1st-114th Congresses). It also provides citations to additional reading material on the subject.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R45087", "sha1": "781cf9f287bdddbe9dbdf2e6b0921d2b6eef32d4", "filename": "files/20180201_R45087_781cf9f287bdddbe9dbdf2e6b0921d2b6eef32d4.html", "images": {} }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R45087", "sha1": "5dc07365fb7c4b6e033be1d94513be344116b64f", "filename": "files/20180201_R45087_5dc07365fb7c4b6e033be1d94513be344116b64f.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [] } ], "topics": [ "Foreign Affairs", "Legislative Process" ] }