{
  "id": "R44897",
  "type": "CRS Report",
  "typeId": "REPORTS",
  "number": "R44897",
  "active": true,
  "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 586048,
      "date": "2017-07-17",
      "retrieved": "2019-04-18T15:41:36.654327",
      "title": "Human Rights in China and U.S. Policy: Issues for the 115th Congress",
      "summary": "This report examines human rights conditions in the People\u2019s Republic of China (PRC) and policy options for Congress. The PRC government under the leadership of Chinese Communist Party General Secretary and State President Xi Jinping has implemented a clampdown on political dissent, civil society, human rights activists and lawyers, and the religious, cultural, and linguistic practices of Tibetans and Uyghurs. Other major human rights violations in China include the practice of incommunicado detention, torture of persons in custody, censorship of the Internet, and restrictions on the freedoms of religion, association, and assembly. \nThe era of Hu Jintao, Xi\u2019s predecessor, who was China\u2019s leader from 2002 to 2012, was marked by serious human rights abuses, but also by an emerging civil society of nongovernmental organizations and advocacy groups, a growing number of human rights activists and lawyers, and the rise of limited investigative reporting and public discourse on social media platforms. Despite moving forward with some policies aimed at reducing rights abuses and making the government more transparent and responsive, Xi has implemented new laws that appear to strengthen the role of the Communist Party and the state over a wide range of social and civil society activities in the name of national security, and instated greater government controls over the media and the Internet. Since July 2015, over 250 human rights lawyers and activists have been temporarily detained, arrested, sentenced to prison terms, or placed under heavy surveillance in what is known as the \u201c7-09 Crackdown.\u201d\nHuman rights conditions in the PRC long have been a central issue in U.S.-China ties. According to some analysts, the Trump Administration has indicated a partial departure from the Obama Administration\u2019s approach toward human rights in China, which some analysts say suggests less emphasis on human rights in U.S. dealings with Beijing. The issue of human rights is not among the \u201cfour pillars\u201d of the new U.S.-China Comprehensive Dialogue that was established during discussions between President Trump and President Xi at Mar-a-Lago in April 2017. In a speech to State Department employees in May 2017, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson stated that \u201cguiding all of our foreign policy actions are our fundamental values: our values around freedom, human dignity, the way people are treated.\u201d He also said, \u201cIf we condition too heavily that others must adopt this value that we\u2019ve come to over a long history of our own, it really creates obstacles to our ability to advance our national security interests, our economic interests.\u201d\nCongress and successive Administrations have developed an array of means for promoting human rights and democracy in China, often deployed simultaneously. Policy tools include open censure of China; quiet diplomacy; congressional hearings and legislation; funding for rule of law and civil society programs in the PRC; support for dissidents and prodemocracy groups in China and the United States; sanctions; bilateral dialogue; Internet freedom efforts; public diplomacy; and coordinating international pressure. Another high-profile policy practice is the U.S. government issuance of congressionally mandated country reports, including reports on human rights, religious freedom, and trafficking in persons. \nMany experts and policymakers have sharply disagreed over the best policy approaches and methods to apply toward human rights issues in China. Possible approaches range from supporting incremental progress and promoting human rights through bilateral and international engagement, to conditioning the further development of bilateral ties on improvements in human rights in China. Some approaches attempt to balance U.S. values and human rights concerns with other U.S. interests in the bilateral relationship. Other approaches challenge the underlying assumption that U.S. human rights values and policies may involve trade-offs with other U.S. interests, arguing instead that human rights are fundamental to other U.S. objectives. \nFor additional information, including policy recommendations, see CRS Report R41007, Understanding China\u2019s Political System; the Congressional-Executive Commission on China\u2019s Annual Report 2016; the U.S. Department of State\u2019s Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2016; and other resources cited in the report.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": true,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/R44897",
          "sha1": "7f629427d2491c059d494ba8abd59f7695b63b02",
          "filename": "files/20170717_R44897_7f629427d2491c059d494ba8abd59f7695b63b02.html",
          "images": {}
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R44897",
          "sha1": "60ae819b66aaef628917f51ae946658c3aec1390",
          "filename": "files/20170717_R44897_60ae819b66aaef628917f51ae946658c3aec1390.pdf",
          "images": {}
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "IBCList",
          "id": 4911,
          "name": "East Asia & Pacific"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Asian Affairs",
    "Economic Policy",
    "Foreign Affairs",
    "Intelligence and National Security",
    "National Defense"
  ]
}