{
  "id": "R44867",
  "type": "CRS Report",
  "typeId": "REPORTS",
  "number": "R44867",
  "active": false,
  "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 585854,
      "date": "2017-06-14",
      "retrieved": "2020-01-02T17:00:00.334097",
      "title": "Defining Readiness: Background and Issues for Congress",
      "summary": "Many defense observers and government officials, including some Members of Congress, are concerned that the U.S. military faces a readiness crisis. The Department of Defense has used readiness as a central justification for its FY2017 and FY2018 funding requests. Yet what makes the U.S. military ready is debated. \nThis report explains how differing uses of the term readiness cloud the debate on whether a readiness crisis exists and, if so, what funding effort would best address it. \nCRS has identified two principal uses of the term readiness. One, readiness is used in a broad sense to describe whether military forces are able to do what the nation asks of them. In this sense, readiness encompasses almost every aspect of the military. Two, readiness is used more narrowly to mean only one component of what makes military forces able. In this second sense, readiness is parallel to other military considerations, like force structure and modernization, which usually refer to the size of the military and the sophistication of its weaponry. Both uses embody accepted concepts: the broader use capturing the military\u2019s ability to accomplish its overall goals and the narrower use capturing the military\u2019s ability when its size and type of weaponry are held steady. \nThese two senses of the term are interdependent. Today, most observers assume the military should be as ready as possible in the narrow sense, but in past eras some favored accepting lower readiness in a narrow sense in order to redirect resources in ways they felt improved the military\u2019s readiness in the broad sense (to include funding a larger force or newer equipment). \nUse of either sense of readiness affects Congress\u2019s evaluation of certain key issues:\nIs there a readiness crisis? Most observers who see a crisis tend to use readiness in a broad sense, asserting the U.S. military is not prepared for the challenges it faces largely because of its size or the sophistication of its weapons. Most observers who do not see a crisis tend to use readiness in a narrow sense, assessing only the state of training and the status of current equipment.\nFor what scenarios, contingencies, and threats should the U.S. military be ready? Some senior officials express confidence in the military\u2019s readiness for the missions it is executing today\u2014although other observers are not as confident\u2014but express concern over the military\u2019s readiness for potential missions in the future. \nHow is readiness measured? Because of the two uses of the term, measuring readiness is difficult; despite ongoing efforts, many observers do not find DOD\u2019s readiness reporting useful. \nHow might DOD\u2019s FY2018 budget request improve readiness? DOD\u2019s request increases operating accounts more than procurement accounts. If readiness is used in a narrow sense, these funding increases may be the best way to improve the military\u2019s readiness. If readiness is used in a broader sense, that funding may not be sufficient, or at least the best way to improve readiness.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/R44867",
          "sha1": "12b54e97deb274e6e3d474b42c8495af02d703d9",
          "filename": "files/20170614_R44867_12b54e97deb274e6e3d474b42c8495af02d703d9.html",
          "images": {}
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R44867",
          "sha1": "df0e04a1aebb050223de03698dc99abfc0f58b23",
          "filename": "files/20170614_R44867_df0e04a1aebb050223de03698dc99abfc0f58b23.pdf",
          "images": {}
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "IBCList",
          "id": 4925,
          "name": "Readiness, Training, Logistics, & Installations"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Affairs",
    "Intelligence and National Security",
    "National Defense"
  ]
}