{
  "id": "R44497",
  "type": "CRS Report",
  "typeId": "REPORTS",
  "number": "R44497",
  "active": true,
  "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 457772,
      "date": "2016-12-19",
      "retrieved": "2016-12-22T16:28:37.727256",
      "title": "Fact Sheet: Selected Highlights of the FY2017 National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 4909, S. 2943)",
      "summary": "This Fact Sheet summarizes selected highlights of the conference agreement on the FY2017 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). The conference report (H.Rept. 114-840), filed in the House on November 30, 2016, is a result of negotiations between the House and Senate on House-passed H.R. 4909 and Senate-passed S. 2943. The agreement authorizes $611.2 billion in discretionary funding for defense activities within the jurisdictions of the House and Senate Armed Services Committees, including $523.7 billion in base discretionary funding for the Department of Defense, $67.8 billion for Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO), and $19.7 billion for defense-related programs of the Energy Department and other agencies.\nThe FY2017 budget request for National Defense-related programs included an additional $7.8 billion of discretionary funding for programs outside the scope of the NDAA and $8.1 billion for mandatory spending that does not require annual authorization.\nThe conference agreement complies with the Budget Control Act of 2011, as amended. However, it authorizes $8.3 billion in OCO funding designated for base budget requirements$5.1 billion requested by the Administration and $3.2 billion in military personnel and operation and maintenance funding added by Congress.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": true,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R44497",
          "sha1": "ceac33fc65185ea0934bcfe40829eb062de0db5b",
          "filename": "files/20161219_R44497_ceac33fc65185ea0934bcfe40829eb062de0db5b.html",
          "images": null
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R44497",
          "sha1": "9407178726ff3b0a9434b78e84140c855260cb17",
          "filename": "files/20161219_R44497_9407178726ff3b0a9434b78e84140c855260cb17.pdf",
          "images": null
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "IBCList",
          "id": 4772,
          "name": "Defense Appropriations"
        },
        {
          "source": "IBCList",
          "id": 4778,
          "name": "Defense Budgets & Appropriations"
        },
        {
          "source": "IBCList",
          "id": 4837,
          "name": "Defense Authorization"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 453230,
      "date": "2016-06-08",
      "retrieved": "2016-10-17T19:54:30.938908",
      "title": "Fact Sheet: Selected Highlights of the FY2017 National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 4909, S. 2943)",
      "summary": "This Fact Sheet summarizes selected highlights of the version of the FY2017 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) passed by the House on May 18, 2016 (H.R. 4909) and the version reported by the Senate Armed Services Committee on the same date (S. 2943).\nCongressional action on the FY2017 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) has been fundamentally shaped by the legally binding caps on discretionary spending for defense programs and for non-defense programs, which were established by P.L. 114-74, the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (BBA). A central issue before Congress is the extent to which Congress and the President will approve Department of Defense (DOD) funding for FY2017 that (1) exceeds the relevant BBA cap; and (2) is exempt from that spending cap because it is classified as funding for so-called Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO).\nThe 2015 BBA increased binding caps on defense and non-defense discretionary appropriations for FY2016 and FY2017, which originally had been codified by the Budget Control Act (BCA) of 2011 (P.L. 112-25). Those spending caps are enforced by a process of \u201csequestration.\u201d",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": true,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R44497",
          "sha1": "534f2597c6112ccc2c190b4e48cdb18c8288986e",
          "filename": "files/20160608_R44497_534f2597c6112ccc2c190b4e48cdb18c8288986e.html",
          "images": null
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R44497",
          "sha1": "1e6c0d60228d0502e8fbc8efb22add51042cbea8",
          "filename": "files/20160608_R44497_1e6c0d60228d0502e8fbc8efb22add51042cbea8.pdf",
          "images": null
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "IBCList",
          "id": 4772,
          "name": "Defense Appropriations"
        },
        {
          "source": "IBCList",
          "id": 4778,
          "name": "Defense Budgets & Appropriations"
        },
        {
          "source": "IBCList",
          "id": 4837,
          "name": "Defense Authorization"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 452498,
      "date": "2016-05-12",
      "retrieved": "2016-05-24T19:08:46.149941",
      "title": "Fact Sheet: Selected Highlights of the FY2017 National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 4909)",
      "summary": "This Fact Sheet summarizes selected highlights of H.R. 4909, the FY2017 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) reported by the House Armed Services Committee on May 4, 2016 (H.Rept. 114-537). \nCongressional action on the FY2017 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) has been fundamentally shaped by the legally binding caps on discretionary spending for defense programs and for non-defense programs, which were established by P.L. 114-74, the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (BBA). A central issue before Congress is the extent to which Congress and the President will approve Department of Defense (DOD) funding for FY2017 that (1) exceeds the relevant BBA cap; and (2) is exempt from that spending cap because it is classified as funding for so-called Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO).\nThe 2015 BBA increased binding caps on defense and non-defense discretionary appropriations for FY2016 and FY2017, which originally had been codified by the Budget Control Act (BCA) of 2011 (P.L. 112-25). Those spending caps are enforced by a process of \u201csequestration.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": true,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R44497",
          "sha1": "bc767d587e4a79a4bd7dcb20a933edb623d23634",
          "filename": "files/20160512_R44497_bc767d587e4a79a4bd7dcb20a933edb623d23634.html",
          "images": null
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R44497",
          "sha1": "ec71e96d4ee8d013586e5c1d1599e3d704063a56",
          "filename": "files/20160512_R44497_ec71e96d4ee8d013586e5c1d1599e3d704063a56.pdf",
          "images": null
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "IBCList",
          "id": 221,
          "name": "Defense Appropriations"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Intelligence and National Security",
    "National Defense"
  ]
}