{ "id": "R44381", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "R", "number": "R44381", "active": true, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov, EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "summary": null, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=R44381", "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "type": "CRS Report", "formats": [ { "sha1": "8c191b39b612479315ea740255e8a643b1c9e64e", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R44381/16", "filename": "files/2023-01-09_R44381_8c191b39b612479315ea740255e8a643b1c9e64e.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2023-01-09_R44381_8c191b39b612479315ea740255e8a643b1c9e64e.html" } ], "title": "Intelligence Community Spending Trends", "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "retrieved": "2023-02-03T04:03:31.865486", "date": "2023-01-09", "typeId": "R", "id": "R44381_16_2023-01-09", "active": true }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 607343, "date": "2019-11-06", "retrieved": "2019-12-13T15:28:38.820029", "title": "Intelligence Community Spending: Trends and Issues", "summary": "Total intelligence spending is usually understood as the combination of the National Intelligence Program (NIP), which supports strategic planning and policymaking, and the Military Intelligence Program (MIP), which supports military operational and tactical levels of planning and operations. There are 4 defense NIP programs, 8 nondefense NIP programs, and 10 MIP programs. Six U.S. intelligence community (IC) components have both MIP and NIP funding sources.\nThe Director of National Intelligence (DNI) and Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence (USD(I)), respectively, manage the NIP and MIP separately under different authorities. A program is primarily NIP if it funds an activity that supports more than one department or agency, or provides a service of common concern for the IC. The NIP funds the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the strategic-level intelligence activities associated with the National Security Agency (NSA), Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), and National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA). It also funds Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) programs throughout the IC. A program is primarily MIP if it funds an activity that addresses tactical or operational-level requirements specific to the DOD. The DNI and USD(I) work together in a number of ways to facilitate the integration of NIP and MIP intelligence efforts. Programs that support both national and tactical or operational military requirements may receive both NIP and MIP resources.\nFunding associated with the 17 components of the IC is significant. In FY2019 alone, the aggregate amount of appropriations requested for these two programs is $81.1 billion, including $59.9 billion for the NIP and $21.2 billion for the MIP. For FY2020 the aggregate amount requested for the NIP and MIP is $85.75 billion\u2014$62.8 billion for the NIP and $22.95 billion for the MIP\u2014an increase of $4.4 billion over what was requested the previous year.\nIn comparison with national defense spending, the proportion of intelligence-related spending has remained relatively constant over the past decade, representing slightly more than 11% of the total defense budget.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/R44381", "sha1": "e1859aa317403b44879021ecaf27f57451e0180e", "filename": "files/20191106_R44381_e1859aa317403b44879021ecaf27f57451e0180e.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R44381_files&id=/3.png": "files/20191106_R44381_images_1a5cfee2e13e4ad174c6949915d74c7c926ba817.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R44381_files&id=/0.png": "files/20191106_R44381_images_c3663f146ea95f210d93dd44c4c9f4428f3e8910.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R44381_files&id=/2.png": "files/20191106_R44381_images_0d182b793c9010beaf5da25fc7dbb71c61f28634.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R44381_files&id=/1.png": "files/20191106_R44381_images_6dec065134e14bac6fdaa99b003b0defe2570095.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R44381", "sha1": "8e36b461d08d310ea0fab734e9f0574cd9680608", "filename": "files/20191106_R44381_8e36b461d08d310ea0fab734e9f0574cd9680608.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4809, "name": "National & Military Intelligence" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 584620, "date": "2018-06-18", "retrieved": "2018-09-07T13:55:34.701520", "title": "Intelligence Community Spending: Trends and Issues", "summary": "Total intelligence spending is usually understood as the combination of the National Intelligence Program (NIP), which supports strategic planning and policymaking, and the Military Intelligence Program (MIP), which supports military operational and tactical levels of planning and operations. There are 4 defense NIP programs, 8 nondefense NIP programs, and 10 MIP programs. Six U.S. intelligence community (IC) components have both MIP and NIP funding sources.\nFunding associated with the 17 components of the IC is significant. In fiscal year FY2017 alone, the aggregate amount (base and supplemental) of appropriated funds for national and military intelligence programs totaled $73.0 billion ($54.6 billion for the NIP, and $18.4 billion for the MIP). For FY2018, the aggregate amount of appropriations requested for national and military intelligence programs totaled $78.4 billion ($57.7 billion for the NIP and $20.7 billion for the MIP).\nIn comparison with national defense spending, intelligence-related spending has remained relatively constant over the past decade, representing approximately 11% of the total defense budget.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R44381", "sha1": "c9aaef329310c404a4f23f8ef21b11cb677b8a66", "filename": "files/20180618_R44381_c9aaef329310c404a4f23f8ef21b11cb677b8a66.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R44381_files&id=/3.png": "files/20180618_R44381_images_541a9d58de0466ec3dfc7b9d860ceafbb56db5d6.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R44381_files&id=/0.png": "files/20180618_R44381_images_c3663f146ea95f210d93dd44c4c9f4428f3e8910.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R44381_files&id=/2.png": "files/20180618_R44381_images_570fa2c8a3052c4fb0a259ed8c3254b4d273a1f5.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R44381_files&id=/1.png": "files/20180618_R44381_images_51191b78df7d606d14ec1987e5758e92c2cb79f7.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R44381", "sha1": "36e829a259f649336b659aba2c569b8cce812e90", "filename": "files/20180618_R44381_36e829a259f649336b659aba2c569b8cce812e90.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4809, "name": "National & Military Intelligence" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 456979, "date": "2016-11-08", "retrieved": "2016-11-21T15:10:28.125387", "title": "Intelligence Community Spending: Trends and Issues", "summary": "This report examines Intelligence Community (IC) funding over the past several decades, with an emphasis on the period from 2007-2017\u2014the period in which total national and military intelligence program (NIP and MIP) spending dollars have been publicly disclosed on an annual basis. Intelligence-related spending (such as the Homeland Security Intelligence Program) that does not fall within the NIP and MIP is outside the scope of this report.\nTotal intelligence spending is usually understood as the combination of (1) the National Intelligence Program (NIP), which covers the programs, projects, and activities of the intelligence community oriented towards the strategic needs of decision makers, and (2) the Military Intelligence Program (MIP), which funds defense intelligence activity intended to support tactical military operations and priorities.\nAmong the tables and graphs included in this report to illustrate trends in intelligence spending, Figure 1 illustrates highs and lows in NIP spending between 1965 and 1994. The highs and lows correspond roughly to highs and lows in defense spending during those same years as illustrated in Figure A-1.\nTable 2 and Figures 2 and 3 illustrate that in comparison with national defense spending, intelligence-related spending has remained relatively constant over the past decade\u2014representing roughly 10 to 11% of national defense spending. Table 2 compares NIP and MIP spending to national defense spending from FY2007 to FY2017, reporting values in both nominal and constant dollars. Figure 2 uses the data in Table 1 to provide an overview of total intelligence spending as a percentage of overall national defense spending. Figure 3 provides a snapshot of NIP spending over the past two decades, and despite the lack of data between 1999 and 2004, the values that are present suggest constancy in NIP topline dollar appropriations. \nAdditional tables in Appendix B and C provide an overview of the IC budget programs. Table B-1 identifies 4 defense NIP programs, 8 nondefense NIP programs, and 10 MIP programs. Table C-1 illustrates that 6 IC components have both MIP and NIP funding sources.\nThis report was originally titled Intelligence Spending: In Brief. It has been retitled for added clarity, and updated with recently published budget numbers. It is published in conjunction with CRS Report R44681, Intelligence Community Programs, Management, and Enduring Issues, by Anne Daugherty Miles. R44681 examines IC spending programs\u2014to include specifics related to NIP and MIP subordinate programs such as the Consolidated Cryptologic Program (CCP) and National Reconnaissance Program (NRP). It also examines the key players and processes associated with IC program management and oversight, and several issues for possible consideration by congressional overseers.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R44381", "sha1": "791c6032e3a1942e415553749f62c956b65de279", "filename": "files/20161108_R44381_791c6032e3a1942e415553749f62c956b65de279.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R44381", "sha1": "b992838dda85144859d62224f5874ebe5a0b3b06", "filename": "files/20161108_R44381_b992838dda85144859d62224f5874ebe5a0b3b06.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4809, "name": "National & Military Intelligence" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 450258, "date": "2016-02-26", "retrieved": "2016-04-06T17:00:27.672628", "title": "Intelligence Spending: In Brief", "summary": "This report examines intelligence funding over the past several decades, with an emphasis on the period from 2007-2017\u2014the period in which total national and military intelligence program spending dollars have been publicly disclosed on an annual basis. \nTotal intelligence spending is usually understood as the combination of (1) the National Intelligence Program (NIP), which covers the programs, projects, and activities of the intelligence community oriented towards the strategic needs of decisionmakers, and (2) the Military Intelligence Program (MIP), which funds defense intelligence activity intended to support tactical military operations and priorities. \nAmong the tables and graphs included in this report to illustrate trends in intelligence spending, Figure 1 illustrates highs and lows in NIP spending between 1965 and 1994. The highs and lows correspond roughly to highs and lows in defense spending during those same years as illustrated in Figure A-1.\n Table 1 and Figures 2 and 3 illustrate that in comparison with national defense spending, intelligence-related spending has remained relatively constant over the past decade\u2014representing roughly 10 to 11% of national defense spending. Table 1 compares NIP and MIP spending to national defense spending from FY2007 to FY2017, reporting values in both nominal and constant dollars. Figure 2 uses the data in Table 1 to provide an overview of total intelligence spending as a percentage of overall national defense spending. Figure 3 provides a snapshot of NIP spending over the past two decades, and despite the lack of data between 1999 and 2004, the values that are present suggest constancy in NIP topline dollar appropriations. \nAdditional tables in Appendix B and C provide an overview of the IC budget programs. Table B-1 identifies 4 defense NIP programs, 8 nondefense NIP programs, and 10 MIP programs. Table C-1 illustrates that 6 IC components have both MIP and NIP funding sources.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R44381", "sha1": "0cd7fa271e630cff929243eded71b4e7f3de70cc", "filename": "files/20160226_R44381_0cd7fa271e630cff929243eded71b4e7f3de70cc.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R44381", "sha1": "afb053a1f59e5f827d1f91563be80024e2d67346", "filename": "files/20160226_R44381_afb053a1f59e5f827d1f91563be80024e2d67346.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 226, "name": "Intelligence and National Security" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc818306/", "id": "R44381_2016Feb16", "date": "2016-02-16", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Intelligence Spending: In Brief", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20160216_R44381_8d1333a98bcb918640f63f09abb763d72bb48448.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20160216_R44381_8d1333a98bcb918640f63f09abb763d72bb48448.html" } ], "topics": [] } ], "topics": [ "Intelligence and National Security", "National Defense" ] }