{
  "id": "R44267",
  "type": "CRS Report",
  "typeId": "REPORTS",
  "number": "R44267",
  "active": true,
  "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 587471,
      "date": "2016-12-16",
      "retrieved": "2020-01-02T15:00:39.975435",
      "title": "State Management of Federal Lands: Frequently Asked Questions",
      "summary": "The federal government owns roughly 640 million acres of land, about 28% of the 2.27 billion acres in the United States. This land is managed by numerous agencies, but four agencies administer about 95% of federal land, with somewhat differing management emphases. These agencies are the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), and National Park Service (NPS) in the Department of the Interior (DOI), and the Forest Service (FS) in the Department of Agriculture. Most federal land is in the West, including Alaska. The total amount of money the federal government spends managing land is not readily available. However, the appropriations for the four major land management agencies totaled $15.47 billion for FY2016. \nFederal land ownership began when the original 13 states ceded title to more than 40% of their \u201cwestern\u201d lands to the central government. Subsequently, the federal government acquired lands from foreign countries through purchases and treaties. The Property Clause of the U.S. Constitution, Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2, gives Congress authority over the lands, territories, or other property of the United States. This provision provides Congress broad authority over lands owned by the federal government. The U.S. Supreme Court has described this power as \u201cwithout limitations.\u201d When Congress exercises its authority over federal land, federal law overrides conflicting state laws under the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution, Article VI, Clause 2.\nStates can obtain authority to own and manage federal lands within their borders only by federal, not state, law. Congress\u2019s broad authority over federal lands includes the authority to dispose of lands, and Congress can choose to transfer ownership of federal land to states. \nStates have legal authority to manage federal lands within their borders to the extent Congress has given them such authority. As an example, Congress has to a large extent allowed states to exercise management authority over wildlife as a traditional area of state concern. Congress could give states authority to manage certain other activities, resources, or other aspects of federal lands. Congress also could give federal agencies authority to delegate or assign responsibility for aspects of federal land management to states or other partners.\nCurrently, some states are seeking more state and local control over federal lands and resources. Accordingly, some are considering measures to provide for or express support for the transfer of federal lands to states, to establish task forces or commissions to examine federal land transfer issues, and to assert management authority over federal lands. A collection of efforts from the late 1970s and early 1980s, known as the Sagebrush Rebellion, sought to foster divestiture of federal lands. However, this effort did not succeed. State efforts to claim control of federal lands, without express approval of Congress, are likely to run afoul of the Constitution.\nOpinions differ about the extent to which the federal government should own and manage land, and whether Congress should transfer some degree of ownership and management of land to states. These are policy choices for Congress. Recent Congresses have considered, and in some cases enacted, measures related to disposal, acquisition, and management of federal lands. A variety of bills sought to provide for ownership and management of particular parcels by states, individuals, and other entities. At the same time, diverse proposals sought to provide for acquisition of lands for federal ownership and management. Still other proposals focused on establishing or amending agency authorities to dispose of or acquire land.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": true,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/R44267",
          "sha1": "23815de4cef2d71576f878728eb4c7e71d24da36",
          "filename": "files/20161216_R44267_23815de4cef2d71576f878728eb4c7e71d24da36.html",
          "images": {}
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R44267",
          "sha1": "48c419b3f270a87a349ab96ef26d480e137319b8",
          "filename": "files/20161216_R44267_48c419b3f270a87a349ab96ef26d480e137319b8.pdf",
          "images": {}
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "IBCList",
          "id": 4841,
          "name": "Federal Land Management"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 447184,
      "date": "2015-11-12",
      "retrieved": "2016-04-06T17:58:05.764403",
      "title": "State Management of Federal Lands: Frequently Asked Questions",
      "summary": "The federal government owns roughly 640 million acres of land, about 28% of the 2.27 billion acres in the United States. This land is managed by numerous agencies, but four agencies administer about 95% of federal land, with somewhat differing management emphases. These agencies are the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), and National Park Service (NPS) in the Department of the Interior (DOI), and the Forest Service (FS) in the Department of Agriculture. Most federal land is in the West, including Alaska. The total amount of money the federal government spends managing land is not readily available. \nFederal land ownership began when the original 13 states ceded title to more than 40% of their \u201cwestern\u201d lands to the central government. Subsequently, the federal government acquired lands from foreign countries through purchases and treaties. The Property Clause of the U.S. Constitution, Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2, gives Congress authority over the lands, territories, or other property of the United States. This provision provides Congress broad authority over lands owned by the federal government. The U.S. Supreme Court has described this power as \u201cwithout limitations.\u201d When Congress exercises its authority over federal land, federal law overrides conflicting state laws under the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution, Article VI, Clause 2.\nStates can obtain authority to own and manage federal lands within their borders only by federal, not state, law. Congress\u2019s broad authority over federal lands includes the authority to dispose of lands, and Congress can choose to transfer land to states. When Congress does so, the transferred lands are no longer federally owned. For lands for which the federal government retains ownership, Congress can also give federal agencies authority to delegate or assign responsibility for aspects of federal land management. States have legal authority to manage federal lands within their borders to the extent Congress has given them such authority. For example, Congress has to a large extent left management of wildlife to the states as a traditional area of state concern. \nCurrently, some states are seeking more state and local control over lands and resources. Accordingly, some are considering measures to provide for or express support for the transfer of federal lands to states, to establish task forces or commissions to examine federal land transfer issues, and to assert management authority over federal lands. A collection of efforts from the late 1970s and early 1980s, known as the Sagebrush Rebellion, sought to foster divestiture of federal lands. However, this effort did not succeed. State efforts to claim control of federal lands, without express approval of Congress, are likely to run afoul of the Constitution.\nOpinions differ about the extent to which the federal government should own and manage land. The extent to which Congress should transfer ownership and management of land to states is a policy choice for Congress. The 114th Congress and recent Congresses have considered, and in some cases enacted, measures related to disposal, acquisition, and management of federal lands. A variety of bills sought to provide for ownership and management of particular parcels by states, individuals, and other entities. At the same time, diverse proposals sought to provide for acquisition of lands for federal ownership and management. Still other proposals focused on establishing or amending agency authorities to dispose of or acquire land.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": true,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R44267",
          "sha1": "82267d470c52451668a9c4af62dc00b4221a396a",
          "filename": "files/20151112_R44267_82267d470c52451668a9c4af62dc00b4221a396a.html",
          "images": null
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R44267",
          "sha1": "c3b41e2ada04d7b7e1252d5d3fb7c6161b717bb6",
          "filename": "files/20151112_R44267_c3b41e2ada04d7b7e1252d5d3fb7c6161b717bb6.pdf",
          "images": null
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "IBCList",
          "id": 314,
          "name": "Federal Lands"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Appropriations",
    "Energy Policy"
  ]
}