{ "id": "R43661", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "R43661", "active": true, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 613751, "date": "2020-01-16", "retrieved": "2020-01-22T13:56:57.590672", "title": "The Effectiveness of the Community Reinvestment Act", "summary": "The Community Reinvestment Act (CRA; P.L. 95-128, 12 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a72901-2908) addresses how banking institutions meet the credit needs of the areas they serve, particularly in low- and moderate-income (LMI) neighborhoods. The federal banking regulatory agencies\u2014the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC)\u2014currently implement the CRA. The regulators issue CRA credits, or points, where banks engage in qualifying activities\u2014such as mortgage, consumer, and business lending; community investments; and low-cost services that would benefit LMI areas and entities\u2014that occur with a designated assessment area. These credits are then used to issue each bank a performance rating. The CRA requires these ratings be taken into account when banks apply for charters, branches, mergers, and acquisitions among other things. \nThe CRA, which was enacted in 1977, was subsequently revised in 1989 to require public disclosure of bank CRA ratings to establish a four-tiered system of descriptive performance levels (i.e., Outstanding, Satisfactory, Needs to Improve, or Substantial Noncompliance). In 1995, the CRA examination was customized to account for differences in bank sizes and business models. In 2005, the bank size definitions were revised and indexed to the Consumer Price Index. The 2005 amendments also expanded opportunities for banks to earn CRA credit for public welfare investments (such as providing housing, services, or jobs that primarily benefit LMI individuals). Qualifying activities under the CRA have evolved to include consumer and business lending, community investments, and low-cost services that would benefit LMI areas and entities.\nCongressional interest in the CRA stems from various perceptions of its effectiveness. Some have argued that, by encouraging lending in LMI neighborhoods, the CRA may also encourage the issuance of higher-risk loans to borrowers likely to have repayment problems (under the presumption that low-income is correlated with lower creditworthiness), which can translate into losses for lenders. Others are concerned that the CRA is not generating sufficient incentives to increase credit availability to qualified LMI borrowers, which may impede economic recovery for some, particularly following the 2007-2009 recession.\nThis report informs the congressional debate concerning the CRA\u2019s effectiveness in incentivizing bank lending and investment activity to LMI borrowers. After a discussion of the CRA\u2019s origins, it presents the CRA\u2019s examination process and bank activities that are eligible for consideration of CRA credits. Next, it discusses the difficulty of determining the CRA\u2019s influence on bank behavior. For example, the CRA does not specify the quality and quantity of CRA-qualifying activities, meaning that compliance with the CRA does not require adherence to lending quotas or benchmarks. In the absence of benchmarks, determining the extent to which CRA incentives have influenced LMI credit availability relative to other factors is not straightforward. Banks also face a variety of financial incentives\u2014for example, capital requirements, the prevailing interest rate environment, changes in tax laws, and technological innovations\u2014that influence how much (or how little) they lend to LMI borrowers. Because multiple financial profit incentives and CRA incentives tend to exist simultaneously, it is difficult to determine the extent to which CRA incentives have influenced LMI credit availability relative to other factors.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/R43661", "sha1": "fa4fabe8879ba7c3a7c587a1216b7272c8623a3a", "filename": "files/20200116_R43661_fa4fabe8879ba7c3a7c587a1216b7272c8623a3a.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R43661_files&id=/0.png": "files/20200116_R43661_images_c31ac434b4c4bf4a174e0156695616330b580d42.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R43661", "sha1": "f5ba3b6e4256c592b9606158e979b2fb161bf42e", "filename": "files/20200116_R43661_f5ba3b6e4256c592b9606158e979b2fb161bf42e.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4870, "name": "Banking" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 592503, "date": "2019-02-28", "retrieved": "2019-12-20T19:51:23.442342", "title": "The Effectiveness of the Community Reinvestment Act", "summary": "The Community Reinvestment Act (CRA; P.L. 95-128, 12 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a72901-2908) addresses how banking institutions meet the credit needs of the areas they serve, particularly in low- and moderate-income (LMI) neighborhoods. The federal banking regulatory agencies\u2014the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC)\u2014currently implement the CRA. The regulators issue CRA credits, or points, where banks engage in qualifying activities\u2014such as mortgage, consumer, and business lending; community investments; and low-cost services that would benefit LMI areas and entities\u2014that occur with a designated assessment area. These credits are then used to issue each bank a performance rating. The CRA requires these ratings be taken into account when banks apply for charters, branches, mergers, and acquisitions among other things. \nThe CRA, which was enacted in 1977, was subsequently revised in 1989 to require public disclosure of bank CRA ratings to establish a four-tiered system of descriptive performance levels (i.e., Outstanding, Satisfactory, Needs to Improve, or Substantial Noncompliance). In 1995, the CRA examination was customized to account for differences in bank sizes and business models. In 2005, the bank size definitions were revised and indexed to the Consumer Price Index. The 2005 amendments also expanded opportunities for banks to earn CRA credit for public welfare investments (such as providing housing, services, or jobs that primarily benefit LMI individuals). Qualifying activities under the CRA have evolved to include consumer and business lending, community investments, and low-cost services that would benefit LMI areas and entities.\nCongressional interest in the CRA stems from various perceptions of its effectiveness. Some have argued that, by encouraging lending in LMI neighborhoods, the CRA may also encourage the issuance of higher-risk loans to borrowers likely to have repayment problems (under the presumption that low-income is correlated with lower creditworthiness), which can translate into losses for lenders. Others are concerned that the CRA is not generating sufficient incentives to increase credit availability to qualified LMI borrowers, which may impede economic recovery for some, particularly following the 2007-2009 recession.\nThis report informs the congressional debate concerning the CRA\u2019s effectiveness in incentivizing bank lending and investment activity to LMI borrowers. After a discussion of the CRA\u2019s origins, it presents the CRA\u2019s examination process and bank activities that are eligible for consideration of CRA credits. Next, it discusses the difficulty of determining the CRA\u2019s influence on bank behavior. For example, the CRA does not specify the quality and quantity of CRA-qualifying activities, meaning that compliance with the CRA does not require adherence to lending quotas or benchmarks. In the absence of benchmarks, determining the extent to which CRA incentives have influenced LMI credit availability relative to other factors is not straightforward. Banks also face a variety of financial incentives\u2014for example, capital requirements, the prevailing interest rate environment, changes in tax laws, and technological innovations\u2014that influence how much (or how little) they lend to LMI borrowers. Because multiple financial profit incentives and CRA incentives tend to exist simultaneously, it is difficult to determine the extent to which CRA incentives have influenced LMI credit availability relative to other factors.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/R43661", "sha1": "a449b82db8c05cd1316a583ede943c521d2f4fbe", "filename": "files/20190228_R43661_a449b82db8c05cd1316a583ede943c521d2f4fbe.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R43661_files&id=/0.png": "files/20190228_R43661_images_c31ac434b4c4bf4a174e0156695616330b580d42.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R43661", "sha1": "c4aad75029f0142f03e31ef637b0451379023c83", "filename": "files/20190228_R43661_c4aad75029f0142f03e31ef637b0451379023c83.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4870, "name": "Banking" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 458567, "date": "2017-01-31", "retrieved": "2017-02-03T19:09:27.209081", "title": "The Effectiveness of the Community Reinvestment Act", "summary": "The Community Reinvestment Act (CRA; P.L. 95-128, 12 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a72901-2908) addresses how banking institutions meet credit needs in low- and moderate-income (LMI) neighborhoods. The federal banking regulatory agencies\u2014the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC)\u2014currently implement the CRA. The regulators conduct examinations to evaluate how banks are fulfilling the objectives of the CRA and issue performance ratings. Having a satisfactory or better CRA rating is desirable when banks request to merge with other banking institutions.\nThe CRA, which was enacted in 1977, was subsequently revised in 1989 to require public disclosure of bank CRA ratings and for the CRA examination to have a four-tiered system of descriptive performance levels (i.e., Outstanding, Satisfactory, Needs to Improve, or Substantial Noncompliance). In 1995, the CRA examination was customized to account for differences in bank sizes and business models. In 2005, the bank size definitions were revised and indexed to the Consumer Price Index. The definition of community development was also modified to expand CRA opportunities for public welfare investments. In addition, the CRA has evolved to include consumer and business lending, community investments, and low-cost services that would benefit LMI areas and entities.\nCongressional concerns regarding the CRA stem from various perceptions of its effectiveness. Some contend that the CRA creates incentives for banks to make loans to unqualified borrowers likely to have repayment problems, which can translate into losses for lenders. Others are concerned that the CRA is not generating sufficient incentives to increase credit availability to qualified LMI borrowers, which may impede economic recovery for some following the 2007-2009 recession.\nThis report informs the congressional debate concerning the CRA\u2019s effectiveness in incentivizing bank lending and investment activity to LMI borrowers. After a discussion of the CRA\u2019s origins, it presents the CRA\u2019s examination process and bank activities that are eligible for consideration of CRA credits. Next, it discusses the difficulty of determining the CRA\u2019s influence on bank behavior. For example, some have argued that, by encouraging lending in LMI neighborhoods, the CRA may also encourage the issuance of higher-risk loans (to the extent that the two are correlated). Regulators, however, generally do not award CRA credits for payday and most subprime (nontraditional mortgage) loans, even if these loans were originated in LMI areas. This regulatory practice suggests the CRA has little or no influence on higher-risk lending. In addition, banks face a variety of financial incentives (e.g., capital requirements, the current interest rate environment, consumer credit demand, and consumer credit history) that influence how much (or how little) they lend to LMI borrowers. Because financial and CRA incentives concurrently exist, it is difficult to separate how much influence should be attributed solely to the CRA. Furthermore, compliance with CRA does not require adherence to lending quotas or benchmarks. In the absence of benchmarks, determining the extent to which CRA incentives have influenced LMI credit availability relative to other factors is not straightforward.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R43661", "sha1": "8c462e37e1cb0a5a0afca5b581f35dfe77ea37b5", "filename": "files/20170131_R43661_8c462e37e1cb0a5a0afca5b581f35dfe77ea37b5.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R43661", "sha1": "74c91fe884989e6086d1a2de1158eea7f427b68b", "filename": "files/20170131_R43661_74c91fe884989e6086d1a2de1158eea7f427b68b.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4870, "name": "Banking" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 448591, "date": "2016-01-11", "retrieved": "2016-04-06T17:32:19.828825", "title": "The Effectiveness of the Community Reinvestment Act", "summary": "The Community Reinvestment Act (CRA; P.L. 95-128, 12 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a72901-2908) addresses how banking institutions meet credit needs in low- and moderate-income (LMI) neighborhoods. The federal banking regulatory agencies\u2014the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC)\u2014currently implement the CRA. The regulators conduct examinations to evaluate how banks are fulfilling the objectives of the CRA and issue performance ratings. Having a satisfactory or better CRA rating is desirable when banks request to merge with other banking institutions.\nThe CRA, which was enacted in 1977, was subsequently revised in 1989 to require public disclosure of bank CRA ratings and for the CRA examination to have a four-tiered system of descriptive performance levels (i.e., Outstanding, Satisfactory, Needs to Improve, or Substantial Noncompliance). In 1995, the CRA examination was customized to account for differences in bank sizes and business models. In 2005, the bank size definitions were revised and indexed to the Consumer Price Index. The definition of community development was also modified to expand CRA opportunities for public welfare investments. In addition, the CRA has evolved to include consumer and business lending, community investments, and low-cost services that would benefit LMI areas and entities.\nCongressional concerns regarding the CRA stem from various perceptions of its effectiveness. Some contend that the CRA creates incentives for banks to make loans to unqualified borrowers likely to have repayment problems, which can translate into losses for lenders. Others are concerned that the CRA is not generating sufficient incentives to increase credit availability to qualified LMI borrowers, which may impede economic recovery for some following the 2007-2009 recession.\nThis report informs the congressional debate concerning the CRA\u2019s effectiveness in incentivizing bank lending and investment activity to LMI borrowers. After a discussion of the CRA\u2019s origins, it presents the CRA\u2019s examination process and bank activities that are eligible for consideration of CRA credits. Next, it discusses the difficulty of determining the CRA\u2019s influence on bank behavior. For example, some have argued that, by encouraging lending in LMI neighborhoods, the CRA may also encourage the issuance of higher-risk loans (to the extent that the two are correlated). Regulators, however, generally do not award CRA credits for payday and most subprime (nontraditional mortgage) loans, even if these loans were originated in LMI areas. This regulatory practice suggests the CRA has little or no influence on higher-risk lending. In addition, banks face a variety of financial incentives (e.g., capital requirements, the current interest rate environment, consumer credit demand, and consumer credit history) that influence how much (or how little) they lend to LMI borrowers. Because financial and CRA incentives concurrently exist, it is difficult to separate how much influence should be attributed solely to the CRA. Furthermore, compliance with CRA does not require adherence to lending quotas or benchmarks. In the absence of benchmarks, determining the extent to which CRA incentives have influenced LMI credit availability relative to other factors is not straightforward.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R43661", "sha1": "8fae215e161be94fb31c356d39dc3737640093de", "filename": "files/20160111_R43661_8fae215e161be94fb31c356d39dc3737640093de.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R43661", "sha1": "238ee32550a1fffe44c8106b0d63539be92674f6", "filename": "files/20160111_R43661_238ee32550a1fffe44c8106b0d63539be92674f6.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4640, "name": "Depository Banks and Credit Unions" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc501665/", "id": "R43661_2015Jan07", "date": "2015-01-07", "retrieved": "2015-03-30T22:03:27", "title": "The Effectiveness of the Community Reinvestment Act", "summary": "The Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) addresses how banking institutions meet credit needs in low- and moderate-income (LMI) neighborhoods. This report informs the congressional debate concerning the CRA's effectiveness in incentivizing bank lending and investment activity to LMI borrowers. After a discussion of the CRA's origins, it presents the CRA's examination process and bank activities that are eligible for consideration of CRA credits. Next, it discusses the difficulty of determining the CRA's influence on bank behavior.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20150107_R43661_94efc358bb94cba3e6e7051f88c42dcf95cbd620.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20150107_R43661_94efc358bb94cba3e6e7051f88c42dcf95cbd620.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Community development", "name": "Community development" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Investments", "name": "Investments" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Neighborhood government", "name": "Neighborhood government" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc463008/", "id": "R43661_2014Jul25", "date": "2014-07-25", "retrieved": "2014-12-05T09:57:41", "title": "The Effectiveness of the Community Reinvestment Act", "summary": "This report informs the congressional debate concerning the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) effectiveness to incentivize bank lending and investment activity tolow- and moderate-income (LMI) borrowers. After a discussion of the CRA's origins, the examination process and bank activities that are eligible for consideration of CRA credits are presented. Next, the difficulty of determining the CRA's influence on bank behavior is discussed.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20140725_R43661_f955ad453a255d5874eb8afb818d53e1eaef8937.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20140725_R43661_f955ad453a255d5874eb8afb818d53e1eaef8937.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Community development", "name": "Community development" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Investments", "name": "Investments" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Neighborhood government", "name": "Neighborhood government" } ] } ], "topics": [ "Domestic Social Policy", "Economic Policy" ] }