{
  "id": "R43184",
  "type": "CRS Report",
  "typeId": "REPORTS",
  "number": "R43184",
  "active": false,
  "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 428395,
      "date": "2014-02-24",
      "retrieved": "2016-05-24T19:41:54.169941",
      "title": "FY2014 National Defense Authorization Act: Selected Military Personnel Issues",
      "summary": "Military personnel issues typically generate significant interest from many Members of Congress and their staffs. Ongoing operations in Afghanistan, along with the operational role of the Reserve Components, further heighten interest in a wide range of military personnel policies and issues.\nThe Congressional Research Service (CRS) has selected a number of the military personnel issues considered in deliberations on the initial House-passed version of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 and on the bill that was enacted and became law (P.L. 113-66). This report provides a brief synopsis of sections that pertain to personnel policy. These include end strengths, pay raises, health care, and sexual assault, as well as less prominent issues that nonetheless generate significant public interest.\nThis report focuses exclusively on the annual defense authorization process. It does not include language concerning appropriations, veterans\u2019 affairs, tax implications of policy choices, or any discussion of separately introduced legislation, topics which are addressed in other CRS products. Some issues were addressed in the FY2013 National Defense Authorization Act and discussed in CRS Report R42651, FY2013 National Defense Authorization Act: Selected Military Personnel Policy Issues, coordinated by Catherine A. Theohary. Those issues that were considered previously are designated with a \u201c*\u201d in the relevant section titles of this report.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R43184",
          "sha1": "09abade4c5951aed7a16819d8e4a9d162df09f7d",
          "filename": "files/20140224_R43184_09abade4c5951aed7a16819d8e4a9d162df09f7d.html",
          "images": null
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R43184",
          "sha1": "b6e0416cd49a5a87f49f5b830a1797bdcb05d7bb",
          "filename": "files/20140224_R43184_b6e0416cd49a5a87f49f5b830a1797bdcb05d7bb.pdf",
          "images": null
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc227910/",
      "id": "R43184_2013Aug19",
      "date": "2013-08-19",
      "retrieved": "2013-11-05T18:07:05",
      "title": "FY2014 National Defense Authorization Act: Selected Military Personnel Issues",
      "summary": "Report regarding the annual defense authorization process and the interest Congress members have in the military.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20130819_R43184_1a347ad7662867cbbc7de4ca0f62a11309e90b4c.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20130819_R43184_1a347ad7662867cbbc7de4ca0f62a11309e90b4c.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense policy",
          "name": "Defense policy"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense economics",
          "name": "Defense economics"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense budgets",
          "name": "Defense budgets"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Appropriations",
    "Intelligence and National Security",
    "National Defense"
  ]
}