{ "id": "R42918", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "R42918", "active": true, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 436316, "date": "2014-12-12", "retrieved": "2016-04-06T19:49:30.694829", "title": "Chemical Facility Security: Issues and Options for the 113th Congress", "summary": "The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has had statutory authority to regulate chemical facilities for security purposes since the 109th Congress. The 113th Congress extended this authority through December 13, 2014, and has passed H.R. 4007, which provides new statutory authority. Congressional policy makers have debated the scope and details of reauthorization and continue to consider establishing an authority with longer duration. Some Members of Congress support an extension, either short- or long-term, of the existing authority. Other Members call for revision and more extensive codification of chemical facility security regulatory provisions. Questions regarding the current law\u2019s effectiveness in reducing chemical facility risk and the sufficiency of federal chemical facility security efforts exacerbate the tension between continuing current policies and changing the statutory authority.\nCongressional policy makers have questioned DHS\u2019s effectiveness in implementing the authorized regulations, called chemical facility anti-terrorism standards (CFATS). The DHS finalized CFATS regulations in 2007. Since then, the site security plans for 900 chemical facilities have been approved in the CFATS process, which starts with information submission by chemical facilities and finishes with inspection and approval of facility security measures by DHS. Additionally, DHS has inspected some facilities for subsequent compliance activities. Several factors, including the amount of detailed information provided to DHS, the effectiveness of DHS program management, and the availability of CFATS inspectors, likely complicate the inspection process and lead to delays in inspection. Policy makers have questioned whether the compliance rate with CFATS is sufficient to mitigate this homeland security risk. For additional analysis of CFATS implementation, see CRS Report R43346, Implementation of Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS): Issues for Congress.\nKey policy issues debated in previous Congresses contribute to the current reauthorization debate. These issues include the adequacy of DHS resources and efforts; the appropriateness and scope of federal preemption of state chemical facility security activities; the availability of information for public comment, potential litigation, and congressional oversight; the range of chemical facilities identified by DHS; and the ability of inherently safer technologies to achieve security goals.\nThe 113th Congress considered various approaches to this issue. Both the House and Senate homeland security appropriations acts would extend the duration of the statutory authority until October 4, 2015. The House and the Senate have passed an amended version of H.R. 4007. This bill will repeal Section 550 of P.L. 109-295 on the effective date of the act (30 days after enactment), and authorize the DHS to regulate chemical facilities for security purposes through the Homeland Security Act. Many of the existing authorities are present in H.R. 4007, but it also provides DHS with new authorities, such as the ability for certain covered chemical facilities to self-certify the sufficiency of their security plans. The DHS may use the existing regulations and issue new regulations as necessary to implement the new authority.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R42918", "sha1": "823d78cb7fd7efc926fabaae5b3dbab0a4c25624", "filename": "files/20141212_R42918_823d78cb7fd7efc926fabaae5b3dbab0a4c25624.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R42918", "sha1": "1026e1c18f426c111b2b5ee32d965d68de6e2ed5", "filename": "files/20141212_R42918_1026e1c18f426c111b2b5ee32d965d68de6e2ed5.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4585, "name": "Homeland Security" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc501875/", "id": "R42918_2014Dec11", "date": "2014-12-11", "retrieved": "2015-03-30T22:03:27", "title": "Chemical Facility Security: Issues and Options for the 113th Congress", "summary": "This report provides a brief overview of the existing statutory authority and implementing regulation. It describes several policy issues raised in previous debates regarding chemical facility security and identifies policy options for congressional consideration.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20141211_R42918_cf4b5c8da2d5e6f6451efa01853b5d5e52f677a6.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20141211_R42918_cf4b5c8da2d5e6f6451efa01853b5d5e52f677a6.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Chemical industries", "name": "Chemical industries" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "National security", "name": "National security" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Chemical warfare", "name": "Chemical warfare" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Terrorism", "name": "Terrorism" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc818845/", "id": "R42918_2014Nov07", "date": "2014-11-07", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Chemical Facility Security: Issues and Options for the 113th Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20141107_R42918_85f4e9fbf8b1ad291179a0dcb8efc2a9424c6e68.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20141107_R42918_85f4e9fbf8b1ad291179a0dcb8efc2a9424c6e68.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc462973/", "id": "R42918_2014Sep16", "date": "2014-09-16", "retrieved": "2014-12-05T09:57:41", "title": "Chemical Facility Security: Issues and Options for the 113th Congress", "summary": "This report provides a brief overview of the existing statutory authority and implementing regulation. It describes several policy issues raised in previous debates regarding chemical facility security and identifies policy options for congressional consideration.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20140916_R42918_fd28ec5628e5bafff88a77b0a3a3226d257b0dff.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20140916_R42918_fd28ec5628e5bafff88a77b0a3a3226d257b0dff.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Chemical industries", "name": "Chemical industries" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "National security", "name": "National security" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Chemical warfare", "name": "Chemical warfare" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc461945/", "id": "R42918_2014Jul17", "date": "2014-07-17", "retrieved": "2014-12-05T09:57:41", "title": "Chemical Facility Security: Issues and Options for the 113th Congress", "summary": "This report provides a brief overview of the existing statutory authority and implementing regulation, as well as a description of several policy issues raised in previous debates regarding chemical facility security. It also identifies policy options for congressional consideration.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20140717_R42918_9a9e51e38753537dfca34b2787cb622d4f21d77f.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20140717_R42918_9a9e51e38753537dfca34b2787cb622d4f21d77f.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Chemical industries", "name": "Chemical industries" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "National security", "name": "National security" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Chemical warfare", "name": "Chemical warfare" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc306439/", "id": "R42918_2014May09", "date": "2014-05-09", "retrieved": "2014-07-08T21:53:44", "title": "Chemical Facility Security: Issues and Options for the 113th Congress", "summary": "This report provides a brief overview of the existing statutory authority and implementing regulation, as well as a description of several policy issues raised in previous debates regarding chemical facility security. It also identifies policy options for congressional consideration.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20140509_R42918_415bf29fb6860430017eec480f6c58f04eef28af.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20140509_R42918_415bf29fb6860430017eec480f6c58f04eef28af.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Chemical industries", "name": "Chemical industries" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "National security", "name": "National security" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Chemical warfare", "name": "Chemical warfare" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc287983/", "id": "R42918_2014Apr16", "date": "2014-04-16", "retrieved": "2014-06-05T20:55:02", "title": "Chemical Facility Security: Issues and Options for the 113th Congress", "summary": "This report provides a brief overview of the existing statutory authority and implementing regulation related to chemical facility security. It also describes several relevant policy issues raised in previous debates and identifies policy options for congressional consideration.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20140416_R42918_327c7edf103e58c88b9e196cda9047e109a42bd5.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20140416_R42918_327c7edf103e58c88b9e196cda9047e109a42bd5.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Chemical industries", "name": "Chemical industries" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "National security", "name": "National security" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Chemical warfare", "name": "Chemical warfare" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc284484/", "id": "R42918_2014Feb25", "date": "2014-02-25", "retrieved": "2014-05-06T21:21:54", "title": "Chemical Facility Security: Issues and Options for the 113th Congress", "summary": "This report provides a brief overview of the existing statutory authority and implementing regulation. It describes several policy issues raised in previous debates regarding chemical facility security and identifies policy options for congressional consideration.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20140225_R42918_06d41b4b2934ec305837f7cb0996c4156d56930f.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20140225_R42918_06d41b4b2934ec305837f7cb0996c4156d56930f.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Chemical industries", "name": "Chemical industries" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "National security", "name": "National security" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Chemical warfare", "name": "Chemical warfare" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc276879/", "id": "R42918_2013Nov15", "date": "2013-11-15", "retrieved": "2014-03-05T18:18:19", "title": "Chemical Facility Security: Issues and Options for the 113th Congress", "summary": "This report provides a brief overview of the existing statutory authority and implementing regulation. It describes several policy issues raised in previous debates regarding chemical facility security and identifies policy options for congressional consideration.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20131115_R42918_de310655afad7a82b3f3a4f79d0bebb52ee69fb7.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20131115_R42918_de310655afad7a82b3f3a4f79d0bebb52ee69fb7.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Chemical industries", "name": "Chemical industries" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "National security", "name": "National security" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Chemical warfare", "name": "Chemical warfare" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc462117/", "id": "R42918_2013Apr01", "date": "2013-04-01", "retrieved": "2014-12-05T09:57:41", "title": "Chemical Facility Security: Issues and Options for the 113th Congress", "summary": "This report provides a brief overview of the existing statutory authority and implementing regulation. It describes several policy issues raised in previous debates regarding chemical facility security and identifies policy options for congressional consideration.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20130401_R42918_92f659c6f3527484c14d9287630006d8cd5d0536.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20130401_R42918_92f659c6f3527484c14d9287630006d8cd5d0536.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Chemical industries", "name": "Chemical industries" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "National security", "name": "National security" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Chemical warfare", "name": "Chemical warfare" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc463351/", "id": "R42918_2013Jan31", "date": "2013-01-31", "retrieved": "2014-12-05T09:57:41", "title": "Chemical Facility Security: Issues and Options for the 113th Congress", "summary": "This report provides a brief overview of the existing statutory authority and implementing regulation. It describes several policy issues raised in previous debates regarding chemical facility security and identifies policy options for congressional consideration.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20130131_R42918_c0b4fca43fdca49a2d9bd9785bad06e61f97b315.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20130131_R42918_c0b4fca43fdca49a2d9bd9785bad06e61f97b315.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Chemical industries", "name": "Chemical industries" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "National security", "name": "National security" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Chemical warfare", "name": "Chemical warfare" } ] } ], "topics": [ "Appropriations", "Intelligence and National Security" ] }