{
  "id": "R42641",
  "type": "CRS Report",
  "typeId": "REPORTS",
  "number": "R42641",
  "active": true,
  "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 429632,
      "date": "2014-04-04",
      "retrieved": "2016-04-06T20:31:24.402174",
      "title": "Global Security Contingency Fund: Summary and Issue Overview",
      "summary": "The FY2012 National Defense Authorization Act (P.L. 112-81), Section 1207, created a new Global Security Contingency Fund (GSCF) as a four-year pilot project to be jointly administered and funded by the Department of Defense (DOD) and the State Department. The purpose of the fund is to carry out security and counterterrorism training, and rule of law programs. (There also are three one-year transitional authorities for assistance to Africa and Yemen.) The GSCF is placed under the State Department budget. Although decisions are to be jointly made by the Secretaries of State and Defense, the mandated mechanism puts the Secretary of State in the lead. \nThe GSCF was conceived of as an important step in improving U.S. efforts to enable foreign military and security forces to better combat terrorism and other threats. It incorporates features of previous legislation and reflects recommendations to address multiple deficiencies in current national security structures and practices. Many have hope that it will provide a model for interagency cooperation on security assistance that will overcome the disadvantages of the current system of agency-centric budgets and efforts. Extended start-up difficulties, however, have led to questions about the mechanisms utility.\nTo date, Congress has provided funds for the GSCF through transfers from other accounts, not from appropriations. While the Administration requested GSCF appropriations in FY2012, FY2013, and FY2014, Congress has appropriated no funding. In the FY2012 omnibus appropriations act (P.L. 112-74), Congress permitted DOD and the State Department to transfer up to the $250 million from specified accounts, with a limit of $200 million from DOD and $50 million from State. For FY2013, Congress made no provision for funding. In the FY2014 omnibus appropriations act (P.L. 113-76), Congress provided authority for DOD to transfer to the GSCF up to $200 million and for the State Department to transfer up to $25 million from specified accounts. For FY2015, the Obama Administration does not request a GSCF appropriation under the State Department budget. Relevant DOD FY2015 budget documents available as of this date seem to indicate there is no DOD FY2015 appropriations request. \nThe Administration has taken steps to program FY2012 funds. In mid-2012, it notified Congress that it would initiate programs for Yemen and East Africa under the transitional (Section 1207(n), P.L. 112-81) authority with authorized funding up to $75 million each. These are being implemented. Later in the year, the Administration transferred $44.8 million to the GSCF for programs under the core GSCF legislation, which provided for country selection by the Administration in the course of the fiscal year. The Secretary of State designated seven countries as eligible for this assistance: Nigeria, the Philippines, Bangladesh, Libya, Hungary, Romania, and Slovakia. The Administration must notify congressional committees with detailed program plans before the programs can begin. The GSCF office has provided no further information to CRS as of this date.\nIssues include whether the State Department has the ability and capacity to lead GSCF activities; possible drawbacks for DOD; the desirability of providing DOD with authority to train non-military security forces, including law enforcement; and the potential effectiveness of GSCF programs in the absence of a strategy for security assistance.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": true,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R42641",
          "sha1": "329986d87366c86388918bb006438f9273d6f459",
          "filename": "files/20140404_R42641_329986d87366c86388918bb006438f9273d6f459.html",
          "images": null
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R42641",
          "sha1": "a05357c0ae7c10af5567e5cff5ec1897e348beb5",
          "filename": "files/20140404_R42641_a05357c0ae7c10af5567e5cff5ec1897e348beb5.pdf",
          "images": null
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "IBCList",
          "id": 221,
          "name": "Defense Appropriations"
        },
        {
          "source": "IBCList",
          "id": 3153,
          "name": "Defense Strategy, Military Operations, and Force Structure"
        },
        {
          "source": "IBCList",
          "id": 3467,
          "name": "Foreign Aid"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc462773/",
      "id": "R42641_2013Jan22",
      "date": "2013-01-22",
      "retrieved": "2014-12-05T09:57:41",
      "title": "Global Security Contingency Fund: Summary and Issue Overview",
      "summary": "This report provides basic information on the Global Security Contingency Fund (GSCF) legislation. It starts with a brief discussion of the conceptual origins of the legislation and then summarizes the legislation's provisions. It concludes with a short analysis of salient issues.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20130122_R42641_ffe741d977d4156922e8540ad0cacc99998ff77b.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20130122_R42641_ffe741d977d4156922e8540ad0cacc99998ff77b.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Contingency fees",
          "name": "Contingency fees"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Security measures",
          "name": "Security measures"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense policy",
          "name": "Defense policy"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Funds",
          "name": "Funds"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Counterterrorism",
          "name": "Counterterrorism"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc807796/",
      "id": "R42641_2012Aug01",
      "date": "2012-08-01",
      "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26",
      "title": "Global Security Contingency Fund (GSCF): Summary and Issue Overview",
      "summary": null,
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20120801_R42641_dc5ac22560c858516fcb49881b6bd3153284435c.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20120801_R42641_dc5ac22560c858516fcb49881b6bd3153284435c.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    }
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Appropriations",
    "Foreign Affairs",
    "Intelligence and National Security",
    "National Defense"
  ]
}