{
  "id": "R42333",
  "type": "CRS Report",
  "typeId": "REPORTS",
  "number": "R42333",
  "active": false,
  "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 398998,
      "date": "2012-01-27",
      "retrieved": "2016-04-07T00:17:23.858985",
      "title": "Marcellus Shale Gas: Development Potential and Water Management Issues and Laws",
      "summary": "Until relatively recently, natural gas-rich shale formations throughout the United States were not considered to have significant resource value because no technologies existed to economically recover the gas. Development and deployment of advanced drilling and reservoir stimulation methods have dramatically increased the gas production from these \u201cunconventional gas shales.\u201d The Marcellus Shale formation potentially represents one of the largest unconventional natural gas resources in the United States, underlying much of West Virginia and Pennsylvania, southern New York, eastern Ohio, western Maryland, and western Virginia. Directional drilling and \u201chydraulic fracturing\u201d are essential to exploiting these low permeability shale gas resources. Although oil and gas developers have applied these technologies in conventional oil and natural gas fields for some time, recent improvements in both technologies have allowed them to be applied effectively to unconventional gas shales on an industrial scale.\nWhile creating significant economic benefits, development of the Marcellus Shale faces infrastructure challenges, such as the need for gathering pipelines. Marcellus development also has generated controversy due to its potential scale and its potential impacts on land and water resources, communities, public infrastructure, and environmental quality. \nSeveral water quality issues have arisen, including concerns about the potential for hydraulic fracturing operations to contaminate groundwater and drinking water supplies. The 111th Congress urged the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to study this issue, and the agency expects to publish initial research results in 2012 and a final report in 2014. Notably, EPA does not have the authority to regulate hydraulic fracturing (except where diesel fuel is used).\nAdditionally, managing the large volumes of wastewater produced during natural gas production (including flowback from hydraulic fracturing and water produced from the shale formation) has emerged as a major water quality issue related to Marcellus development. In some areas across the Marcellus Shale region, the geology may limit the use of underground injection wells (the most common produced-water disposal practice in oil and gas fields), and wastewater disposal is posing treatment, quality, and regulatory challenges. Both industry best practices and state regulations continue to evolve.\nOther concerns associated with shale gas development include the contamination of water from surface spills, migration of methane gas and contaminants into residential water wells from faulty well construction, siltation of streams from drilling and pad construction activities, and potential impacts that large water withdrawals might have on water resources, streams, and aquatic life.\nThe development of the Marcellus Shale on private or state land is subject primarily to state laws and regulations, including requirements for well construction and operation. Provisions of two federal water quality laws\u2014the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) and the Clean Water Act (CWA)\u2014can apply to activities related to wastewater disposal through underground injection and discharge to surface waters. Additionally, several of the states include watersheds that are subject to water resource regulations resulting from the adoption of interstate compacts (primarily the Delaware River Basin Compact and the Susquehanna River Basin Compact). \nThis report reviews the Marcellus Shale resource, development processes, and related surface water and groundwater issues. It also discusses related federal and state regulatory authorities and related developments, and pending federal legislation.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R42333",
          "sha1": "8657ba2cca8bb761eab4e905c1b4ef83d5948c38",
          "filename": "files/20120127_R42333_8657ba2cca8bb761eab4e905c1b4ef83d5948c38.html",
          "images": null
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R42333",
          "sha1": "8ac5e410aa8e01df171e336b0f6e9fb3044fc33b",
          "filename": "files/20120127_R42333_8ac5e410aa8e01df171e336b0f6e9fb3044fc33b.pdf",
          "images": null
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    }
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Energy Policy",
    "Environmental Policy"
  ]
}