{ "id": "R42133", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "R42133", "active": false, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 399244, "date": "2012-02-09", "retrieved": "2016-04-07T00:16:00.125612", "title": "Building Civilian Interagency Capacity for Missions Abroad: Key Proposals and Issues for Congress", "summary": "Within the past two decades, prominent foreign policy organizations and foreign policy experts have perceived serious deficiencies in the authorities, organizations, and personnel used to conduct interagency missions that prevent the United States from exercising its power to full advantage. For the 112th Congress, proposals to address these problems may be of interest for their perceived potential not only to enhance performance, but also to save money by streamlining processes, encouraging interagency cooperation, and reducing duplication. These proposals also provide context for current and recent legislation, including the Interagency Personnel Rotation Act of 2011 (S. 1268 and H.R. 2314) and the Contingency Operations Oversight and Interagency Enhancement Act of 2011 (H.R. 3660), as well as the new Global Security Contingency Fund contained in the FY2012 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA, Section 1207, H.R. 1540, P.L. 112-81, signed into law December 31, 2011). The FY2012 NDAA requires the President to submit to Congress a \u201cwhole-of-government\u201d implementation plan. \nDespite a growing perception during the 1990s that reforms were needed to foster interagency cooperation in missions abroad, it was not until the terrorist attacks on the United States of September 11, 2001, during the presidency of George W. Bush, and subsequent U.S. military interventions that the need became urgent enough to result in significant changes. The earlier first steps of the Clinton Administration toward interagency reform were in short order embraced and then expanded by the Bush Administration, which also implemented reforms of its own. The Barack H. Obama Administration has endorsed these changes and undertaken some of its own. \nThree problems with the current interagency cooperation system are most commonly cited. These are (1) a government-wide lack of strategic planning and interagency operational planning capabilities among civilian agencies; (2) a variety of structural deficiencies in the U.S. government for conducting missions abroad that lead to a tendency for \u201cstove-piping\u201d responses, with each agency operating independently, and to civilian agencies\u2019 reluctance to divert scarce resources, including personnel, from their core missions to interagency missions; and (3) personnel who are not trained for interagency missions and often unfamiliar with the missions, capabilities, and cultures of other agencies. \nThis report draws on over three dozen studies with recommendations to improve the current national security system. The studies surveyed include three prepared by the Project on National Security Reform, with comprehensive recommendations, four prepared or co-sponsored by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), and two by RAND in conjunction with the American Academy of Diplomats, as well as reports by the Council on Foreign Relations, the Defense Science Board, the National Defense University, and others. This report draws from these studies, as well as a few articles, for recommendations to improve strategy-making, planning, and budgeting; to improve institutional authorities, structures, and arrangements; and to create interagency personnel policies and mechanisms.\nAs the breadth and variety of the recommendations indicate, there is no consensus on how to fix the perceived problems. Nor is there agreement among policymakers on a number of overarching questions: whether interagency reform is necessary for missions abroad, which proposals are considered highest priority, whether reforms would save money, and whether reform of congressional organization or procedures must accompany other national security reform measures.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R42133", "sha1": "611403f3be4683079564a5b7a309788a762aa957", "filename": "files/20120209_R42133_611403f3be4683079564a5b7a309788a762aa957.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R42133", "sha1": "76e12859ffd09626ee8fdd2149c78b41577c528f", "filename": "files/20120209_R42133_76e12859ffd09626ee8fdd2149c78b41577c528f.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc87196/", "id": "R42133_2012Feb02", "date": "2012-02-02", "retrieved": "2012-07-03T07:51:21", "title": "Building Civilian Interagency Capacity for Missions Abroad: Key Proposals and Issues for Congress", "summary": "Within the past two decades, prominent foreign policy organizations and foreign policy experts have perceived serious deficiencies in the authorities, organizations, and personnel used to conduct interagency missions that prevent the United States from exercising its power to full advantage. For the 112th Congress, proposals to address these problems may be of interest for their perceived potential not only to enhance performance, but also to save money by streamlining processes, encouraging interagency cooperation, and reducing duplication. These proposals also provide context for current and recent legislation, including the Interagency Personnel Rotation Act of 2011 (S. 1268 and H.R. 2314) and the Contingency Operations Oversight and Interagency Enhancement Act of 2011 (H.R. 3660), as well as the new Global \r\nSecurity Contingency Fund contained in the FY2012 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA, Section 1207, H.R. 1540, P.L. 112-81, signed into law December 31, 2011). The FY2012 NDAA requires the President to submit to Congress a \u201cwhole-of-government\u201d implementation plan.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20120202_R42133_3c8ce161b7bf95f123d3260ab01bcb21382f7f38.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20120202_R42133_3c8ce161b7bf95f123d3260ab01bcb21382f7f38.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Foreign policy", "name": "Foreign policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "International relations", "name": "International relations" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Budgets", "name": "Budgets" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc87197/", "id": "R42133_2012Jan23", "date": "2012-01-23", "retrieved": "2012-07-03T07:51:21", "title": "Building Civilian Interagency Capacity for Missions Abroad: Key Proposals and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report draws on over three dozen studies with recommendations to improve the current national security system. The studies surveyed include three prepared by the Project on National Security Reform, with comprehensive recommendations, four prepared or co-sponsored by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), and two by RAND in conjunction with the American Academy of Diplomats, as well as reports by the Council on Foreign Relations, the Defense Science Board, the National Defense University, and others. This report draws from these studies, as well as a few articles, for recommendations to improve strategy-making, planning, and budgeting; to improve institutional authorities, structures and arrangements; and, to create interagency personnel policies and mechanisms.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20120123_R42133_cd8b31c56c73add167c82c73ce53f547b47c3b6a.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20120123_R42133_cd8b31c56c73add167c82c73ce53f547b47c3b6a.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "National security", "name": "National security" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Foreign policy", "name": "Foreign policy" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc93919/", "id": "R42133_2011Dec22", "date": "2011-12-22", "retrieved": "2012-07-24T12:39:36", "title": "Building Civilian Interagency Capacity for Missions Abroad: Key Proposals and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report gives an overview of the current problems with interagency cooperation and draws on the conclusions of more than three dozen studeis to provide recommendations for improvement. It provides information about key problems and reform proposals as well as issues for Congress.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20111222_R42133_b28a75adaf6a96f48dbcb61d0a5bba96d80a5831.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20111222_R42133_b28a75adaf6a96f48dbcb61d0a5bba96d80a5831.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "National security", "name": "National security" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "International relations", "name": "International relations" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" } ] } ], "topics": [ "Foreign Affairs", "Intelligence and National Security", "National Defense" ] }