Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses

Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses

Sexual Abuse of Children:
Federal Criminal Offenses
Richard M. Thompson II
Legislative Attorney
July 13, 2012
Congressional Research Service
7-5700
www.crs.gov
R42132
CRS Report for Congress
Pr
epared for Members and Committees of Congress

Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses

Summary
Over the past 100 years, Congress has sought to prohibit acts of sexual abuse of minors and
punish those who harm the nation’s children. These efforts began in the early 20th century when
Congress prohibited the transportation of a minor in interstate commerce for the purpose of
sexual exploitation, and continue to more modern measures such as outlawing the use of the
Internet to lure children for sexual purposes. Nevertheless, Congress’s power in this area does
have constitutional limits.
The power to create criminal laws in the United States resides most broadly with the states. The
states retain a general police power to regulate for the health, safety, and welfare of their citizens.
By contrast, Congress may only act within its express and implied powers, including the power to
legislate for federal enclaves and in areas within its enumerated powers (e.g., commerce,
spending, taxing). Congress has exercised both strands of authority to criminalize sexual abuse of
children.
Congress began outlawing sexual abuse of minors in 1910 with the Mann Act, which outlawed
the use of a common carrier to transport a minor in interstate commerce for an illegal sexual
purpose. In subsequent enactments, including the Sexual Exploitation of Children Act of 1977,
the Sexual Abuse Act of 1986, and the Protection of Children from Sexual Predators Act of 1998,
Congress increased penalty provisions (including repeat offender provisions), expanded
jurisdictional clauses, and broadened the list of prohibited acts, including aggravating factors
warranting an increased penalty.
Presently, federal sexual abuse law is a hierarchy based on the age of the victim and whether the
act involved aggravating circumstances. The most serious offense is when a child is murdered
during the commission of a sexual offense. The penalty is death or up to life imprisonment. The
least serious is sexual contact (as opposed to a sexual act) with a minor at least 12 years of age
but younger than 16. This crime requires no aggravating circumstances and carries a possible
four-year maximum prison sentence. Between these two crimes falls a host of other offenses
prohibiting sexual abuse or contact. These include sexual abuse of a child at least 12 years of age
but younger than 16, sexual contact with a child under the age of 12 years, and use of the mail or
other facility of interstate commerce to persuade a minor under the age of 18 to engage in an
illegal sexual act.
Because much of the prohibited conduct in these statutes overlaps, courts must consider the
lesser-included offense doctrine when handling sexual abuse cases. This doctrine permits a court
to instruct the jury on not only the offense charged by the government, but also a lesser offense
that is “necessarily included” in the charged offense. This doctrine has been used to aid the
prosecution in obtaining a conviction when proof of the charged offense is insufficient, but also
assists defendants by allowing the jury to convict on the lesser included offense.

Congressional Research Service

Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses

Contents
Introduction...................................................................................................................................... 1
Limits of Federal Authority to Punish Local Criminal Acts ............................................................ 1
Child Abuse Reporting Laws........................................................................................................... 3
Overview of Federal Child Sexual Abuse Laws .............................................................................. 4
Specific Federal Offenses ................................................................................................................ 7
Aggravated Sexual Abuse of Children ...................................................................................... 7
Abusive Sexual Contact with Minor or Ward............................................................................ 8
Sexual Abuse of Child at Least 12 Years of Age but Younger than 16.................................... 10
Illegal Sexual Activity in Interstate Commerce....................................................................... 10
Other Sections Relating to Sexual Abuse................................................................................ 11
Lesser Included Offenses for Child Sexual Abuse Crimes ............................................................ 11

Appendixes
Appendix. Federal Child Sexual Abuse Laws ............................................................................... 13

Contacts
Author Contact Information........................................................................................................... 15

Congressional Research Service

Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses

Introduction
Prompted by reported cases of child sexual abuse, Congress periodically evaluates whether
federal law adequately protects the nation’s children from sexual abuse and properly punishes
those who seek to harm them. Congress has passed many criminal laws that prohibit acts such as
aggravated sexual abuse of a minor, sexual contact with a minor, and transporting minors across
state lines with the intent to commit sexual acts. Congress’s power to outlaw sexual abuse,
however, is not limitless. The federal government may only proscribe abuse when it occurs in a
federal enclave (a statutorily and constitutionally defined federal territorial jurisdiction) or is
within Congress’s enumerated powers, such as commerce, taxing, or spending, or its implied
powers (those arising from the necessary and proper clause).
To clarify at the outset, this report does not cover issues such as sex offender registration and
grant programs covered under the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006,1 and
only generally discusses programs for reporting child abuse under the Child Abuse Prevention
and Treatment Act.2 Those issues are covered comprehensively in other CRS reports.3
Instead, this report focuses on a narrow subset of substantive criminal offenses that outlaw and
punish sexual abuse of children, and certain procedural aspects under these laws. First, the report
will briefly discuss the federal government’s authority (as opposed to state authority) to enact
criminal laws. Next, it will briefly discuss child abuse reporting requirements under the Child
Abuse Prevention Treatment Act. Third, it will provide a general overview of the various laws
Congress has passed to address sexual abuse of children, including the Sexual Abuse Act of
1986,4 the Amber Hagerman Child Protection Act of 1996,5 and the Protection of Children from
Sexual Predators Act of 1998.6 Fourth, it will take an in-depth look at each sexual abuse offense,
including its substantive elements, potential punishments, and procedural aspects. Finally, this
report includes an Appendix that lists federal child sexual abuse crimes, including each
prohibited act, its jurisdictional clause, its punishment, and its statute of limitations.
Limits of Federal Authority to Punish
Local Criminal Acts
The power to create criminal laws in the United States rests with both the federal and state
governments. Under this system of dual sovereigns, the “States possess primary authority for
defining and enforcing the criminal law.”7 They have retained “inherent police power,”8 meaning

1 Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act, P.L. 109-248, 120 Stat. 587 (2006).
2 Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act, P.L. 93-247, 88 Stat. 4 (1974).
3 CRS Report RL33967, Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act: A Legal Analysis, by Charles Doyle; CRS
Report R40899, The Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA): Background, Programs, and Funding, by
Emilie Stoltzfus.
4 Sexual Abuse Act of 1986, P.L. 99-646, §87, 100 Stat. 3592, 3620.
5 Amber Hagerman Child Protection Act of 1996, P.L. 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009, 3009-031.
6 Protection of Children from Sexual Predators Act of 1998, P.L. 105-314, 112 Stat. 2974.
7 United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549, 561 n.3 (1995) (quoting Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619, 635 (1993)); see
also Screws v. United States, 325 U.S. 91, 109 (1945) (plurality opinion) (“Our national government is one of
(continued...)
Congressional Research Service
1

Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses

the power to legislate for the “health, safety, and morals” of the citizenry.9 The federal
government, on the other hand, is allocated a more limited role. The Constitution does not grant it
a broad police power to outlaw local acts generally, but instead confines its authority to a limited
bundle of powers, both express and implied.10 Nonetheless, the federal government does have
power to create and enforce criminal laws under both its territorial and enumerated powers.
Respecting its territorial power, Congress can criminalize acts that occur within certain federal
enclaves—those areas carved out by the Constitution for congressional administration. These
include the District of Columbia,11 territories of the United States,12 and land purchased by the
federal government from the states.13 Also, with this power, Congress has created a host of
offenses applicable to the “special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States.”14
This area includes the high seas, any land acquired by the United States from one of the several
states or land generally reserved or acquired by the United States, military posts, and crimes
occurring on an aircraft while in-flight over the high seas and out of the jurisdiction of the several
states.15
Congress can also criminalize acts that occur within the states if the desired prohibition is within
its enumerated powers. These powers include the commerce clause, the spending power, and the
taxing power.16 Under its power “[t]o regulate Commerce ... among the several States,”17
Congress can regulate three broad categories: (1) the use of the channels of interstate commerce,
(2) instrumentalities, or persons or things in interstate commerce, and (3) activities that have a
substantial effect on interstate commerce.18 Congress has employed the first and second
categories to outlaw crimes occurring in interstate commerce including domestic violence,19
stalking,20 and child sexual abuse.21

(...continued)
delegated powers alone. Under our federal system the administration of justice rests with the States except as Congress,
acting within the scope of those delegated powers, has created offenses against the United States.”).
8 Newberry v. United States, 256 U.S. 232, 258 (1921).
9 Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., 501 U.S. 560, 569 (1991).
10 1 WAYNE R. LAFAVE, SUBSTANTIVE CRIMINAL LAW §4.2(a) (2d ed. 2003). Congress’s implied powers derive from
the necessary and proper clause. U.S. CONST. art. I, §8, cl. 18 (“The Congress shall have Power ... To make all Laws
which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers....”).
11 “The Congress shall have Power ... To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not
exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat
of the Government of the United States....” U.S. CONST. art. I, §8, cl. 17.
12 “The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or
other Property belonging to the United States....” U.S. CONST. art. IV, §3.
13 “The Congress shall have Power ... To exercise exclusive Legislation ... over all places purchased by the Consent of
the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and
other needful Buildings.” U.S. CONST. art. I, §8, cl. 17.
14 18 U.S.C. §7 (2006).
15 Id.
16 LaFave, supra note 10.
17 U.S. CONST. art. I, §8, cl. 3.
18 See United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549, 558-59 (1995); United States v. Morrison 529 U.S. 598, 608-09.
19 18 U.S.C. §2261 (2006).
20 18 U.S.C. §2261A (2006).
21 18 U.S.C. §2241(c) (2006).
Congressional Research Service
2

Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses

While Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause is broad, it is not without limits. In United
States v. Lopez, the Court held that a provision of the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 that
prohibited possession of a firearm in a school zone, was beyond Congress’s commerce power
because the “Act neither regulate[d] a commercial activity nor containe[d] a requirement that the
possession be connected in any way to interstate commerce” (sometimes referred to as a
“jurisdictional hook”).22 But 10 years later in Gonzales v. Raich, the Court upheld a provision of
the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) that prohibited a person from possessing, obtaining, or
manufacturing marijuana for medical use.23 The Court sustained this use of Congress’s power to
regulate a wholly intrastate activity because the CSA was part of a “larger scheme” designed to
regulate an act that “in the aggregate, substantially affect[ed] interstate commerce.”24
Under its spending power, Congress has conditioned receipt of federal money by states upon their
passage of criminal statutes.25 Describing this process, the Court stated that “legislation enacted
pursuant to the spending power is much in the nature of a contract: in return for federal funds, the
States agree to comply with federally imposed conditions.”26 The Court upheld in South Dakota v.
Dole Congress’s condition of state receipt of highway funds upon the states passage of a 21-year
old minimum drinking age.27 In the child sexual abuse context, Congress conditioned law
enforcement funds to the states upon the state’s passage of Megan’s Law,28 which required states
to release information to the public about convicted sex offenders.29
Exercising both its territorial power in the federal enclaves, and its express and implied powers
under its Article I commerce and spending powers, Congress has criminalized certain acts of
sexual abuse towards children.
Child Abuse Reporting Laws
Though not a focal point of this report, it is necessary to briefly discuss child abuse reporting
laws. In 1974, Congress enacted the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA)30 to
establish procedures for the “prevention, identification, and treatment of child abuse and
neglect.”31 Among other provisions, CAPTA created a uniform definition for child abuse and
established minimum child abuse reporting standards the states were required to institute as a
condition of receiving grant funds.32 All fifty states have enacted definitions that meet CAPTA’s

22 Lopez, 514 U.S. at 551.
23 Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 22 (1995).
24 Id.
25 See generally KENNETH THOMAS, CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE, UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION: ANALYSIS
AND INTERPRETATION 165 (2002), available at http://crs.gov/conan/default.aspx?mode=topic&doc=Article01.xml&t=
3|1|2&s=8&c=1.
26 Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp. v. Halderman, 451 U.S. 1, 17 (1981).
27 South Dakota v. Dole, 483 U.S. 203, 211 (1987).
28 Megan’s Law, P.L. 104-145, 110 Stat. 1345 (1996).
29 See W. Paul. Koenig, Does Congress Abuse Its Spending Clause Power By Attaching Conditions on the Receipt of
Federal Law Enforcement Funds to a State’s Compliance with “Megan’s Law”?, 88 J. CRIM. L. & CRIMINOLOGY 721,
729-30 (1998).
30 Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act, P.L. 93-247, 88 Stat. 4 (1974).
31 S.Rept. 93-308, at 1 (1973).
Congressional Research Service
3

Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses

minimum definition of “child abuse,” while some states have exercised their discretion to expand
on CAPTA’s definition.33
In addition to CAPTA, Congress enacted as Title II of the Crime Control Act of 1990, the Victims
of Child Abuse Act,34 which extended mandatory reporting requirements to “covered
professionals” while engaged in their work on “[f]ederal land or in a federally operated (or
contracted) facility.”35 A person who fails to report an act of child abuse under this act is subject
to fines and imprisonment of not more than one year.36
Overview of Federal Child Sexual Abuse Laws
Although Congress’s role in the field of criminal law is limited, it has made an effort to target
sexual abuse, with an emphasis on sexual abuse of children, a “particularly vulnerable section of
our society.”37 Congress’s movement to prohibit the sexual exploitation of minors began in 1910
with the White Slave Traffic Act or “Mann Act.”38 This act outlawed a person from inducing or
enticing a female under the age of 18 to engage in “prostitution, debauchery, or any other
immoral practice” while knowingly causing her to be transported in interstate commerce upon a
common carrier.39 This law was later expanded by the Sexual Exploitation of Children Act of
1977, which prohibited the transportation of any minor (making the offense gender neutral) in
interstate commerce or within the District of Columbia or a territory of the United States, with the
intent that the minor engage in prostitution or in prohibited sexual conduct if that person knew or
had reason to know that such conduct would be commercially exploited.40

(...continued)
32 See CRS Report R40899, The Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA): Background, Programs, and
Funding, by Emilie Stoltzfus.
33 Child Welfare Information Gateway, Mandatory Reporters of Child Abuse and Neglect: Summary of State Laws,
U.S. DEP’T OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, http://www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/laws_policies/statutes/
manda.cfm. “Child abuse and neglect” was defined under CAPTA as “the physical or mental injury, sexual abuse,
negligent treatment, or maltreatment of a child under the age of eighteen by a person who is responsible for the child’s
welfare under circumstances which indicate the child’s health or welfare is harmed or threatened thereby, as
determined in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary.” §3, 88 Stat. at 5. “Child abuse” was amended
(to its present form) to mean “any recent act or failure to act on the part of a parent or caretaker, which results in death,
serious physical or emotional harm, sexual abuse or exploitation, or an act or failure to act which presents an imminent
risk of serious harm.” 42 U.S.C. §5101 (2006).
34 Victim’s of Child Abuse Act, P.L. 101-647, §201, 104 Stat. 4789, 4806 (1990).
35 42 U.S.C. §13031 (2006).
36 18 U.S.C. §2258 (2006).
37 Hearings on Federal Rape Reform Law Before the Subcomm. on Criminal Justice of the H. Comm. on the Judiciary,
98th Cong. 80 (1984) (statement of Rep. Steny Hoyer).
38 White Slave Traffic Act, ch. 395, §4, 36 Stat. 825, 826 (1910). The Mann Act outlawed a person from enticing or
coercing any female under the age of 18 to engage in “prostitution, debauchery, or any other immoral practice” while
knowingly causing her to be transported in interstate commerce upon a common carrier. Id.
39 White Slave Traffic Act, ch. 395, §4, 36 Stat. 825, 826 (1910).
40 Sexual Exploitation of Children Act of 1977, P.L. 95-225, §3(a), 92 Stat. 7, 8 (codified at 18 U.S.C. §2423). The
Child Sexual Abuse and Pornography Act of 1986, P.L. 99-628, §5, 100 Stat. 3510, 3511, amended the requirement
that the prohibited sexual conduct “be commercially exploited,” to its current form, which requires that the minor
engage in sexual activity “for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense.” 18 U.S.C. §2423(a) (2006).
Congressional Research Service
4

Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses

Then in 1986, in an effort to “modernize and reform Federal rape statutes” and “protect[] children
of very tender years,” Congress enacted the Sexual Abuse Act of 1986.41 This act added a new
chapter to Title 18 entitled “Sexual Abuse” and contained five new sections creating sexual abuse
offenses within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States or a federal
prison. Of these five, several targeted sexual abuse of children, including aggravated sexual abuse
of a child under the age of 12 years and sexual abuse of a minor at least 12 years of age but
younger than 16.42 This act is tiered, in that the seriousness of the offenses escalates depending on
whether the defendant engaged in a “sexual act” or “sexual contact” and whether there are
aggravating factors present.43 The greatest offense is contained in Section 2241 (aggravated
sexual abuse), which requires a sexual act coupled with serious aggravating circumstances.44 Also
requiring a sexual act but with less serious aggravating factors are Sections 2242 (sexual abuse)
and 2243 (sexual abuse of a minor or ward).45 Finally, the least serious is Section 2244 (abusive
sexual contact), which requires sexual contact, and not a sexual act.46
The offenses created under the Sexual Abuse Act, however, were limited to crimes occurring in
the special maritime or territorial jurisdiction of the United States or in a federal prison.47 Seeking
to expand the reach of these statutes, Congress passed the Amber Hagerman Child Protection Act
of 1996, which, among other provisions, broadened existing statutes to cover crimes that occurred
not only in the federal enclaves, but also when the defendant crossed state lines.48 Also enacted
that year as part of the Communications Decency Act of 1996, Congress made it unlawful to use
the mail or other facility of interstate commerce or within the defined federal jurisdiction to
persuade a minor under 18 years of age to engage in sexual activity if that act constituted a
criminal offense.49
Two years later Congress passed the Protection of Children from Sexual Predators Act of 1998,
which increased the penalties for several sexual abuse offenses including sexual abuse of a child
under the age of 12 years and also added a repeat offender penalty.50 Previously, 18 U.S.C.
Section 2244 (abusive sexual contact) did not expressly distinguish between adult and child
victims in setting maximum penalties for violations of it.51 This act amended Section 2244 to add
a separate penalty provision, doubling the sentence if the victim of the abusive sexual contact is
under the age of 12.52 For example, under Section 2244(a)(1) a person can receive up to 10 years
imprisonment for abusive sexual contact regardless of the victim’s age.53 Under the amended
version, the same abusive sexual contact of a child under the age of 12 may receive 20 years.54

41 Sexual Abuse Act of 1986, P.L. 99-646, §87, 100 Stat. 3592, 3620; H.Rept. 99-594, at 6, 15 (1986).
42 18 U.S.C. §2241(c) (2006); 18 U.S.C. §2243(a) (2006).
43 3-61 MODERN FEDERAL JURY INSTRUCTIONS-CRIMINAL P 61.01 cmt. (2011).
44 Id.
45 18 U.S.C. §§2242-43 (2006).
46 18 U.S.C. §2244 (2006).
47 Sexual Abuse Act of 1986 §87.
48 Amber Hagerman Child Protection Act of 1996, P.L. 104-208, §121(7), 110 Stat. 3009, 3009-31.
49 Communications Decency Act of 1996, P.L. 104-104, §508, 110 Stat. 133, 137.
50 Protection of Children from Sexual Predators Act of 1998, P.L. 105-314, 112 Stat. 2974.
51 18 U.S.C. §2244 (1994).
52 18 U.S.C. §2244(c).
53 18 U.S.C. §2244(a)(1).
54 18 U.S.C. §2244(c) (cross-referencing 18 U.S.C. §2244(a)(1)).
Congressional Research Service
5

Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses

This act increased the penalty from a maximum of 10 years to a maximum of 15 years under both
Section 2422(b) (using the mail or other facilities of interstate commerce or within a federal
enclave to coerce or entice a minor under the age of 18 to engage in illegal sexual activity) and
Section 2423(a) (transporting a minor in interstate commerce with the intent to engage in illegal
sexual activity).55 This law also doubled the prison sentence for repeat offenders who committed
a sexual abuse offense found in Chapter 109A of Title 18.56 Finally, this law made it a crime to
use the mail or other facility of interstate commerce to transmit personal information about a
minor under the age of 16 with the intent to entice or encourage any person to engage in any
sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a crime.57
In 2003, Congress enacted the PROTECT Act, increasing the minimum and maximum penalty for
several sexual abuse offenses.58 The minimum penalties under Section 2422(b) (coercing or
enticing a minor under the age of 18 to engage in an illegal sexual act) and Section 2423(a)
(transporting a minor in interstate commerce with intent to engage in illegal sexual activity) were
set at five years and the maximum penalties were increased from 15 to 30 years.59 The PROTECT
Act also created the “Two Strikes You’re Out” section,60 which requires a sentence of life
imprisonment if a person is convicted of a “federal sex offense”61 and had a “prior sex
conviction.”62
Finally, Congress enacted the Adam Walsh Protection and Safety Act in 2006, which, in addition
to establishing a system of sex offender registration, increased the terms of imprisonment of
existing offenses.63 As an example of the increased sentences for sexual abuse of a child, Section

55 §§102-3, 112 Stat. at 2975.
56 18 U.S.C. §2426 (2006).
57 18 U.S.C. §2425 (2006).
58 Prosecutorial Remedies and Other Tools to end the Exploitation of Children Today Act of 2003 (PROTECT Act),
P.L. 108-21, 117 Stat. 650.
59 Id. §103, 117 Stat. at 652.
60 Id. §106, 117 Stat. at 654.
61 “Federal sex offense” is defined as “an offense under section 1591 (relating to sex trafficking of children), 2241
(relating to aggravated sexual abuse), 2242 (relating to sexual abuse), 2244(a)(1) (relating to abusive sexual contact),
2245 (relating to sexual abuse resulting in death), 2251 (relating to sexual exploitation of children), 2251A (relating to
selling or buying of children), 2422(b) (relating to coercion or enticement of a minor into prostitution), or 2423(b)
(relating to transportation of minors)[.]” 18 U.S.C. §3559(e)(2)(A) (2006).
62 “Prior sex conviction” is defined as “a conviction for which the sentence was imposed before the conduct occurred
constituting the subsequent Federal sex offense, and which was for a Federal sex offense or a State sex offense[.]” 18
U.S.C. §3559(e)(2)(C). “State sex offense” is defined as
an offense under State law that is punishable by more than one year in prison and consists of
conduct that would be a Federal sex offense if, to the extent or in the manner specified in the
applicable provision of this title—
(i) the offense involved interstate or foreign commerce, or the use of the mails; or
(ii) the conduct occurred in any commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States,
within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, in a Federal prison,
on any land or building owned by, leased to, or otherwise used by or under the control of the
Government of the United States, or in the Indian country (as defined in Section 1151)[.]
18 U.S.C. §3559(e)(2)(B).
Though beyond the scope of this report, there are specific sections of the United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual
relating to sexual abuse of children. See U.S. SENTENCING GUIDELINES MANUAL §2A3.1 (2011); see generally CRS
Report R41696, How the Federal Sentencing Guidelines Work: An Overview, by Charles Doyle.
63 Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act, P.L. 109-248, 120 Stat. 587 (2006).
Congressional Research Service
6

Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses

204 of the act increased the sentence for transporting a minor in interstate commerce for sexual
activity from five to 30 years to 10 years to life.64 Likewise, the offense of aggravated sexual
abuse was increased from any term of years to a minimum of 30 years to life.65
Specific Federal Offenses
As shown above, Congress’s efforts to combat the sexual exploitation and abuse of minors spans
from 1910 with the Mann Act, which prohibited enticing minors to travel on a common carrier in
interstate commerce for illegal sexual purposes, to more modern laws that prohibit the use of the
Internet to entice minors to engage in sexual acts. At each point, Congress has sought to
modernize and expand the laws to better effectuate its goals of preventing child abuse and
punishing those who engage in it. Such changes include stronger penalty provisions (including
repeat offender provisions), extension of jurisdictional clauses, and expansion of the acts
prohibited under the laws. This section explores current federal offenses (as opposed to a
historical review) pertaining to child sexual abuse.
Aggravated Sexual Abuse of Children
Enacted as part of the Sexual Abuse Act of 1986,66 and amended multiple times since, 18 U.S.C.
Section 2241(c) outlaws two categories of aggravated sexual abuse of children. The first category
prohibits a person from committing aggravated sexual abuse of a child under the age of 12. This
section has two alternative jurisdictional elements: the first requires interstate travel and the
second requires the act be committed in a federal jurisdiction. Specifically, the first offense makes
it unlawful to cross a state line with the intent to engage in a sexual act with a child under the age
of 12 and either commit or attempt to commit the sexual act.67 Similarly, the second offense
prohibits a person from committing or attempting to commit a sexual act on a child under the age
of 12 while in the territorial or special maritime jurisdiction of the United States or in a federally
run or contracted prison.68
The second category under Section 2241(c) prohibits aggravated sexual abuse of a minor at least
12 years of age but younger than 16 while in the special maritime or territorial jurisdiction of the

64 §204, 120 Stat. at 613, 18 U.S.C. §2423(a) (2006).
65 §206, 120 Stat. at 613, 18 U.S.C. §2241(c) (2006).
66 Sexual Abuse Act of 1986, P.L. 99-646, §87, 100 Stat. 3592, 3620.
67 18 U.S.C. 2241(c); United States v. Cryar, 232 F.3d 1318, 1322 (10th Cir. 2000); United States v. King, 604 F.3d
125, 139 (3d Cir. 2010). “Sexual act” is defined as
(A) contact between the penis and the vulva or the penis and the anus, and for purposes of this
subparagraph contact involving the penis occurs upon penetration, however slight;
(B) contact between the mouth and the penis, the mouth and the vulva, or the mouth and the anus;
(C) the penetration, however slight, of the anal or genital opening of another by a hand or finger or
by any object, with an intent to abuse, humiliate, harass, degrade, or arouse or gratify the sexual
desire of any person; or
(D) the intentional touching, not through the clothing, of the genitalia of another person who has
not attained the age of 16 years with an intent to abuse, humiliate, harass, degrade, or arouse or
gratify the sexual desire of any person.
18 U.S.C.§2246(2) (2006).
68 18 U.S.C. §2241(c); see 3-61 MODERN FEDERAL JURY INSTRUCTIONS-CRIMINAL P 61.02 cmt. (2011).
Congressional Research Service
7

Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses

United States, or in a federally run or contracted prison. This category can be further divided into
three subcategories. First, it is unlawful to knowingly cause a minor to engage in a sexual act by
the use of force or “threatening or placing that other person in fear that any person will be
subjected to death, serious bodily injury, or kidnapping,” if the child is at least four years younger
than the offender.69 Second, it is unlawful to render a minor unconscious and engage in a sexual
act with that minor.70 Third, Section 2241(c) prohibits a person from administering a drug to a
minor through the use of force, threat of force, or without the minor’s knowledge, which
substantially impairs that minor’s ability to apprise or control her conduct, and then engaging in a
sexual act with that minor.71 An attempt to commit any of these three crimes is sufficient for a
conviction under Section 2241(c).
In addition to the substantive elements, there are attendant procedural aspects to these two
categories. As to first category, Congress intended the offenses require no force or threats on the
part of offender.72 Likewise, the age of the offender is of no consequence.73
There are similar procedural rules that apply to both categories. For example, each distinct sexual
act under Section 2241(c) can be charged as a separate offense.74 If a perpetrator performs one
sexual act as defined in Section 2246(2) (e.g., contact between the penis and the vulva) and then
performs another distinct act (e.g., intentional touching of the genitalia), he can be prosecuted for
each separate count. Also, mistake of age is not a defense under Section 2241(c).75 Nor is there a
statute of limitations under Section 2241(c), meaning there is no time limit to when cases may be
brought against an offender.76 A person who violates any of the offenses in Section 2241(c) may
be fined and imprisoned for a minimum of 30 years up to life.77 Furthermore, if the offender has
committed a previous aggravated sexual abuse of a child under Section 2241(c), or a state offense
that would have been an offense under this subsection had it occurred in a federal jurisdiction, the
punishment for the second offense will be life imprisonment (unless the death penalty is
imposed).78
Abusive Sexual Contact with Minor or Ward
In 1998, Congress enacted the Protection of Children from Sexual Predators Act “to respond to
the horrifying menace of sex crimes against children” and to provide “law enforcement with the
tools it needs to investigate and bring to justice those individuals who prey on our nation’s
children.”79 This act doubled the punishment for crimes committed under 18 U.S.C. Section 2244

69 Id. (cross-referencing 18 U.S.C. §2241(a)(1)).
70 Id. (cross-referencing 18 U.S.C. §2241(a)(2)).
71 Id. (cross-referencing 18 U.S.C. §2241(b)).
72 H.Rept. 99-594, at 16 (1986).
73 H.Rept. 99-954, at 17 (1986).
74 United States v. Two Elk, 536 F.3d 890, 899 (8th Cir. 2008) (holding that multiple counts under §2241(c) not
prohibited under the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment as the offense of aggravated sexual abuse is
considered a “separate-act offense” and not a “course of conduct offense”).
75 18 U.S.C. §2241(d); see United States v. Juvenile Male, 211 F.3d 1169, 1171 (9th Cir. 2000).
76 18 U.S.C. §3299 (2006).
77 18 U.S.C. §2241(c).
78 Id.
79 H.Rept. 105-557, at 10 (1998).
Congressional Research Service
8

Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses

if the victim was under the age of 12.80 To determine the elements of each offense under Section
2244, one must refer back to Sections 2241(a)-(b), 2242, and 2243(a)-(b). For each of these
offenses, Section 2244 requires that the prohibited conduct currently in the text—“sexual act”—
be replaced with a different prohibited conduct—“sexual contact.”81 As one moves up or down
the levels of offenses, Congress has increased or decreased the penalty depending on the level of
force and violence involved.
Applying this process to Section 2244(c) produces the following offenses. It is unlawful for any
person while in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or in a
federally run or federally contracted prison facility, to knowingly engage in sexual contact with a
child under the age of 12 years by use of force against that child or by threatening or placing the
child in fear that “any person will be subject to death, serious bodily injury, or kidnapping.”82
Likewise, it is unlawful for any person while in this defined federal jurisdiction to render a child
unconscious, or administer a drug or intoxicant to this child, substantially impairing her, and then
initiating sexual contact with her.83 A sexual offender who violates either of these offenses is
subject to not more than 20 years imprisonment.84
Similarly, it is a federal offense for a person, while in the special maritime and territorial
jurisdiction of the United States, to knowingly cause a child under the age of 12 years to engage
in sexual contact by threatening or placing that child in fear (other than by threatening another
person who is not the child).85 Also, it is unlawful while in this same defined federal jurisdiction
to knowingly86 cause a child under the age of 12 to engage in sexual contact if the child is
“incapable of appraising the nature of the conduct” or is “physically incapable of declining
participation in, or communicating unwillingness to engage in, that sexual contact.”87 Violators of
either of these offenses are subject to fines and not more than six years of imprisonment.88
As a lesser tiered offense, it is unlawful while in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction
of the United States or in a federally run or contracted prison to engage or attempt to engage in
sexual contact with a child under 12 years of age.89 Violators of this section are subject to fines
and not more than four years imprisonment.90 Further, it is also unlawful to commit such an act

80 Protection of Children from Sexual Predators Act of 1998, P.L. 105-314, §302, 112 Stat. 2974, 2979.
81 18 U.S.C. §2244(a)(1)-(4). Sexual contact is defined as the “intentional touching, either directly or through the
clothing, of the genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks of any person with an intent to abuse, humiliate,
harass, degrade, or arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person....” 18 U.S.C. §2246(3) (2006).
82 18 U.S.C. §2244(c) (cross-referencing 18 U.S.C. §2244(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. §2241(a)). One court has noted that an
offender can be charged with the same conduct under both 18 U.S.C. §2244(a)(1) and §2241(b) combined with
§2244(c). United States v. Johns, 309 F.3d 298, 301 (5th Cir. 2002). Section 2244(b) applies to all victims, regardless of
age, thus is beyond the scope of this memorandum.
83 18 U.S.C. §2244(c) (cross-referencing 18 U.S.C. §2244(a)(1) and 2241(b)).
84 Id. (cross-referencing 18 U.S.C. §2244(a)(1)).
85 Id. (cross-referencing 18 U.S.C. §2244(a)(2) and §2242(1) (2006)).
86 The mental state requirement of “knowingly” has been described in the sexual abuse context as follows: “[T]he
defendant realized what he was doing and was aware of the nature of his conduct and did not act through ignorance,
mistake, or accident. Knowledge may be proved by the Defendant’s conduct and by all the facts and circumstances
surrounding the case.” United States v. Peters, 277 F.3d 963, 968 (7th Cir. 2002).
87 §2244(c) (cross-referencing 18 U.S.C. §2244(a)(2) and 2242(2)).
88 Id. (cross-referencing 18 U.S.C. §2244(a)(2)).
89 Id. (cross-referencing 18 U.S.C. §2244(a)(3) and §2243(a) (2006)).
90 Id. (cross-referencing 18 U.S.C. §2244(a)(3)).
Congressional Research Service
9

Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses

on a child when the child is in official detention and under the custody of the offender.91 There is
no time limit for when a prosecution may be brought for any of the offenses under Section
2244.92
Sexual Abuse of Child at Least 12 Years of Age but Younger than 16
Congress has also enacted several crimes for sexual acts and sexual contact committed on
children at least 12 years of age but younger than 16, what has traditionally been called statutory
rape. Congress wanted these laws to reach “older, mature persons who take advantage of younger,
immature persons, but not to reach sexual activity between persons of comparable age.”93 Under
Section 2243(a), a person is prohibited, while in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of
the United States, or in a federally run or contracted prison, from knowingly engaging, or
attempting to engage, in a sexual act with a child who is at least 12 years of age but younger than
16, and the offender is at least four years older than the child.94 Violators of this section are
subject to 15 years in prison.95 If the offender initiates sexual contact, rather than engaging in a
sexual act, with the child, that person will be subject to a maximum of two years imprisonment.96
Under this section, the prosecution need not prove that the defendant knew the victim’s age.97 It
is, however, a defense if the defendant can establish by a preponderance of the evidence that he
“reasonably believed” that the victim was at least 16 years old or that the defendant and the
victim were married at the time the act took place.98
Illegal Sexual Activity in Interstate Commerce
Dating back to 1910 with the Mann Act, Congress has outlawed certain sexual acts occurring in
interstate commerce. For instance, under 18 U.S.C. Section 2423(a), it is unlawful to knowingly
transport a minor (a person under the age of 18 years) in interstate or foreign commerce with the
intent that the minor engage in prostitution or any other sexual activity99 for which any person can
be charged with a criminal offense.100 The defendant need not know that the victim is under the
age of 18 years when the crime is committed.101 Moreover, the government need not prove that
the illegal behavior was the “dominant purpose” for traveling, but only that it was a “motivating
factor.”102 There is no limitation for when this crime may be prosecuted.103 A violator of this

91 Id. (cross-referencing 18 U.S.C. §2243(b)).
92 18 U.S.C. §3299 (2006).
93 H.Rept. 99-594, at 16 (1986).
94 18 U.S.C. §2243(a).
95 Id. at (a)(2).
96 18 U.S.C. §2244(a)(3) (cross-referencing 18 U.S.C. §2243).
97 18 U.S.C. §2243(d).
98 Id. at (c)(1).
99 United States v. Cole, 262 F.3d 704, 708 (8th Cir. 2001) (holding that the application of a Florida law that prohibited
a person from having sex with a person at least 12 years of age but younger than 16 was a proper predicate offense
satisfying the “any other sexual activity” clause of §2423) (citing FLA. STAT. §800.04(4)(a) (2007)).
100 18 U.S.C. §2423(a) (2006).
101 United States v. Hamilton, 456 F.2d 171, 173 (3d Cir. 1972).
102 United States v. Garcia-Lopez, 234 F.3d 217, 220 (5th Cir. 2000).
103 18 U.S.C. §3299 (2006).
Congressional Research Service
10

Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses

statute may be imprisoned from a minimum of 10 years to life.104 It is not a defense to a
conviction under Section 2423(a) that the person whom the defendant attempted to transport
across state lines was not actually a minor.105 Rather, it is enough to sustain a conviction if the
defendant had the requisite intent to transport a minor across state lines, even if the target was not
actually a minor.
Additionally, any person who uses the mail or other facility of interstate commerce, or within a
federal enclave, “knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces” a minor under the age of 18
years to engage in “sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense”
can be imprisoned for 10 years to life.106 Finally, it is a federal crime to knowingly transmit
through the mail or other means of interstate commerce personal information (e.g., name, address,
social security, e-mail address) about a minor under the age of 16 with the intent to entice or
encourage any person to engage in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a
crime.107
Other Sections Relating to Sexual Abuse
In addition to the specific criminal offenses, there are several corresponding penalty and
procedural statutes. If in the course of committing any of the offenses previously mentioned, the
offender murders the child, that person is subject to death or imprisonment for any term of years
up to life.108 If 18 U.S.C. Section 3559(e) (the “Two Strikes You’re Out” provision)109 does not
apply, repeat offenders—persons previously convicted for an offense under chapter 109A of Title
18, or a state offense consisting of conduct that would be an offense if committed in the proper
federal jurisdiction—shall be given a prison sentence twice the term that is already provided
under each respective section.110 If Section 3559(e) applies, repeat offenders may be sentenced to
life imprisonment.111 Finally, there is no statute of limitations for any of the offenses described
above.112
Lesser Included Offenses for
Child Sexual Abuse Crimes
Many of the child sexual abuse offenses have seemingly overlapping elements—that is, two
offenses which have at least one similar element (e.g., sexual contact with a child through the use
of force versus by threat of force). This overlap implicates the lesser-included offense doctrine,
which permits a court to instruct the jury on not only the underlying offense charged by the

104 18 U.S.C. §2423(a).
105 United States v. Morris, 549 F.3d 548, 550 (7th Cir. 2008) (sustaining conviction in which target was actually the
mother of a 15-year-old girl).
106 18 U.S.C. §2422(b) (2006).
107 18 U.S.C. §2425 (2006).
108 18 U.S.C. §2245 (2006).
109 18 U.S.C. §3559(e); see supra note 60.
110 18 U.S.C. §2247 (cross-referencing 18 U.S.C. §2426(b) (2006)).
111 18 U.S.C. §3559(e).
112 18 U.S.C. §3299.
Congressional Research Service
11

Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses

government, but also a lesser offense that is “necessarily included” in that charged offense. The
lesser-offense doctrine was traditionally used to aid the government in achieving a conviction
when the necessary proof for the primary offense was not attainable, but was sufficient to support
a lesser charge.113 It has also come to the aid of defendants, however, allowing the jury to use its
nullification power to convict on the lesser included offense, and also provides a compromise
conviction for a jury divided on the charged offense.114
Relying on language in Rule 31 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Supreme Court
has adopted the “elements” test for determining whether the doctrine is applicable, requiring that
the elements of the lesser included offense be a subset of the charged offense.115 This requires the
courts to focus objectively on the elements of the crime and not the actual facts of the crime
allegedly committed.
A more straightforward application of the lesser-offense doctrine is displayed in United States v.
Boyles, where the defendant argued that the court should have instructed the jury on the lesser
offense of sexual assault under Section 2242(1), in addition to the charged offense of aggravated
sexual assault under Section 2241(a)(1). Aggravated sexual assault requires “knowingly causing
another to engage in a sexual act by using force against that person,” whereas general sexual
assault requires “knowingly causing another to engage in a sexual act by threatening them or
placing them in fear.”116 Noting this difference between the use of force on a victim as compared
with using fear or threats, the court held that sexual assault under Section 2242(1) could not be a
lesser-included offense of aggravated sexual assault, since the elements of the former were not a
subset of the later.117
This doctrine becomes more difficult to apply when the elements are closer in nature. Take, for
example, the split in the federal circuit courts of appeals over whether “sexual contact” under
Section 2244 (abusive sexual contact) is “necessarily included” in the term “sexual act” under
Sections 2242 (sexual abuse) and 2243 (sexual abuse of a minor or ward). The majority of the
circuits hold that the inclusion of the intent requirement in Section 2244, the requirement that the
prohibited act be coupled with “an intent to abuse, humiliate, harass, degrade, or arouse or gratify
the sexual desire ...,” which is not contained in Sections 2242 or 2243, necessarily requires that
the lesser-included offense instruction not be given.118 The Eighth Circuit is the sole minority
circuit holding that sexual contact under Section 2244 is a lesser included offense of both
aggravated sexual abuse and sexual abuse of a minor.119

113 6 WAYNE R. LAFAVE ET AL., CRIMINAL PROCEDURE §24.8(d) (3d ed. 2007).
114 Id.
115 Schmuck v. United States, 489 U.S. 705, 716 (1989) (citing FED. R. CRIM. P. 31). Rule 31 states that a “defendant
may be found guilty of ... an offense necessarily included in the offense charged.” FED. R. CRIM. P. 31.
116 United States v. Boyles, 57 F.3d 535, 544 (7th Cir. 1995).
117 Id. at 544-45.
118 United States v. Castillo, 140 F.3d 874, 886 (10th Cir. 1998); United States v. Torres, 937 F.2d 1469, 1477-78 (9th
Cir. 1991).
119 United States v. Demarias, 876 F.2d 674, 676-77 (8th Cir. 1989).
Congressional Research Service
12

Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses

Appendix. Federal Child Sexual Abuse Laws

Code Jurisdictional

Statute
of
Offense
Section No.
Clause
Prohibited Act
Penalty
Limitations
Aggravated
18
U.S.C.
Crossing a state line Committing
or
30 years–Life No limitation
sexual abuse of a
§2241(c)
with the intent to
attempting to
child under 12
engage in a sexual
commit a sexual act
years
act or in the special
on a child under the
maritime or
age of 12 years
territorial
jurisdiction of the
United States or in
a federally run or
contracted prison
Aggravated
18
U.S.C.
Special maritime or
Knowingly renders a 30 years–Life No limitation
sexual abuse of a
§2241(c)
territorial
child at least 12
child at least 12
& §2241(b)
jurisdiction of the
years of age but
years of age but
United States or in
younger than 16
younger than 16
a federally run or
unconscious or
contracted prison
administers a drug
to that child and
engages or attempts
to engage in a sexual
act with that child
Aggravated
18
U.S.C.
Special maritime or
Knowingly causing a
30 years–Life No limitation
sexual abuse of
§2241(c)
territorial
child at least 12
child at least 12
& §2241(a)
jurisdiction of the
years of age but
years of age but
United States or in
younger than 16 to
younger than 16
a federally run or
engage in sexual act
contracted prison
by using force or
threat of death,
serious bodily injury,
or kidnapping
Sexual contact
18
U.S.C.
Special maritime or
Knowingly
initiates 20
year
No limitation
with a child
§2244(c),
territorial
sexual contact with
maximum
under the age of
§2244(a)(1),
jurisdiction of the
a child under 12
12 years through
§2241(a)
United States or in
years of age through
force or threat
a federally run or
use of force or
contracted prison
threat to kill,
seriously injure, or
kidnap any person
Sexual contact
18
U.S.C.
Special maritime or
Knowingly
initiates 20
year
No limitation
with a child
§2244(c),
territorial
sexual contact with
maximum
under the age of
§2244(a)(1),
jurisdiction of the
a child under 12
12 years while
& §2241(b)
United States or in
years of age while
unconscious or
a federally run or
child is unconscious
incapacitated
contracted prison
or has been
administered drugs
Sexual contact
18
U.S.C.
Special maritime or
Knowingly
initiates 6
year
No limitation
with a child
§2244(c),
territorial
sexual contact with
maximum
under the age of
§2244(a)(2),
jurisdiction of the
a child under 12
12 years through
& 2242(1)
United States or in
years of age by
fear or threat
a federally run or
threatening or
contracted prison
placing child in fear
Congressional Research Service
13

Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses

Code Jurisdictional

Statute
of
Offense
Section No.
Clause
Prohibited Act
Penalty
Limitations
Sexual contact
18
U.S.C.
Special maritime or
Knowingly
initiates 6
year
No limitation
with child under
§2244(c),
territorial
sexual contact with
maximum
12 years of age
§2244(a)(2),
jurisdiction of the
a child under 12
who is
& 2242(2)
United States or in
years of age who is
incapacitated
a federally run or
incapable of
contracted prison
understanding the
situation or
physically incapable
of declining
participation
Sexual contact
18
U.S.C.
Special maritime or
Knowingly
initiates 4
year
No limitation
with a child
§2244(c),
territorial
or attempts to
maximum
under 12 years
§2244(a)(3)
jurisdiction of the
initiate sexual

of age
& §2243
United States or in
contact with a child
a federally run or
at least 12 years of
contracted prison
age but younger
than 16
Sexual act with
18
U.S.C.
Special maritime or
Knowingly
engaging, 15
year
No limitation
child at least 12
§2243(a)
territorial
or attempting to
maximum
years of age but
jurisdiction of the
engage in sexual
younger than 16
United States or in
contact with a child
a federally run or
at least 12 years of
contracted prison
age but younger
than 16
Sexual contact
18
U.S.C.
Special maritime or
Knowingly
initiating 4
year
No limitation
with child at
§2244(a)(3)
territorial
sexual contact with
maximum
least 12 years of
& §2243(a)
jurisdiction of the
a child at least 12
age but younger
United States or in
years of age but
than 16
a federally run or
younger than 16
contracted prison
Sexual activity
18
U.S.C.
Use of mail or
Knowingly
10
years–Life No
limitation
with a minor
§2422(b)
facility of interstate
persuading or
under the age of
commerce, or
inducing a minor
18
special maritime or
under the age of 18
territorial
to engage in sexual
jurisdiction of the
activity when that
United States
act is a criminal
offense
Transportation
18
U.S.C.
Transport
in
Knowingly
10
mandatory No
limitation
of minor under
§2423
interstate
transporting a minor
minimum
18 years of age
commerce
under the age of 18
with intent to
in interstate
engage in sexual
commerce with the
activity
intent that the
minor engage in
sexual activity when
that act is a criminal
offense
Congressional Research Service
14

Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses

Code Jurisdictional

Statute
of
Offense
Section No.
Clause
Prohibited Act
Penalty
Limitations
Transmittal of
18
U.S.C.
Use of mail or
Knowingly
transmit 5
year
No
limitation
information
§2425
other facility of
personal information
maximum
about minor to
interstate
about a minor under
entice a sexual
commerce
16 years with the
act
intent to entice any
person to engage in
any sexual act for
which any person
can be charged with
a crime
Sexual contact
18
U.S.C.
Crossing a state line Child is murdered
Death or up
No limitation
or act that
§2245
or in the special
during the
to life
results in death
maritime or
commission of a
imprisonment
of child
territorial
sexual offense as
jurisdiction of the
defined in Title 18,
United States or in
chapter 109, and
a federally run or
§§2423.
contracted prison
Repeat
18
U.S.C.
Special maritime or
Second
or
Twice
the
No
limitation
Offenders
§2247
territorial
subsequent offense
original
jurisdiction of the
committed under
sentence, or
United States or in
chapter 109A of
life if person
a federally run or
Title 18
was
contracted prison
previously
convicted of
a sex offense
against a
minor
Two sexual
18
U.S.C.
—
A
federal
sex
Life,
unless No
limitation
abuse offenses
§3559
offense coupled with
death penalty
a prior sex
applies
conviction (under
either applicable
federal or state law).
Source: Title 18 of the United States Code.

Author Contact Information

Richard M. Thompson II

Legislative Attorney
rthompson@crs.loc.gov, 7-8449

Congressional Research Service
15