{
  "id": "R41641",
  "type": "CRS Report",
  "typeId": "REPORTS",
  "number": "R41641",
  "active": false,
  "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 390707,
      "date": "2011-09-20",
      "retrieved": "2016-04-07T00:33:10.200609",
      "title": "Reducing the Budget Deficit: Tax Policy Options",
      "summary": "Tax reform and deficit reduction are two issues being considered by the 112th Congress. In recent months, a number of groups have published various plans for tackling the nation\u2019s growing deficits. On September 19, 2011, President Obama submitted recommendations to the Joint Select Committee for Deficit Reduction. \nThis report analyzes various revenue options for deficit reduction, highlighting proposals made by the President\u2019s Fiscal Commission, the Debt Reduction Task Force, and the President\u2019s proposal. Others, such as House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan and the Obama Administration, have noted the importance of tax reform as part of deficit reduction plans. These plans, however, do not provide the same level of detail with respect to tax provisions as the Fiscal Commission, Debt Reduction Task Force, and President\u2019s proposal, and are therefore not reviewed in detail as part of this report.\nLarge budget deficits, rising national debt, and the growth of entitlement spending have raised questions regarding fiscal sustainability in the United States. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) predicts a FY2011 budget deficit of nearly $1.5 trillion, or 9.8% of gross domestic product (GDP). Over the past three decades, budget deficits have averaged 3% of GDP. Large budget deficits have contributed to an increased level of federal debt, relative to the size of the economy. Increased debt levels are expected to lead to increased federal interest payments. If not addressed, the current fiscal situation could undermine economic growth.\nReducing federal deficits will likely require reductions in spending, increased federal revenues, or some combination of spending cuts and revenue increases. Federal revenues in 2009 and 2010, relative to the size of the economy, were low by historical standards. Reduced federal collections may be partially attributable to the weak economy and the fiscal policy response. Historically low individual income tax collections may also be partially explained by the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts. Spending through the tax code, via tax expenditures, also reduces federal revenues. The use of tax expenditures may undermine economic efficiency and equity in the tax code.\nThe primary sources of federal revenues are individual income taxes, payroll taxes, corporate income taxes, and excise taxes. Additional income tax revenues could be raised with a broader tax base, which could be achieved by eliminating various exemptions, credits, and deductions. A broader tax base could also allow for lower tax rates, without a loss in federal revenues. Broadening the tax base could enhance the economic efficiency of the tax system. \nThe Fiscal Commission, the Debt Reduction Task Force, and the President\u2019s proposal took different approaches in the tax reform components of their fiscal sustainability plans. The President\u2019s Fiscal Commission raised additional tax revenues primarily through comprehensive income tax reform. The Fiscal Commission chose to broaden the tax base, allowing for both lower tax rates and increased federal revenues. The Debt Reduction Task Force\u2019s proposal also recommended individual income tax reform. The individual income tax reforms recommended by the Debt Reduction Task Force were designed to enhance efficiency and increase progressivity in the income tax system. Additional revenues in the Debt Reduction Task Force\u2019s plan originate from the proposed 6.5% debt-reduction sales tax. The President\u2019s proposal does not propose comprehensive tax reform, but instead highlights various provisions that could be modified or eliminated to generate additional federal revenues.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R41641",
          "sha1": "15647d59b29bdf74e236b934d4e722646297249f",
          "filename": "files/20110920_R41641_15647d59b29bdf74e236b934d4e722646297249f.html",
          "images": null
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R41641",
          "sha1": "1b9056b3bce5b53703719d4fee0c47c99f0642dc",
          "filename": "files/20110920_R41641_1b9056b3bce5b53703719d4fee0c47c99f0642dc.pdf",
          "images": null
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc96684/",
      "id": "R41641_2011Jul13",
      "date": "2011-07-13",
      "retrieved": "2012-08-07T13:52:45",
      "title": "Reducing the Budget Deficit: Tax Policy Options",
      "summary": "This report analyzes various revenue options for deficit reduction, highlighting proposals made by the President's Fiscal Commission and the Debt Reduction Task Force. Others, such as House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan and the Obama Administration, have noted the importance of tax reform as part of a deficit reduction plans. These plans, however, do not provide the same level of detail as the Fiscal Commission and Debt Reduction Task Force, and are therefore not reviewed in detail as part of this report.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20110713_R41641_9bc115ebbba78deca5ce251646cc9feb42562693.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20110713_R41641_9bc115ebbba78deca5ce251646cc9feb42562693.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Tax reform",
          "name": "Tax reform"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Taxation",
          "name": "Taxation"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Tax review",
          "name": "Tax review"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Deficit reduction",
          "name": "Deficit reduction"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Budgets",
          "name": "Budgets"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Budget deficits",
          "name": "Budget deficits"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc40119/",
      "id": "R41641_2011May17",
      "date": "2011-05-17",
      "retrieved": "2011-08-27T10:13:38",
      "title": "Reducing the Budget Deficit: Tax Policy Options",
      "summary": "This report analyzes various revenue options for deficit reduction, highlighting proposals made by the President's Fiscal Commission and the Debt Reduction Task Force. Others, such as House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan and the Obama Administration, have noted the importance of tax reform as part of a deficit reduction plans. These plans, however, do not provide the same level of detail as the Fiscal Commission and Debt Reduction Task Force, and are therefore not reviewed in detail as part of this report.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20110517_R41641_b964ec55d486cb83b504adaa232f742c148f3760.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20110517_R41641_b964ec55d486cb83b504adaa232f742c148f3760.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Tax reform",
          "name": "Tax reform"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Taxation",
          "name": "Taxation"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Tax review",
          "name": "Tax review"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Deficit reduction",
          "name": "Deficit reduction"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Budgets",
          "name": "Budgets"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Budget deficits",
          "name": "Budget deficits"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc40118/",
      "id": "R41641_2011April26",
      "date": "2011-04-26",
      "retrieved": "2011-08-27T10:13:38",
      "title": "Reducing the Budget Deficit: Tax Policy Options",
      "summary": "This report begins by reviewing the current fiscal situation. As a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP), revenues remain at historically low levels while spending remains elevated, contributing to budget deficits. The budget deficit in FY2011 is projected to be nearly $1.5 trillion, or 9.8% of GDP. Further, in recent years, the share of the federal budget devoted to mandatory spending has increased, making it difficult, if not impossible, for fiscal sustainability to be achieved through cuts in discretionary spending alone. Large budget deficits continue to contribute to a growing national debt, which, if left unchecked, could undermine future economic growth.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20110426_R41641_e7deb9743155206814ec7dff4aeabb444f1a1798.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20110426_R41641_e7deb9743155206814ec7dff4aeabb444f1a1798.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Budget",
          "name": "Budget"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Budget reductions",
          "name": "Budget reductions"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Federal budgets",
          "name": "Federal budgets"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Government spending reductions",
          "name": "Government spending reductions"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc103127/",
      "id": "R41641_2011Feb18",
      "date": "2011-02-18",
      "retrieved": "2012-09-19T20:16:14",
      "title": "Tax Policy Options for Deficit Reduction",
      "summary": "This report analyzes various revenue options for deficit reduction and highlights proposals made by the President's Fiscal Commission and the Debt Reduction Task Force.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20110218_R41641_7ef78304ee3a678d816fdaf60290fce7b4fed247.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20110218_R41641_7ef78304ee3a678d816fdaf60290fce7b4fed247.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Taxation",
          "name": "Taxation"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Tax reform",
          "name": "Tax reform"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Deficit reduction",
          "name": "Deficit reduction"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Budgets",
          "name": "Budgets"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "topics": []
}