{ "id": "R41444", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "R41444", "active": false, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 409727, "date": "2012-06-19", "retrieved": "2016-04-07T00:03:20.985706", "title": "Double-Dip Recession: Previous Experience and Current Prospect", "summary": "Concerns have been expressed that growth in the United States may falter to the point where the U.S. economy again experiences recession. A double-dip or W-shaped recession occurs when the economy emerges from a recession, has a short period of growth, but then, still well short of a full recovery, falls back into recession. This prospect raises policy questions about the current level of economic stimulus and whether added stimulus may be needed. The pace of the recovery has been relatively slow and growth has recently decelerated. For the first year of the recovery, real GDP grew at an average rate of 3.3%, slow by the standard of earlier post-war recoveries, but fast enough to stop the rise of the unemployment rate at 10.1% in October 2010 and to cause it to fall to 9.5% by mid-2010. In the recovery\u2019s second year, the rate of GDP growth slowed to an average rate of 1.6%, and the unemployment rate was only slightly lower at 9.1% by mid-2011. Growth remained weak during the recovery\u2019s third year, advancing at an annual rate of 1.9%, and the unemployment rate had only improved to 8.2% by May 2012. Other indicators, such as weak consumer spending, falling house prices, reduced flows of credit, the prospect of fading fiscal stimulus, and the premature return of recession in the euro area are also worrisome.\nDouble-dip recessions are rare. There are only two modern examples of a double-dip recession for the United States: the recession of 1937-1938 and the recession of 1981-1982. They both had the common attribute of resulting from a change in economic policy. In the first case, recession was an unintended consequence of the policy change; in the second case, recession was an intended consequence. Historically, there has been what is termed a \u201csnap back\u201d relationship between the severity of the recession and the strength of the subsequent recovery. In other words, a sharp contraction followed by a robust recovery traces out a V-shaped pattern of growth. However, unlike earlier post-war recessions, the recent recession occurred with a financial crisis. Research suggests that a slow recovery with sustained high unemployment is the norm in the aftermath of a deep financial crisis.\nThe prelude to the economic crisis in the United States was characterized by excessive leverage (the use of debt to support spending) in households and financial institutions, generating an asset price bubble that eventually collapsed and left balance sheets severely damaged. The aftermath is likely to be a period of resetting asset values, deleveraging, and repairing balance sheets. This correction results in higher saving, weakened domestic demand, a slower than normal recovery, and persistent high unemployment, but not necessarily a double-dip recession.\nSlower growth in the first half of 2011 was, in part, attributable to temporary factors, such as supply chain disruptions caused by the earthquake in Japan, recent floods and tornadoes in the South and Midwest, and the spike in many commodity prices, particularly oil. Nevertheless, recent economic indicators suggest that the recovery\u2019s underlying momentum has also weakened. While not leading to projections of a double-dip recession, this weakening has prompted many economic forecasters to substantially reduce their near-term growth projections from those made in 2011.\nThis report discusses factors suggesting an increased risk of a double-dip recession. It also discusses other factors that suggest economic recovery will continue. It presents the U.S. historical experience with double-dip recessions. It examines the role of deleveraging by households and businesses in the aftermath of the recent financial crisis in shaping the likely pace of economic recovery. The report concludes with a look at current economic projections.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R41444", "sha1": "6fce8dcbcbaa90349f5939334779bbee76d14250", "filename": "files/20120619_R41444_6fce8dcbcbaa90349f5939334779bbee76d14250.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R41444", "sha1": "772b9d946e5a2d0475324d24724a2c393065fa5f", "filename": "files/20120619_R41444_772b9d946e5a2d0475324d24724a2c393065fa5f.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc819913/", "id": "R41444_2011Dec09", "date": "2011-12-09", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Double-Dip Recession: Previous Experience and Current Prospect", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20111209_R41444_99d971caf3a132a4daf1183b992e1f107b33836e.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20111209_R41444_99d971caf3a132a4daf1183b992e1f107b33836e.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc491082/", "id": "R41444_2010Dec03", "date": "2010-12-03", "retrieved": "2015-01-27T19:40:46", "title": "Double-Dip Recession: Previous Experience and Current Prospect", "summary": "This report discusses factors suggesting an increased risk of double-dip recession. It discusses other factors that suggest economic recovery will continue. The U.S. historical experience with double-dip recessions is also presented. It examines the role of deleveraging by households and businesses in the aftermath of the recent financial crisis in shaping the likely pace of economic recovery. The report concludes with a look at current economic projections.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20101203_R41444_951e963a4833add53bc139cc486ad98f8bf37783.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20101203_R41444_951e963a4833add53bc139cc486ad98f8bf37783.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Business cycles", "name": "Business cycles" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Economic stabilization", "name": "Economic stabilization" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Financial crises", "name": "Financial crises" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Business forecasting", "name": "Business forecasting" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Economic policy", "name": "Economic policy" } ] } ], "topics": [ "Economic Policy" ] }