{ "id": "R41379", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "R41379", "active": false, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 426507, "date": "2013-12-16", "retrieved": "2016-04-06T23:12:25.541192", "title": "Samantar v. Yousef: The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) and Foreign Officials", "summary": "On June 1, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court decided unanimously in Samantar v. Yousef that the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), which governs the immunity of foreign states in U.S. courts, does not apply in suits against foreign officials. The ruling clarifies that officials of foreign governments, whether present or former, are not entitled to invoke the FSIA as a shield, unless the foreign state is the real party in interest in the case. Samantar\u2019s particular facts involve the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) and the Torture Victims Protection Act (TVPA), but the ruling applies to all causes of action against foreign officials. The ruling leaves open the possibility that foreign officials have recourse to other sources of immunity or other defenses to jurisdiction or the merits of a lawsuit. Officials may assert immunity under the common law, for example, perhaps aided by State Department suggestions of immunity. The Court also left open the possibility that Congress could enact new provisions to address the immunity of foreign officials.\nPrior to the Samantar decision, most federal judicial circuits interpreted the FSIA to cover foreign officials as \u201cagencies or instrumentalities\u201d of the foreign state based on their interpretation that Congress had intended to fully codify the common law of foreign sovereign immunity. To the extent the FSIA exceptions codify sovereign immunity of states under the common law, as in the case of lawsuits based on commercial activity under the restrictive theory, the recognition of a separate theory of immunity for foreign officials may not yield results significantly different from those cases in which courts applied the FSIA. The same common law considerations some courts previously applied to determine whether a foreign official is an \u201cagency or instrumentality\u201d under the FSIA would likely lead to similar results where the common law is applied directly. However, where Congress enacts exceptions to the FSIA that depart from the common law, outcomes may vary from cases decided under the pre-Samantar approach.\nThis report provides an overview of the FSIA, followed by a consideration of the remaining options for foreign officials who seek immunity from lawsuits, as well as some of the questions that may emerge from each option. The report also discusses legislation addressing the immunity of foreign officials (the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act, H.R. 3143 and S. 1535).", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R41379", "sha1": "f9460c6ae1a334fc500e149bcd1cdd28b8b77bda", "filename": "files/20131216_R41379_f9460c6ae1a334fc500e149bcd1cdd28b8b77bda.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R41379", "sha1": "9580fff5a018bd3b88d262c92dd94f0927a79b0a", "filename": "files/20131216_R41379_9580fff5a018bd3b88d262c92dd94f0927a79b0a.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc462379/", "id": "R41379_2012Dec17", "date": "2012-12-17", "retrieved": "2014-12-05T09:57:41", "title": "Samantar v. Yousef: The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) and Foreign Officials", "summary": "This report provides an overview of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), followed by a consideration of the remaining options for foreign officials who seek immunity from lawsuits, as well as some of the questions that may emerge from each option. The report also addresses legislation considered by the 112th Congress addressing the immunity of foreign officials (the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act, S. 1894 and H.R. 5904).", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20121217_R41379_b37c1e77a9b1cd6aefab9e13b6dce070398835f5.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20121217_R41379_b37c1e77a9b1cd6aefab9e13b6dce070398835f5.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Privileges and immunities", "name": "Privileges and immunities" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Diplomatic privileges and immunities", "name": "Diplomatic privileges and immunities" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Immunities of foreign states", "name": "Immunities of foreign states" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc31473/", "id": "R41379_2011Jan11", "date": "2011-01-11", "retrieved": "2011-03-09T09:26:47", "title": "Samantar v. Yousef: The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act and Foreign Officials", "summary": "On June 1, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court decided unanimously in Samantar v. Yousef that the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), which governs the immunity of foreign states in U.S. courts, does not apply in suits against foreign officials. The report also addresses legislation considered by the 111th Congress that would have affected the immunity of foreign officials (the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act, S. 2930, 111th Cong.).", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20110111_R41379_3a9d2498933f1f7e135eeec683f292f1692a5528.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20110111_R41379_3a9d2498933f1f7e135eeec683f292f1692a5528.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "International affairs", "name": "International affairs" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Foreign leaders", "name": "Foreign leaders" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Law", "name": "Law" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Actions and defenses", "name": "Actions and defenses" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Privileges and immunities", "name": "Privileges and immunities" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Immunities of foreign states", "name": "Immunities of foreign states" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Foreign policy", "name": "Foreign policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Diplomatic privileges and immunities", "name": "Diplomatic privileges and immunities" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc31366/", "id": "R41379_2010Sep24", "date": "2010-09-24", "retrieved": "2011-03-09T09:26:47", "title": "Samantar v. Yousef: The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act and Foreign Officials", "summary": "On June 1, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court decided unanimously in Samantar v. Yousef that the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), which governs the immunity of foreign states in U.S. courts, does not apply in suits against foreign officials. This report provides an overview of the FSIA, followed by a consideration of the remaining options for foreign officials who seek immunity from lawsuits, as well as some of the questions that may emerge from each option. The report also addresses legislation that would affect the immunity of foreign officials, including S. 2930.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20100924_R41379_737f0c4b857bad859ad00860537283e82c16819e.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20100924_R41379_737f0c4b857bad859ad00860537283e82c16819e.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Foreign policy", "name": "Foreign policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Protection of foreign officials", "name": "Protection of foreign officials" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "International affairs", "name": "International affairs" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Immunities of foreign states", "name": "Immunities of foreign states" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Privileges and immunities", "name": "Privileges and immunities" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Government liability (International law)", "name": "Government liability (International law)" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc491079/", "id": "R41379_2010Aug24", "date": "2010-08-24", "retrieved": "2015-01-27T19:40:46", "title": "Samantar v. Yousef: The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act and Foreign Officials", "summary": "On June 1, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court decided unanimously in Samantar v. Yousef that the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), which governs the immunity of foreign states in U.S. courts, does not apply in suits against foreign officials. This report provides an overview of the FSIA, followed by a consideration of the remaining options for foreign officials who seek immunity from lawsuits, as well as some of the questions that may emerge from each option. The report also addresses legislation that would affect the immunity of foreign officials, including S. 2930.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20100824_R41379_aa4125d1f0baf6a1763ba2d2dd61c68338b87e31.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20100824_R41379_aa4125d1f0baf6a1763ba2d2dd61c68338b87e31.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Foreign policy", "name": "Foreign policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Protection of foreign officials", "name": "Protection of foreign officials" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "International affairs", "name": "International affairs" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Immunities of foreign states", "name": "Immunities of foreign states" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Privileges and immunities", "name": "Privileges and immunities" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Government liability (International law)", "name": "Government liability (International law)" } ] } ], "topics": [ "American Law", "Intelligence and National Security" ] }