{ "id": "R41062", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "R41062", "active": false, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 414646, "date": "2010-12-21", "retrieved": "2016-04-07T01:19:03.800942", "title": "Ozone Air Quality Standards: EPA\u2019s Proposed Revisions", "summary": "On December 8, 2010, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced that it will delay issuing revised ambient air quality standards for ozone until July 2011 so that it can consider further recommendations from an independent panel of scientific advisers. The agency proposed changes to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ozone on January 19, 2010, with an expected promulgation date of August 2010. The December announcement marks the third time that the agency has postponed issuing the revised standards.\nNAAQS are standards for outdoor (ambient) air that are intended to protect public health and welfare from harmful concentrations of pollution. By changing the standard, EPA would be concluding that protecting public health and welfare requires lower concentrations of ozone pollution than it previously judged to be safe. Under the January 2010 proposed standards, as many as 96% of the counties that currently monitor ozone might need to take action to reduce emissions. The proposal would also, for the first time, set a separate standard for public welfare, the principal effect of which would be to call attention to the negative effects of ozone on forests and agricultural productivity. \nThe ozone standard affects a large percentage of the population: as of September 2010, 119 million people (nearly 40% of the U.S. population) lived in areas classified \u201cnonattainment\u201d for the primary ozone NAAQS. As a result of the standard\u2019s strengthening, more areas would likely be affected, and those already considered nonattainment may have to impose more stringent emission controls.\nThe proposed revision would lower the primary (health-based) standard from 0.075 parts per million\u201475 parts per billion (ppb)\u2014averaged over 8 hours to somewhere in the range of 70 to 60 ppb averaged over the same time. Using the most recent three years of monitoring data, 515 counties (76% of all counties with ozone monitors) would violate the new standard at 70 ppb; 650 counties (96% of those with monitors) would be in nonattainment if the standard is set at 60 ppb. By comparison, only 85 counties have monitors showing exceedance of the currently implemented 1997 standard. (The counties that might exceed the proposed standard are shown in Figure 3 of this report.)\nThe proposed standards, now expected to be finalized in July 2011, will set in motion a long and complicated implementation process that has far-reaching impacts. The first step, designation of nonattainment areas, is expected to take place within a year of the new standards\u2019 promulgation; the areas so designated would then have 3 to 20 years to reach attainment.\nThe proposed standards raise a number of issues, including whether they should lead to stronger federal controls on the sources that contribute to ozone pollution. Current federal standards for cars, trucks, nonroad vehicles and engines, power plants, and other stationary pollution sources are not strong enough to bring many areas into attainment, thus requiring local pollution control measures in many cases. EPA, the states, and Congress may also wish to consider whether the current monitoring network is adequate to detect violations of a more stringent standard. Only 675 of the nation\u2019s 3,000 counties have ozone monitors in place. \nThis report discusses the standard-setting process, the specifics of the new standard, and issues raised by the Administrator\u2019s choice; and it describes the steps that will follow EPA\u2019s promulgation.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R41062", "sha1": "57ad61bbe25d96e5ffc7691e4bf4996601067d1e", "filename": "files/20101221_R41062_57ad61bbe25d96e5ffc7691e4bf4996601067d1e.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R41062", "sha1": "3a93702078cdfd72b6e9f2256a7e938bd88cf01d", "filename": "files/20101221_R41062_3a93702078cdfd72b6e9f2256a7e938bd88cf01d.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc503479/", "id": "R41062_2010Feb01", "date": "2010-02-01", "retrieved": "2015-04-30T17:37:21", "title": "Ozone Air Quality Standards: EPA's Proposed January 2010 Revisions", "summary": "This report discusses the standard-setting process for ambient air, the specifics of the new standard, and issues raised by the Administrator's choice; and it describes the steps that will follow EPA's promulgation.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20100201_R41062_a711b2c35bab087f72e571015e8f708df297c4a4.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20100201_R41062_a711b2c35bab087f72e571015e8f708df297c4a4.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Air pollution", "name": "Air pollution" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Air quality -- Standards", "name": "Air quality -- Standards" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Environmental policy", "name": "Environmental policy" } ] } ], "topics": [] }