{
  "id": "R40745",
  "type": "CRS Report",
  "typeId": "REPORTS",
  "number": "R40745",
  "active": false,
  "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 352330,
      "date": "2009-09-23",
      "retrieved": "2016-04-07T02:15:57.781356",
      "title": "Public Health, Workforce, Quality, and Other Provisions in H.R. 3200",
      "summary": "Health care reform is at the top of the domestic policy agenda for the 111th Congress, driven by concerns about the growing ranks of the uninsured and the unsustainable growth in spending on health care and health insurance. But efforts to improve access to care and control rising health care costs also will require changes to the health care delivery system. Experts point to a growing body of evidence of the health care system\u2019s failure to consistently provide high-quality care to all Americans. Major challenges to the delivery of high-quality care include improving patient safety by eliminating medical errors, eradicating disparities in care, reducing the burden of chronic disease, and eliminating unnecessary and ineffective care that compromises quality, drives up costs, and neglects the needs of patients.\nThe health reform debate has embraced a number of proposals to address these challenges and improve the delivery of health care services. They include initiatives to encourage individuals to adopt healthier lifestyles, and to change the way that physicians and other providers treat and manage disease. Delivery reform proposals focus on expanding the primary care workforce, encouraging the use of clinical preventive services, and strengthening the role of chronic care management. However, health care delivery reform cannot happen unless mechanisms are in place to drive change in the systems of care. Key drivers include performance measurement and the public dissemination of performance information, comparative effectiveness research, adoption of health information technology, and, most importantly, the alignment of payment incentives with high-quality care.\nCongress took an important first step toward reforming the health care delivery system when it enacted the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA; P.L. 111-5) in February 2009. ARRA included $1.1 billion for comparative effectiveness research and established an interagency advisory panel to help coordinate and support the research. It also incorporated the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, which is intended to promote the widespread adoption of health information technology (HIT) for the electronic sharing of clinical data among hospitals, physicians, and other health care stakeholders.\nThe health reform legislation (H.R. 3200) introduced in the House and approved by the Committees on Ways and Means, Energy and Commerce, and Education and Labor includes numerous provisions intended to increase the primary care and public health workforce, promote preventive services, and strengthen quality measurement, among other things. H.R. 3200 would amend and expand on many of the existing health workforce programs authorized under Title VII (health professions) and Title VIII (nursing) of the Public Health Service Act (PHSA). It would create a Public Health Workforce Corps and establish a new loan repayment program, modeled on the National Health Service Corps (NHSC), for individuals who agree to practice in medically underserved areas with unmet health care needs. The House bill also would make a number of changes to the Medicare Graduate Medical Education (GME) program, which subsidizes medical residency programs, in part to encourage the training of more primary care physicians.\nIn addition, H.R. 3200 would bolster quality improvement activities, including performance measurement, and broaden Medicare and Medicaid coverage of clinical preventive services. The legislation would establish a multi-billion dollar Public Health Investment Fund to provide additional funding for these and other new programs and activities.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R40745",
          "sha1": "cd312cdfff2faa7ec460fb39731e3d702bfe45f7",
          "filename": "files/20090923_R40745_cd312cdfff2faa7ec460fb39731e3d702bfe45f7.html",
          "images": null
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R40745",
          "sha1": "b9294506b92b4a38249ea2ec924a99fd2553a017",
          "filename": "files/20090923_R40745_b9294506b92b4a38249ea2ec924a99fd2553a017.pdf",
          "images": null
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    }
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Aging Policy",
    "Economic Policy",
    "Health Policy"
  ]
}