{ "id": "R40648", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "R40648", "active": false, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 422214, "date": "2010-05-27", "retrieved": "2016-04-07T01:39:17.263276", "title": "Tax Options for Financing Health Care Reform", "summary": "Several tax options were proposed to provide financing for health care reform. President Obama initially proposed restricting itemized deductions for high-income taxpayers, along with some narrower provisions. H.R. 3962 passed in the House on November 14, 2009; its largest source of increased revenues was from additional income taxes for higher-income taxpayers. On December 24, 2009, the Senate adopted H.R. 3590, whose revenue provisions are similar to those in the bill reported by the Senate Finance Committee (S. 1796). Taxing insurance companies on high-cost employer plans was the largest single source of revenue in that plan. Both plans included health-related provisions, including fees or excise taxes, along with some other provisions.\nOn February 22, 2010, the Obama Administration released a new compromise proposal, which generally uses H.R. 3590 as a starting point, but offered several changes to the revenue provisions of this bill. The President\u2019s proposal would have delayed the effective date for the tax on high-cost employer plans proposed in H.R. 3590 from 2013 to 2018 and raised the exemption threshold for this tax to $27,500 for families and $10,200 for individuals. In addition, the new plan offered by the Administration would broaden H.R. 3590\u2019s proposed increase of the Medicare Hospital Insurance (HI) tax for high-income households by adding a tax on unearned income at a 3.8% rate. On March 22, 2010, the House passed the Senate bill, along with the revenue revisions (H.R. 4872). The President signed H.R. 3590 on March 23 (P.L. 111-148); the Senate and House agreed on H.R. 4872 on March 25, 2010, and it was signed by the President (P.L. 111-152) on March 30.\nSeveral proposals for revenue, considered during the health care financing debate of 2009, have not been included in legislation reported out by congressional committees. These proposals include eliminating tax benefits from the exclusion of employer-provided health insurance, which has a significant revenue potential, and limiting tax savings to 28% of itemized deductions for the top two brackets, which was the centerpiece of the President\u2019s initial health reform tax proposals.\nThese provisions differ in their potential revenue gain, and behavioral and distributional effects. Some proposals are progressive (imposing higher relative burdens on higher income groups), some impose larger relative burdens on lower-income families, and some tend to fall on middle-class groups. The distributional analysis, however, relates only to finance: the total health care program may redistribute in favor of lower-income families even if the revenue sources do not.\nThe House bill (H.R. 3962) included a high-income surtax of 5.4% on income above $1 million (income levels are 50% as large for singles). The proposal would have initially raised more than $30 billion per year. One concern that has been raised about this surtax is the effect on small business, entrepreneurship, and job creation; however, much of this income is passive income or income of professions (e.g., stockbrokers, doctors). The proposal also includes some narrower, largely corporate provisions and restrictions on health-related tax expenditures. The Senate bill (H.R. 3590) would have imposed an excise tax on insurance companies for high-cost employer plans. Most of the remaining revenue is raised from restricting health-related tax expenditures; increasing the Medicare payroll tax for high-income earners; and imposing fees on medical devices, branded drugs, and health insurance providers.\nOne revenue raising provision that has produced some recent controversy is the requirement for information reporting by firms for all payments over $600. H.R. 5141, to repeal this provision, has been introduced.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R40648", "sha1": "e78bca7529cb8b244af52fd4e63f80958cd0a204", "filename": "files/20100527_R40648_e78bca7529cb8b244af52fd4e63f80958cd0a204.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R40648", "sha1": "5e70300e2da213b77433850779c8c598462fe8f5", "filename": "files/20100527_R40648_5e70300e2da213b77433850779c8c598462fe8f5.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc503565/", "id": "R40648_2010Mar02", "date": "2010-03-02", "retrieved": "2015-04-30T17:37:21", "title": "Tax Options for Financing Health Care Reform", "summary": "This report reviews the revenue raisers proposed to fund health care reform. Other financing proposals are presented including those made by the Obama Administration and those introduced in earlier congressional work. The final sections discuss other proposals suggested by the round-table discussion participants.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20100302_R40648_9e3269b153cdad9f6b2fe938d89a9af822b6771c.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20100302_R40648_9e3269b153cdad9f6b2fe938d89a9af822b6771c.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Taxation", "name": "Taxation" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Fiscal policy", "name": "Fiscal policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Health policy", "name": "Health policy" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc809116/", "id": "R40648_2009Jun19", "date": "2009-06-19", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Tax Options for Financing Health Care Reform", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20090619_R40648_ddd8c37d7c7048e32bf8d91895f49ea5e9d42c20.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20090619_R40648_ddd8c37d7c7048e32bf8d91895f49ea5e9d42c20.html" } ], "topics": [] } ], "topics": [ "Economic Policy", "Health Policy" ] }