The Twenty-Fifth Amendment and Presidential Inability, Part 6: Final Approval and Implementation

The Twenty-Fifth Amendment and Presidential Inability, Part 6: Final Approval and Implementation

Legal Sidebari

The Twenty-Fifth Amendment and
Presidential Inability, Part 6: Final Approval
and Implementation
March 28, 2024
This Legal Sidebar post is the sixth in a seven-part series that discusses the Twenty-Fifth Amendment to
the Constitution. In an effort to ensure that the United States will always possess a functioning President
and Vice President, the Twenty-Fifth Amendment seeks to promote the prompt, orderly, and democratic
transfer of executive power. In particular, the Amendment establishes procedures for addressing
presidential inability and vacancies that arise in the presidency or vice presidency. Because Congress may
play a role in implementing the Twenty-Fifth Amendment, understanding the Amendment’s history and
drafting may assist Congress in its legislative activities.
This Sidebar post discusses the Twenty-Fifth Amendment’s implementation. Other Sidebars in this series
discuss the Twenty-Fifth Amendment’s procedures; the framing of the Presidential Succession Clause at
the Constitutional Convention of 1787; the history of presidential succession; and the Amendment’s
drafting in Congress and unresolved issues. Additional information on this topic is available at the
Constitution Annotated: Analysis and Interpretation of the U.S. Constitution and in several CRS reports.
Final Congressional Approval and State Ratification of the Twenty-Fifth
Amendment
On February 19, 1965, the Senate unanimously approved the revised S.J. Res. 1, which proposed an
amendment to the Constitution on presidential vacancy, vice presidential vacancy, and presidential
inability. The House approved the revised H.J. Res. 1 as a substitute for the Senate joint resolution on
April 13, 1965, by a vote of 368 to 29. The houses convened a conference committee to reconcile
differences in the House and Senate versions of the joint resolution. As compared to the House resolution,
the Senate version featured a longer, seven-day time frame for the Vice President and a majority of the
Cabinet (or other body) to challenge a President’s assertion that he had recovered from an inability under
Section 4. The Senate version also lacked the House version’s specific deadlines for Congress to assemble
and resolve disputes between the President and the officials challenging the President’s recovery
declaration.
Congressional Research Service
https://crsreports.congress.gov
LSB11136
CRS Legal Sidebar
Prepared for Members and
Committees of Congress

Congressional Research Service
2
As a compromise, the conferees recommended adopting (1) a four-day deadline for the Vice President (as
Acting President) and Cabinet (or other body) to challenge a President’s recovery declaration under
Section 4; (2) a 48-hour deadline for Congress to assemble (if not in session) after the relevant officials
challenge the President’s recovery declaration; and (3) a 21-day deadline for Congress to decide the issue
of presidential inability once it has convened, after which the President would automatically resume the
powers and duties of his office in the absence of a two-thirds vote in each chamber declaring him unable
to serve. The conferees also adopted the House language clarifying that a President could resume his
powers and duties at any time after a self-certified Section 3 disability by transmitting proper notice. The
House agreed to the conference report on June 30, 1965, by voice vote. The Senate concurred on July 6,
1965, by a vote of 68 to 5. Congress then submitted the amendment to the states for potential ratification.
Just over 18 months later, on February 23, 1967, the Administrator of General Services, who at that time
was responsible for authenticating constitutional amendments, certified that the requisite three-fourths of
the states had ratified the Twenty-Fifth Amendment on February 10. At a White House ceremony,
President Lyndon B. Johnson remarked that “in this crisis-ridden era there is no margin for delay, no
possible justification for ever permitting a vacuum in our national leadership.” He stated that the Twenty-
Fifth Amendment had clarified “the crucial clause that provides for succession to the Presidency and for
filling a Vice Presidential vacancy.”
Implementation of the Twenty-Fifth Amendment
Since the Twenty-Fifth Amendment’s ratification in 1967, each of its first three sections has been invoked
at least once. However, Section 4, which allows the Vice President and a majority of either the Cabinet or
other congressionally established body to initiate the transfer of the President’s powers and duties to the
Vice President in the event of presidential inability, has never been used.
Sections 1 and 2 of the Twenty-Fifth Amendment were invoked during the 1970s as a result of various
congressional and criminal investigations into President Richard Nixon’s White House. In 1973, President
Nixon invoked Section 2 to fill a vacancy arising from Vice President Spiro T. Agnew’s resignation
during a bribery and corruption investigation. After congressional hearings on Nixon’s nominee, House
Republican Leader and Representative Gerald Ford of Michigan, Congress confirmed Ford to serve as
Vice President by a majority vote in each chamber. Ford was sworn into office in front of a joint session
of Congress by Supreme Court Chief Justice Warren Burger almost two months after Agnew’s
resignation.
A year later, Sections 1 and 2 were invoked as a result of President Nixon’s resignation under threat of
impeachment for his involvement in the Watergate scandal. The Watergate scandal involved the June 1972
arrests of five men for breaking into the Democratic National Committee headquarters at the Watergate
Hotel and Office Building. The arrested men were employed by the Committee to Re-Elect the President,
a campaign organization formed to support President Nixon’s reelection. Congressional and criminal
investigations implicated President Nixon and other White House officials in the cover-up of the break-in
and attempts to harass political adversaries. Following hearings and further investigations, the House
Judiciary Committee approved three articles of impeachment charging Nixon with obstruction of justice,
abuse of power, and refusal to cooperate with the committee’s investigation.
President Nixon resigned on August 9, 1974, before the House held a floor vote on the articles of
impeachment, and Vice President Ford immediately became President by operation of Section 1 of the
Twenty-Fifth Amendment. President Ford nominated former New York Governor Nelson Rockefeller to
become Vice President under Section 2. Rockefeller took office on December 19, 1974, after a nearly
four-months-long confirmation process that culminated in a vote of approval by each chamber of
Congress. As a result, Gerald Ford and Nelson Rockefeller, two men who had not faced the voters in a
national election, became President and Vice President, respectively.

Congressional Research Service
3
Finally, since the Twenty-Fifth Amendment’s ratification, a few Presidents have invoked Section 3 to
transfer their powers and duties to the Vice President temporarily while they were sedated for medical
procedures. For example, in 2002, Presidents have invoked Section 3 when undergoing routine
colonoscopies.

Author Information

Brandon J. Murrill

Attorney-Adviser (Constitution Annotated)

Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff
to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of
Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of
information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role.
CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United
States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However,
as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the
permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

LSB11136 · VERSION 1 · NEW