The Nineteenth Amendment and Women’s Suffrage Part 6: Impacts Beyond the Supreme Court

The Nineteenth Amendment and Women’s Suffrage Part 6: Impacts Beyond the Supreme Court

Legal Sidebari

The Nineteenth Amendment and Women’s
Suffrage Part 6: Impacts Beyond the Supreme
Court
January 13, 2023
This Legal Sidebar is the last in a six-part series that discusses the Nineteenth Amendment to the
Constitution, which recognized women’s voting rights. Shortly before Election Day 2022, a group of
people gathered in Rochester, New York, to honor the late social reformer and women’s rights activist,
Susan B. Anthony. About 150 years earlier, Anthony cast a ballot in the 1872 presidential election. She
was arrested and charged with illegally voting as a woman in violation of federal law. She unsuccessfully
claimed that the Fourteenth Amendment gave her the right to vote as a privilege of citizenship. A federal
district court imposed a fine of $100 on Anthony, but she never paid it. As the nation marks the 150th
anniversary of Anthony’s vote—and the 2020 centennial of the Nineteenth Amendment’s ratification—
Congress may be interested in the history and impact of the women’s suffrage movement and the
Nineteenth Amendment. Additional information on this topic will be published in the Constitution
Annotated: Analysis and Interpretation of the U.S. Constitution.
Although the Supreme Court has not decided many cases interpreting the Nineteenth Amendment, the
Constitution’s recognition of women’s suffrage has had a significant impact throughout society. As the
late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg noted at an event celebrating the centennial of the Nineteenth
Amendment’s ratification, the Amendment “was the first step toward equal-citizenship stature for
women” in the political and civil spheres of public life.
In the political domain, the Nineteenth Amendment changed voter demographics by adding millions of
potential female voters to the electorate. As a result, many women immediately acquired a direct role in
choosing their elected leaders and representatives for the first time. Nonetheless, many African American
women and other female minority groups throughout the United States continued to face significant
obstacles to voting after the Nineteenth Amendment’s ratification.
Another visible legacy of the Nineteenth Amendment has been an increase in the number of women
holding public office. As a result of the suffrage movement, the Nineteenth Amendment, and other
societal developments, the twentieth and twenty-first centuries witnessed a number of electoral “firsts” for
women. These included Jeannette Rankin’s 1916 election to the House of Representatives; Hattie Wyatt
Caraway’s 1932 election to the Senate; Nancy Pelosi’s 2007 election as Speaker of the House; and
Congressional Research Service
https://crsreports.congress.gov
LSB10901
CRS Legal Sidebar
Prepared for Members and
Committees of Congress

Congressional Research Service
2
Kamala Harris’s 2020 election to the vice presidency. At the beginning of the 117th Congress in January
2021, a record number of 151 women took office, accounting for about 28% of Congress’s total
membership.
In addition to increasing women’s involvement in politics, the Nineteenth Amendment helped to increase
women’s participation in other domains of public life. For example, during the twentieth century, women
increasingly served on juries, pursued higher education, and entered the professional workforce in the
United States. Nonetheless, despite progress on women’s rights issues, some advocates, such as the
National Woman’s Party, continued to campaign for the removal of all “existing sex distinctions” from
the law. These advocates sought an amendment to the Constitution that would have guaranteed full legal
equality between women and men. This proposed Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) was ultimately
unsuccessful; however, efforts to obtain an ERA received new attention during the 2020 centennial
celebration of the Nineteenth Amendment’s ratification.

Author Information

Brandon J. Murrill

Legislative Attorney

Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff
to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of
Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of
information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role.
CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United
States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However,
as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the
permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

LSB10901 · VERSION 1 · NEW