Recent White House Actions on Immigration

Recent White House Actions on Immigration

Legal Sidebari

Recent White House Actions on Immigration
Updated March 23, 2021
In the past several weeks, the Biden Administration has engaged in a series of executive actions on a

range of issues. Some concern the administration and enforcement of federal immigration laws. These
immigration-related initiatives purport to revise substantially Trump Administration policies that
generally prioritized immigration enforcement activities and restricted the ability of some non-U.S.
nationals (aliens) to enter the United States or pursue immigration benefits. Some of these prior policies
have been discussed and analyzed in other CRS products which can be found here. This Legal Sidebar
provides a brief overview of President Biden’s executive orders and other directives relating to
immigration through March 23, 2021.
Presidential Proclamations Restricting Entry into the United States
Under § 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), the President may “suspend entry of all
aliens or any class of aliens” whose entry he “finds . . . would be detrimental to the interests of the United
States.” Relying on § 212(f), President Trump issued a series of proclamations restricting the entry of
aliens from designated countries on grounds related to national security and the Coronavirus Disease 2019
(COVID-19) pandemic. Through three iterative executive actions in 2017, sometimes called the “Travel
Ban,” the President provided for the exclusion of broad categories of nationals of specified countries,
most of which were predominantly Muslim. Though subject to legal challenge, the Supreme Court held
that these restrictions fell within the President’s § 212(f) authority. President Trump also issued several
proclamations restricting the entry of foreign nationals from certain regions and countries to deter the
spread of COVID-19 (President Trump later terminated some of these entry restrictions), and more
generally suspended the entry of certain immigrants and nonimmigrants (subject to exceptions) to protect
American workers during the COVID-19-related economic recovery.
On January 20, 2021, President Biden revoked the “Travel Ban” restrictions and directed Department of
State officials to resume visa processing for immigrant visa applicants from the designated countries. But
citing the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and emerging “variant strains” of the virus, President Biden on
January 25, 2021, suspended the entry of aliens who, within the prior 14 days, had been in Brazil, the
European Schengen Area, Ireland, South Africa, or the United Kingdom (excluding overseas territories
outside Europe), subject to certain exceptions (e.g., lawful permanent residents [LPRs], foreign
government officials). President Biden has left intact former President Trump’s COVID-19-related entry
restrictions for aliens who had been in Mainland China or Iran. President Biden has revoked the entry
restrictions that aim to protect American workers by barring certain immigrants, but has not acted on the
Congressional Research Service
https://crsreports.congress.gov
LSB10574
CRS Legal Sidebar
Prepared for Members and
Committees of Congress

Congressional Research Service
2
similar entry restrictions applying to certain nonimmigrants. Meanwhile, at least one federal district court
has barred the government from applying these restrictions to certain individuals during the pendency of
litigation, ruling that § 212(f) does not confer broad authority to suspend entry for purely domestic
economic (as opposed to national security) reasons.
Immigration Enforcement Priorities
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is primarily responsible for enforcing federal immigration
laws, including arresting and initiating removal proceedings against aliens who have committed
immigration violations. In 2017, former President Trump issued an executive order directing DHS
officials to enforce federal immigration laws “against all removable aliens,” with a particular focus on
aliens engaged in criminal activity, aliens arriving at the border and recent unlawful entrants, aliens who
committed fraud or abused public benefits programs, aliens with final orders of removal, and aliens who
threatened national security or public safety.
On January 20, 2021, President Biden revoked the 2017 executive order, and directed DHS officials to
implement new immigration enforcement priorities. Acting Secretary of Homeland Security David
Pekoske then ordered a “100-day pause” on most deportations pending DHS’s review of its immigration
enforcement priorities, and established interim guidelines generally limiting immigration enforcement
actions to cover only those who present threats to national security, border security, and public safety
(e.g., aliens convicted of aggravated felonies, recent unlawful entrants). Following a legal challenge
brought by the State of Texas, a federal district court ruled that the “100-day pause” likely violates an INA
provision requiring the removal of aliens subject to final orders of removal, that the agency adopted the
policy without a reasoned explanation, and that DHS had failed to comply with notice-and-comment
requirements under federal law. After initially issuing a temporary restraining order blocking
implementation, the court issued a preliminary injunction barring enforcement and implementation of the
“100-day pause” nationwide as litigation in the case continues. But the new enforcement priorities in the
interim guidelines otherwise may go into effect.
Deferred Enforced Departure
Deferred enforced departure (DED) is “a temporary, discretionary, administrative stay of removal” to
aliens from designated countries experiencing war or instability. Unlike many other forms of immigration
relief, rooted in statute, the executive branch has characterized the power to grant DED as flowing from
the President’s constitutional authority in foreign relations. Certain Liberian nationals have had DED
protections since 2007 (previously, they had Temporary Protected Status [TPS], which confers protections
similar to DED but, among other distinctions, is authorized by statute and governed by statutory
parameters). In 2018, former President Trump terminated DED for Liberians, citing improved conditions
in Liberia, but repeatedly postponed the termination to allow for a “wind-down period,” which ended on
January 10, 2021. And in 2019, Congress passed the National Defense Authorization Act for FY2020,
which included a Liberian Refugee and Immigrant Fairness (LRIF) provision that allows Liberian
nationals (and their spouses and children) to adjust to LPR status if they meet specified requirements. To
be eligible for adjustment, LRIF applicants must file their applications by December 20, 2021.
Apart from terminating DED (and extending the wind-down period) for Liberians, former President
Trump on January 19, 2021, granted DED for a period of 18 months to Venezuelan nationals present in
the United States as of January 20, 2021, with certain exceptions (e.g., those convicted of any felony).
On January 20, 2021, President Biden reinstated DED through June 30, 2022, for Liberian nationals
residing in the United States who had DED on January 10, 2021. The President also directed DHS to
provide DED-covered Liberian nationals employment authorization while they apply for LRIF benefits.

Congressional Research Service
3
The President excluded some Liberian nationals from DED and work authorization, including those
convicted of certain criminal offenses or whose LRIF applications had been denied.
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals
Started in 2012, the Obama Administration’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) initiative
allowed certain unlawfully present aliens who arrived in the United States as children to remain and work
in the United States for renewable two-year periods. In 2017, the Trump Administration announced it
would rescind DACA. But as detailed in this Sidebar, several federal district courts enjoined most aspects
of the rescission from taking effect. In 2020, the Supreme Court ruled that the DACA rescission was
unlawful because DHS provided inadequate reasoning in support of its decision to end the initiative
(notably, the Court did not rule on the legality of DACA itself, and it indicated that DHS could rescind the
program if it provided an adequate explanation for its decision). As a result of the ruling by the High
Court and later lower court rulings, the DACA program has remained in place.
On January 20, 2021, President Biden directed the Secretary of Homeland Security “to preserve and
fortify DACA,” asserting that DACA recipients “should not be a priority for removal based on
humanitarian concerns and other considerations.” Thus, many expect DHS will likely announce new
guidance on the continuation of DACA relief and associated benefits. Meanwhile, a lawsuit brought in
2018 by a group of states contesting the legality of DACA is ongoing, with a summary judgment motion
pending before a federal district court in Texas. As such, the future of DACA remains uncertain.
Construction of Additional Fencing, Walls, and Other Barriers on the
Southern Border
On January 25, 2017, President Trump issued an executive order directing the securing of the southern
border through “immediate construction of a physical wall.” For fiscal year (FY) 2019, Congress
appropriated $1.375 billion for that construction. The Trump Administration sought additional funding
from other sources—including funds from the Treasury Forfeiture Fund and the redirecting of certain
funds appropriated to the Department of Defense (DOD). In a proclamation dated February 15, 2019,
President Trump declared a national emergency at the southern border under authority granted in the
National Emergencies Act. He then invoked emergency powers that purportedly authorized the DOD to
support the response at the southern border, including redirecting funds appropriated to DOD for military
construction. Litigation challenging the lawfulness of these actions is ongoing. The Trump Administration
also made further requests for funding for FY2020 and 2021 as described in this CRS product.
On January 20, 2021, President Biden issued a proclamation declaring that the national emergency along
the southern border was terminated, and that the authorities invoked in that proclamation will no longer
be used to construct a wall at the southern border. President Biden directed a pause of construction
projects on the southern border pending an assessment of the legality of funding and contracting methods.
Of special note, the oral arguments that had been scheduled for February 22, 2021, before the Supreme
Court in pending litigation over the use of DOD funds for construction were cancelled pursuant to a
request by the Biden Administration.
Processing of Asylum Seekers at the Southern Border
The Trump Administration took a series of actions restricting the availability of asylum and other
protections for many aliens arriving at the southern border. The administration also adopted a “zero
tolerance policy” to criminally prosecute aliens who unlawfully enter the United States without
inspection. This policy led to the separation of some children from accompanying parents transferred to
criminal custody for prosecution, and the policy was later rescinded. Additionally, the administration

Congressional Research Service
4
expanded the use of a streamlined, expedited removal process typically applied to aliens at or near the
border, to cover certain unlawfully present aliens in the interior of the United States. Many of these
initiatives have been the subject of ongoing litigation and are discussed in other CRS products.
On February 2, 2021, President Biden issued an executive order announcing the creation of a task force to
reunite parents and children separated under the zero tolerance policy. A separate executive order calls for
several changes to asylum processing at the border, and directs the Secretary of Homeland Security and
other agency officials to take certain actions, including
 to decide whether to reinstate the Central American Minors (CAM) Parole program to
allow lawfully present parents to bring children facing dangerous conditions in the
Northern Triangle Countries to the United States as refugees or parolees;
 to resume “safe and orderly processing” of asylum claims, and decide whether to
terminate, rescind, or modify a March 2020 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
directive suspending the entry of asylum seekers in response to the spread of COVID-19;
 to decide whether to end or modify the Migrant Protection Protocols, which required
some arriving asylum seekers to return to Mexico pending the outcome of their formal
removal proceedings, and which has been suspended for new enrollments;
 to determine whether to rescind a 2018 rule that would have made ineligible for asylum
those aliens who violated a presidential proclamation barring the entry of aliens (other
than LPRs) at the southern border except at designated ports of entry;
 to cease implementation of the Prompt Asylum Claim Review (PACR) and Humanitarian
Asylum Review Process (HARP), in which asylum screening interviews occur in short-
term holding facilities at the border instead of in long-term detention facilities in the
interior;
 to decide whether to modify, revoke, or rescind a 2019 rule expanding the use of
expedited removal into the interior of the United States; and
 to conduct a broad review of rules, legal precedent, and guidelines for adjudicating
asylum claims brought by aliens fleeing domestic or gang violence.
The Secretary of State announced on February 6, 2021, that, consistent with this executive order, the
Biden Administration would end the “Asylum Cooperative Agreements” with Guatemala, Honduras, and
El Salvador that required transfer of some asylum seekers arriving at the U.S. southern border to those
countries to pursue relief.
Legal Immigration and Naturalization
The Trump Administration had taken certain actions that restricted the ability of some aliens to immigrate
legally to the United States. For example, in 2019, DHS issued a final rule on the public charge ground of
inadmissibility that would have made it harder for some aliens to obtain LPR status due to their potential
future use of public benefits. Additionally, in 2020, DHS issued a final rule that, among other things,
increased the fees for some immigration benefit petitions and applications (including naturalization
applications), added new fees for certain benefit requests, and limited fee waivers.
On February 2, 2021, President Biden issued an executive order directing the Secretary of Homeland
Security, the Secretary of State, and the Attorney General to identify agency actions that impede access to
immigration benefits, and determine whether to revise or rescind those agency actions, including the 2020
rule increasing fees for immigration benefit requests. President Biden also ordered review of agency
actions related to the public charge grounds of inadmissibility or deportability (i.e., the grounds related to
use of public benefits). Subsequently, DHS rescinded a 2019 rule that made it more likely that individuals

Congressional Research Service
5
would not qualify to become LPRs based on their potential future use of public benefits. The President
also ordered the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of State, and the Attorney General to
develop a plan to improve the naturalization process and make it more accessible.
Refugee Admissions
The President has statutory authority to set the number of refugees who may be admitted each fiscal year.
President Trump substantially reduced refugee admission levels compared to prior administrations. He
also initially suspended the refugee admissions program pending a review to improve the screening
process. After later resuming refugee admissions, he directed officials to consider whether admission of
certain classes of refugees endangered national security. Further, President Trump ordered officials to
obtain the consent of states and localities before resettling refugees in those jurisdictions. Federal courts,
however, have barred that order’s implementation pending legal challenge.
On February 4, 2021, President Biden revoked President Trump’s actions on refugee admissions. Seeking
to expand the refugee program, President Biden directed officials to determine whether to maintain,
reverse, or modify any policies adopted pursuant to President Trump’s directives limiting access to
refugee admission. President Biden ordered the Secretary of State, in consultation with other agencies, to
review the Special Immigrant Visa Program for certain Iraqi and Afghan nationals working for the U.S.
military, and provide recommendations for improving that program. President Biden is reportedly
considering raising refugee admission levels.

Author Information

Hillel R. Smith
Kelsey Y. Santamaria
Legislative Attorney
Legislative Attorney

Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff
to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of
Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of
information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role.
CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United
States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However,
as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the
permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

LSB10574 · VERSION 3 · UPDATED