Recent Trends in Wages and Productivity

Recent Trends in Wages and Productivity

INSIGHTi

Recent Trends in Wages and Productivity
January 11, 2023
Productivity growth is an important determinant in long-term wage growth. In 2022, labor productivity
growth and real wage growth have been negative, a concern for many policymakers. This CRS Insight
discusses the theoretical relationship between productivity and wages and the historical and recent trends
of the two. For more information about recent wage trends, see CRS Report R47380, Average Wage
Growth and Related Economic Trends in 2022, by Lida R. Weinstock.
The Relationship Between Wages and Productivity
In economic theory, wages are equal to the marginal product of labor—the added output from the last
worker hired. In other words, employers set wages for workers based on how much those workers
individually produce. Historically, the relationship has not been close economy-wide in the short run. To
measure the productivity of labor, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) calculates the amount of output
produced per worker per hour worked. Productivity increases allow for more goods and services to be
produced using the same amount of labor. In theory, an increase in productivity may result in an increase
in wages, all else equal. For example, if a worker generates $10 of revenue per hour, the employer may be
willing to pay up to $10 per hour. If that worker becomes more productive and generates $11 of revenue
per hour, the employer’s willingness to pay may increase up to $11 per hour as well. Therefore, increases
in real wages that occur in tandem with increases in labor productivity are generally viewed as more
sustainable than those that are not. Since productivity increases allow for increased output (and revenue)
per unit of labor, a corresponding real wage increase would not be expected to push up inflation. Rather,
productivity helps maintain business net revenue without raising prices. However, if real wage growth
outstrips productivity growth, workers would be paid more than they add to their employers’ output and
revenue, causing the employers’ costs to increase, which may result in increasing prices.
Historical Trends
Most economists agree that until the 1970s, productivity and pay trends were closely correlated. However,
there is disagreement about whether productivity and pay trends began to diverge at that point, with
productivity growing faster than real wages, often referred to as the productivity-pay gap. Much of the
disagreement comes down to methodology for analyzing these trends. There are several different
measures of productivity, pay, and inflation that can be used in determining trends in productivity and pay
Congressional Research Service
https://crsreports.congress.gov
IN12076
CRS INSIGHT
Prepared for Members and
Committees of Congress

link to page 3 Congressional Research Service
2
such that trends across different methodologies may differ. For example, BLS found that across sectors
and industries, much of the productivity-pay gap could be explained by using an output deflator as
opposed to the consumer price index to calculate real compensation. Of note, this was not the case across
all industries, and BLS noted that a decreasing labor share of income—the share of income going to
workers as opposed to other factors of production, such as capital—was also a major explanatory variable
and the dominant one in some industries. Nonetheless, many measures do find a gap, which would
indicate that pay trends have been lower than productivity growth trends on average. Explanations for this
gap are wide-ranging, including changes to the way employers compensate their employees,
globalization, and increasing wage inequality.
Recent Trends
Figure 1 below shows the trends in labor productivity and real average hourly earnings growth over the
past few years. The two series are fairly volatile from quarter to quarter, but wage growth has generally
been slower than productivity growth, meaning that, in real terms, wage gains have typically been
associated with productivity gains of greater value.
Both productivity growth and real wage growth were high in 2020 but have declined since. Notably, both
real wage and productivity growth have been consistently negative in 2022. Although nominal wage gains
have been above trend in 2022, they have been lower than inflation, causing real wages to decline. While
real wage declines have been deeper than productivity declines—and therefore not of immediate concern
in terms of fueling inflation—declining productivity is, in and of itself, a concern for future wages. The
extent to which this trend may continue is not certain, however.
There is some evidence to suggest that labor productivity increases during recessions as workers boost
their output, some of which would likely be reversed during an expansion. During the height of the
pandemic, employment decreased rapidly and then increased at a slower pace. Some of the factors
temporarily holding back job growth had to do with the nature of the public health crisis. During this
time, some workers were required to work harder, longer, or with fewer coworkers, resulting in increased
productivity. Some economists have also argued that the increase in productivity at the height of the
pandemic was the result of changes in the composition of the workforce that was reversed when
employment recovered.
As the economy has recovered and added jobs at a relatively rapid clip, productivity growth would
typically decrease, all else equal—more workers means that each worker can work less intensively (less
capital per worker). However, some factors affecting business operations and the labor force have proven
longer lasting and could result in a downward shift in productivity growth trends. Such factors include
supply chain issues and health factors. The pandemic also resulted in innovations to the way individuals
work, although it is not yet clear whether these changes (such as the widespread adoption of
videoconferencing technology and increased telework) will affect longer-term productivity trends
positively, negatively, or at all.

Congressional Research Service
3
Figure 1. Labor Productivity and Real Wage Growth
Q1 2017 to Q3 2022

Source: CRS calculations using BLS productivity and CES data.
Trends in productivity and wage growth moving forward have important implications for the economy.
One aspect of this relationship that economists are currently watching closely is whether wage growth
will outpace productivity growth, as this could result in further upward pressure on prices in the economy.
For more information on the relationship between wages and inflation, see CRS Insight IN12075, Is the
United States Experiencing a Wage-Price Spiral?, by Lida R. Weinstock.

Author Information

Lida R. Weinstock

Analyst Macroeconomic Policy

Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff
to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of
Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of
information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role.
CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United
States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However,
as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the
permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

Congressional Research Service
4

IN12076 · VERSION 1 · NEW