Legislating on Cybersecurity

https://crsreports.congress.gov

December 17, 2024

Legislating on Cybersecurity

Introduction

Cybersecurity considerations for policymakers are broader than those for managing cybersecurity at an organization. When thinking strategically about how to legislate for cybersecurity, lawmakers may consider educating, recruiting, and retaining knowledgeable workers; authorizing and resourcing agencies; deterring and responding to threats; securing international supply chains; and understanding the resiliency of individual companies and sectors.

This In Focus discusses key cybersecurity threats and impacts, how Congress has addressed cyber risk, and some general actions policymakers may consider in the future.

Threats and Impacts

The nation faces many threats in cyberspace. Threat actors may directly target the elements of cyberspace (e.g., networks and data) or use those elements to attack public and private entities. The 2024 Annual Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence Community discusses five main threat actors: the People’s Republic of China (China), the Russia Federation (Russia), Iran, North Korea, and criminals. (Quotes below are from the Assessment).

China is “the most active and persistent cyber threat to U.S. Government, private-sector, and critical infrastructure networks.” Recently, China compromised telecommunications systems to spy on campaigns, federal officials, and sensitive government operations.

Russia “views cyber disruptions as a foreign policy lever to shape other countries’ decisions and continuously refines and employs its espionage, influence, and attack capabilities against a variety of targets.” In 2021, Russia compromised a technology services company so it could spy on that company’s clients.

Iran is “growing expertise and willingness to conduct aggressive cyber operations” and takes an “opportunistic approach” to attacks. In 2022, Iran exploited a severe bug in widely used open-source software to attack web servers.

North Korea poses “a sophisticated and agile espionage, cybercrime, and attack threat” and focuses on attacks which lead to financial gain. North Korea has long used ransomware and hack-and-leak operations to steal money and bolster North Korea’s economy.

Criminal groups are likely to continue to be “involved in ransomware operations … extorting funds, disrupting critical services, and exposing sensitive data.” Earlier this year, criminals deployed ransomware on systems that

forced a company to degrade their services, snarling healthcare delivery nationwide.

Not all cyber incidents are caused by malicious actors. A computer glitch resulted in mass transportation and commerce disruptions in 2024.

Recent Congressional Actions

For more than a decade, Congress has taken a sustained interest in cybersecurity policy.

The 113th Congress (2013-2014) authorized many existing executive branch activities. Congress directed the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to serve as the interface between the private sector and the government for cybersecurity matters, and gave DHS a role in the management of federal agencies’ cybersecurity.

The 114th Congress (2015-2016) expanded agency authorities. Building on the previous Congress’s work, this Congress increased agency responsibilities for cyber information sharing, required federal cybersecurity protection actions, and directed strategy development.

The 115th Congress (2017-2018) created the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (borne out of an existing organization within DHS) to manage national cyber risk.

The 116th Congress (2019-2020) sought to improve interagency coordination. It created a Senate-confirmed position in the White House to coordinate federal agency actions and resourcing for cybersecurity.

The 117th Congress (2021-2022) increased cyber security resources. This Congress provided $4 billion in new funding for federal agencies, state and local governments, and the private sector to modernize information technology and improve cyber resilience. It also created a requirement for private entities to report to the government when they experience cyber incidents and make ransomware payments.

The 118th Congress (2023-2024) added and clarified roles for the Department of Defense and Department of State.

Legislative Activity During each of the past six Congresses, Members have introduced more than 40 pieces of legislation related to cybersecurity. Approximately half of those got committee consideration, and a smaller number were passed (or adopted) by either the House or Senate. A portion of those became law, either as part of a broader package (e.g., the National Defense Authorization Act) or stand-alone

Legislating on Cybersecurity

https://crsreports.congress.gov

legislation. Table 1 shows the number of cyber bills that were considered, passed a chamber, or became a law during each of the 113th to 118th Congresses.

Table 1. “Cyber” Legislation 113th to 118th Congresses (2013-2024)

Cong. Bills Cons.

Passed a

Chamber

Became

Law

118 54 26 6 3

117 110 41 30 14

116 75 23 15 4

115 113 46 37 13

114 70 34 29 6

113 43 20 19 8

Source: CRS analysis of pieces bills and joint resolutions that matched the search term “cyber” on congress.gov through December 9, 2024. Notes: Congress (Cong.) Considered (Cons.).

Nearly every committee in the House and Senate has been referred a bill addressing cybersecurity. House Rule XII allows for legislation to be referred to multiple committees. Measures in the Senate are usually referred to a single committee under Senate Rule XVII. Taking that into account, the congressional committees that received, considered, and reported (or had discharged) the highest number of cyber bills are displayed in Error! Reference source not found.2.

Table 2.“Cyber” Bill Activity by House and Senate Committee 113th to 118th Congresses (2013-2024)

Ref. Cons. Rep./Dis.

House Committee

Homeland Security 86 40 28

Foreign Affairs 53 18 11

Judiciary 49 11 8

Oversight and Accountability 47 18 9

Armed Services 45 10 11

Science, Space, and Technology

39 15 10

Energy and Commerce 35 12 11

Education and the Workforce

29 4 1

Intelligence 29 9 10

Financial Services 22 4 3

Transportation and Infrastructure

22 11 10

Ways and Means 22 7 7

Ref. Cons. Rep./Dis.

Senate Committee

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

70 48 45

Foreign Relations 34 18 11

Commerce, Science, and Transportation

32 17 14

Armed Services 26 7 8

Judiciary 25 9 13

Intelligence 13 13 13

Small Business and Entrepreneurship

13 11 9

Energy and National Resources

11 9 7

Source: CRS analysis of bills and joint resolutions that matched the search term “cyber” on congress.gov. Notes: Includes House Committees with over 20 referred bills, and Senate Committees with over 10 referred bills. Referred (Ref.). Considered (Cons.). Reported (Rep.). Discharged (Dis.).

Policy Options

Congress has many options available if it chooses to consider actions related to cybersecurity.

With regard to federal agencies, Congress can assess and allocate resources, establish programs, and conduct oversight. Examining an agency’s budget may help determine whether there is adequate investment in cyber- related areas or if adjustments are necessary to align with congressional expectations. Hearings, investigations, letters, speeches, and media appearances may help bring to light cybersecurity challenges facing the nation, the actions agencies are undertaking to address those challenges, and what (if any) gaps continue to exist that require additional legislation. Congress can also spur activity by directing agencies to develop strategies and reports. If additional legislation is necessary, Congress may choose to establish a program to address a particular facet of cybersecurity by authorizing an agency to do such work and appropriating funds for its execution.

Congress may also seek to achieve its cybersecurity goals by targeting the cybersecurity of firms operating in the United States. For instance, by establishing conditions for the use of technology; defining requirements for data privacy, retention, and use; incentivizing the behavior of companies either directly (e.g., through a grant program for critical infrastructure) or indirectly (e.g., by providing liability protections); or directing an industry to adopt standards, best practices, or participate in information sharing.

Chris Jaikaran, Specialist in Cybersecurity Policy

IF12851

Legislating on Cybersecurity

https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF12851 · VERSION 1 · NEW

Disclaimer

This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.