U.N. Reform in the 1997 General Assembly

U.N. Reform in the 1997 General Assembly

Order Code 98-275 F
March 23, 1998
CRS Report for Congress
Received through the CRS Web
U.N. Reform in the 1997 General Assembly
(name redacted)
Foreign Affairs Analyst
Foreign Affairs and National Defense Division
Summary
This short report provides background and summarizes U.N. reforms considered
and adopted by the 1997 U.N. General Assembly. During 1997, Congress considered
legislation which would pay some of the U.S. arrears (debt) to the United Nations, the
U.N. Specialized Agencies, and other international organizations but only in exchange
for specific reforms adopted and implemented by the United Nations. Although the
legislation did not pass, Secretary of State Albright has maintained that arrears payment
is one of her top priorities for 1998, and in fact, a top priority for legislative action this
spring.1 As the issue was being debated in Congress, discussions and decisions on
reform were continuing at the United Nations under the leadership of the newly
appointed Secretary-General. In November and December 1997, the U.N. General
Assembly approved two resolutions which endorsed most of U.N. Secretary-General
Annan’s reform proposals. These included efforts to streamline the administrative
structure of the U.N. system, reduce the budget, and improve coordination among
similar activities. The General Assembly established the U.N. Office of Internal
Oversight (Inspector General), as a reform measure in 1994. A recent GAO report,
required by U.S. legislation, noted that its structure and procedures are in place, but
because GAO does not have access to all its reports, audits and records, its independence
cannot be ascertained. Readers may also wish to see the following related CRS
products: CRS Report 97-711, CRS Report 95-571, and CRS Issue Brief IB86116.
During the 1997 General Assembly session, which ran from September to late
December, U.N. members focused on issues of reform as presented by the Secretary-
General. In this second year of the biennium, the budget and assessment were debated
and members spent considerable time on these subjects. While U.N. reform was being
debated in Congress, discussions and decisions on reform were continuing at the United
Nations and the other affected agencies, spurred in part by U.S. legislation, but also as a
continuing effort by many members to address post-Cold War problems. The reform
1 For information on the Congressional debate, see CRS Report 97-711, U.N. Funding, Payment
of Arrears and Linkage to Reform: Legislation in the 105th Congress.
Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress

CRS-2
initiatives of the new U.N. Secretary-General developed out of these efforts. Many of the
reform provisions addressed issues also of concern to the U.S. Congress. This paper
focuses on the 1997 session of the General Assembly, but changes in U.N. practice, which
both the State Department and Congress supported and often initiated, have been ongoing
for many years. For example, the Office of Internal Oversight Services was established
in 1994. Changes in U.N. peacekeeping procedures have been made in recent years. The
requirement for zero real growth budgets and agreement by consensus of all members on
the budget began in the mid-1980's.

Budget and Assessments
The General Assembly approved a budget of $2.532 billion for the two year period
1998-1999. The budget had to be approved by consensus. This budget was lower than
the budget of the previous biennium ($2.608 billion). The General Assembly also agreed
to the scale of assessments which would apportion the budget among the member
countries for the next three years. The United States will continue to be assessed 25
percent. Japan’s contribution will rise from 18 percent in 1998 to over 20 percent in 2000
and Germany’s will increase from 9.6 percent to nearly 10 percent.2 The assessment rate
floor for the poorest countries was reduced to .001 percent, down from .01 percent, so that
those countries whose economies would require an assessment lower than .01 will see
their assessment reduced. Ability to pay will be determined for this period by each
country’s GNP for a six year period (down from the previous 7.5 year period.) Finally,
the General Assembly may consider reviewing the scale of assessments for the 1999-2000
period during 1998 if conditions change.3
U.N. Reform Measures

The General Assembly considered U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan’s Track One
and Track Two reform proposals and adopted two resolutions which put many of his
proposals into effect during the 1997 Session. Some of his proposals were adopted
completely. Member states will continue considering others which lacked broad support
during the spring 1998 session. In some cases, the Secretary-General was asked to
provide further information.
Recommendations adopted.
! Establish the post of Deputy Secretary-General to assist the Secretary-
General in managing operations, act for him in his absence, and support
him in his oversight and coordination functions. Louise Frechette of
Canada has been named to the post and will begin her duties in March.

! Establish a Department of Disarmament Affairs. Direct the Disarmament
Commission and the First Committee (Disarmament and International
2 For information on the current assessment of other countries, see IB86116, U.N. System
Funding: Congressional Issues. For historical information on assessment rates, see CRS Report
95-571 F, United Nations Regular Budget Contributions: Members Compared, 1989-1996.
3 For a more detailed discussion of these changes, see The New U.N. Assessment Scale by Jeffrey
Laurenti, U.N. Association of the United States. Www.unausa.org/ programs/scale.htm.

CRS-3
Security) to review their work with a view to rationalizing and
streamlining it.
! Establish a Department of Economic and Social Affairs by consolidating
three departments in the Secretariat which address economic and social
affairs.
! Discontinue the High-level Advisory Board on Sustainable Development.
! Abolish the Department of Humanitarian Affairs and establish instead the
Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs.
! Include discussion of humanitarian affairs during the annual session of
the Economic and Social Council.
! Designate the Emergency Relief Coordinator as the U.N. Humanitarian
Assistance Coordinator with responsibility for coordinating natural
disaster relief. Transfer responsibility for operational disaster mitigation
activities to U.N. Development Program.
! Combine the Vienna-based programs on fighting crime, drug trafficking,
money laundering and terrorism into a single office headed by an
Executive Director.
! Combine the Geneva based programs on human rights into a single office
under the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights.
! Bring the UN development activities into a UN Development Group to
facilitate cooperation to meet common goals and consolidate all UN
offices in each country into a single UN office under a Resident
Coordinator.
! Establish a development account in the 1998-1999 budget to be funded
from savings in administrative and other overhead costs.
! Make the Department of Political Affairs the focal point in the UN for
post- conflict peace building.
! Increase consultation and cooperation with the business community,
labor unions, non-governmental organizations and academia.
! Encourage member states to continue to provide information to the
Secretary-General that could assist in preventing conflict.
! Encourage all appropriate organs to consider specific measures to
enhance the deployment capacity of the United Nations in peacekeeping
operations.

CRS-4
! Request the Security Council to consider establishing a time frame for
the conclusion of peacekeeping activities in establishing future
peacekeeping operations.
! Cut Administrative costs over the next four years by $200 million and
from 38 percent to 25 percent of the budget by 2000. Reduce the number
of permanent posts by 950 over the next two years. Consolidate U.N.
information activities, procurement services, and conference support
services within the Secretariat.
Recommendations to be considered further.
The General Assembly agreed to continue the consideration of other reform
proposals of the Secretary-General. Some of the reform measures will be discussed
during 1998. The General Assembly requested that the Secretary-General or other U.N.
bodies consider further or report on several of the Secretary General’s other proposals.
These include the request to:
! examine the SG’s recommendation for a review of the International Civil
Service Commission;
! consider in more detail the approved change to results based budgeting;
! consider applying sunset provisions to new programs;
! consider the employee code of conduct expeditiously;
! consider the Secretary-General’s recommendations for the reform of the
Economic and Social Council’s subsidiary bodies;
! conduct a review of the regional economic commissions in 1998 session
of the Economic and Social Council and report to the General Assembly;
! consider arrangements for closer integration of the Executive Boards of
UNDP, UNFPA, and UNICEF to ensure review of issues of common
concern.
The General Assembly also asked the Secretary-General to elaborate further on his
longer range proposals of establishing a new concept of trusteeship; holding a
Millennium Assembly and a Millennium Forum; establishing a Special Commission to
examine the need for Charter amendments and the treaties which establish the mandates
of the U.N. Specialized Agencies; establishing a new system of core resources for
development; financing natural disaster mitigation; establishing a revolving credit fund
to assist the agency in time of financial difficulty; and retaining unspent balances under
the regular budget for development programs.
U.N. Inspector General
The United Nations established the Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS) or
Inspector General, in 1994. Reports by the Department of State on the independence and

CRS-5
adequacy of staffing and funding of this office have been required by legislation since
1994. Part of U.S. payments to the United Nations have been withheld, pending
certification by the Department of State that the legislative conditions have been met. In
addition, the General Accounting Office reported on the status of the U.N. Inspector
General in November 1997.4 The GAO concluded that although the Office of Internal
Oversight Services had some start up and early operational problems, many of these have
been resolved. The GAO states that early concerns about inadequate budget and staff
have been addressed and that two of the four OIOS units, the audit division and the
Investigations Section have developed written audit and investigative policies and
procedures. But, since the GAO did not have access to all the audit, inspection, and
investigation reports and other records, it could not ascertain whether the OIOS exercised
its authority and implemented its procedures in an independent manner.
4
GAO/ NSIAD-98-9. United Nations. Status of Internal Oversight Functions. November 1997.

EveryCRSReport.com
The Congressional Research Service (CRS) is a federal legislative branch agency, housed inside the
Library of Congress, charged with providing the United States Congress non-partisan advice on
issues that may come before Congress.
EveryCRSReport.com republishes CRS reports that are available to al Congressional staff. The
reports are not classified, and Members of Congress routinely make individual reports available to
the public.
Prior to our republication, we redacted names, phone numbers and email addresses of analysts
who produced the reports. We also added this page to the report. We have not intentional y made
any other changes to any report published on EveryCRSReport.com.
CRS reports, as a work of the United States government, are not subject to copyright protection in
the United States. Any CRS report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without
permission from CRS. However, as a CRS report may include copyrighted images or material from a
third party, you may need to obtain permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or
otherwise use copyrighted material.
Information in a CRS report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public
understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to members of Congress in
connection with CRS' institutional role.
EveryCRSReport.com is not a government website and is not affiliated with CRS. We do not claim
copyright on any CRS report we have republished.