Democracy in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Compilation of Selected Indices

Updated August 11, 2026 (R46016)
Jump to Main Text of Report

Contents

Figures

Tables

Summary

This report provides a regional snapshot of the state of democracy in Latin America and the Caribbean, based on selected nongovernmental indices that measure democracy worldwide. Using tables and graphs to illustrate regional trends, this report provides a snapshot of democracy indicators from the following sources: (1) Bertelsmann Stiftung's 2026 Bertelsmann Transformation Index (BTI); (2) the Economist Intelligence Unit's (EIU's) Democracy Index 2025; (3) Freedom House's Freedom in the World 2026; and (4) the Varieties of Democracy Institute's (V-Dem's) Liberal Democracy Index in its Democracy Report 2026. Additional resources appear at the end of the report.


Introduction

For decades, U.S. policy has broadly reflected the view that the spread of democracy around the world is favorable to U.S. interests. The current trajectory of democracy around the world is an issue of interest for Congress, which has generally supported U.S. democracy promotion efforts. This report provides a regional snapshot of the state of democracy in Latin America and the Caribbean based on selected nongovernmental organizations' (NGOs') indices that measure democracy worldwide.

For additional information on democracy in the global context, see the following products:

For related information about democracy in Latin American and the Caribbean, see the following products:

CRS also publishes reports on specific Latin American and Caribbean countries.

Democracy Indices and Source Notes

This report compiles information from the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) and data from the most recent findings of four NGOs' democracy indices, which are each discussed briefly below. Findings from these indices cover developments during calendar year 2025 or earlier and do not reflect more recent events. CRS does not endorse the methodology or accuracy of any particular democracy index. Findings and scores for particular countries may vary across indices for a variety of reasons, including differing coverage periods, methodologies, and subjective expert assessments. (For a discussion about definitions of democracy and critiques of democracy indices, see [archived] CRS Report R45344, Global Trends in Democracy: Background, U.S. Policy, and Issues for Congress, by Michael A. Weber.)

The following indices are discussed below: (1) Bertelsmann Stiftung's 2026 Bertelsmann Transformation Index (BTI); (2) the Economist Intelligence Unit's (EIU's) Democracy Index 2025; (3) Freedom House's Freedom in the World 2026; and (4) the Varieties of Democracy Institute's (V-Dem's) Liberal Democracy Index in its Democracy Report 2026.

Bertelsmann Transformation Index (BTI)

Bertelsmann Stiftung, a private foundation based in Germany, has published the Bertelsmann Transformation Index (BTI) biannually since 2006. BTI 2026 reviewed the period of February 2023 through January 2025 with global, regional, and country reports that evaluated the state of democracy, the economy, and governance in 137 countries. (It excluded countries that were members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development by the year 1989, considered to be "long-consolidated democratic systems and in which economic development can be regarded as well-advanced.")1 The BTI ranked countries' political transformation using five criteria: (1) stateness, (2) political participation, (3) rule of law, (4) stability of democratic institutions, and (5) political and social integration.2 The political transformation criteria also determine each country's classification: democracy in consolidation, defective democracy, highly defective democracy, moderate autocracy, or hardline autocracy.3 BTI evaluates all Central and South American nations except for Belize, Guyana, and Suriname. Among Caribbean nations, BTI evaluates Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Haiti, Jamaica, and Trinidad and Tobago.

BTI's Regional Report Latin America and the Caribbean 2026

"Overall, progress toward democratic consolidation faces substantial barriers. While levels of democratization vary widely across the region, most countries remain stuck in the category of defective democracy, reflecting enduring weaknesses in the rule of law, party systems and political integration."4

In its 2026 regional report, BTI found that "democratic and economic transformation, as well as the quality of governance … showed no pronounced trend during the review period [February 2023 through January 2025].… [O]verall, developments since February 2023 point to either stagnation or continuity, depending on perspective."5 The report added that "no country experienced a regime shift toward democracy or autocracy during the review period, though Guatemala's trajectory improved" from a hardline autocracy to a moderate autocracy.6 Meanwhile, "the steepest democratic decline occurred in the moderate autocracy of El Salvador."7 In its global report, BTI highlighted that, of all the states under review "today, 56% are governed autocratically," and "two-thirds of the countries assessed since 2006 are now less democratic than they were 20 years ago."8 At the same time, the same global report noted "improvements in strategic prioritization, implementation and policy learning are particularly visible in countries such as Brazil … and Guatemala."9

Figure 1 shows the global rank and classification of all Central and South American and Caribbean countries according to the Political Transformation Rank, a component of the 2026 Bertelsmann Stiftung Transformation Index (BTI).

Figure 1. BTI's 2026 Political Transformation Global Ranking
of Latin American and Caribbean Countries

Source: Created by CRS using Bertelsmann Stiftung's 2026 Transformation Index.

Economist Intelligence Unit's (EIU)'s Democracy Index

The Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU), based in London and New York, has produced a democracy index since 2006.10 The most recent report provided an annual snapshot of the state of democracy for 165 independent states and two territories.11 The EIU classified countries as full democracies, flawed democracies, hybrid regimes, or authoritarian regimes based on an aggregate score of 60 indicators in five categories: (1) electoral process and pluralism, (2) civil liberties, (3) the functioning of government, (4) political participation, and (5) political culture.12 EIU evaluated Mexico and all Central and South American nations. With respect to the Caribbean, EIU looked at Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Guyana, Haiti, Jamaica, Suriname, and Trinidad and Tobago.

Please note that the summary report of EIU's Democracy Index 2025 can be freely downloaded, but the full report may require a subscription.

EIU's Democracy Index 2025

"Latin America and the Caribbean scores above the global average on electoral process and pluralism, functioning of government, political participation and civil liberties. Although it is the worst-performing region in political culture, this category saw the greatest improvement from 2024 (albeit from a low base)."13

According to the EIU's Democracy Index 2025 summary report, covering calendar year 2025, the Latin America and Caribbean region's average score rose to 5.71 from 5.61 after nine years of declining scores.14 Specifically, EIU found that 13 out of 24 countries recorded score improvements.15 EIU reported that the "most important positive regional development in 2025" occurred in Bolivia, putting it in the top five countries worldwide with the biggest score improvements from 2024 to 2025 along with Argentina.16 On the other hand, Colombia registered "the steepest score decline in 2025."17

Figure 2 shows the global rank and classification of Central and South American and Caribbean countries according to the EIU's full report on the Democracy Index 2025.

Figure 2. EIU's Democracy Index 2025 Global Ranking
for Latin American and Caribbean Countries

Source: Created by CRS using EIU's Democracy Index 2025 (full report).

Freedom House's Freedom in the World

Freedom House is a U.S.-based NGO that conducts research on democracy, political freedom, and human rights worldwide. It has published a global report on political rights and civil liberties, now called Freedom in the World, annually since 1972.18 The 2026 report, which covered calendar year 2025, measured 195 countries and 13 territories, including all Latin American and Caribbean countries.19 Freedom House assigned each country 0 to 4 points on 25 different indicators—10 indicators for political rights and 15 indicators for civil liberties—for a total of up to 100 points. The calculation equally weights a country's aggregate political rights and civil liberties scores to determine whether the country has an overall status of free, partly free, or not free.20 The report's analysis was based on data that are not available online but can be requested from Freedom House.21 The Freedom House website also listed the current freedom scores with a detailed profile for each assessed country.22

Freedom House's Freedom in the World 2026

"Major threats to freedom in the Americas during 2025 included criminal violence and mounting restrictions on civic space."23

In 2025, Freedom House classified 23 out of 35 countries in the Americas as "free," a region that includes North America, Central America, South America, and the Caribbean. The report highlighted that "only six countries earned score improvements for the year, while 12 registered score declines."24 According to the report, "El Salvador recorded the region's largest decline in score for the second consecutive year."25 On the other hand, Freedom House determined that Bolivia's rating improved "from Partly Free to Free status, which it last held in 2002."26 Figure 3 shows the aggregate scores of all Central and South American and Caribbean countries according to the relevant Freedom House country web pages for Freedom in the World 2026. The political rights scores and the civil liberties scores, which comprise the aggregate scores, can be found under the Freedom House heading for each country in Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3.

Figure 3. Freedom House's Freedom in the World 2026 Aggregate Scores
for Latin American and Caribbean Countries

Source: Created by CRS using Freedom House's Freedom in the World 2026.

Varieties of Democracy Institute (V-Dem)'s Liberal Democracy Index

The Varieties of Democracy Institute (V-Dem), headquartered at the University of Gothenburg in Sweden, collects democracy data through its research team in collaboration with country experts. In 2017, V-Dem published its first global report measuring the status of democracy. V-Dem's Democracy Report 2026 includes the Liberal Democracy Index, which is composed of two parts using formulas that are detailed in the 2026 codebook: the Electoral Democracy Index (46 indicators that examine freedom of expression, freedom of association, percentage of the population with voting rights, elections practices, and selection practices for elected officials) and the Liberal Component Index (20 indicators that examine the structure of the legislature, equality before the law, and individual liberties as well as judicial and legislative constraints on the executive branch).27 V-Dem evaluated Mexico and all Central and South American nations. V-Dem evaluated a subset of Caribbean nations: Barbados, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Guyana, Haiti, Jamaica, Suriname, and Trinidad and Tobago.

V-Dem's Democracy Report 2026

"Latin America and the Caribbean is the second most democratic region in the world by 2025. Peaking on both democracy measures in the early 2000s, it is in decline since then."28

The V-Dem 2026 report, covering calendar year 2025, grouped 179 countries into four categories according to its Regimes of the World measure: liberal democracy, electoral democracy, electoral autocracy, and closed autocracy.29 In describing the Latin American and the Caribbean population, the report stated that 71% lived in democracies, "making it the second most democratic region," with autocracies accounting for the remaining 29%.30 On the one hand, V-Dem found "four democratizing countries (or 16% of the region): the Dominican Republic, Bolivia, Brazil, and Guatemala," characterizing the last three as "U-turn democratizers—countries that are reversing autocratization."31 On the other hand, the report determined that "autocratization continues in six countries (or 24% of the region): Argentina, El Salvador, Haiti, Mexico, Nicaragua, and Peru."32

Figure 4 shows the liberal democracy index rank and classification of all Central and South American and Caribbean countries according to V-Dem's Democracy Report 2026.

Figure 4. V-Dem's Democracy Report 2026's Liberal Democracy Index Rank
for Latin American and Caribbean Countries

Source: Created by CRS using the Varieties of Democracy Institute's Democracy Report 2026.

Compilation of Democracy Indicators

Table 1, below, looks at Caribbean countries' global democracy rankings according to Bertelsmann Stiftung's 2026 Transformation Index, EIU's Democracy Index 2025 (full report), Freedom House's Freedom in the World 2026, and V-Dem's Democracy Report 2026. Table 2 compares the same reports for Mexico and Central America, as does Table 3 for South America. In each table, the country name is followed by parentheses with the nature of the country's political system, as described by the IPU data tools, which categorize political systems.33 Each report evaluates a different set of countries, leaving inconsistent rankings across the sources in the tables below. Countries are listed alphabetically in each table.

Each index is based on a unique methodology, and the rankings are not necessarily comparable. For more details on the methodologies, see "Democracy Indices and Source Notes" above. For term definitions of each index, see footnote 3 for BTI, footnote 12 for EIU, footnote 20 for Freedom House, and footnote 29 for V-Dem, or consult the full reports.

Table 1. Caribbean: 2025 Democracy Rankings

Bertelsmann Stiftung Transformation Index 2026

EIU Democracy Index 2025

Freedom House
Freedom in the World 2026

V-Dem Democracy Report 2026

Country
(IPU political systems category)

Political Transfor-mation Global Rank (of 137)

Status

Global Rank (of 167)a

Regime Type

Aggregate Score (out of 100)

Political Rights Score (out of 40)

Civil Liberties Score (out of 60)

Freedom Status

Liberal Democracy Index Global Rank (of 179)

Regime Typeb

Antigua & Barbuda (parliamentary system)

83

32

51

Free

The Bahamas (parliamentary system)

90

38

52

Free

Barbados (parliamentary system)

94

37

57

Free

32

(-)

Liberal democracy

Belize (parliamentary system)

87

34

53

Free

Cuba (communist system)

114

Hard-line autocracy

135

Authoritarian regime

9

0

9

Not free

161

Closed autocracy

Dominica (parliamentary system)

92

37

55

Free

Dominican Republic (presidential system)

23

Defective democracy

51

Flawed democracy

67

27

40

Partly free

64

Electoral democracy

Grenada (parliamentary system)

89

37

52

Free

Guyana (presidential-parliamentary system)

71

Flawed democracy

74

29

45

Free

92

(-)

Electoral autocracy

Haiti (presidential system)

130

Hard-line autocracy

125=

Authoritarian regime

22

5

17

Not free

146

Closed autocracy

Jamaica (parliamentary system)

15

Consolidating democracy

52

Flawed democracy

81

34

47

Free

33

Electoral democracy

St. Kitts and Nevis (parliamentary system)

89

35

54

Free

St. Lucia (parliamentary system)

91

38

53

Free

St. Vincent and the Grenadines (parliamentary system)

90

36

54

Free

Suriname (presidential system)

45

Flawed democracy

81

35

46

Free

41

Electoral democracy

Trinidad & Tobago (parliamentary system)

13

Consolidating democracy

43

Flawed democracy

83

34

49

Free

34

(-)

Liberal democracy

Source: Compiled by CRS using the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) data on political systems, Bertelsmann Stiftung's 2026 Transformation Index (BTI), the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) Democracy Index 2025 (full report), Freedom House's Freedom in the World 2026, and the Varieties of Democracy Institute (V-Dem) Democracy Report 2026.

Notes: Although Belize is located in Central America and Guyana and Suriname are located in South America, all three are members of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM).

a. EIU's symbol "=" indicates that one or more countries were ranked equally.

b. V-Dem's symbol (-) indicates that, taking uncertainty into account, the country could belong to the lower category, while (+) signifies that the country could belong to the higher category.

c. IPU noted that "The mandate of all members of the Haitian Chamber of Deputies expired in January 2020 in the absence of elections." For more information, see CRS Report R47394, Haiti: Recent Developments and U.S. Policy, by Karla I. Rios and Clare Ribando Seelke, and CRS Report 98-684, Latin America and the Caribbean: Fact Sheet on Leaders and Elections, by Carla Y. Davis-Castro.

Table 2. Mexico and Central America: 2025 Democracy Rankings

Bertelsmann Stiftung Transformation Index 2026

EIU Democracy Index 2025

Freedom House
Freedom in the World 2026

V-Dem Democracy Report 2026

Country (IPU political systems category)

Political Transfor-mation Global Rank (of 137)

Status

Global Rank (of 167)a

Regime Type

Aggregate Score (out of 100)

Political Rights Score (out of 40)

Civil Liberties Score (out of 60)

Freedom Status

Liberal Democracy Index Global Rank (of 179)

Regime Typeb

Costa Rica (presidential system)

9

Consolidating democracy

19

Full democracy

91

38

53

Free

7

Liberal democracy

El Salvador (presidential system)

63

Moderate autocracy

96

Hybrid regime

42

15

27

Partly Free

153

Electoral autocracy

Guatemala (presidential system)

83

Moderate autocracy

94=

Hybrid regime

48

19

29

Partly free

57

Electoral democracy

Honduras (presidential system)

67

Highly defective democracy

92

Hybrid regime

47

21

26

Partly free

82

(-)

Electoral democracy

Mexico (presidential system)

56

Highly defective democracy

81

Hybrid regime

58

26

32

Partly free

110

(+)

Electoral autocracy

Nicaraguac (presidential system c)

117

Hard-line autocracy

150=

Authoritarian regime

14

2

12

Not free

175

Electoral autocracy

Panama (presidential system)

45

Defective democracy

44

Flawed democracy

82

35

47

Free

49

Electoral democracy

Sources: Compiled by CRS using the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) data on political systems, Bertelsmann Stiftung's 2026 Transformation Index (BTI), the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU)'s Democracy Index 2025 (full report), Freedom House's Freedom in the World 2026, and the Varieties of Democracy Institute's (V-Dem's) Democracy Report 2026.

Notes: Although Belize is located in Central America, it is a member of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) and is listed in Table 1.

a. EIU's symbol "=" indicates that one or more countries were ranked equally.

b. V-Dem's symbol (-) indicates that, taking uncertainty into account, the country could belong to the lower category, while (+) signifies that the country could belong to the higher category.

c. IPU noted that "In the presidential elections held together with the parliamentary polls, President Ortega was re-elected for a fourth consecutive term, along with his wife, the Vice President Rosario Murillo…. Prior to the 2021 elections, several potential presidential candidates were arrested…. The European Union said the elections had 'taken place without democratic guarantees and their results lack legitimacy.' … The Organization of American States (OAS) adopted a resolution stating the 2021 elections had no democratic legitimacy." For more information, see CRS Report R48294, Nicaragua: In Brief, by Karla I. Rios, and CRS Report 98-684, Latin America and the Caribbean: Fact Sheet on Leaders and Elections, by Carla Y. Davis-Castro.

Table 3. South America: 2025 Democracy Rankings

Bertelsmann Stiftung Transformation Index 2026

EIU Democracy Index 2025

Freedom House
Freedom in the World 2026

V-Dem Democracy Report 2026

Country (IPU political systems category)

Political Transfor-mation Global Rank (of 137)

Status Index

Global Rank (of 167)a

Regime Type

Aggregate Score (out of 100)

Political Rights Score

Civil Liberties Score

Freedom Status

Liberal Democracy Index Global Rank (of 179)

Regime Typeb

Argentina (presidential system)

25

Defective Democracy

49

Flawed democracy

85

35

50

Free

56

Electoral democracy

Bolivia (presidential system)

39

Defective democracy

83

Hybrid regime

69

30

39

Free

89

Electoral democracy

Brazil (presidential system)

22

Defective democracy

50

Flawed democracy

73

30

43

Free

28

(+)

Electoral democracy

Chile (presidential system)

5

Consolidating democracy

27

Flawed democracy

95

38

57

Free

16

(-)

Liberal democracy

Colombia (presidential system)

39

Defective democracy

73=

Flawed democracy

69

31

38

Free

53

Electoral democracy

Ecuador (presidential system)

47

Defective democracy

86

Hybrid regime

64

27

37

Partly free

79

Electoral democracy

Paraguay (presidential system)

42

Defective democracy

73=

Flawed democracy

63

26

37

Partly free

83

Electoral democracy

Peru (presidential system)

54

Highly defective democracy

76

Hybrid regime

66

27

39

Partly free

63

Electoral democracy

Uruguay (presidential system)

1

Consolidating democracy

12

Full democracy

97

40

57

Free

13

(-)

Liberal democracy

Venezuela (presidential system)

113

Hard-line autocracy

144=

Authoritarian regime

13

0

13

Not free

170

Electoral autocracy

Source: Compiled by CRS using Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) data on political systems, Bertelsmann Stiftung's 2026 Transformation Index (BTI), EIU's Democracy Index 2025 (full report), Freedom House's Freedom in the World 2026, and the Varieties of Democracy Institute's (V-Dem's) Democracy Report 2026.

Notes: Although Guyana and Suriname are located in South America, both are members of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) and are listed in Table 1.

a. EIU's symbol "=" indicates that one or more countries were ranked equally.

b. V-Dem's symbol (-) indicates that, taking uncertainty into account, the country could belong to the lower category, while (+) signifies that the country could belong to the higher category.

c. IPU noted that "According to the National Electoral Council (CNE), the presidential alliance … won 253 seats in the 285-member National Assembly (see IPU note 2). The elections were boycotted by PUD, an alliance of opposition parties (see IPU note 3). Other opposition alliances won a total of 29 seats." For more information, see CRS In Focus IF10715, Venezuela: Overview of U.S. Sanctions Policy, by Clare Ribando Seelke, and CRS Report 98-684, Latin America and the Caribbean: Fact Sheet on Leaders and Elections, by Carla Y. Davis-Castro.

Selected Resources

Table 4 provides selected resources for further information about democracy indicators for Latin American and Caribbean nations, although many resources cover other geographic areas as well. The sources are organized alphabetically by authoring organization followed by the titles organized chronologically and then alphabetically. This is not an exhaustive list.

Table 4. Selected Resources for Democracy Indicators

Organization

Title and Year Published

Resource Type and Notes

Bertelsmann Stiftung (BTI)

BTI 2026 Global Findings

Regional report examines 137 countries and analyzes the results of the 2026 Bertelsmann Stiftung Transformation Index (BTI) covering February 1, 2023, to January 31, 2025

BTI Governance Index 2026

Index ranks 137 countries composed of scores for level of difficulty, steering capability, resource efficiency, consensus-building, and international cooperation

BTI 2026 Political Transformation Index

Index ranks 137 countries composed of scores for stateness, political participation, rule of law, stability of democratic institutions, and political and social integration

BTI Regional Report Latin America and the Caribbean 2026

Regional report examines 22 countries and analyzes the results of the 2026 BTI covering February 1, 2023, to January 31, 2025

Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU)

Democracy Index 2025 (summary)

Summary of global report covers 167 countries and territories (full report may require a subscription)

Electoral Integrity Project

Electoral Integrity Global Report 2025

Annual report summarizes data from Perceptions of Electoral Integrity dataset based on a survey of academic experts for 194 countries with case studies from Mexico and El Salvador

Freedom House

Countries and Territories Rankings 2026

Global ranking list covers global freedom, internet freedom, and democracy scores for 208 countries and territories

Freedom in the World 2026

Global report covers 208 countries and territories

Freedom Map 2026

Map shows map of "Freedom in the World" report covering 208 countries and territories as well as map of "Freedom on the Net" report regarding internet and digital media freedom in 72 countries

International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA)

Global State of Democracy Indices (2025)

Interactive map illustrates four aspects of democracy in173 countries from 1975 to 2025 as well as providing datasets and methodology

Global State of Democracy Report 2025

Global report looks at democracy trends from 1975 to 2024 across 173 countries

U.S. Department of State

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices 2024

Global report covers all countries receiving U.S. assistance and all United Nations member states

Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem)

Datasets (2026)

Includes current and past datasets for downloading as well as reference documents

Democracy Report 2026

Global report covers 179 countries

World Bank

Worldwide Governance Indicators (2025)

Data on six aggregate indicators of governance for over 200 countries from 1996 to 2024; in particular, see Voice and Accountability indicator

World Justice Project

Rule of Law Index 2025

Website with interactive map and data graphics that cover 143 countries and jurisdictions from 2015 to 2025

Mexico States Rule of Law Index 2023-24 (Spanish only)

World Justice Project's only subnational index that examines the rule of law in each of Mexico's 32 states

Rule of Law Country Reports (2021-2022)

Country reports cover 30 countries from Latin America and the Caribbean based on key findings from the General Population Poll 2022

Source: Compiled by CRS.


Footnotes

1.

Bertelsmann Stiftung, "Methodology," accessed June 29, 2026, https://bti-project.org/en/methodology.

2.

Bertelsmann Stiftung, "Methodology," accessed May 20, 2026, https://bti-project.org/en/methodology. For political transformation criteria, (1) stateness examines the monopoly on the use of force, state identity, interference of religious dogmas, and basic administration; (2) political participation examines free and fair elections, effective power to govern, association and assembly rights, and freedom of expression; (3) rule of law examines separation of powers, independent judiciary, prosecution of office abuse, and civil rights; (4) stability of democratic institutions examines performance of democratic institutions and commitment of democratic institutions; and (5) political and social integration examines the party system, interest groups, approval of democracy, and social capital.

3.

Bertelsmann Stiftung, "Methodology," accessed May 20, 2026, https://bti-project.org/en/methodology. BTI uses seven threshold values to mark minimum requirements for a democracy: (1) free and fair elections, (2) effective power to govern, (3) association/assembly rights, (4) freedom of expression, (5) separation of powers, (6) civil rights, and (7) monopoly on the use of force and basic administration. BTI classifies a country as an autocracy if any one of seven political transformation indicators falls short of the relevant threshold. BTI considers failing states autocracies. See also Bertelsmann Stiftung, "Regional Dashboard: Latin America and the Caribbean," accessed January 17, 2025, https://bti-project.org/en/reports/regional-dashboard/LAC?&cb=00000.

4.

Ariam Macias-Weller and Thomas Kestler, Enduring Weaknesses and Emerging ChallengesBTI Regional Report Latin America and the Caribbean, Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2026, p. 9, https://bti-project.org/fileadmin/api/content/en/downloads/reports/global/BTI_2026_Regional_Report_LAC.pdf.

5.

Macias-Weller and Kestler, BTI Regional Report, p. 4.

6.

Macias-Weller and Kestler, BTI Regional Report, p. 9.

7.

Macias-Weller and Kestler, BTI Regional Report, p. 6.

8.

Sabine Donner et al., Repression Meets Resistance: BTI 2026 Global Findings, Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2026, p. 4, https://bti-project.org/fileadmin/api/content/en/downloads/reports/global/BTI_2026_Global_Findings_EN.pdf.

9.

Donner et al., Repression Meets Resistance, p. 5.

10.

The Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) did not produce a democracy index report covering 2007 or 2009.

11.

EIU, Democracy Index 2025: Democracy Stabilises After Eight Years of Decline, 2026, summary report, https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2025/.

12.

EIU, Democracy Index Report: World, 2025 (full report), pp. 65-66. EIU defines terms as: full democracies are countries where the "functioning of government is satisfactory. Media are independent and diverse … effective system of checks and balances … judiciary is independent and judicial decisions are enforced … only limited problems." Flawed democracies have "free and fair elections … basic civil liberties are respected. However, there are significant weaknesses in other aspects of democracy, including problems in governance, an underdeveloped political culture and low levels of political participation." Hybrid regimes have "substantial election irregularities … government pressure on opposition parties and candidates … corruption tends to be widespread and the rule of law is weak. Civil society is weak … and the judiciary is not independent." In authoritarian regimes, "state political pluralism is absent or heavily circumscribed … some formal institutions of democracy may exist, but these have little substance … elections … are not free and fair … disregard for abuses and infringements of civil liberties … repression of criticism of the government and pervasive censorship. There is no independent judiciary."

13.

EIU, Democracy Index 2025 (summary), p. 23.

14.

EIU, Democracy Index 2025 (summary), pp. 10, 23.

15.

EIU, Democracy Index 2025 (summary), p. 23.

16.

EIU, Democracy Index 2025 (summary), pp. 23, 11.

17.

EIU, Democracy Index 2025 (summary), p. 23.

18.

Until 1978, the annual report was titled The Comparative Study of Freedom.

19.

Yana Gorokhovskaia et al., Freedom in the World 2026: The Growing Shadow of Autocracy, Freedom House, March 2026, p. 2, https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2026-03/FIW2026_final_digital%20%281%29.pdf.

20.

The methodology is derived from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. "The political rights questions are grouped into three subcategories: Electoral Process (3 questions), Political Pluralism and Participation (4), and Functioning of Government (3). The civil liberties questions are grouped into four subcategories: Freedom of Expression and Belief (4 questions), Associational and Organizational Rights (3), Rule of Law (4), and Personal Autonomy and Individual Rights (4)." The methodology questions and table for calculating country status are listed online at Freedom House, "Freedom in the World Research Methodology," accessed May 21, 2026, https://freedomhouse.org/reports/freedom-world/freedom-world-research-methodology.

21.

Freedom House, "Freedom in the World: About the Report," accessed May 21, 2026, https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world.

22.

Freedom House, "Countries and Territories," accessed May 21, 2026, https://freedomhouse.org/countries/freedom-world/scores.

23.

Gorokhovskaia et al., Freedom in the World 2026, p. 27.

24.

Gorokhovskaia et al., Freedom in the World 2026, p. 27.

25.

Gorokhovskaia et al., Freedom in the World 2026, p. 27.

26.

Gorokhovskaia et al., Freedom in the World 2026, p. 27.

27.

Michael Coppedge et al., "V-Dem Codebook v16," Varieties of Democracy Project, 2026, pp. 452-453, https://www.v-dem.net/documents/70/codebook_v16.pdf.

28.

Marina Nord et al., Democracy Report 2026: Unraveling the Democratic Era?, V-Dem Institute, 2026, p. 57, https://www.v-dem.net/documents/75/V-Dem_Institute_Democracy_Report_2026_lowres.pdf.

29.

Although not officially endorsed by the V-Dem Steering Committee, V-Dem data is used to sort countries into regime types based on Anna Lührmann et al., "Regimes of the World (RoW): Opening New Avenues for the Comparative Study of Political Regimes," Politics & Governance, vol. 6, no. 1 (2018), pp. 60-77. This article states "that Dahl's theory of polyarchy (1971, 1998) provides the most comprehensive and most widely accepted theory of what distinguishes a democracy based on six … institutional guarantees (elected officials, free and fair elections, freedom of expression, alternative sources of information, associational autonomy, and inclusive citizenship)." The article defines democracies as having "de-facto multiparty, free and fair elections, and Dahl's institutional prerequisites minimally fulfilled." An electoral democracy is one in which "the rule of law or liberal principles [are] not satisfied" and a liberal democracy is one in which "the rule of law and liberal principles [are] satisfied." Autocracies have "no de facto multiparty, or free and fair elections, or Dahl's institutional prerequisites not minimally fulfilled." An electoral autocracy has "de jure multiparty elections for the chief executive and the legislature" and a closed autocracy has "no multiparty elections for the chief executive or the legislature." See Nord et al., Democracy Report 2026, p. 25, and Coppedge et al., "V-Dem Codebook v16," p. 317.

30.

Nord et al., Democracy Report 2026, pp. 11-12.

31.

Nord et al., Democracy Report 2026, p. 20.

32.

Nord et al., Democracy Report 2026, p. 20.

33.

Inter-Parliamentary Union, "Compare Data on Parliaments: Political Systems," 2026, https://data.ipu.org/compare/?field=political_systems&region=americas&chart=map&year_to=# .