The HOME Investment Partnerships Program is a federal block grant program that provides funding to states and eligible localities to be used exclusively for affordable housing activities to benefit low-income households. On January 6, 2025, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) published in the Federal Register a final rule related to the HOME program: "HOME Investment Partnerships Program: Program Updates and Streamlining." The final rule makes several significant changes to the implementation of the HOME program, and represents the first major regulatory update since 2013. Major provisions include tenancy addenda that create tenant protections for residents of HOME-assisted rental housing and recipients of HOME tenant-based rental assistance, changes to maximum per-unit subsidy limits, changes to periods of affordability, updated guidance and policy changes for HUD-assisted homebuyer housing, and several provisions intended to streamline participation in the HOME program. This report summarizes the major provisions of the final rule.
The HOME Investment Partnerships Program is a federal block grant program that provides funding to states and eligible localities to be used exclusively for affordable housing activities to benefit low-income households.1 Federal funds are distributed by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to participating jurisdictions—states and eligible localities—by formula. HOME funds may be used for new construction or rehabilitation of rental housing, new construction or rehabilitation of owner-occupied housing, assistance to homebuyers, and tenant-based rental assistance.
On May 29, 2024, HUD published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking related to the HOME program.2 The final rule was published in the Federal Register on January 6, 2025.3 The effective date for most of the rule's provisions was April 20, 2025, with the exception of the tenancy addenda and the increase in the maximum per-unit subsidy limit for projects that meet green building standards, both of which have a delayed effective date of October 30, 2025.4
The final rule represents the first major regulatory update since 2013, and includes several significant changes to the 2013 regulations and subsequent updates (hereinafter, "the 2013 regulations"). There are also several notable differences between the proposed and final rules, prompted by public comment on the proposed rule. This report summarizes the major provisions of the final rule.
Delayed Effective Date The tenancy addenda provisions described in this section, which revise 24 C.F.R. §92.253 (tenant protections and selection), have a delayed effective date of October 30, 2025. See 90 Federal Register 16085-16087. |
Eligible uses of HOME funds for rental housing include rental housing development activities and tenant-based rental assistance, including security deposit assistance. The final rule includes three distinct tenancy addenda for each of HOME rental housing, HOME tenant-based rental assistance (TBRA), and HOME security deposit assistance. These tenancy addenda, which would be appended to lease agreements, are intended to establish new and revised protections for tenants in HOME-assisted rental housing. The final rule revises the proposed rule, which proposed applying uniform tenant protections to all HOME-assisted rental housing tenants and HOME TBRA recipients. HUD states that the text of the final rule allows for protections tailored to the form of assistance being received.5 These tenant protections would only apply to projects for which HOME funds were committed on or after the rule's effective date; they would not apply retroactively to existing HOME projects.
The rental housing tenancy addendum lays out tenant protections for residents of all rental housing that receives HOME funding for its construction, rehabilitation, or acquisition on or after the rule's effective date. The tenancy addendum includes the following new protections for tenants of rental housing assisted with HOME funds:6
The 2013 regulations included protections related to termination of tenancy for tenants of rental housing assisted with HOME funds. Under the 2013 regulations, an owner may not terminate the tenancy of any tenant or household member, or refuse to renew a lease, except for serious or repeated violation of the terms and conditions of the lease; violation of applicable federal, state, or local law; completion of the tenancy period for transitional housing or failure to follow any required transitional housing supportive services plan; or other good cause.8 The owner must serve written notice at least 30 days before the termination of tenancy.9
The final rule includes a revision of the phrase "terms and conditions of the lease" to "material terms and conditions of the lease," with HUD finding that "minor lease violations, especially when easily curable or already cured, should not provide the basis for a termination of tenancy or refusal to renewal tenancy in a HOME rental housing project."10 The final rule also adds a clarification that these provisions apply to any individual household member. The rule provides several examples of "other good cause" including "threats to safety and property." The final rule includes the same 30-day notice period for termination of tenancy present in the 2013 regulations.11 The final rule includes an exception to the 30-day notice period if the termination of tenancy or refusal to renew is due to a direct threat to the safety of the tenants or employees of the housing, or an imminent and serious threat to the property, unless otherwise required by law. The rule also includes a requirement that owners seeking to evict must institute a civil court proceeding and may not perform a constructive eviction such as locking a tenant out of their unit.
The 2013 regulations included several tenant protections in the form of prohibited lease terms.12 These existing protections are also included in the new rental housing tenancy addendum:
The tenancy addendum for tenant-based rental assistance is substantially similar to the tenancy addendum for rental housing, including provisions related to termination of tenancy, with three exceptions. HUD intends for these exceptions to avoid discouraging private owners from accepting tenants with HOME tenant-based rental assistance.14 First, the tenant-based rental assistance tenancy addendum does not include the requirement to relocate tenants if life-threatening property deficiencies cannot be repaired within one day. Second, it does not include the provision allowing tenants to organize. Third, it includes a waiver to the prohibition on surety bonds, security deposit insurance, and other security deposit alternatives if the tenant is already in a lease and has already fulfilled the lease's security deposit requirements before they enter into a rental assistance contract. The HOME tenant-based rental assistance tenancy addendum would terminate upon the termination of the rental assistance contract.
The tenancy addendum for tenants receiving only one-time security deposit assistance from the HOME program is nearly identical to the prohibited lease terms in the 2013 regulations.15 The security deposit tenancy addendum does not include any of the additional provisions present in the other tenancy addendums. HUD states that security deposit assistance is "fundamentally different" from other types of HOME assistance because it is primarily intended as one-time emergency assistance rather than long-term assistance.16
Delayed Effective Date The increase to the maximum per-unit subsidy limit for projects that meet a green building standard, revising 24 C.F.R. §92.250, has a delayed effective date of October 30, 2025. All other revisions to 24 C.F.R. §92.250 described below had an effective date of April 20, 2025. See 90 Federal Register 16085-16087. |
HUD sets a maximum amount of HOME dollars that can be applied to each assisted unit. The Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-625), as amended, directs HUD to base maximum per-unit subsidy amounts on the Section 221(d)(3) mortgage insurance program for elevator-type projects. After that program was discontinued in 2013, HUD published an interim policy in 2015 that identified the Section 234 Condominium Housing Insurance Program as an alternative.17 The National Affordable Housing Act also authorized HUD to increase the per-unit subsidy limit in any High Cost Area18 by an additional 140% of those limits, making the ceiling for a HOME maximum per-unit subsidy limit 240% of the Section 234 Condominium Housing Insurance Program for elevator-type projects.
The final rule includes a provision allowing HUD to establish a new methodology for determining maximum per-unit subsidy limits, to be published in the Federal Register at a later date. In the interim, the final rule includes an increase to the maximum per-unit subsidy limits in designated High Cost Areas to 270% of the Section 234 limits as of the rule's effective date. This increase is based on a HUD determination that Congress intended the adjusted Section 221(d)(3) limitations to establish a floor, rather than a cap, for the maximum subsidy amount. The change to a 270% multiplier would bring HOME's maximum per-unit costs into alignment with the maximum mortgage amounts for the FHA multifamily mortgage insurance programs.19
The final rule also includes a provision allowing states and local governments that receive HOME funds to exceed the maximum per-unit subsidy by an additional 10% for projects that meet one of the green building standards identified by HUD and published in the Federal Register.
HOME-assisted units must be affordable to low-income households,20 and must continue to be occupied by low-income households and remain affordable to such households for a given period of affordability, with the exception of homeowner rehabilitation projects. Both the 2013 regulations and the 2025 final rule state that all newly constructed rental housing—or acquisitions of newly constructed rental housing—must remain affordable for at least 20 years. Minimum periods of affordability for rental rehabilitation, rental acquisition, homebuyer acquisition, and homebuyer new construction projects vary based on the per-unit amount of HOME funds expended on the project. The final rule includes adjustments to the thresholds for this variation so as to account for rising costs, as shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Minimum Periods of Affordability for HOME-Assisted Rental Rehabilitation, Rental Acquisition, Homebuyer Acquisition, and Homebuyer New Construction
Amount of Per-Unit HOME Assistance |
Period of Affordability |
Period of Affordability |
Less than $15,000 |
5 years |
5 years |
$15,000 to $25,000 |
10 years |
5 years |
$25,001 to $40,000 |
10 years |
10 years |
$40,001 to $50,000 |
15 years |
10 years |
Greater than $50,000 |
15 years |
15 years |
Source: Comparison by CRS of 24 C.F.R. §92.252 and 24 C.F.R. §92.254 before and after revisions made in 90 Federal Register 874 and 90 Federal Register 882.
During periods of affordability, HOME-assisted rental housing units have maximum rents based on the lesser of HUD-calculated fair market rents or a percentage of area median income. However, the final rule states that if a tenant is using a federal, state, or local rental assistance or subsidy program, the project owner may accept the total of the tenant's rent contribution and the full permissible assistance or subsidy payment, even if that total exceeds the maximum HOME rent. In other words, the final rule states that HOME rent limits do not apply to rental assistance or subsidy payments made by federal, state, or local programs (limits on the maximum tenant contribution to rent still apply).21 This regulatory change stems from the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (P.L. 110-289).22
The final rule also includes a revision to the 2013 regulation that projects need to demonstrate that operating costs "significantly exceed" operating revenue as evidence that a HOME project is no longer financially viable and thereby eligible for certain types of relief. Rather, the final rule states that owners may demonstrate that operating costs "exceed" operating revenue, the owner is unable to pay for necessary expenses, or the project reserves are insufficient to operate the project.
If a homebuyer receives homebuyer assistance (such as downpayment assistance) from the HOME program but does not continue to reside in that housing as their principal residence for the duration of the period of affordability (see Table 1), the participating jurisdiction must follow certain resale requirements. The housing must be sold at a price that both ensures "fair return on investment" to the original HOME-assisted owner and "affordability to a reasonable range of low-income homebuyers." Otherwise, some of the proceeds of the sale must be returned to the participating jurisdiction in order to cover the HOME funds that were invested in the home. The final rule offers new guidance on defining "fair return on investment" by providing four examples of compliant formulas:
The intent of providing these formulas is to assist participating jurisdictions that found it difficult to create compliant resale formulas; the final rule includes a provision whereby participating jurisdictions may design their own resale provisions, subject to HUD review and approval.
The final rule also includes revisions to certain deadlines related to homebuyer housing. The deadline for sale of a homebuyer unit acquired, rehabilitated, or constructed with HOME funds is extended from 9 months to 12 months. Additionally, the final rule states that homebuyers receiving HOME assistance have 6 months to meet the participating jurisdiction's property standards, with an extension of up to 12 months from acquisition, rather than requiring the home to meet all property standards at the time of purchase.
The final rule includes several provisions that HUD describes as streamlining procedures and simplifying requirements to facilitate participation in the HOME program for certain types of entities or certain types of housing.
The final rule defines "small-scale housing" as one-to-four-unit rental housing projects—either managed on the same site or on multiple sites—such as Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), duplexes, and triplexes. The final rule provides that participating jurisdictions may permit owners of small-scale housing to re-examine tenant incomes every three years, instead of annually, during the period of affordability. The rule includes a waiver of the requirement that tenants be selected from a written waiting list for small-scale housing.
A Community Land Trust (CLT) is a landowning entity that places restrictions on ownership and resale of housing built on the land to preserve affordability. A key mechanism by which CLTs can preserve housing affordability is by exercising a preemptive purchase option: when housing built on land owned by the CLT is put up for sale, the CLT may purchase the housing to prevent the loss of units to the open market. The right of CLTs to a preemptive option to purchase a HOME-funded homebuyer unit from the homeowner at resale or in lieu of foreclosure was codified in statute in the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016 (P.L. 114-113).23 To address this statutory provision, the final rule provides a working definition of "Community Land Trust" as a nonprofit organization that
The final rule states that housing purchased by qualifying Community Land Trusts within the period of affordability will continue to be considered affordable housing.
The HOME statute requires each participating jurisdiction to reserve at least 15% of its HOME funding for Community Housing Development Organizations (CHDOs): private nonprofit organizations that meet certain legal and organizational requirements.
CHDOs are required to maintain accountability to low-income community residents. Under the 2013 regulations, CHDOs could only fulfill this requirement by including low-income community residents, or elected representatives of low-income neighborhood organizations, on their governing boards. The final rule provides that the requirement may alternatively be fulfilled by designees of certain nonprofit organizations serving on the board.
CHDOs must also have a demonstrated capacity for carrying out housing projects. Under the 2013 regulations, CHDOs were required to have paid employees with housing development experience, and demonstrated capacity for carrying out housing projects assisted with HOME funds specifically. The final rule states that CHDOs may demonstrate their capacity based on experience with programs other than HOME—such as Low-Income Housing Tax Credits or the Federal Home Loan Bank Affordable Housing Program. Additionally, the final rule states that the experience of paid employees may be supplemented by board members or officers who are volunteers.
The final rule also states that CHDOs may share developer responsibilities with private, non-CHDO partners, provided that the CHDO remains "in charge" of all aspects of the development process.
The final rule additionally includes the following selected provisions:
1. |
For more details, see CRS Report R40118, An Overview of the HOME Investment Partnerships Program, by Henry G. Watson. |
2. |
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, "HOME Investment Partnerships Program: Program Updates and Streamlining," 89 Federal Register 46618-46680, May 29, 2024. |
3. |
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, "HOME Investment Partnerships Program: Program Updates and Streamlining," 90 Federal Register 746-895, January 6, 2025. |
4. |
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, "HOME Investment Partnerships Program: Program Updates and Streamlining-Delay of Effective Date, Withdrawal, and Correction," 90 Federal Register 16085-16087, April 17, 2025. |
5. |
90 Federal Register 758, January 6, 2025. |
6. |
For more details, see 90 Federal Register 876-881. |
7. |
92 C.F.R. §253(a), January 6, 2025. |
8. |
92 C.F.R. §253(c), January 6, 2025. |
9. |
92 C.F.R. §253(c), January 6, 202). |
10. |
90 Federal Register 761, January 6, 2025. |
11. |
HUD decided to withdraw a proposal to extend the notice period to 60 days in response to public comment. |
12. |
92 C.F.R. §253(b), January 6, 2025. |
13. |
The phrase "and the court so orders" is only present in the new tenancy addendum, not the prohibited lease terms in prior regulation. |
14. |
90 Federal Register 758, January 6, 2025. |
15. |
See 92 C.F.R. §253(b), January 6, 2025. Note that the new security deposit assistance tenancy addendum revises 92 C.F.R. §253(b)(8) (January 6, 2025) to specify that a tenant is only chargeable for the cost of legal actions if the tenant loses in a court proceeding "and the court so orders." |
16. |
90 Federal Register 759, January 6, 2025. |
17. |
These Section 234 limits are published annually in the Federal Register. For calendar year 2025, see HUD, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Housing—Federal Housing Commissioner, "Annual Indexing of Basic Statutory Mortgage Limits for Multifamily Housing Programs," 89 Federal Register 107155-107156, December 31, 2024. |
18. |
There is not a statutory determination of High Cost Areas. The Office of Multifamily Production develops and annually updates a list of High Cost Percentages (up to 270%) and High Cost Areas, which are published as Mortgagee Letters, available online at https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/administration/hudclips/letters/mortgagee. |
19. |
The statutory exception for High Cost Areas was revised to 270% from 240% for FHA multifamily housing programs by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008 (P.L. 110-161). |
20. |
Specific income-targeting requirements depend on the type of HOME assistance. For additional information, see CRS Report R40118, An Overview of the HOME Investment Partnerships Program, by Henry G. Watson. |
21. |
For further discussion of the reasoning for and implications of this regulatory change, see 89 Federal Register 46632-46633. |
22. |
See §2835(a). |
23. |
129 Stat. 2878. |
24. |
134 Stat. 2162 (2020). |
25. |
136 Stat. 4459 (2022). |