
 
 
April 25, 2024
Patent Listing in FDA’s Orange Book 
For over 40 years, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration 
patents beyond the active ingredient, including patents on 
(FDA) has maintained a resource formally titled Approved 
methods of using a drug, drug formulations, devices to 
Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. 
administer a drug, and methods of making a drug. A single 
This frequently updated publication—now available as a 
brand-name drug may thus be protected by multiple patents, 
searchable online database—is more commonly called the 
which may expire at different times. 
“Orange Book” after the color of the print version’s cover. 
Patent Listing in the Orange Book 
The Orange Book 
Only certain types of pharmaceutical patents are included in 
The Orange Book lists all of the nonbiologic (a.k.a. “small-
the Orange Book. By statute, a company seeking FDA 
molecule”) drugs approved by FDA to be marketed in the 
approval of a new drug must include in their new drug 
United States. (Biological products, which are drugs 
application (NDA) any patent that either (1) “claims the 
derived from living organisms—such as vaccines, blood 
drug” and “is a drug substance (active ingredient) patent or 
components, and monoclonal antibodies—are listed in a 
a drug product (formulation or composition) patent”; or 
separate FDA publication known as the “Purple Book.”) 
(2) “claims a method of using such drug for which approval 
Along with information about the approved drugs (e.g., 
is sought.” If the drug is later approved by FDA, the patent 
dosages and forms), the Orange Book includes FDA’s 
information in the NDA (along with any updates) is listed 
therapeutic equivalence evaluations—that is, the approved 
in the Orange Book with the drug. 
products that are pharmaceutically equivalent and 
bioequivalent to another approved product (e.g., a generic 
FDA regulations provide that “[p]rocess patents, patents 
form of a brand-name drug). Finally, the Orange Book 
claiming packaging, patents claiming metabolites, and 
includes information on patents and regulatory exclusivities 
patents claiming intermediates” must not be included in an 
that may protect a brand-name drug from generic 
NDA. As a result, these types of patents should not be listed 
competition. 
in the Orange Book per FDA regulation. 
The Orange Book serves as an important resource for health 
Brand-name and generic drug manufacturers have disputed 
care providers and the pharmaceutical industry. Health care 
in court whether certain patents should be listed in the 
providers may use the Orange Book to determine the 
Orange Book. In Jazz Pharmaceuticals v. Avadel CNS 
regulatory status of a product (e.g., whether a drug has been 
Pharmaceuticals, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal 
approved by FDA or if an approval has been withdrawn). 
Circuit held that a patent on a computerized risk evaluation 
Pharmacists may use the Orange Book to determine 
and mitigation strategy (REMS) system for a drug should 
whether a therapeutically equivalent generic form of a drug 
not have been listed in the Orange Book. Similarly, in In re 
is available to substitute when they fill a prescription 
Lantus Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation, the U.S. 
written for a brand-name drug. 
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that a patent on a 
device for injecting a drug should not have been listed in 
For drug manufacturers, the Orange Book’s information on 
the Orange Book. A 2022 report from FDA and a 2023 
a drug’s patents and regulatory exclusivities can be critical 
report from the Government Accountability Office reveal 
to whether and when generic competition occurs. (For more 
varied stakeholder views on these issues, with some calling 
information, see CRS Report R46679, The Role of Patents 
for FDA to clarify the rules for listing REMS and device 
and Regulatory Exclusivities in Drug Pricing.) 
patents in the Orange Book. 
Pharmaceutical Patents 
The FDA’s “Ministerial” Role  
Patents are a form of intellectual property that protect new 
FDA does not actively police the patent information in 
inventions. To obtain a patent, an inventor must file a patent 
NDAs to make sure that the listed patents in fact claim the 
application with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office 
drug or a method of using the drug. FDA maintains that it 
(USPTO). USPTO reviews the application and grants a 
lacks expertise in patent law and that its role with respect to 
patent only if the claimed invention meets the statutory 
Orange Book patents is only “ministerial.” In other words, 
requirements. A patent’s term lasts for about 20 years. 
FDA merely lists the patent information provided by drug 
companies without independently verifying that the patent 
Like any other invention, pharmaceutical-related 
should be listed in the Orange Book. This approach has 
innovations must be new, useful, nonobvious, and 
raised concerns among some commentators that NDA filers 
sufficiently described to be patented. For example, if a 
may list inapplicable patents in the Orange Book to deter 
person synthesizes a new chemical with potential use for 
generic competition. 
treating human disease, she may obtain a patent on that 
chemical itself (an active-ingredient patent). Pharmaceutical 
FDA does offer an administrative process through which 
manufacturers often obtain many other types of drug 
any person who “disputes the accuracy or relevance of 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
Patent Listing in FDA’s Orange Book 
patent information” in the Orange Book may notify FDA 
market participants on notice that the FTC intends to 
and seek correction of the patent information. But FDA will 
scrutinize improper Orange Book listings to determine 
not change the patent information in the Orange Book 
whether these constitute unfair methods of competition in 
unless the NDA holder agrees to amend or correct the 
violation of Section 5 of the [FTC] Act.” FTC observed that 
information in response to the patent listing dispute. 
improperly listed patents “may disincentivize investments 
in developing a competing product and increase the risk of 
The Orange Book and Generic Entry 
delayed generic and follow-on product entry, reducing 
Prior to generic entry, the brand-name drug may be the only 
patient access to more affordable prescription drugs and 
available version of a product. Generic competition tends to 
increasing costs to the healthcare system.”  
bring down the price of a drug, in some cases sharply.  
A few months later, FTC announced that it had used FDA’s 
The process for generic drug approval by FDA is governed 
administrative process to challenge more than 100 patents 
by the Hatch-Waxman Act of 1984 (P.L. 98-417), as 
as improperly listed in the Orange Book, including patents 
amended. Under Hatch-Waxman, a drug company may 
relating to drug-delivery devices such as asthma inhalers 
seek FDA approval for a generic version of an approved 
and epinephrine autoinjectors. FTC also sent notice letters 
brand-name drug by filing an abbreviated new drug 
to 10 drug companies informing them of FTC’s actions and 
application (ANDA). An ANDA must make one of four 
its view that these patents were improperly listed in the 
certifications with respect to every patent listed in the 
Orange Book. FTC’s letters noted that it retained the right 
Orange Book: 
to take further action, including an investigation under 
Section 5 of the FTC Act. 
•  Paragraph I: Certifies that there are no patents listed for 
that drug in the Orange Book. 
In response to FTC’s actions, several drugmakers opted to 
•
delist (i.e., remove) some or all of the patents challenged by 
  Paragraph II: Certifies that all the patents listed in the 
FTC. Other drugmakers refused to delist the patents, 
Orange Book for that drug are expired. 
arguing that the patents were properly included in the 
•  Paragraph III: Certifies that the ANDA filer does not 
Orange Book. In March 2024, FTC filed a brief in a patent 
challenge the patent(s) listed in the Orange Book.  
case involving a generic version of a Teva asthma inhaler, 
•
urging the court to order Teva to remove the patents at issue 
  Paragraph IV: Certifies that the ANDA filer challenges 
from the Orange Book (which were among those FTC had 
the patent(s) listed in the Orange Book as invalid or not 
challenged using FDA’s process). 
infringed (i.e., inapplicable). 
Issues for Congress 
FDA may approve ANDAs with paragraph I or II 
certifications immediately. If the generic applicant makes a 
The types of patents required to be listed in the Orange 
paragraph III certification, FDA may not approve the 
Book and their effect on generic entry under the Hatch-
ANDA until the patents at issue have expired.  
Waxman Act ultimately derive from statutes Congress 
created and could amend, should it choose to do so. 
If the generic applicant makes a paragraph IV certification 
and the NDA filer timely sues in court for patent 
One issue concerns responsibility for monitoring Orange 
infringement, this triggers a 30-month stay. FDA cannot 
Book patent listings. Due to FDA’s ministerial role with 
approve the ANDA for 30 months, unless the court resolves 
respect to Orange Book patents, disputes over Orange Book 
the patent dispute earlier (so-called “patent linkage”). 
patent listings are more often decided by courts in Hatch-
Waxman or antitrust litigation. Congress may consider 
In considering whether and when to file an ANDA, generic 
whether to impose more responsibilities on FDA, FTC, or 
drug companies will assess the expiration date, scope, and 
the courts, or whether to expand current procedures for 
validity of patents listed in the Orange Book. They may 
challenging Orange Book patents before FDA or in court. 
weigh, for example, the costs and benefits of challenging a 
patent under paragraph IV or instead waiting for a patent to 
Another issue is whether additional clarity is needed on the 
expire under paragraph III. The patent information in the 
types of patents that may be listed in the Orange Book. 
Orange Book can thus affect when generic competition 
Congress updated the statute on the types of patents that 
begins for a particular drug.  
should be listed in 2021 (P.L. 116-290), and FDA has 
issued and updated its regulations on these issues. Even so, 
It is generally in the interest of NDA holders to list all 
disputes continue over whether certain patent types (e.g., 
relevant patents in the Orange Book. While patent holders 
REMS or drug-delivery devices) should be listed. 
may still sue in court for infringement of drug patents that 
are not listed in the Orange Book, the ANDA filer need not 
A final issue Congress may consider is the relationship 
certify as to unlisted patents and the 30-month stay would 
between Orange Book patents and the 30-month stay. 
not apply. FDA could therefore approve the ANDA on its 
Congress could consider, for example, whether the 30-
own schedule, unless a court ruled otherwise.  
month stay should apply only to certain patent types (e.g., 
active ingredient patents but not drug-delivery devices). 
The FTC’s 2023 Policy Statement 
In September 2023, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) 
Kevin J. Hickey, Legislative Attorney   
issued a policy statement concerning some drug 
manufacturers’
IF12644
 alleged “improper listing of patents” in the 
Orange Book. The intent of the statement was to “put 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
Patent Listing in FDA’s Orange Book 
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to 
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. 
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has 
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the 
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be 
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include 
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you 
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF12644 · VERSION 1 · NEW