

 
 INSIGHTi 
 
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families 
(TANF) and Pregnancy Centers 
Updated January 19, 2024 
The House has passed legislation (H.R. 6918) seeking to forestall the Department of Health and Human 
Services (HHS) from implementing a proposed regulation that might limit the use of Temporary 
Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) block grant funds at “pregnancy centers.” The bill defines a 
pregnancy center as an entity that “supports protecting the life of the mother and the unborn child” and 
offers resources and services to the mothers, fathers, and families. These centers sometimes receive funds 
through TANF subgrants from the states in Alternatives to Abortion programs. 
States that are found using TANF funding improperly are penalized by HHS through a reduction in their 
block grant. The bill would prohibit HHS from finalizing, implementing, or enforcing any modification to 
existing regulations with respect to pregnancy centers regarding what is considered a proper or improper 
use of TANF funds. 
TANF Use of Funds and the Proposed Regulation 
The TANF block grant and associated nonfederal dollars fund a wide range of benefits, services, and 
activities related to both ameliorating the effects of, or stemming the root causes of, childhood economic 
and social disadvantage. It is best known for funding ongoing cash assistance for low-income families 
with children (sometimes called welfare). However, the overarching purpose of TANF is to “increase state 
flexibility” to achieve four statutory goals: 
1.  assist needy families so they can live in their own homes or the homes of their relatives; 
2.  end the dependence of needy parents on government benefits through work, job 
preparation, and marriage; 
3.  reduce the incidence of out-of-wedlock pregnancies; and 
4.  promote the formation and maintenance of two-parent families. 
States have the authority to use TANF funds in any manner “reasonably calculated” to achieve the 
overarching TANF purpose and the four goals. There are some prohibitions on the use of TANF funds. 
For example, the statute prohibits states from using TANF funds for medical services other than pre-
pregnancy family planning. Aside from specific prohibitions, however, states have broad flexibility in the 
Congressional Research Service 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
IN12302 
CRS INSIGHT 
Prepared for Members and  
 Committees of Congress 
 
  
 
Congressional Research Service 
2 
use of TANF funds. Thus, TANF is best described as a broad-purpose block grant. (A summary of how 
states have, on average, used TANF funds in FY2021 can be found here.) 
Aside from ongoing cash assistance, which is subject to certain federal rules (work standards, time limits), 
most of the other activities funded out of TANF are subject to minimal statutory rules and oversight. This 
includes TANF-funded activities such as employment services for those not receiving assistance, child 
care, programs for youth, pre-kindergarten programs, and other activities that reflect spending to achieve 
TANF’s goals. The range of allowable benefits that can be funded by TANF and the lack of rules for them 
was highlighted in a 2023 hearing by a House Ways and Means subcommittee.   
On October 2, 2023, HHS issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) that seeks to rein in TANF 
spending for activities beyond those related to ongoing assistance and employment. 
Proposed Regulatory Change that Would Affect Pregnancy Centers 
The HHS-proposed change to the regulatory language is not specific to pregnancy centers. Rather, for an 
activity that “does not appear to HHS to be reasonably calculated” to achieve TANF’s purpose, it puts the 
burden of proof on the state to show that “a reasonable person” would consider that activity to meet a 
statutory TANF goal.  
The reference to pregnancy centers in the NPRM is in its preamble (or discussion) of the intent of the 
regulatory change. In the preamble, referring to states funding pregnancy centers based on TANF’s goal 
of reducing out-of-wedlock pregnancies, HHS states that 
programs that only or primarily provide pregnancy counseling to women only after they become 
pregnant likely do not meet the reasonable person standard because the connection to preventing 
and  reducing  out-of-wedlock  pregnancies  is  tenuous  or  non-existent,  and  therefore  do  not 
accomplish purpose three. States that provide funding for these types of programs, including through 
entities sometimes known as crisis pregnancy centers or pregnancy resource centers, must be able 
to show that the expenditure actually accomplishes the TANF purpose, that prior expenditures by 
the  state  or  another  entity  for  the  same  or  a  substantially  similar  program  or  activity  actually 
accomplished  the  TANF  purpose,  or  that  there  is  academic  or  other  research  indicating  that  the 
expenditure could reasonably be expected to accomplish the TANF purpose.  
(U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Strengthening Temporary Assistance for Needy 
Families (TANF) as a Safety Net and Work Program,” 88 Federal Register 67705, October 3, 2023.) 
HHS also noted in the preamble that it would require evidence from the state that certain activities 
unrelated to pregnancy centers are tied to TANF’s purpose. Examples of such activities are college 
scholarships for adults without children, after-school mentoring and academic tutoring, and other 
education and training provided for childless individuals or parents without regard to income.  
Available Information on TANF and Pregnancy Centers 
The information that the statute requires states to provide to HHS on TANF is not at the level of detail to 
show how many states and how much funding is provided out of TANF block grants to pregnancy 
centers. A CRS search of the Lexis database using terms such as TANF, Temporary Assistance for Needy 
Families, pregnancy resource center, abortion alternative, and alternatives to abortion for state laws that 
may have provided appropriations to these initiatives within the past fiscal year or the upcoming fiscal 
year yielded information for four states: Indiana, Louisiana, Missouri, and Ohio. Not all states produce 
budgets on an annual fiscal year basis. The search may not be comprehensive; it is possible that relevant 
laws may not have included the above search terms. (Lexis is a subscription legal research database to 
which CRS researchers have access.)
  
Congressional Research Service 
3 
For more information on TANF, see CRS In Focus IF10036, The Temporary Assistance for Needy 
Families (TANF) Block Grant. 
 
Author Information 
 
Gene Falk 
  Sarah K. Braun 
Specialist in Social Policy 
Research Librarian 
 
 
 
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff 
to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of 
Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of 
information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. 
CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United 
States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, 
as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the 
permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
IN12302 · VERSION 3 · UPDATED