
 
 
December 7, 2022
Selected Issues in Pharmaceutical Drug Pricing
Many factors influence the prices consumers pay for 
competition to lower drug prices for patients through an 
prescription drugs. Congress has repeatedly attempted to 
efficient market. Health insurers, including private plans 
address high drug prices through legislation, including bills 
and public programs, typically contract with pharmacy 
that seek to increase generic competition, lower prices for 
benefit managers (PBMs) for drug benefit management 
certain health care entities that serve rural and vulnerable 
services that include developing and maintaining 
populations, and regulate drug price negotiations through 
formularies (lists of covered drugs), negotiating prices with 
the Medicare program. Congress has also proposed to cap 
drug companies including discounts and rebates, and 
out-of-pocket Medicare costs, increase drug price 
reimbursing pharmacies for drugs dispensed to 
transparency, permit more drug importation, and regulate 
beneficiaries. Currently, the PBM market is dominated by 
pharmacy benefit managers. This In Focus reviews several 
three companies, raising questions about adequate 
issues affecting drug prices of potential interest to the 118th 
competition and whether the negotiated discounts and 
Congress. 
rebates result in lower prescription drug prices for patients. 
Economics of the Pharmaceutical 
Policies to mitigate the high price of sole-source drugs 
Industry and the Life Cycle of Drugs 
include efforts to modify the timing and degree of 
In 2020, U.S. expenditures on outpatient prescription drugs 
competition through changes in the length and scope of 
were $348 billion, accounting for 8.4% of total healthcare 
exclusivity rights, and to impose certain restrictions on drug 
expenditures. Over the last 20 years, this percentage has 
prices and price increases over time.  
been as high as 10.5% in 2006 but has otherwise remained 
between 8 to 10%. The Congressional Budget Office found 
Patent Rights, Regulatory Exclusivities, 
that from 2009 to 2018, the average net price of a 
and Generic Competition 
prescription—the price of a prescription after subtracting 
Intellectual property (IP) rights play an important role in the 
the discounts and rebates that manufacturers provide to 
development and pricing of prescription drugs and 
private insurers and federal programs—fell “in both the 
biologics. Two forms of IP are particularly important for 
Medicare Part D and Medicaid program,” reflecting “the 
pharmaceuticals. To encourage innovation, patents grant 
increased use of lower-cost generic drugs, which was 
inventors the exclusive right to make and sell a novel 
partially offset by rising prices for brand-name drugs.” 
invention (such as a new drug), potentially enabling the 
Despite these trends, concern about the price of prescription 
patent holder to charge higher-than-competitive prices 
drugs has drawn much attention in Congress, partly due to 
during the patent term. Similarly, the Food and Drug 
the high price of sole-source (brand-name) drugs and 
Administration (FDA) grants regulatory exclusivities to 
biological products (biologics).  
pharmaceuticals meeting certain criteria. During a period of 
regulatory exclusivity, FDA will not accept and/or approve 
Researching, developing, obtaining approval for, and 
applications for a generic or biosimilar form of the drug. 
marketing pharmaceutical products has generally been a 
high-risk, high-reward endeavor. The discovery, 
IP rights are typically justified as necessary for 
development, and testing phases can be complex and 
pharmaceutical manufacturers to recoup their costs in 
lengthy, with a low success rate (~1 in 10,000 candidate 
research and development, including clinical trials and 
molecules, according to some studies). However, 
other tests necessary to obtain FDA approval and bring a 
pharmaceutical companies that succeed in bringing a new 
drug to market. However, IP rights are sometimes criticized 
product to market benefit from exclusivity and, as sole-
as contributing to high prices for pharmaceutical products 
source providers, can set a higher price for their product in 
in the United States by deterring or delaying competition 
the absence of competition. As the market for a 
from generic drug and biosimilar manufacturers. For 
pharmaceutical product grows, sales and profits typically 
example, some Members of Congress have criticized 
increase until competitors enter the market, either (1) as 
certain pharmaceutical patenting practices as unduly 
other products with similar functions and clinical 
extending periods of exclusivity. 
applications receive their own separate approvals and are 
launched; (2) as exclusivity rights expire, permitting others 
Studies show that generic competition lowers drug prices. 
to produce bioequivalent versions of the original product 
Generic forms often cost a fraction of the price of a brand-
(i.e., generics or biosimilars); or (3) as the market matures 
name drug before generic entry. Whether and when generic 
and sales decline. 
or biosimilar competition is permitted, however, depends 
on the IP rights in the drug and, in many cases, litigation 
While pharmaceutical companies that produce sole-source 
under the specialized patent dispute procedures of the 
drugs benefit from a lack of competition, the buyers’ 
Hatch-Waxman Act (P.L. 98-417) and the Biologics Price 
market for drugs (purchasers) also lacks sufficient 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
Selected Issues in Pharmaceutical Drug Pricing 
Competition and Innovation Act (P.L. 111-148, §§ 7001-
The IRA creates a new Drug Price Negotiation Program 
7003). 
requiring the Secretary of HHS to negotiate prices for 
certain qualifying single-source drugs furnished to 
The 340B Drug Discount Program 
Medicare program beneficiaries, including those drugs and 
Given the high cost of many drugs, Congress has proposed 
biologics with the highest expenditures in Medicare Parts B 
ways to make drugs more affordable for patients and 
and D.  
providers who care for rural and underserved populations. 
One such program is the 340B Drug Discount Program 
The first negotiated Maximum Fair Prices (MFPs) will take 
(340B), which Congress created to enable healthcare 
effect in 2026 for 10 eligible drugs or biologics. For 2027 
providers that serve low-income and uninsured patients to 
and 2028, the HHS Secretary will select and publish a list 
purchase drugs at lower costs. The Health Resources and 
each year of 15 negotiation-eligible drugs as selected drugs, 
Services Administration (HRSA), part of the U.S. 
rising to 20 for 2029 and subsequent years. A chemical 
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), 
drug will have to be FDA-approved for at least seven years 
administers the Program. HRSA estimates that 340B sales 
before the Secretary can select it for negotiation. A biologic 
constitute about 7.2% of the overall U.S. drug market; sales 
will have to be licensed for 11 years before it can be 
reached approximately $44 billion in 2021. 
selected for negotiation. Certain types of drugs or biologics 
are exempt from negotiation. For example, single-source 
The program requires the Secretary of HHS to enter into 
drugs manufactured by companies that meet the definition 
purchase price agreements (PPAs) with drug manufacturers 
of a small biotechnology firm are exempt in years 2026 
that participate in the Medicaid program. PPAs require 
through 2028. For 2029 and 2030, there is a special MFP 
manufacturers to sell to qualifying “covered entities” 
floor for qualifying single-source drugs of small biotech 
certain outpatient drugs at a “ceiling price,” which is set via 
firms. Manufacturers are subject to an excise tax for non-
a statutory formula. Covered entities include Federally 
compliance, including failure to enter into an agreement to 
Qualified Health Centers, Tribal and Urban Indian 
negotiate an MFP. 
organizations, Ryan White clinics, Critical Access 
Hospitals, and Disproportionate Share Hospitals (DSHs), 
Separately, the IRA also makes modifications to drug 
which serve a disproportionate number of low-income 
coverage and payment under Medicare Parts B and D to 
patients. DSHs currently make about 75% of 340B sales.  
lower the cost to beneficiaries. Pharmaceutical companies 
are required to pay rebates to Medicare if they increase 
Since its creation, Congress has significantly expanded the 
prices faster than consumer inflation. The IRA reconfigures 
340B Program to increase the number of eligible covered 
the Medicare Part D retail prescription drug benefit to 
entities. The Government Accountability Office 
impose an annual enrollee out-of-pocket spending cap, 
recommends that HRSA increase its oversight of covered 
expand subsidies for low-income enrollees, and cap annual 
entity eligibility requirements and its oversight to ensure 
premium increases, among other changes. Cost-sharing for 
that covered entities are not receiving duplicate discounts 
certain Part D vaccines is eliminated, and the IRA sets a 
from Medicaid.  
$35 cap on enrollee cost-sharing for insulin covered 
through Medicare Parts B and D. The IRA also changes 
Drug manufacturers have recently challenged the Program’s 
certain Part B drug payment formulas and delays 
expansion, particularly with respect to contract pharmacies, 
implementation of a Centers for Medicare & Medicaid 
which provide 340B drugs to patients of covered entities 
Services rule that would eliminate anti-kickback statute 
outside of the provider setting. In 2020, several companies 
protections (safe harbors) for manufacturer rebates in 
announced pricing restrictions on covered entities that use 
Medicare Part D. 
contract pharmacies, making it more difficult for covered 
entities to purchase drugs at or below ceiling prices. In 
Considerations for Congress 
2021, HRSA issued violation letters to the manufacturers, 
Just as Congress authorized the programs discussed in this 
notifying them that such restrictions violated the 340B 
report, the 118th Congress could propose legislative changes 
statute. The manufacturers have since challenged HRSA’s 
to those programs or increase its oversight of them. As 
authority to issue the letters in court. 
Congress considers additional action to address high-priced 
pharmaceuticals, it may also continue to weigh the balance 
Federal district courts have analyzed the 340B statute, 
between maintaining incentives for innovation and new 
legislative history, and HRSA’s guidance but have arrived 
drug discovery, while promoting access to pharmaceutical 
at different legal conclusions. Two courts ruled that HHS 
products at an affordable price. 
acted within its statutory authority in issuing the violation 
letters, while two others disagreed. Three of the cases were 
 
appealed, and the appeals courts could release decisions at 
any time. 
Jim Hahn, Specialist in Health Care Financing   
Medicare Drug Prices and the Inflation 
Kevin J. Hickey, Legislative Attorney   
Reduction Act 
Suzanne M. Kirchhoff, Analyst in Health Care Financing   
Hannah-Alise Rogers, Legislative Attorney   
Congress also included several provisions in P.L. 117-169, 
often referred to as the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 
IF12272
2022, to lower prices for patients receiving prescription 
drugs covered and paid for under Medicare Parts B and D. 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
Selected Issues in Pharmaceutical Drug Pricing 
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to 
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. 
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has 
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the 
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be 
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include 
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you 
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF12272 · VERSION 1 · NEW