INSIGHTi

FY2023 Intelligence Authorization Act:
Whistleblower Provisions
October 7, 2022
Several provisions in the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence-reported Intelligence Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2023 (S. 4503) would make changes to laws governing whistleblower protections and
procedures in the 18 federal agencies and organizations authorized to conduct intelligence and
intelligence-related activities, generally referred to as the intelligence community. The House Permanent
Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI)- ordered reported the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2023 (H.R. 8367), which would not make such changes. The provisions of S. 4503 are consistent
with previous intelligence community whistleblowing legislation, which has evolved to add both greater
protections for federal employees and contractors, and clarity on the process for making a complaint.
Background
Many experts see laws governing whistleblower protections and procedures in the intelligence community
as attempts to strike a balance between encouraging individuals to come forward to report alleged
wrongdoing and the need to protect classified information. Intelligence community whistleblower laws
are codified in the following statutes: the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.
§8H), which applies to the inspectors general of all intelligence community elements; the Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA) Act of 1949, as amended (50 U.S.C. §3517); the National Security Act of
1947, as amended (50 U.S.C. §3033), which applies to the Inspector General of the Intelligence
Community (ICIG); Title VI of the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, as amended (50
U.S.C. §3234), which provides protections for whistleblowers making a lawful disclosure; and Title III of
the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, as amended (50 U.S.C. §3341), governing
security clearances.
Legislative Provisions
S. 4503 includes provisions that would amend these statutes by: (1) expanding a whistleblower’s access
to Congress; (2) strengthening measures to protect classified information; (3) adding protections against
disclosure of a whistleblower’s identity as a reprisal for making a disclosure; (4) adding protections
against revoking a whistleblower’s security clearance in retaliation for making a disclosure; (5) expanding
Congressional Research Service
https://crsreports.congress.gov
IN12029
CRS INSIGHT
Prepared for Members and
Committees of Congress

---

Congressional Research Service
2
options for contractor employees to report alleged wrongdoing; and (6) expanding the scope of activities
defined in statute as matters of “urgent concern.” H.R. 8367 does not include comparable provisions.
Table 1. FY2023 Intelligence Authorization Proposals on Whistleblower Protections
House-introduced (H.R. 8367)
Senate-introduced (S. 4503)
No similar language.
§509 would amend the federal statute governing security
clearance or access determinations (50 U.S.C. §3341) by
adding protections against revoking a whistleblower’s
security clearance in retaliation for making a disclosure.
No similar language.
§601 would allow a whistleblower to report wrongdoing to
the Chair, Vice Chair or Ranking Member, a non-partisan
staff member designated for the purposes of receiving such
complaints, or a member of the majority or minority staff of
any committee of jurisdiction over intelligence matters. The
provision would enable whistleblowers to approach
Congress directly or via their agency, whether or not the
relevant inspector general has determined a complaint to be
a matter or “urgent concern,” provided whistleblowers
fol ow a set of specified strengthened measures intended to
protect classified information.
No similar language.
§602 would expand the reporting options for contractor
employees to include reporting to a supervisor of the
employing federal agency with responsibility for the subject
matter of the disclosure.
No similar language.
§603 would add a prohibition on wil ful disclosure of a
whistleblower’s identity in reprisal for reporting alleged
wrongdoing. The provision would afford a whistleblower the
option of exercising a private right of action upon final
administrative disposition of a claim of reprisal.
No similar language.
§604 would broaden the statutory definition of matters of
“urgent concern” to include matters that fall outside the
authority and responsibility of the Director of National
Intelligence (DNI) and do not necessarily involve classified
information.
Source: CRS analysis of H.R. 8367 and S. 4503 on Congress.gov.
Discussion
Sections 601 and 603 of S. 4503 would expand whistleblowers’ options for reporting a complaint. In
addition, Section 601 specifies that the relevant inspector general would no longer have to declare
reportable allegations of wrongdoing to be matters of urgent concern in order to be brought to Congress’s
attention.
Section 604 of the legislation would also expand the scope of what could be reported. The definition of
urgent concern would no longer require that a complaint involve classified information or, for complaints
brought to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community, be a matter under the authority and
responsibility of the Director of National Intelligence. Instead, matters of urgent concern could concern
any “matter of national security” involving flagrant problems, abuses, violations of law, or problems
involving the funding, administration, or operation of an intelligence activity.
Section 601 of the legislation, which appears to be aimed at strengthening measures to protect classified
information, notably would provide for the appointment of security officers within the offices of the

---

Congressional Research Service
3
inspectors general of intelligence community elements who are able to provide “confidential, security-
related guidance and direction” to whistleblowers who intend to report a complaint to Congress in a
manner that protects classified information.
The legislation would add protections involving security clearance determinations and disclosure of a
whistleblower’s identity: Section 509 would place the burden on the relevant agency to prove that a
negative determination on a whistleblower’s access to classified information would have been made
regardless of the whistleblower making a complaint. Section 603 would protect against the willful
disclosure of a whistleblower’s identity in reprisal for making a complaint.
Resources
For more background and analysis on intelligence community whistleblower protections, see CRS Report
R45345, Intelligence Community Whistleblower Provisions, by Michael E. DeVine.

Author Information

Michael E. DeVine

Analyst in Intelligence and National Security




Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff
to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of
Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of
information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role.
CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United
States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However,
as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the
permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

IN12029 · VERSION 1 · NEW

---