
 
 
August 23, 2022
India: Human Rights Assessments
Overview 
and actions expressing hatred and violence against religious 
India is identified by U.S. government agencies, the United 
minority communities” in India, in particular two incidents 
Nations, and some nongovernmental organizations as the 
in late 2021, when Hindu nationalist leaders “called for the 
site of numerous human rights abuses, many of them 
murder of Muslims, in a context purporting to make India a 
significant, some seen as perpetrated by agents of both state 
Hindu nation.” She also decried “problematic” religious 
and federal governments. The scope and scale of such 
conversion bans that “may foster hatred or even violence.” 
abuses reportedly has increased under the leadership of 
Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Hindu nationalist 
Press Freedom 
Bharatiya Janata Party, particularly since their convincing 
The State Department’s 2021 Country Reports on Human 
national reelection in 2019.  
Rights Practices (Human Rights Reports or HRRs) states 
that, while the Indian government generally respected press 
Many analyses also warn of democratic backsliding in 
freedom in 2021, “there were instances in which the 
India. For example, since 2019, the Sweden-based Varieties 
government or actors considered close to the government 
of Democracies project has classified India as “an electoral 
allegedly pressured or harassed media outlets critical of the 
autocracy.” In 2021, U.S.-based nonprofit Freedom House 
government, including through online trolling.” It notes 
re-designated India as “Partly Free,” contending that “Modi 
“restrictions on free expression and media, including 
and his party are tragically driving India itself toward 
violence, threats of violence, or unjustified arrests or 
authoritarianism,” with negative implications for global 
prosecutions against journalists.” Paris-based Reporters 
democratic trends. The New Delhi government issued a 
Without Borders’ (RSF) 2022 Press Freedom Index ranks 
“rebuttal” of the Freedom House conclusions, calling them 
India 150th of 180 countries (just below Turkey; the United 
“misleading, incorrect, and misplaced.” The following 
States is 42nd), down from 142nd in 2021 and continuing a 
sections describe selected areas of human rights concerns. 
six-year downward trend. RSF sees “press freedom in 
crisis” in India, which it calls “one of the world’s most 
Religious Freedom 
dangerous countries for the media.” It finds “charges of 
About 80% of Indians are Hindu and roughly 14% are 
defamation, sedition, contempt of court and endangering 
Muslim. The State Department’s 2021 Report on 
national security are increasingly used against journalists 
International Religious Freedom (IRF) asserts that, 
critical of the government, who are branded as ‘anti-
“Attacks on members of religious minority communities, 
national.’” According to Freedom House, “attacks on press 
including killings, assaults, and intimidation, occurred 
freedom have escalated dramatically under the Modi 
throughout the year” in India. It notes “cow vigilantism” 
government,” with Indian authorities using various laws “to 
against non-Hindus based on allegations of cow slaughter 
quiet critical voices in the media.” 
or trade in beef, the near-doubling of the number of 
reported violent attacks against Christians to an average of 
Freedom of Expression 
more than nine per week, and adoption of laws restricting 
According to the 2021 HRR, violations of online freedoms 
religious conversions in ten Indian states. Secretary of State 
in 2021 included restrictions on access to the internet, 
Antony Blinken has asserted, “[W]e’ve seen rising attacks 
disruptions of access to the internet, censorship of online 
on people and places of worship” in India, and the U.S. 
content, and reports the government occasionally monitored 
Ambassador at Large for IRF added, “[I]n India some 
users of digital media, as well as “use of criminal libel laws 
officials are ignoring or even supporting rising attacks on 
to prosecute social media speech.” Access Now, a global 
people and places of worship.” The Indian government’s 
digital rights group that calls internet shutdowns 
response noted what it called “ill-informed comments by 
“dangerous acts of digital authoritarianism,” named India 
senior U.S. officials” and suggested that the IRF report was 
the “world’s largest offender” for the fourth consecutive 
“based on motivated inputs and biased views.” 
year for blacking out the internet at least 106 times in 2021. 
In 2022, the group declared that, “Free expression is not 
Since 2020, the U.S. Commission on International 
safe in India.” Freedom House finds that, in India, 
Religious Freedom has recommended that the Secretary of 
“Academic freedom has significantly weakened in recent 
State designate India as a Country of Particular of Concern 
years, as intimidation of professors, students, and 
(CPC) under the International Religious Freedom Act “due 
institutions over political and religious issues has 
to the Indian government’s promotion of Hindu 
increased.” Meanwhile, U.S.-based tech platforms 
nationalism, and engagement and facilitation of systematic, 
including Facebook, Twitter, and WhatsApp face escalating 
ongoing, and egregious violations of religious freedom.” 
pressure from the Indian government over the companies’ 
reluctance to comply with data and takedown requests, and 
In March 2022, the U.N. High Commissioner for Human 
video streaming services such as Netflix and Amazon have 
Rights (HCHR) expressed concern about “recent statements 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
India: Human Rights Assessments 
come under scrutiny for content deemed controversial by 
communications and movement restrictions,” and notes 
Hindu nationalists and their allies in the Indian government. 
reports that human rights monitors have been “restrained or 
harassed” by state agents there. Human Rights Watch’s 
Civil Society 
(HRW) World Report 2021 finds that, “The government 
The 2021 HRR finds “overly restrictive laws on the 
continued to impose harsh and discriminatory restrictions 
organization, funding, or operations of nongovernmental 
on Muslim-majority areas” of Kashmir in 2021, and it 
[NGOs] and civil society organizations” in India, as well as 
criticizes the “draconian” Public Safety Act and the Armed 
“government harassment of domestic and international 
Forces (Special Powers) Act as allowing for mass 
human rights organizations.” Freedom House reports that 
detentions without charges and impunity for security forces 
some NGOs in India, particularly those working on human 
“even for serious human rights abuses.” 
rights, “continue to face threats, legal harassment, excessive 
police force, and occasionally lethal violence.” Foreign 
Women’s Status 
NGOs have for years faced financing restrictions in India 
According to the 2021 HRR, there was a “lack of 
via the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act. The act has 
investigation of and accountability for gender-based 
been “misused by government agencies to silence NGOs,” 
violence” in India in 2021: “Rape continued to be a 
according to London-based Amnesty International, which 
persistent problem, including gang rape, rape of minors, 
in 2020 ended its India operations following what it called 
rape against lower-caste women or women from religious 
“years of official threats, intimidation and harassment.” 
and nonreligious minority communities by upper-caste 
men, and rape by government officials.” Dowry disputes 
Corruption 
and so-called honor killings also “remain serious 
The 2021 HRR contends that India suffers from “serious 
problems.” HRW reports “systemic barriers to justice for 
government corruption,” and, “Despite government efforts 
survivors of sexual violence in India, including stigma, fear 
to address abuses and corruption, a lack of accountability 
of retaliation, hostile or dismissive police response, and a 
for official misconduct persisted at all levels of 
lack of access to adequate legal and health support 
government, contributing to widespread impunity.” Berlin-
services.”  
based Transparency International’s “Corruption Perceptions 
Index,” which measures relative degrees of global 
Other Issues 
corruption, ranks India 85th of 180 world countries (just 
The 2021 HRR also finds significant human rights issues in 
below Belarus; the United States is 27th). Its “Global 
India included “credible reports of” unlawful and arbitrary 
Corruption Barometer” found 89% of Indian citizens “think 
killings, including extrajudicial killings by the government 
government corruption is a big problem.” Freedom House 
or its agents; torture and cases of cruel, inhuman, or 
argues that, “Large-scale political corruption scandals have 
degrading treatment or punishment by police and prison 
repeatedly exposed bribery and other malfeasance, but a 
officials; harsh and life-threatening prison conditions; 
great deal of corruption is thought to go unreported and 
arbitrary arrest and detention by government authorities; 
unpunished, and the authorities have been accused of 
politically motivated imprisonments or detentions; arbitrary 
selective, partisan enforcement.” 
or unlawful interference with privacy; refoulement of 
refugees; and crimes involving violence and discrimination 
Human Trafficking and Bonded Labor 
targeting members of minority groups based on social status 
The State Department’s 2022 Trafficking in Persons Report 
or sexual orientation or gender identity.  
places India in the “Tier 2” category, meaning its 
government “does not fully meet the minimum standards 
Issues for Congress 
for the elimination of trafficking, but is making significant 
In March 2021, the Chairman of the Senate Foreign 
efforts to do so. ... However, the government did not meet 
Relations Committee sent a public letter to the U.S. 
the minimum standards in several key areas,” including 
Secretary of Defense urging him to “raise democracy and 
“inadequate” anti-trafficking efforts against bonded labor 
human rights concerns” during travel to New Delhi, 
and increasing acquittal rates (89%) for accused traffickers. 
asserting that “the Indian government has been trending 
Freedom House notes that, while the Indian constitution 
away from” democratic values. 
bans human trafficking and bonded labor is illegal, 
estimates suggest that 20-50 million workers are affected, 
Resolutions Before Congress 
and, “The use of child labor reportedly surged during the 
S.Res. 609 (introduced May 2022), recognizing widening threats 
COVID-19 lockdowns.” 
to press freedom and free expression around the world—and 
taking note of retaliatory kil ings of journalists and internet 
Human Rights in Kashmir  
blackouts in India—has garnered nine co-sponsors to date. A 
Until recently Jammu and Kashmir was India’s only 
similar bil , H.Res. 1095 (introduced the same month), has 
Muslim-majority state; today it has none. In 2019, the 
garnered 16 co-sponsors to date. H.Res. 1196 (introduced June 
government repealed Article 370 of the Indian Constitution 
2022), “condemning human rights violations and violations of 
and Section 35A of its Annex, removing the state’s 
international religious freedom in India,” has garnered 11 co-
(nominally) autonomous status and bifurcating it into two 
sponsors to date. 
“Union Territories,” each with reduced administrative 
 
powers. The U.N. Office of the HCHR said the changes 
The Biden Administration requests $117 million in foreign 
“risk undermining minorities’ rights.” The 2021 HRR 
assistance to India for FY 2023. Congress could consider 
 
states, “Journalists working in Jammu and Kashmir 
whether or not to condition some or all of such aid on 
continued to face barriers to free reporting through 
improvements in human rights and civil liberties in India.
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
India: Human Rights Assessments 
 
IF12198
K. Alan Kronstadt, Specialist in South Asian Affairs   
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to 
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. 
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has 
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the 
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be 
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include 
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you 
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF12198 · VERSION 1 · NEW