

 
 Legal Sidebari 
 
War Crimes: A Primer 
March 15, 2022 
The Russian invasion of Ukraine has given rise to numerous accusations of war crimes. This Insight 
addresses the sources and content of the law of war, also known as the law of armed conflict or 
international humanitarian law (IHL) as it pertains to war crimes that occur in an international armed 
conflict. IHL applies to the conduct of war; it does not address the legality of the war itself. For 
information about potential accountability for war crimes in international tribunals, see CRS Legal 
Sidebar LSB10704, The Role of International Tribunals in the Response to the Invasion of Ukraine, by 
Nina M. Hart and Stephen P. Mulligan. 
Sources of International Humanitarian Law 
IHL is a combination of international treaties and customary international law. The Hague Convention of 
1907 generally prescribes rules of conduct for armed forces, while the Geneva Conventions and Protocol 
Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of 
International Armed Conflicts 1 (Protocol 1) address the rights of protected persons, such as civilians and 
prisoners of war, in an international armed conflict. Not all states are parties to these and other treaties 
pertaining to the law of war, but many provisions are regarded as reflecting customary international law, 
which is binding on all states. 
Principles of International Humanitarian Law 
Certain principles undergird IHL and form the basis for the content of war crimes and serve to reduce 
unnecessary suffering during war. The most important principles are military necessity, humanity, and 
honor. The principles of distinction and proportionality flow from the first three. The Department of 
Defense’s Law of War Manual describes their interaction as follows: 
Military necessity justifies certain actions necessary to defeat the enemy as quickly and efficiently 
as  possible.  Conversely,  humanity  forbids  actions  unnecessary  to  achieve  that  object. 
Proportionality requires that even when actions may be justified by military necessity, such actions 
not be unreasonable or excessive. Distinction underpins the parties’ responsibility to comport their 
behavior with military necessity, humanity, and proportionality by requiring parties to a conflict to 
apply certain legal categories, principally the distinction between the armed forces and the civilian 
population. Lastly, honor supports the entire system and gives parties confidence in it. (Citations 
omitted).  
Congressional Research Service 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
LSB10709 
CRS Legal Sidebar 
Prepared for Members and  
 Committees of Congress 
 
  
 
Congressional Research Service 
2 
The main purposes of the law of armed conflict are: 
  Protecting combatants, noncombatants, and civilians from unnecessary suffering; 
  Providing certain fundamental protections for persons who fall into the hands of the 
enemy, particularly prisoners of war, military wounded and sick, and civilians; 
  Facilitating the restoration of peace; 
  Assisting the commander in ensuring the disciplined, ethical, and effective use of military 
force; 
  Preserving the professionalism and humanity of combatants; and 
  Preventing the degeneration of warfare into savagery or brutality. 
United States Law: The War Crimes Act of 1996 
The War Crimes Act (18 U.S.C. §2441) sets forth conduct the United States punishes as war crimes, albeit 
only when U.S. nationals are involved as either perpetrator or victim. The act implements the United 
States’ obligation under treaties and international law to hold perpetrators of war crimes accountable, 
although some observers argue that the act is insufficient because Congress decided not to provide for 
universal jurisdiction. The United States has never prosecuted anyone for violating the act. 
A war crime under the act includes conduct “defined as a grave breach” in the Geneva Conventions of 
1949 or prohibited by certain provisions of the Annex to the Hague Convention IV, Respecting the Laws 
and Customs of War on Land of 1907. The act further proscribes the willful killing of or causing serious 
injuries to civilians contrary to the provisions of the Protocol on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of 
Mines, Booby-Traps and Other Devices. It also proscribes certain violations defined as “a grave breach of 
common Article 3” of the Geneva Conventions. 
The Geneva Conventions 
Grave breaches as defined in the Geneva Conventions include the following acts if committed against 
protected persons or property (as applicable):  
  Willful killing;  
  Torture or inhuman treatment, including biological experiments;  
  Willfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health;  
  Extensive destruction and appropriation of property not justified by military necessity 
and carried out unlawfully and wantonly;  
  Compelling a prisoner of war or other protected person to serve in the forces of a hostile 
power;  
  Willfully depriving a prisoner of war or other protected person of the rights of fair and 
regular trial; 
  Unlawful deportation or transfer or unlawful confinement; and  
  Taking of hostages.  
The Hague Convention 
Violations of the Annex to the Hague Convention punishable under the War Crimes Act include 
provisions forbidding combatants: 
  
Congressional Research Service 
3 
  To employ poison or poisoned weapons. 
  To kill or wound treacherously individuals belonging to the hostile nation or army. 
  To kill or wound an enemy who, having laid down his arms, or having no longer means 
of defense, has surrendered at discretion. 
  To declare that no quarter will be given (“take no prisoners”). 
  To employ arms, projectiles, or material calculated to cause unnecessary suffering. 
  To make improper use of a flag of truce, of the national flag or of the military insignia 
and uniform of the enemy, as well as the distinctive badges of the Geneva Convention. 
  To destroy or seize the enemy’s property, unless such destruction or seizure be 
imperatively demanded by the necessities of war. 
  To declare abolished, suspended, or inadmissible in a court of law the rights and actions 
of the nationals of the hostile party. A belligerent is likewise forbidden to compel the 
nationals of the hostile party to take part in the operations of war directed against their 
own country, even if they were in the belligerent’s service before the commencement of 
the war. 
  The attack or bombardment, by whatever means, of towns, villages, dwellings, or 
buildings that are undefended. 
  The attack of buildings dedicated to religion, art, science, or charitable purposes; 
historical monuments, hospitals, and places where the sick and wounded are collected, 
provided they are not being used at the time for military purposes. 
  The pillage of a town or place, even when taken by assault. 
Common Article 3 
Article 3 Common to the four Geneva Conventions of 1949 provides protections during armed conflicts 
not of an international nature and also protects persons during international armed conflicts who are not 
entitled to protected status under any of the four conventions. Title 18, Section 2441(d), of the U.S. Code 
defines grave breaches of Common Article 3 to include committing, or attempting or conspiring to 
commit: 
  Torture (defined in a manner similar to that used by the federal torture statute [18 U.S.C. 
§§2340-2340A]), 
  Cruel or inhuman treatment, 
  The performing of biological experiments, 
  Murder of a person taking no active part in the hostilities, 
  Mutilation or maiming persons taking no active part in the hostilities, 
  Intentionally causing serious bodily injury, 
  Rape, 
  Sexual assault or abuse, and 
  The taking of hostages. 
The proscriptions against murder, mutilation or maiming, and causing bodily injury do not apply in cases 
of collateral damage or results incident to lawful acts of warfare. 
  
Congressional Research Service 
4 
International Law 
Although the War Crimes Act sets forth conduct the United States considers serious war crimes, the 
United States is not party to all treaties regarding the law of armed conflict, including notably the 
Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions (regulating international armed conflicts). The Rome 
Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) probably provides the best compendium of serious war 
crimes as accepted by the international community. The United States is not party to the Rome Statute but 
took part in its negotiation, including regarding the inclusion of the covered war crimes. Neither Ukraine 
nor Russia is party to the agreement, but Ukraine has agreed to accept the jurisdiction of the ICC for 
activities that occur on its territory since 2014—an issue discussed in this CRS Legal Sidebar. 
In addition to grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions set forth above, the Rome Statute provides for 
punishment of: 
(i)  Intentionally  directing  attacks  against  the  civilian  population  as  such  or  against  individual 
civilians not taking direct part in hostilities; 
(ii)  Intentionally  directing  attacks  against  civilian  objects,  that  is,  objects  which  are  not  military 
objectives; 
(iii)  Intentionally  directing  attacks  against  personnel,  installations,  material,  units  or  vehicles 
involved in a humanitarian assistance or peacekeeping mission in accordance with the Charter of 
the United Nations, as long as they are entitled to the protection given to civilians or civilian objects 
under the international law of armed conflict; 
(iv) Intentionally launching an attack in the knowledge that such attack will cause incidental loss of 
life or injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects or widespread, long-term and severe damage 
to the natural environment which would be clearly excessive in relation to the concrete and direct 
overall military advantage anticipated; 
(v) Attacking or bombarding, by whatever means, towns, villages, dwellings or buildings which are 
undefended and which are not military objectives; 
(vi) Killing or wounding a combatant who, having laid down his arms or having no longer means 
of defence, has surrendered at discretion; 
(vii) Making improper use of a flag of truce, of the flag or of the military insignia and uniform of 
the  enemy  or  of  the  United  Nations,  as  well  as  of  the  distinctive  emblems  of  the  Geneva 
Conventions, resulting in death or serious personal injury; 
(viii)  The  transfer,  directly  or  indirectly,  by  the  Occupying  Power  of  parts  of  its  own  civilian 
population into the territory it occupies, or the deportation or transfer of all or parts of the population 
of the occupied territory within or outside this territory; 
(ix) Intentionally directing attacks against buildings dedicated to religion, education, art, science or 
charitable  purposes,  historic  monuments,  hospitals  and  places  where  the  sick  and  wounded  are 
collected, provided they are not military objectives; 
(x) Subjecting persons who are in the power of an adverse party to physical mutilation or to medical 
or scientific experiments of any kind which are neither justified by the medical, dental or hospital 
treatment of the person concerned nor carried out in his or her interest, and which cause death to or 
seriously endanger the health of such person or persons; 
(xi) Killing or wounding treacherously individuals belonging to the hostile nation or army; 
(xii) Declaring that no quarter will be given; 
(xiii) Destroying or seizing the enemy’s property unless such destruction or seizure be imperatively 
demanded by the necessities of war; 
  
Congressional Research Service 
5 
(xiv) Declaring abolished, suspended or inadmissible in a court of law the rights and actions of the 
nationals of the hostile party; 
(xv)  Compelling  the  nationals  of  the  hostile  party  to  take  part  in  the  operations  of  war  directed 
against their own country, even if they were in the belligerent’s service before the commencement 
of the war; 
(xvi) Pillaging a town or place, even when taken by assault; 
(xvii) Employing poison or poisoned weapons; 
(xviii) Employing asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and all analogous liquids, materials or 
devices; 
(xix) Employing bullets which expand or flatten easily in the human body, such as bullets with a 
hard envelope which does not entirely cover the core or is pierced with incisions; 
(xx) Employing weapons, projectiles and material and methods of warfare which are of a nature to 
cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering or which are inherently indiscriminate in violation 
of the international law of armed conflict, provided that such weapons, projectiles and material and 
methods of warfare are the subject of a comprehensive prohibition [to be set forth in an annex]; 
(xxi) Committing outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment; 
(xxii)  Committing  rape,  sexual  slavery,  enforced  prostitution,  forced  pregnancy,  …  enforced 
sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence also constituting a grave breach of the Geneva 
Conventions; 
(xxiii) Utilizing the presence of a civilian or other protected person to render certain points, areas or 
military forces immune from military operations; 
(xxiv) Intentionally directing attacks against buildings, material, medical units and transport, and 
personnel using the distinctive emblems of the Geneva Conventions in conformity with international 
law; 
(xxv) Intentionally using starvation of civilians as a method of warfare by depriving them of objects 
indispensable to their survival, including wilfully impeding relief supplies as provided for under the 
Geneva Conventions; 
(xxvi) Conscripting or enlisting children under the age of fifteen years into the national armed forces 
or using them to participate actively in hostilities. 
For more information about these war crimes, see the ICC list of elements of crimes.  
 
 
Author Information 
 
Jennifer K. Elsea 
   
Legislative Attorney 
 
 
 
 
Disclaimer
  
Congressional Research Service 
6 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff 
to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of 
Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of 
information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. 
CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United 
States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, 
as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the 
permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
LSB10709 · VERSION 1 · NEW