

 
 INSIGHTi 
 
Elections Policy Overview and the 117th 
Congress 
January 21, 2022 
The second session of the 117th Congress has continued considering legislation on issues related to 
campaign finance, elections, and voting. As Congress examines whether or how to address such 
proposals, a threshold question may be which policy areas the House and Senate want to affect, if any. 
This CRS Insight provides a brief overview of the campaign finance, election administration, and voting 
rights policy issues that pending or future legislation could address. It also provides links to selected CRS 
products that contain additional detail about various policy issues. It does not address constitutional or 
legal issues, but links to CRS products that do so. 
Recent Legislative Activity 
The first session of the 117th Congress did not enact major changes to federal election law. In the first 
session, the House passed three bills related to campaign finance, elections, or voting rights: H.R. 1, the 
For the People Act; H.R. 4, the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act (VRAA); and H.R. 5314, 
the Protecting Our Democracy Act. In addition, a House-passed appropriations bill (H.R. 4502) contained 
funding for elections grants to states. Also during the first session, the Senate did not invoke cloture on 
the motion to proceed to versions of the For the People Act (S. 2093; see also S. 1); the VRAA (S. 4); and 
another bill, the Freedom to Vote Act (S. 2747). Early in the second session, on January 13, 2022, the 
House approved the Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act and sent it to the Senate in the form of an 
amendment between the houses on an unrelated bill (H.R. 5746). On January 19, 2022, the Senate did not 
agree to a cloture motion on the text. The legislation combines elements of some of the bills noted above 
and addresses aspects of campaign finance, election administration, and voting rights. Because policy 
issues are not necessarily mutually exclusive, how to classify various bills could be a matter of debate. 
 
Votes on elections-related bills that have advanced during the 117th Congress primarily have occurred 
along party lines, amid disagreements over the extent of policy problems and appropriate federal 
remedies, if any. Additional activity on bills related to campaign finance, elections, or voting is possible.  
Congressional Research Service 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
IN11841 
CRS INSIGHT 
Prepared for Members and  
 Committees of Congress 
 
  
 
Congressional Research Service 
2 
Policy Area Overview 
Existing federal statutes, and proposals to amend them, generally fall into three broad areas: campaign 
finance, election administration, and voting rights. Each addresses unique but potentially related topics. 
Congress most recently approved substantial amendments to these policy areas between 2002 and 2009. 
Traditionally, the federal role in campaigns and elections primarily includes regulating campaign finance, 
protecting voting rights, and supporting states in election administration. States and localities are 
responsible for most aspects of determining voter eligibility and casting and counting ballots.  
Campaign Finance 
Congress most recently substantially amended campaign finance law in 2002, with the Bipartisan 
Campaign Reform Act (BCRA). BCRA amended the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA), which 
currently houses most federal campaign finance statutory provisions. Federal campaign finance policy is 
organized around three major themes: (1) prohibitions on contributions or expenditures from certain 
sources (e.g., foreign nationals); (2) limits on contributions from permissible sources; and (3) disclosure 
and disclaimer requirements designed to provide identifying information about financial transactions and 
responsibility for campaign-related communications. FECA also established the Federal Election 
Commission (FEC). Supreme Court rulings have affected several FECA provisions. 
Election Administration  
States are primarily responsible for election administration and voter registration. The Help America Vote 
Act (HAVA) and the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) address aspects of both issues. Enacted in 
1993, NVRA is noted primarily for requiring states to offer voter-registration opportunities when eligible 
citizens apply for drivers licenses and during specified other interactions with state agencies. The act also 
specifies “list maintenance” requirements for updating state voter rolls.  
HAVA, enacted in 2002, primarily addresses election administration issues. Among other requirements, 
HAVA sets minimum standards for voting systems; requires provisional ballots subject to verification; and 
mandates statewide voter registration databases. The act also authorized grants for states to upgrade 
election equipment after the 2000 presidential election and otherwise support election administration. It 
also established the Election Assistance Commission (EAC). Congress also has authorized grants 
separately to support state and territorial election administration. Most recently, the 116th Congress 
provided funding to support states and territories responding to developments in election security and the 
COVID pandemic. 
Voting Rights 
Since initial enactment in 1965, Voting Rights Act (VRA) provisions are the primary method by which the 
federal government affects voting policy nationwide. The VRA contains various provisions that, among 
others, prohibit discrimination or abridgment in voter registration, ballot access, and redistricting based on 
race, color, or membership in certain language-minority groups. Historical protections for some 
jurisdictions, mostly in the South, that fall under a VRA coverage formula currently are inoperable due to 
a 2013 Supreme Court decision (Shelby County v. Holder). Other federal statutes address voting 
protections for elderly and disabled voters, those in the military and other uniformed services members, 
and overseas citizens. 
Selected Other Issues Related to Elections 
In addition to the broad policy issues and statutes discussed above, legislation could address issues 
affecting election processes. At the federal level, apportionment and redistricting criteria affect allocation
  
Congressional Research Service 
3 
and district boundaries of House seats. Although redistricting is primarily a state responsibility, the 
process has obvious implications for Members of Congress. VRA provisions also can affect redistricting.  
Two other process issues affect presidential elections. Congress occasionally considers proposals to alter 
the electoral college process specified in the Constitution. Some Members of Congress reportedly also are 
considering changes to the Electoral Count Act (ECA), which addresses the process of counting electoral 
votes. As with the other areas discussed above, Congress could approve such changes as “stand-alone” 
measures or through bills affecting multiple policy issues.  
 
 
 
Author Information 
 
R. Sam Garrett 
   
Specialist in American National Government 
 
 
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff 
to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of 
Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of 
information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. 
CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United 
States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, 
as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the 
permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
IN11841 · VERSION 1 · NEW